16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5-03<br />

Operation of the Electrostatic Accelerators<br />

T. Agematsu a) , S. Uno a) , A. Chiba a) , K. Yamada a) , A. Yokoyama a) , Y. Saitoh a) , Y. Ishii a) ,<br />

T. Satoh a) , T. Ohkubo a) , W. Yokota a) , T. Kitano b) , T. Takayama b) , S. Kanai b) ,<br />

T. Orimo b) , Y. Aoki b) and N. Yamada b)<br />

a) Department of Advanced Radiation Technology, TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />

b) Beam Operation Service, Co., Ltd<br />

1. Operation and Status<br />

Three electrostatic accelerators were operated smoothly<br />

in FY 2009, and all the planned experiments were carried<br />

out except those canceled by users. The yearly operation<br />

time of the tandem accelerator, the single-ended accelerator<br />

and the ion implanter amounted to 2,100, 2,416 and 1,866<br />

hours respectively, similarly to past years. The total<br />

operation time of each accelerator since operation started<br />

was 32,422, 36,864 and 28,875 hours, respectively. The<br />

monthly operation time is shown in Fig. 1. Ion species<br />

used for experiments in FY 2009 are also shown in Fig. 2.<br />

Fig. 1 Monthly operation time of each<br />

accelerator in FY 2009.<br />

(C,Al,Au)<br />

(Be,B,Al,Si,Mo,Ag)<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

2. Maintenance<br />

The number of troubles was smaller than that for past<br />

years. Major maintenance performed in FY 2009 is as<br />

follows;<br />

Tandem accelerator: There was no trouble of accelerator<br />

leading to cancelation of experiments. Minor repair and<br />

scheduled maintenance were carried out.<br />

Single-ended accelerator: The radio frequency oscillator<br />

of the ion source mounted in high-voltage terminal and the<br />

sequencer for control of the SB beam line have failed, and<br />

they were changed to new ones.<br />

Ion implanter: The oven controller of Freeman ion source<br />

was renewed in February <strong>2010</strong>.<br />

3. New Beam Development<br />

As to the ion implanter, intensity of Pt ion beam was very<br />

small and we tried to generate Pd ion as an alternative. But<br />

intensity of Pd ion beam can not be kept long time, and it is<br />

insufficient now for experiments. We will study to keep<br />

beam intensity long time.<br />

As to the tandem accelerator, ion beam of Mn was<br />

successfully generated and accelerated at intensity of<br />

150 nA. We also tried to generate Yb ion, which was trial<br />

development for expanding the variety of ion species as<br />

lanthanoid group. However, beam intensity of the target<br />

mass separated by analyzer magnet of accelerator was very<br />

small, and it is insufficient for experiments.<br />

(He,Li,B,C,O,Ne,S,K,Cr,<br />

Mn,Ni,Ge,Xe,Tb,Pt,Bi)<br />

Fig. 2 Ion species used for experiments in FY 2009.<br />

- 181 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!