JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1-22<br />
Touch-Down Test of Magnetic Bearing Type Centrifugal<br />
Contactor with Irradiated Touch-Down Bearing<br />
H. Ogino, K. Fujisaku and H. Hirano<br />
Nuclear Cycle Engineering Department, NFCEL, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />
The centrifugal contactor has excellent phase separation<br />
and a smaller hold-up volume than any other contactor type<br />
such as mixer-settler and pulsed column. These<br />
characteristics lead to “rapid start-up and shut-down”,<br />
“compact design” and “less solvent degradation”.<br />
Therefore, the centrifugal contactor is said to be<br />
advantageous for reprocessing a fast breeder fuel of high<br />
burn-up and high Pu-enrichment 1) , and study and<br />
development have been progressed since the 1960s.<br />
In <strong>JAEA</strong>, the rolling bearing type centrifugal contactor<br />
with anti-corrosion design (include air purge system,<br />
ceramic-bearing and others) has been developed and has<br />
achieved to 5,000 hours of operation without significant<br />
troubles. However, the grease becomes deteriorated by<br />
acid mist, temperature and other environmental factors, and<br />
2)<br />
that also affects the service life . To provide a possible<br />
resolution to this technical issue, we have developed the<br />
centrifugal contactor of non-contact journaled construction<br />
3)<br />
using magnetic bearings without grease . A magnetic<br />
bearing has the construction in which the attractive force of<br />
electromagnets is exerted to levitate a rotor without<br />
mechanical contact. Figure 1 shows the overview of<br />
irradiated magnetic bearing type centrifugal contactors and<br />
the structure of magnetic bearing.<br />
We carried out the gamma-ray irradiation test of<br />
centrifugal contactor with magnetic bearing system to<br />
estimate the radiation resistance in 2008. The equipments<br />
stopped several times under irradiation, and were not finally<br />
reactivated of two different factors, one was abrasion of the<br />
touch-down bearing and adhesion to the main shaft (shown<br />
in Fig. 2), the other was a trouble of IC. Accumulated dose<br />
of the equipments was 3.7- 4.7 × 10 8 R. Therefore, the<br />
present work is intended to investigate whether the cause of<br />
the stop with the touch-down bearing is an influence of<br />
gamma-ray irradiation.<br />
Motor<br />
Rotor<br />
Fig. 1 Irradiated magnetic bearing type centrifugal<br />
contactors and structure of magnetic bearing.<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
Thrust<br />
magnetic bearing<br />
Upper<br />
touch-down<br />
bearing<br />
Radial<br />
magnetic bearing<br />
Lower<br />
touch-down<br />
bearing<br />
Main shaft<br />
- 26 -<br />
The touch-down test were continuously carried out 6 runs<br />
(1run: 5 times touch-down) using the magnetic bearing type<br />
centrifugal contactor to which irradiated the lower<br />
touch-down bearing (a slide bearing formed of polyimide<br />
resin) was put in. So we observed the touch-down bearing,<br />
the main shaft, etc and monitored the control situation of<br />
magnetic-bearing after the touch-down test. Gamma-ray<br />
was irradiated to the lower touch-down bearing up to about<br />
10 9 R at a rate of 17.3 kGy/h at room temperature. Figure<br />
3 shows the observation result after the touch-down test<br />
(6 runs, 1 × 10 9 R). As shown in Fig. 3, neither abrasion of<br />
the touch-down bearing nor adhesion to the main shaft was<br />
observed. Moreover, the problem did not occur to control<br />
situation of the magnetic-bearing. Based on these results,<br />
we concluded that polyimide resin was a material which<br />
could be used under these system requirements. In the<br />
future, we will carry out gamma-ray irradiation test of<br />
improvement equipment which reflected these results again.<br />
Main shaft and adhesion material<br />
Fig. 2 Main shaft of No.1 equipment after the irradiation<br />
test (4.7 × 10 8 R).<br />
Lower touch-down bearing Main shaft<br />
Fig. 3 Main shaft and lower touchdown bearing after the<br />
touch-down test (6 runs, 10 9 R).<br />
References<br />
1) G. J. Bernstein et al., ANL-7969 (1973).<br />
2) T. Washiya et al., Proc. Global 2005 (2005).<br />
3) N. Okamura et al., Proc. Global 2007(2007).