JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Feasibility Study on a 90 nm Bulk CMOS Process for<br />
Applicability to Space Environments<br />
A. Maru a) , H. Shindou a) , S. Kuboyama a) , T. Hirao b) and T. Ohshima b)<br />
a) Aerospace Research and Development Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA),<br />
b) Environment and Industrial Materials Research Division, QuBS, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />
Recently, due to the requirements for higher density<br />
integration and device scaling, the logical circuits have been<br />
designed with < 100 nm design rule. Single-Event Upset<br />
(SEU) and Single-Event Transient (SET) phenomena are<br />
serious problems for those integrated circuits, because their<br />
supply voltage and the threshold to the phenomena are also<br />
decreasing. It is said that DICE (Dual Interlocked Storage<br />
Cell) circuit is the hardened topology against SEU 1, 2) . The<br />
DICE circuit keeps data using two memory nodes, and if<br />
data inversion has occurred by incident particles on the one<br />
hand memory node, the correct data is rewritten by the other<br />
hand memory node. Therefore, DICE circuit has excellent<br />
radiation tolerance. However, in the highly integrated<br />
circuits, it is occurred that two neighboring transistors are<br />
simultaneously inverted by an incident particle due to the<br />
charge sharing mechanism. Therefore, it is important for<br />
the design of those circuits to estimate the extent of the<br />
charge sharing.<br />
In this feasibility study, the applicability to space<br />
environments of a 90 nm bulk CMOS process was evaluated<br />
by heavy ions and the SEU cross section was calculated.<br />
For detailed evaluation, we also performed the angled<br />
irradiation. The experimental results suggested there are<br />
the critical angles in the DICE memory circuit.<br />
At first, we evaluated the effectiveness of RHBD<br />
apploarch for 90 nm CMOS process, by using the heavy<br />
ions delivered from the AVF cyclotron at <strong>JAEA</strong>. As<br />
shown in Fig. 1, the latch cell with RHBD methodology for<br />
90 nm, the DICE topology, has excellent radiation hardness.<br />
However, it is said that if two critical off state transistors<br />
Cross Section [cm 2 /bit]<br />
1-04<br />
1.E-07<br />
1.E-08<br />
1.E-09<br />
Standard LAT<br />
DICE LAT<br />
0 20 40 60 80 100<br />
LET [MeV/(mg/cm 2 )]<br />
Fig. 1 SEU cross-sections as a function of Linear<br />
energy transfer for Standard and DICE latch circuits.<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
- 8 -<br />
in the DICE circuit upset simultaneously, the memorized<br />
data in the DICE memory is lost. Therefore we performed<br />
the angled irradiation for DICE memory circuit and the SEU<br />
cross section against incident angle was calculated.<br />
Figure 2 shows SEU cross-sections as a function of<br />
incident angle when Kr (LET= 40.3 MeV/mg/cm 2 ) particles<br />
were irradiated. In our DICE circuit, the most critical<br />
angle is estimated to be 52 degree. So, if the irradiated<br />
heavy ion incidents from that angle, the particle pass<br />
through the two critical transistors in the DICE circuit.<br />
Therefore, although it is considered that the actual distance<br />
of the two adjacent transistors in the off state to hold the<br />
logic state is one of the critical parameters to prevent SEUs,<br />
in addition to this parameter, some artifice to prevent SEUs<br />
by the angled irradiation is necessary. In future work, we<br />
plan to design the circuit that optimized the actual layout<br />
and added the countermeasure against the angled irradiation<br />
in order to achieve SEU immunity up to 64 MeV/(mg/cm 2 )<br />
of LET.<br />
References<br />
1) M.P.Baze, et al., EEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., Vol. 55 (2008)<br />
3295.<br />
2) Kuande Wang, et al., Canadian Conference on Electrical<br />
and Computer Engineering, (2009) 1076.<br />
Fig. 2 SEU cross-sections against incident angle.