16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4-40<br />

Simultaneous Measurement of Secondary-electron<br />

Emission and Coulomb Explosion Imaging for<br />

250-keV/u C2 + Ions Bombarded to Thin Carbon Foils<br />

Y. Takahashi a) , K. Narumi a) , A. Chiba b) , Y. Saitoh b) , K. Yamada b) ,<br />

N. Ishikawa a) , H. Sugai a) c, a)<br />

and Y. Maeda<br />

a) Advanced Science Research Center, <strong>JAEA</strong>, b) Department of Advanced Radiation Technology,<br />

TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong>, c) Department of Energy Science and Technology, Kyoto University<br />

The origin of vicinage effect on secondary-electron<br />

emission induced by swift molecular ions or cluster ions is<br />

still an unresolved question although many studies have<br />

been performed. The secondary-electron emission under a<br />

swift monoatomic ion impact has been accounted for by a<br />

three-step process: production (excitation) of scattered<br />

electrons by the incident ion, transport of the scattered<br />

electrons in the solid, and finally, transmission of the<br />

scattered electrons through the surface barrier. It has been<br />

pointed out that the mechanism of the vicinage effect is<br />

mainly due to disturbance in the transport process by an<br />

1)<br />

electric potential induced by fragment ions . Under this<br />

mechanism, it is expected that the potential can strongly<br />

affect the transport process, and such influence may depend<br />

on the relative position of trajectories of fragment ions. In<br />

this study, we have measured the correlation between<br />

secondary-electron emission and relative position of<br />

fragment ions obtained from Coulomb explosion imaging<br />

for C 2 + ions bombarded to thin carbon foils.<br />

The swift C + and C 2 + ions with the energies of 250 keV/u<br />

(3.2 v 0) and self-supporting amorphous carbon foils of 1.4,<br />

2.8, 14.1 μg/cm 2 (70-700 Å) were used. The secondary-<br />

electron yield γ n in the forward and backward directions<br />

from a carbon foil were measured simultaneously by two<br />

microchannel-plate (MCP) detectors. Fragment ions with<br />

different charge states transmitted through a foil were<br />

separated by electrostatic deflection plates, and detected as<br />

luminous points by an MCP detector equipped with a<br />

fluorescent screen. The orientational angle ϕ between the<br />

internuclear vector of a pair of fragment ions after the<br />

penetration of the foil and the beam direction was derived<br />

from the relative positions of the two luminous points. The<br />

γ 2(ϕ) as a function of the orientational angle divided into<br />

three angular regions was obtained from the distribution of<br />

the number of secondary electrons for each orientational<br />

angle. We also measured γ 1 using C + ions with the same<br />

velocity. The orientation dependence of the vicinage effect<br />

was evaluated from the ratio of the secondary-electron yield<br />

R 2(ϕ) = γ 2(ϕ)/2γ 1. Appearance of the vicinage effect is<br />

presented as R 2(ϕ) ≠ 1.<br />

Figure 1 shows γ 2(ϕ) in the backward and forward<br />

directions for the three foils with different thickness for a<br />

pair of outgoing C 3+ - C 3+ ions. The forward yield was<br />

larger when the internuclear vector of a pair of fragment<br />

ions was parallel to the beam direction than when it was<br />

perpendicular for the thinnest foil. No orientation<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 164 -<br />

dependence was observed for the other thicker foils in the<br />

forward direction and for all foils in the backward direction.<br />

The ratio R 2(ϕ) for ϕ = 0-30º and ϕ = 60-90º in the forward<br />

direction plotted as a function of the calculated internuclear<br />

distance between the fragment ions at the exit of the target is<br />

shown in Fig. 2. It indicates that the dependence vanishes<br />

at the internuclear distance of ~1.6 Å, although the vicinage<br />

effect in the transport process has been observed even for<br />

~70 Å in this velocity 2) . Hence, the present result indicates<br />

that there is little effect of the orientation in the transport<br />

process, and the orientation dependence observed in the<br />

forward direction for the thinnest foil could be attributed to<br />

the production process of electrons. No orientation<br />

dependence of the vicinage effect in the transport process<br />

was observed for the region of foil thickness used in this<br />

study. Therefore, it is conceivable that a response distance<br />

of the electric potentials induced by fragment ions is much<br />

larger than the transport length of electrons.<br />

References<br />

1) H. Arai et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 78 No. 10 (2009)<br />

104301.<br />

2) Y. Takahashi et al., Europhys. Lett. 88 (2009) 63001.<br />

2()<br />

30<br />

28<br />

26<br />

24<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

0 30 60 90 0 30 60 90<br />

Orientational Angle [deg]<br />

R 2()= 2() / 2 1<br />

14.1g/cm 2<br />

1.00<br />

0.95<br />

0.90<br />

0.85<br />

0.80<br />

(a)<br />

Backward (C 3+ - C 3+ )<br />

2.8g/cm 2<br />

1.4g/cm 2<br />

Forward (C 3+ - C 3+ )<br />

0.75<br />

0.70<br />

0-30deg<br />

60-90deg<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

Internuclear Distance [Å]<br />

Fig. 2 Ratio R 2(ϕ) = γ 2(ϕ)/2γ 1 in the forward direction as<br />

a function of the internuclear distance.<br />

55<br />

53<br />

51<br />

49<br />

47<br />

45<br />

43<br />

41<br />

Forward (C 3+ - C 3+ )<br />

14.1g/cm 2<br />

2.8g/cm 2<br />

1.4g/cm 2<br />

Fig. 1 γ 2(ϕ) for (a) backward and for (b) forward emission<br />

for a pair of outgoing C 3+ - C 3+ ions from three foils.<br />

(b)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!