JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4-18<br />
Vacancy Generation around an SCC Crack Tip<br />
in Stainless Steels Probed by a Positron Microbeam<br />
In the 1970’s, the stress corrosion cracking (SCC)<br />
occurred frequently in reactor materials of Type 304<br />
austenitic stainless steels. It has been recognized that the<br />
degradation of the corrosion resistance is caused by the<br />
reduction of chromium concentration near the grain<br />
boundary due to chromium carbide formation during<br />
welding. This chromium carbide formation phenomenon is<br />
called sensitization, and nuclear-reactor materials were<br />
replaced by low-carbon stainless steels to avoid sensitization.<br />
Nevertheless, the SCC still occurs in the high-temperature<br />
pure-water reactor environment. This suggests that the<br />
suppression of the corrosion resistance degradation can not<br />
prevent the SCC failure. Recently, the SCC propagation<br />
model that the vacancy-type defects that accumulate in the<br />
1, 2)<br />
crack tip play a role as a crack nucleus was proposed .<br />
However, there is no information available on the generation<br />
or accumulation mechanism of such vacancies around the<br />
SCC crack tips. In this study, lattice defect spatial<br />
distributions around the SCC crack tip in an austenitic<br />
stainless steel have been probed by a positron microbeam.<br />
A Type 304 stainless steel foil with 5 × 10 mm in size<br />
and 30 μm in thickness was annealed for 24 hours at 650 o C<br />
in the vacuum. The foil was attached to the compact<br />
tensile test specimen holder and tensile stress was applied.<br />
The holder was exposed into boiling MgCl2 solution, so the<br />
SCC crack was introduced. The SCC crack specimen was<br />
3)<br />
loaded into the positron microbeam apparatus . The SCC<br />
crack specimen was irradiated with a 20-keV positron<br />
microbeam. When vacancy-type defects are present in a<br />
(a) Optical Image<br />
(b) S-parameter Image<br />
1 mm<br />
A. Yabuuchi, M. Maekawa and A. Kawasuso<br />
Advanced Science Research Center, <strong>JAEA</strong><br />
0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02<br />
Normalized S parameter<br />
0.98 0.99 1.00 1.01 1.02<br />
Fig. 1 (a) Optical image of the SCC crack in the<br />
sensitized Type 304 stainless steel and (b) S-parameter<br />
image around the SCC crack. The black pixel in the<br />
S-parameter image corresponds to the pre-notch and<br />
the SCC crack gap.<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
- 142 -<br />
material, annihilation gamma-ray peak intensity is increased.<br />
We have evaluated the change in peak intensity using the S<br />
parameter which increases with increasing peak intensity.<br />
Figure 1 shows the measured S-parameter distribution<br />
map obtained from an SCC crack specimen. From this<br />
result, the increase of S parameter was observed around the<br />
SCC crack. To investigate what type of defect has caused<br />
the increase of this S parameter, the gamma-ray spectrum<br />
obtained from the surrounding of the SCC crack was<br />
compared with the spectrum obtained from the tensile test<br />
specimen. The tensile specimen was prepared from a<br />
50-μm thick Type 316L stainless steel foil. The test piece<br />
was solution-annealed and tensile-deformed with a nominal<br />
strain of 22%. The spectra obtained from both specimen<br />
are plotted in Fig. 2 with the ratio change from the standard<br />
spectra. These two ratio curves agree well, which means<br />
that the same type of defect is included in the two specimens.<br />
Furthermore, the calculated spectrum of mono-vacancy in<br />
bcc-Fe replicates the experimental spectra. On the contrary,<br />
corrosion test revealed corrosion-induced defects were<br />
introduced only to 100 nm from the surface. These results<br />
indicate that the increase of S parameter near the SCC crack<br />
was caused by plastic-deformation-induced vacancies.<br />
References<br />
1) R.W. Staehle, "Proc. Int. Conf. Water Chem. of Nucl.<br />
React. Sys.", Jeju Is., Korea (2006).<br />
2) K. Arioka et al., INSS Journal 13 (2006) 168.<br />
3) M. Maekawa and A. Kawasuso, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255<br />
(2008) 39.<br />
Ratio to bulk bulk bulk<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
512 514 516 518<br />
-ray -ray -ray Energy, E E E / keV<br />
V 1<br />
Fig. 2 The ratio curves for SCC crack specimen (●)<br />
and tensile test specimen (○). The solid line<br />
represents the calculation result with annihilating at<br />
mono-vacancy.