16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Low Temperature Ion Channeling of Fe2MnSi Film<br />

Epitaxially Grown on Ge(111)<br />

Y. Maeda a, b) , K. Narumi b) , Y. Terai c) , T. Sadoh d) and M. Miyao d)<br />

a) Kyoto University, b) Advanced Science Research Center, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />

c) Osaka University, d) Kyushu University<br />

A full Heusler alloy L2 1-Fe 2MnSi is important for a spin<br />

polarized metal electrode (a spin injector) toward realization<br />

of a spin filed effect transistor: Spin-FET 1, 2) . The perfect<br />

atomic rows along the direction consist of periodic<br />

intervals of Fe(A), Mn(B), Fe(C), Si(D) in the L2 1 lattice.<br />

According to theoretical calculation of magnetic properties<br />

of Fe 2MnSi, perfect spin polarization (half metallicity) may<br />

be affected by actual occupation behavior of Mn atoms at<br />

the B site because the B site atom dominates electronic spin<br />

states near the Fermi level. Since 2007, we have<br />

successively investigated axial orientation and perfection of<br />

DO 3-Fe 3Si, Fe 4Si 2) , L2 1-Fe 2MnSi with some compositions,<br />

Fe 2CoSi, Co 2MnSi films epitaxially grown on Ge(111)<br />

substrate. We found both cases that a lattice mismatch<br />

with the Ge substrate dominated axial orientation as<br />

observed in Fe 2MnSi 4) and that the nearest neighbor atoms<br />

around the B site or (A, C) site dominate chemical bond<br />

strength and stability of axial orientation as in Fe 2CoSi.<br />

In this study following on the previous work, we<br />

investigate the axial orientation at the epitaxial interface of<br />

Fe 2MnSi(111)/Ge(111), then discuss the results taking into<br />

account the results on ion channeling at low temperature,<br />

where we can pass over effect of lattice vibrations on the<br />

axial orientation.<br />

The epitaxial Fe 2MnSi layers with a thickness of ~50 nm<br />

were grown by low temperature- molecular beam epitaxy<br />

(MBE) on n-type Ge(111) substrates at 200 o C 5) . The three<br />

elements of Fe, Mn, and Si were co-evaporated with<br />

Knudsen cells. The axial channeling measurement and<br />

Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS) for analysis<br />

of composition of alloy films were carried out at either SC1<br />

or MD2 beam lines in TIARA. The channeling<br />

Normalized Yield<br />

Normalized Yield<br />

4-17<br />

1.000<br />

0.100<br />

300K<br />

=0.85<br />

1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

1.000<br />

0.100<br />

=0.045<br />

min =0.037<br />

min =0.045 =0.037<br />

min =0.045 min<br />

min =0.037<br />

110K<br />

measurement using 2.0 MeV- 4 He + ions and a backscattering<br />

angle of 165 degrees was carried out at 300 K, 110 K and<br />

40 K. The samples were mounted on a cooled holder.<br />

Figure 1 shows angular yield profiles obtained by RBS at<br />

300, 110, and 40 K. We observed evident channeling<br />

along the Ge axis and obtained the minimum yield at<br />

the interface min = 0.045, 0.037 and 0.023, and the critical<br />

angle 1/2 = 0.85, 0.94 and 1.04 degrees at each temperature.<br />

Considering the previous results that their axial<br />

channeling at the interface of Fe 3-xMn xSi/Ge was affected by<br />

the lattice mismatch ratio which increased by increase of Mn<br />

content, the better channeling behavior observed at low<br />

temperature may be attributed to decrease in the lattice<br />

mismatch caused by thermal expansion. Actually, the<br />

lattice mismatch ratios calculated from thermal expansion<br />

data between Fe 2MnSi 6) and Ge 7) are 0.27% at 300 K,<br />

0.15% at 110 K and 0.10% at 40 K. The channeling<br />

behavior being dependent upon the composition and<br />

temperature teaches us that the most dominant factor of the<br />

axial orientation at the interface is the lattice mismatch<br />

between Fe 2MnSi and Ge.<br />

References<br />

1) K. Hamaya et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 137204.<br />

2) M. Miyao et al., Thin Solid Films. 518 (<strong>2010</strong>) S273.<br />

3) Y. Maeda et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91 (2007) 17191.<br />

4) Y. Maeda et al., MRS Proc. 1119E (2009) 1119-L05-02.<br />

5) K. Ueda et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93 (2008) 112108.<br />

6) G. D. Mukherjee et al., Physica B 254 (1998) 223.<br />

7) O. Madelung, Semiconductors: Data Handbook, 3rd ed.<br />

Springer, 2003, Berlin, p.47.<br />

=0.94<br />

1/2<br />

0.010<br />

0.010<br />

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

0.01<br />

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

0.01<br />

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

0.01<br />

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4<br />

Tilt Angle (degree) Tilt angle (degree)<br />

1<br />

0.1<br />

40K 40 K<br />

=0.023<br />

min<br />

=1.04 deg<br />

1/2<br />

Fig. 1 Angular yield profiles along the Ge axis of Fe 2MnSi/Ge(111) obtained at 300, 110, and 40 K.<br />

- 141 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!