JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1-01<br />
Radiation Resistance of InGaP/GaAs Dual-Junction<br />
Thin-Film Space Solar Cell<br />
M. Imaizumi a) , S. Sato b) , T. Ohshima b) , M. Takahashi a) and K. Kibe a)<br />
a) Institute of Aerospace Technology, JAXA,<br />
b) Environment and Industrial Materials Research Division, QuBS, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />
Increasingly, solar panels are being required to have less<br />
weight and volume, namely, higher specific power in W/kg<br />
and lower stowage volume in W/m 3 . There are two ways<br />
to meet these requirements. One is to improve the solar<br />
cell efficiency, and the other is to reduce the weight and/or<br />
thickness of solar cells. However, if a thin-film III-V<br />
multi-junction solar cell can be achieved, it realizes both<br />
properties of high-efficiency and lightweight. We have<br />
developed an InGaP/GaAs thin-film dual-junction (TF2J)<br />
solar cell 1), 2) . In this paper, we present comparison of the<br />
radiation resistance of the TF2J cell and conventional 3J<br />
cells 3), 4) .<br />
A hundred of the TF2J cells were prepared for proton<br />
irradiation experiment. No laminating film was applied on<br />
the front surface of the cell. The initial efficiency of the<br />
cells was in the range of 20-23% under AM0, 1sun<br />
(136.7 mW/cm 2 ) at 25 °C. Also, a conventional<br />
InGaP/GaAs/Ge triple-junction (3J) space solar cell was<br />
prepared for comparison. The thicknesses of the InGaP<br />
and GaAs sub-cells in the TF2J and the 3J cells are<br />
equivalent.<br />
The cells were subjected to proton irradiation at the<br />
following energies; 100 keV, 200 keV, 380 keV, 1 MeV,<br />
3 MeV, and 6 MeV with varied fluences. The<br />
current-voltage (I-V) output characteristics and the external<br />
quantum efficiency (EQE) of the cells before and after<br />
irradiation were measured. The results of the TF2J cell<br />
were compared with those of the 3J cell.<br />
The remaining factors of the short-circuit current (Isc),<br />
the open-circuit voltage (Voc) and the maximum power<br />
(Pmax) of the TF2J and the space 3J cells irradiated with<br />
various energies of protons are compared in Fig. 1. The<br />
fluence of all energies of protons is equal (1 × 10 12 cm -2 ).<br />
In the energy range of 200 - 400 keV, radiation resistance of<br />
the TF2J cell is superior to that of the 3J cell. Protons in<br />
this energy range stop in the GaAs sub-cells according to<br />
TRIM simulation 3) . Therefore, the energy range is the<br />
4)<br />
most destructive to space 3J cells . In the case of<br />
380 keV-proton irradiation, the value of Isc of the TF2J cell<br />
after the irradiation is significantly higher than that of the 3J<br />
cell. In addition, the Voc values of the two types of cell<br />
irradiated are almost equivalent although the TF2J cell has<br />
dual-junction structure. These facts result in higher Pmax<br />
value for the TF2J cell after the irradiation.<br />
Typical degradation in EQE of InGaP and GaAs<br />
sub-cells in the TF2J cell and the 3J cell before and after the<br />
380 keV-proton irradiation were compared. It reveals that<br />
the better radiation resistance of Isc of the TF2J cell is<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
- 5 -<br />
Remaining Factor<br />
Remaining Factor<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
1<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
0.4<br />
0.2<br />
0<br />
Isc<br />
Voc<br />
Pmax<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Proton Energy (MeV)<br />
Isc<br />
Voc<br />
Pmax<br />
(a) TF2J cell<br />
0.01 0.1 1 10<br />
Proton Energy (MeV)<br />
(b) #502 3J cell<br />
Fig. 1 Dependency of remaining factors of Isc, Voc and<br />
Pmax of (a) TF2J cell and (b) #502 3J cell on<br />
irradiated proton energy. The fluence of each energy<br />
proton is 1 × 10 12 cm -2 .<br />
attributed to higher radiation resistance of the GaAs sub-cell<br />
in the TF2J cell.<br />
From these results, the TF2J cell is thought to require less<br />
radiation-shielding materials such as coverglass or other<br />
laminating films than conventional 3J cells. This is a great<br />
advantage for developing lightweight and flexible solar<br />
panels.<br />
References<br />
1) T. Takamoto et al., Proc. 31st IEEE Photovoltaic<br />
Specialists Conf. (2005) 519-524.<br />
2) T. Takamoto et al., Proc. 4th World Conf. of<br />
Photovoltaic Energy Conversion (2006) 1769-1772.<br />
3) M. Imaizumi et al., Proc. 29th IEEE Photovoltaic<br />
Specialists Conf. (2002) 990-993.<br />
4) T. Sumita et al., Proc. World Conf. of Photovoltaic<br />
Energy Conversion (2003) CD 3P-B5-10.