16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hydrogen Generation in the System of<br />

Water–Adsorbent Containing the Organic Extractant<br />

by Gamma-Ray Radiation<br />

Y. Koma, K. Matsumura, S. Watanabe, K. Nomura and Y. Sano<br />

The extraction chromatography is a promising technique<br />

for Am and Cm separation from a highly radioactive<br />

solutions of spent fuel reprocessing and employs the<br />

adsorbent composed of the porous silica particle, polymer<br />

and an extractant 1) . In the system, water and the adsorbent<br />

will generate hydrogen by gamma radiation. Generation of<br />

hydrogen should be considered for explosion safety, thus,<br />

was studied using several extractants.<br />

Adsorbents containing CMPO (n-octyl(phenyl)-N,N-<br />

diisobutylcarbamoylmethylphosphine oxide), TODGA<br />

(N,N,N'N'-tetraoctyl-3-oxapentane-1,5-diamide), HDEHP<br />

(bis(2-ethylhexyl)hydrogen phosphate), R-BTP (2,6-<br />

bis(5,6-di-isohexyl-1,2,4-triazine-3-yl)pyridine) and TRPEN<br />

(N,N,N’,N’-tetrakis((5-octyloxypyridin-2-yl)methyl)ethylen<br />

ediamine), were irradiated with gamma-ray of Co-60 in<br />

water at room temperature. The mixture of water and the<br />

adsorbent was contained in a vial for static irradiation<br />

whereas the stainless steel vessel for irradiation with Ar gas<br />

bubbling. The dose rate was about 3 kGy/h. Gas was<br />

sampled and analyzed by gas chromatography.<br />

When CMPO adsorbent is immersed in water with the<br />

ratio of mass of adsorbent and volume of water up to<br />

0.36 g/cm 3 , G value is increased comparing the value for<br />

water and this suggests a synergy effect in hydrogen<br />

production. At the ratio of 0.50 g/cm 3 , G value is<br />

suppressed about 40% of the value for water. It seems that<br />

hydrogen generated is retained longer and/or consumed in<br />

the system.<br />

Figure 1 shows G values obtained for the<br />

water–adsorbent system at the ratio of 0.01 g/cm 3 in the<br />

G value<br />

1-16<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

CMPO<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

TODGA<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

HDEHP<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

R-BTP<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

Adsorbents<br />

Advanced Processing Unit, ANSRD, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />

TRPEN<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

Fig. 1 G values for the water–adsorbent system at<br />

0.01 g/cm 3 . The adsorbent–water mixture was<br />

irradiated for 1 h at standing.<br />

SiO 2 -P<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

Water<br />

- 20 -<br />

static irradiation. The G value is increased for the<br />

two-phase system when compared with that of water, and<br />

the extent is depends on the adsorbent. This implies that<br />

addition of support particle denoted as ‘SiO 2-P’ as well as<br />

extractant enhances radiolysis. Nitric acid helps to<br />

suppress G value of H 2 for water 2) and this is also applied to<br />

the system.<br />

Stirring the system with Ar during irradiation increases G<br />

value, on the other hand, it diminishes the difference in G<br />

value as shown in Fig. 2 except for the case of HDEHP.<br />

Irradiation at standing induces distribution of hydrogen in<br />

the system and takes long time to reach a steady state.<br />

Based on the G values obtained, it is expected that<br />

hydrogen generated in the separation column packed with<br />

the adsorbent will be dissolved into the mobile phase and<br />

discharged to resulting in safety for explosion.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank Mr. R. Yamagata at Irradiation<br />

Service Section in TARRI for his assistance on the<br />

experiment. Present study is the result of “Development of<br />

Extraction Chromatography for Am and Cm Recovery”<br />

entrusted to <strong>JAEA</strong> by the Ministry of Education, Culture,<br />

Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT).<br />

References<br />

1) H. Funasaka and M. Itoh, Global 2007, Boise, USA<br />

(2007) 259.<br />

2) F. J. Miner and J. R. Seed, Chem. Rev., 67, (1967) 299.<br />

G value<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

CMPO<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

TODGA<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

HDEHP<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

R-BTP<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

TRPEN<br />

/SiO -P<br />

2<br />

Adsorbents<br />

Fig. 2 G values for the water–adsorbent system at<br />

0.1 g/cm 3 obtained after 1.25 h irradiation. The<br />

adsorbent–water mixture was stirred with Ar<br />

during irradiation.<br />

SiO 2 -P<br />

SiO 2<br />

Water

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!