JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4-38<br />
Dose Measurement for 110 keV Electron Beam<br />
H. Seito a) , S. Matsui b) , T. Hakoda a) , M. Ishikawa b) , H. Hanaya a) , Y. Haruyama a) ,<br />
H. Kaneko a) , J. Kimura b) and T. Kojima a)<br />
a) Department of Advanced Radiation Technology, TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />
b) Hamamatsu Photonics K. K.<br />
An electron beam (EB) generator of a few tens of keV is<br />
frequently used to hardening of printing ink and addition of<br />
the hydrophily for various materials. Thin radiochromic<br />
film dosimeters such as FWT-60, GAF and B3 are mainly<br />
1)<br />
used in low energy EB industrial processing . These<br />
dosimeters are calibrated for high energy EB or cobalt-60<br />
gamma-rays 2) . Consistency in dose evaluation for a few<br />
MeV electron and ten-hundred keV electron is still under<br />
discussion 3) . This work aims to reveal consistency in dose<br />
response of film dosimeter between low and high energy EB.<br />
The dosimetry study for 110 keV electron beams was<br />
performed at the EB generative machine called<br />
EB-ENGINE (Hamamatsu Photonics K. K). The machine<br />
is composed of electron source (filament), vacuum tube and<br />
irradiation chamber. Accelerated electrons traverse air<br />
through beryllium accelerator window. The distance from<br />
the window to the surface of film dosimeter was 40 mm as<br />
shown in Fig. 1. The dosimeters (FWT-60) were calibrated<br />
for 2-MeV electron and dose distribution in 110 keV<br />
electron beam irradiation field was evaluated by both the<br />
film dosimetry and Monte Carlo calculation code:<br />
PENELOPE. The absorbed dose distributions given by<br />
measurement and the calculation are compared in Fig. 2.<br />
The difference in dose between the measurement and<br />
calculation was found to be within ± 6 kGy. Such a<br />
difference is small, considering geometrical deviation in<br />
setting of film dosimeter. This fact suggests that<br />
calibration curve of FWT-60 film dosimeter for 2 MeV EB<br />
would be valid also for 110 keV EB. These results show<br />
that dose responses of FWT-60 film dosimeters are<br />
independent on electron energy.<br />
As the next step, calorimetry was tested to check the film<br />
dosimetry results. A calorimeter with an aluminum<br />
absorber was designed. The calorimeter consists of mainly<br />
three parts; an absorber disk, a temperature sensitive sensor<br />
and an aluminum stage with three polycarbonate props to<br />
sustain the absorber disk. A cross section of the<br />
calorimeter is shown in Fig. 3. Energy fluence values<br />
measured by the calorimeter were slightly smaller than those<br />
estimated by the PENELOPE code calculation. The factor<br />
of this difference is under consideration. Application of<br />
calorimetry to 110 keV EB dosimetry needs to be discussed<br />
further.<br />
References<br />
1) ISO/ASTM 51275, 2004. Standard Practice for Use of a<br />
Radiochromic Film Dosimetry System. ASTM<br />
International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West<br />
Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA.<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
- 162 -<br />
2) ISO/ASTM 51261, 2002. Standard Guide for Selection<br />
and Calibration of Dosimetry System for Radiation<br />
Processing. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,<br />
West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA.<br />
3) J. Helt-Hansen et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74 (2005)<br />
341.<br />
Filament<br />
Accelerator window<br />
Film dosimeter<br />
H.V. Generator Controller<br />
Fig. 1 Geometry of the irradiation set-up.<br />
250<br />
200<br />
150<br />
Vacuum tube<br />
40 mm<br />
<br />
Fig. 2 Comparison of the dose distribution given by<br />
FWT-60 film dosimeter with that by PENELOPE<br />
calculation.<br />
Thermistor sensor<br />
1 mm<br />
25 mm<br />
20 mm<br />
Fig. 3 Schematic drawing of the calorimeter.<br />
○ Film dosimeter<br />
◇ PENELOPE<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />
Absorber disk<br />
Polycarbonate prop<br />
Aluminum stage