16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4-38<br />

Dose Measurement for 110 keV Electron Beam<br />

H. Seito a) , S. Matsui b) , T. Hakoda a) , M. Ishikawa b) , H. Hanaya a) , Y. Haruyama a) ,<br />

H. Kaneko a) , J. Kimura b) and T. Kojima a)<br />

a) Department of Advanced Radiation Technology, TARRI, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />

b) Hamamatsu Photonics K. K.<br />

An electron beam (EB) generator of a few tens of keV is<br />

frequently used to hardening of printing ink and addition of<br />

the hydrophily for various materials. Thin radiochromic<br />

film dosimeters such as FWT-60, GAF and B3 are mainly<br />

1)<br />

used in low energy EB industrial processing . These<br />

dosimeters are calibrated for high energy EB or cobalt-60<br />

gamma-rays 2) . Consistency in dose evaluation for a few<br />

MeV electron and ten-hundred keV electron is still under<br />

discussion 3) . This work aims to reveal consistency in dose<br />

response of film dosimeter between low and high energy EB.<br />

The dosimetry study for 110 keV electron beams was<br />

performed at the EB generative machine called<br />

EB-ENGINE (Hamamatsu Photonics K. K). The machine<br />

is composed of electron source (filament), vacuum tube and<br />

irradiation chamber. Accelerated electrons traverse air<br />

through beryllium accelerator window. The distance from<br />

the window to the surface of film dosimeter was 40 mm as<br />

shown in Fig. 1. The dosimeters (FWT-60) were calibrated<br />

for 2-MeV electron and dose distribution in 110 keV<br />

electron beam irradiation field was evaluated by both the<br />

film dosimetry and Monte Carlo calculation code:<br />

PENELOPE. The absorbed dose distributions given by<br />

measurement and the calculation are compared in Fig. 2.<br />

The difference in dose between the measurement and<br />

calculation was found to be within ± 6 kGy. Such a<br />

difference is small, considering geometrical deviation in<br />

setting of film dosimeter. This fact suggests that<br />

calibration curve of FWT-60 film dosimeter for 2 MeV EB<br />

would be valid also for 110 keV EB. These results show<br />

that dose responses of FWT-60 film dosimeters are<br />

independent on electron energy.<br />

As the next step, calorimetry was tested to check the film<br />

dosimetry results. A calorimeter with an aluminum<br />

absorber was designed. The calorimeter consists of mainly<br />

three parts; an absorber disk, a temperature sensitive sensor<br />

and an aluminum stage with three polycarbonate props to<br />

sustain the absorber disk. A cross section of the<br />

calorimeter is shown in Fig. 3. Energy fluence values<br />

measured by the calorimeter were slightly smaller than those<br />

estimated by the PENELOPE code calculation. The factor<br />

of this difference is under consideration. Application of<br />

calorimetry to 110 keV EB dosimetry needs to be discussed<br />

further.<br />

References<br />

1) ISO/ASTM 51275, 2004. Standard Practice for Use of a<br />

Radiochromic Film Dosimetry System. ASTM<br />

International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West<br />

Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 162 -<br />

2) ISO/ASTM 51261, 2002. Standard Guide for Selection<br />

and Calibration of Dosimetry System for Radiation<br />

Processing. ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive,<br />

West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, USA.<br />

3) J. Helt-Hansen et al., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74 (2005)<br />

341.<br />

Filament<br />

Accelerator window<br />

Film dosimeter<br />

H.V. Generator Controller<br />

Fig. 1 Geometry of the irradiation set-up.<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Vacuum tube<br />

40 mm<br />

<br />

Fig. 2 Comparison of the dose distribution given by<br />

FWT-60 film dosimeter with that by PENELOPE<br />

calculation.<br />

Thermistor sensor<br />

1 mm<br />

25 mm<br />

20 mm<br />

Fig. 3 Schematic drawing of the calorimeter.<br />

○ Film dosimeter<br />

◇ PENELOPE<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Absorber disk<br />

Polycarbonate prop<br />

Aluminum stage

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!