JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Low Temperature Ion Channeling of Fe2MnSi Film<br />
Epitaxially Grown on Ge(111)<br />
Y. Maeda a, b) , K. Narumi b) , Y. Terai c) , T. Sadoh d) and M. Miyao d)<br />
a) Kyoto University, b) Advanced Science Research Center, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />
c) Osaka University, d) Kyushu University<br />
A full Heusler alloy L2 1-Fe 2MnSi is important for a spin<br />
polarized metal electrode (a spin injector) toward realization<br />
of a spin filed effect transistor: Spin-FET 1, 2) . The perfect<br />
atomic rows along the direction consist of periodic<br />
intervals of Fe(A), Mn(B), Fe(C), Si(D) in the L2 1 lattice.<br />
According to theoretical calculation of magnetic properties<br />
of Fe 2MnSi, perfect spin polarization (half metallicity) may<br />
be affected by actual occupation behavior of Mn atoms at<br />
the B site because the B site atom dominates electronic spin<br />
states near the Fermi level. Since 2007, we have<br />
successively investigated axial orientation and perfection of<br />
DO 3-Fe 3Si, Fe 4Si 2) , L2 1-Fe 2MnSi with some compositions,<br />
Fe 2CoSi, Co 2MnSi films epitaxially grown on Ge(111)<br />
substrate. We found both cases that a lattice mismatch<br />
with the Ge substrate dominated axial orientation as<br />
observed in Fe 2MnSi 4) and that the nearest neighbor atoms<br />
around the B site or (A, C) site dominate chemical bond<br />
strength and stability of axial orientation as in Fe 2CoSi.<br />
In this study following on the previous work, we<br />
investigate the axial orientation at the epitaxial interface of<br />
Fe 2MnSi(111)/Ge(111), then discuss the results taking into<br />
account the results on ion channeling at low temperature,<br />
where we can pass over effect of lattice vibrations on the<br />
axial orientation.<br />
The epitaxial Fe 2MnSi layers with a thickness of ~50 nm<br />
were grown by low temperature- molecular beam epitaxy<br />
(MBE) on n-type Ge(111) substrates at 200 o C 5) . The three<br />
elements of Fe, Mn, and Si were co-evaporated with<br />
Knudsen cells. The axial channeling measurement and<br />
Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS) for analysis<br />
of composition of alloy films were carried out at either SC1<br />
or MD2 beam lines in TIARA. The channeling<br />
Normalized Yield<br />
Normalized Yield<br />
4-17<br />
1.000<br />
0.100<br />
300K<br />
=0.85<br />
1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
1.000<br />
0.100<br />
=0.045<br />
min =0.037<br />
min =0.045 =0.037<br />
min =0.045 min<br />
min =0.037<br />
110K<br />
measurement using 2.0 MeV- 4 He + ions and a backscattering<br />
angle of 165 degrees was carried out at 300 K, 110 K and<br />
40 K. The samples were mounted on a cooled holder.<br />
Figure 1 shows angular yield profiles obtained by RBS at<br />
300, 110, and 40 K. We observed evident channeling<br />
along the Ge axis and obtained the minimum yield at<br />
the interface min = 0.045, 0.037 and 0.023, and the critical<br />
angle 1/2 = 0.85, 0.94 and 1.04 degrees at each temperature.<br />
Considering the previous results that their axial<br />
channeling at the interface of Fe 3-xMn xSi/Ge was affected by<br />
the lattice mismatch ratio which increased by increase of Mn<br />
content, the better channeling behavior observed at low<br />
temperature may be attributed to decrease in the lattice<br />
mismatch caused by thermal expansion. Actually, the<br />
lattice mismatch ratios calculated from thermal expansion<br />
data between Fe 2MnSi 6) and Ge 7) are 0.27% at 300 K,<br />
0.15% at 110 K and 0.10% at 40 K. The channeling<br />
behavior being dependent upon the composition and<br />
temperature teaches us that the most dominant factor of the<br />
axial orientation at the interface is the lattice mismatch<br />
between Fe 2MnSi and Ge.<br />
References<br />
1) K. Hamaya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 137204.<br />
2) M. Miyao et al., Thin Solid Films. 518 (<strong>2010</strong>) S273.<br />
3) Y. Maeda et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 17191.<br />
4) Y. Maeda et al., MRS Proc. 1119E (2009) 1119-L05-02.<br />
5) K. Ueda et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 112108.<br />
6) G. D. Mukherjee et al., Physica B 254 (1998) 223.<br />
7) O. Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook, 3rd ed.<br />
Springer, 2003, Berlin, p.47.<br />
=0.94<br />
1/2<br />
0.010<br />
0.010<br />
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />
0.01<br />
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />
0.01<br />
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />
0.01<br />
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />
Tilt Angle (degree) Tilt angle (degree)<br />
1<br />
0.1<br />
40K 40 K<br />
=0.023<br />
min<br />
=1.04 deg<br />
1/2<br />
Fig. 1 Angular yield profiles along the Ge axis of Fe 2MnSi/Ge(111) obtained at 300, 110, and 40 K.<br />
- 141 -