16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Feasibility Study on a 90 nm Bulk CMOS Process for<br />

Applicability to Space Environments<br />

A. Maru a) , H. Shindou a) , S. Kuboyama a) , T. Hirao b) and T. Ohshima b)<br />

a) Aerospace Research and Development Directorate, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA),<br />

b) Environment and Industrial Materials Research Division, QuBS, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />

Recently, due to the requirements for higher density<br />

integration and device scaling, the logical circuits have been<br />

designed with < 100 nm design rule. Single-Event Upset<br />

(SEU) and Single-Event Transient (SET) phenomena are<br />

serious problems for those integrated circuits, because their<br />

supply voltage and the threshold to the phenomena are also<br />

decreasing. It is said that DICE (Dual Interlocked Storage<br />

Cell) circuit is the hardened topology against SEU 1, 2) . The<br />

DICE circuit keeps data using two memory nodes, and if<br />

data inversion has occurred by incident particles on the one<br />

hand memory node, the correct data is rewritten by the other<br />

hand memory node. Therefore, DICE circuit has excellent<br />

radiation tolerance. However, in the highly integrated<br />

circuits, it is occurred that two neighboring transistors are<br />

simultaneously inverted by an incident particle due to the<br />

charge sharing mechanism. Therefore, it is important for<br />

the design of those circuits to estimate the extent of the<br />

charge sharing.<br />

In this feasibility study, the applicability to space<br />

environments of a 90 nm bulk CMOS process was evaluated<br />

by heavy ions and the SEU cross section was calculated.<br />

For detailed evaluation, we also performed the angled<br />

irradiation. The experimental results suggested there are<br />

the critical angles in the DICE memory circuit.<br />

At first, we evaluated the effectiveness of RHBD<br />

apploarch for 90 nm CMOS process, by using the heavy<br />

ions delivered from the AVF cyclotron at <strong>JAEA</strong>. As<br />

shown in Fig. 1, the latch cell with RHBD methodology for<br />

90 nm, the DICE topology, has excellent radiation hardness.<br />

However, it is said that if two critical off state transistors<br />

Cross Section [cm 2 /bit]<br />

1-04<br />

1.E-07<br />

1.E-08<br />

1.E-09<br />

Standard LAT<br />

DICE LAT<br />

0 20 40 60 80 100<br />

LET [MeV/(mg/cm 2 )]<br />

Fig. 1 SEU cross-sections as a function of Linear<br />

energy transfer for Standard and DICE latch circuits.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 8 -<br />

in the DICE circuit upset simultaneously, the memorized<br />

data in the DICE memory is lost. Therefore we performed<br />

the angled irradiation for DICE memory circuit and the SEU<br />

cross section against incident angle was calculated.<br />

Figure 2 shows SEU cross-sections as a function of<br />

incident angle when Kr (LET= 40.3 MeV/mg/cm 2 ) particles<br />

were irradiated. In our DICE circuit, the most critical<br />

angle is estimated to be 52 degree. So, if the irradiated<br />

heavy ion incidents from that angle, the particle pass<br />

through the two critical transistors in the DICE circuit.<br />

Therefore, although it is considered that the actual distance<br />

of the two adjacent transistors in the off state to hold the<br />

logic state is one of the critical parameters to prevent SEUs,<br />

in addition to this parameter, some artifice to prevent SEUs<br />

by the angled irradiation is necessary. In future work, we<br />

plan to design the circuit that optimized the actual layout<br />

and added the countermeasure against the angled irradiation<br />

in order to achieve SEU immunity up to 64 MeV/(mg/cm 2 )<br />

of LET.<br />

References<br />

1) M.P.Baze, et al., EEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., Vol. 55 (2008)<br />

3295.<br />

2) Kuande Wang, et al., Canadian Conference on Electrical<br />

and Computer Engineering, (2009) 1076.<br />

Fig. 2 SEU cross-sections against incident angle.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!