16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1-09<br />

Evaluation of Single Event Effects on Commercial-off-<br />

the-Shelf Semiconductors for Space Flight Applications<br />

I. Kato a) , S. Matsuda a) , S. Baba b) , T. Hirose b) , J. Ohya b) , H. Okamoto b) , H. Katayama c) ,<br />

M. Naitoh c) , M. Harada c) , M. Suganuma c) and Y. Tange c)<br />

a) Space System Department, Kamakura Works, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation,<br />

b) Quality Assurance Division, Ryoei Technica Corporation,<br />

c) Earth Observation Research Center, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency<br />

Nowadays, there are increasing interests in applying the<br />

commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) devices widely used in the<br />

ground-based systems to space satellites, which may reduce<br />

the size and cost of satellite systems as well as shorten the<br />

time for development. However, one has to intensively<br />

evaluate potential risks of using them in the space radiation<br />

environment before they are put on board for actual flights.<br />

We are developing a compact infra-red camera (CIRC)<br />

for the earth observation from the space, in which we utilize<br />

the design of an already developed one for the ground use<br />

with some appropriate modifications. Its preliminary<br />

design was known to contain 9 COTS semiconductor<br />

devices whose sensitivity to the single event effects (SEEs)<br />

was unknown. Hence, we performed heavy-ion irradiation<br />

test on them to evaluate it. Among variations of SEEs, we<br />

have concentrated in this test on such effects that could<br />

cause fatal failure resulting in potential permanent loss of<br />

system functions, such as Single Event Latch-up (SEL).<br />

The test was conducted at TIARA in TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong>.<br />

Nine COTS devices tested were as listed in Table 1; a<br />

driver/receiver, a gate inverter (Gate Inv.), a reset IC, a<br />

thermoelectric cooler (TEC) driver, a multiplexer (MUX), a<br />

synchronous static random access memory (SSRAM), a<br />

flash memory (Flash), an analog-to-digital converter (ADC)<br />

and a digital-to-analog converter (DAC). The devices<br />

under test (DUT) were set in JAXA’s irradiation chamber<br />

installed in the HD2 course in TIARA facility and a cocktail<br />

ion beam with M/Q = 5 was irradiated on them. Every<br />

DUT was powered during the irradiation and the supply<br />

current was monitored to detect possible SEL event. The<br />

device temperature was nominally kept at 80 °C during the<br />

irradiation, while it was at 40-65 °C in some cases. For<br />

each device, 3 samples were exposed to 129 Xe 23+ beam with<br />

a linear energy transfer (LET) value of 69.2 MeV-cm 2 /mg.<br />

Irradiation was continued until the total fluence reached<br />

1 × 10 5 ions/cm 2 , or otherwise until enough number of<br />

detected SEL events was accumulated when happened.<br />

After irradiation, samples were tested for its functionality.<br />

When SEL event was detected during the irradiation and/or<br />

a sample was found to be functionally broken at the<br />

post-irradiation test about a certain device, additional<br />

irradiations were performed on that device using other<br />

species of ions, where we used either 84 Kr 17+ (LET =<br />

39.9 MeV-cm 2 /mg), 40 Ar 8+ (LET = 15.3 MeV-cm 2 /mg), or<br />

20 Ne 4+ (LET = 6.3 MeV-cm 2 /mg) ions depending on what<br />

kind of SEE was observed.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 13 -<br />

Among 9 devices tested, the driver/receiver, the Gate inv.,<br />

the MUX, the TEC driver and the reset IC showed no<br />

evidence of SEL event happening during 129 Xe 23+ beam<br />

irradiation. They also passed the functional testing after<br />

the irradiation. The results mean the SEL cross-section for<br />

them is below 1 × 10 -5 cm 2 at LET = 69.2 MeV-cm 2 /mg.<br />

Some SEL signals were detected during 129 Xe 23+ irradiation<br />

on the other 4 devices. They, except for the DAC, were<br />

found to be functioning in the post-irradiation testing,<br />

indicating that they are recoverable by a power cycle even if<br />

SEL happens. The DAC was found not to be functional.<br />

Additional irradiation was conducted with 40 Ar 8+ ion on<br />

4 devices which had shown the SEL sensitivity above.<br />

Neither the SSRAM nor Flash shows any evidence of SEL,<br />

indicating that their SEL threshold lies between 15.3 and<br />

69.2 MeV-cm 2 /mg. They also passed functional tests after<br />

irradiation. The ADC and DAC showed some SEL signals.<br />

The ADC was properly functioning after the irradiation,<br />

while the DAC was not. The ADC and DAC were further<br />

irradiated by other ion species. The ADC showed no SEL<br />

evidence during 20 Ne 4+ irradiation, indicating its SEL<br />

threshold lies between 6.3 and 15.3 MeV-cm 2 /mg. Its<br />

functionality is recoverable by a power cycle when SEL<br />

happens. Further DAC samples were devoted for 84 Kr 17+<br />

irradiation in order to evaluate consequent risks to a single<br />

SEL event. It was observed that a device temperature rose<br />

by about 10 °C from nominal after a single SEL occurred,<br />

which could be due to the increased current caused by the<br />

SEL. The DAC failed the post-irradiation testing, again.<br />

In summary, 4 out of 9 devices tested were found to be<br />

SEL-sensitive at some level, as shown in Table 1. Except<br />

for the DAC, they are recoverable from SEL events by a<br />

power cycle. The DAC was found to lose its functions<br />

after an SEL. We have evaluated possible risks of using<br />

them in the space based on the above results and properly<br />

reflected them to the CIRC’s design to avoid the risks.<br />

Table 1 Summary of SEE test results for 9 COTS devices.<br />

DUT SEL threshold Reflection to design<br />

Driver/Receiver<br />

Gate Inverter<br />

Reset IC<br />

TEC driver<br />

> 69.2<br />

[MeV-cm 2 /mg]<br />

Use as is<br />

(Function<br />

recoverable from<br />

SEL by power cycle)<br />

Multiplexer<br />

SSRAM<br />

Flash memory<br />

15.3 - 69.2<br />

ADC 6.3 - 15.3<br />

DAC < 15.3 To be replaced

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!