16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-51<br />

PET Studies of Neuroendcrine Tumors by<br />

Using 76 Br-m-Bromobenzylguanidine ( 76 Br-MBBG)<br />

Sh. Watanabe a) , H. Hanaoka b) , J. X. Liang a) , Y. Iida b) , Sa. Watanabe a) ,<br />

K. Endo b) and N. S. Ishioka a)<br />

a) Radiation-Applied Biology Division, QuBS, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />

b) Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University<br />

Introduction<br />

131 I-m-Iodobenzylgunanidine ( 131 I-MIBG), functional<br />

analogue of norepinephrine, has been employed for the<br />

therapy of neuroendcrine tumors which express<br />

norepinephrine transporter (NET). 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy<br />

has been also used for diagnosis of NET positive tumors<br />

such as detecting metastasis, investigating suitability and<br />

monitoring response to the treatment with 131 I-MIBG.<br />

However, 123 I-MIBG scintigraphy has limitation to diagnose<br />

small legions due to lower sensitivity and resolution. Since<br />

positron emission tomography (PET) is superior to spatial<br />

resolution and quantitative capability compared to<br />

scintigraphy, positron emitter labeled MIBG has potential to<br />

improve diagnostic ability of NET positive neuroendcrine<br />

tumors. Then, we have reveal the utility of positron emitter<br />

76 Br (t1/2 = 16.1 h, + = 57% labeled m-bromobenzyl-<br />

guanidine ( 76 Br-MBBG) as a PET tracer for NET positive<br />

tumor. In this study, we have performed PET imaging by<br />

using 76 Br-MBBG and 18 F-FDG.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

No-carrier-added 76 Br was produced using enriched<br />

Cu2 76 Se target (99.7% enrichment, 365 mg) at<br />

76<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-TIARA AVF cyclotron. Br-MBBG was<br />

synthesized from MIBG in the presence of in situ generated<br />

Cu + catalyst 2) . Characterization was carried out with<br />

HPLC analysis. (Mobile phase: 15% acetonitrile in 0.01 M<br />

Na2HPO4 solution; Flow rate: 3 mL/min.; Column:<br />

μBondapak C-18 300 mm × 7.6 mm i.d., Waters). For PET<br />

studies, rat pheochromocytoma (PC-12) xenografted mice<br />

were intravenously administered 5 MBq of FDG. The<br />

mice were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital solution,<br />

and PET scans were performed at 1 h after administration by<br />

using an animal PET scanner (Inveon; Siemens) with 20 min<br />

emission scanning. Two days after FDG-PET, the<br />

tumor-bearing mice were intravenously administered 7 MBq<br />

76<br />

of Br-MBBG and also anesthetized with sodium<br />

pentobarbital solution. PET scans were then performed at<br />

1 h, 3 h, and 6 h after administration.<br />

Results and Discussions<br />

76 Br-MBBG was synthesized with 20-50% of labeling<br />

efficiency. Retention time of 76 Br-MBBG in HPLC<br />

analysis was 27 min, which are identical to non-radioactive<br />

MBBG. Radiochemical purity was >97%. Animal PET<br />

demonstrated that the transplanted PC-12 tumor was<br />

successfully imaged at 3 h after administration (Fig. 1).<br />

In mouse A, high accumulation was also observed at this<br />

time point in the bladder, after which 76 Br-MBBG was<br />

gradually cleared from these non- target organs. On the<br />

other hand, FDG failed to detect an even larger tumor.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />

- 107 -<br />

In mouse B, however, there were two tumors which showed<br />

differential uptake of 76 Br-MBBG and FDG. That is,<br />

76 Br-MBBG showed high accumulation in the lower tumor,<br />

but FDG showed high accumulation in the upper tumor<br />

(Fig. 1B). Animal PET studies demonstrated that<br />

76 Br-MBBG could image NET expressing tumors clearly at<br />

3 h after administration. The accumulation patterns of<br />

MBBG and FDG in the tumors differed from mouse to<br />

mouse and even from lesion to lesion within individual<br />

animals. Histological staining of the excised tumors after<br />

PET studies indicated that MBBG-strong and FDG-weak<br />

tumors were well-differentiated and MBBG-weak and<br />

FDG-strong tumors were poorly differentiated, which agrees<br />

well with the clinical data. Thus, the variation of tumor<br />

differentiation was considered to have contributed to the<br />

variation in the accumulation level of MBBG.<br />

Conclusion<br />

In the present study, MBBG showed a higher level of<br />

tumor accumulation than MIBG. In PET studies, MBBG<br />

provided a clear image with high sensitivity, and its<br />

accumulation pattern was distinct from that of FDG. These<br />

results indicated that 76 Br-MBBG would be a potential tracer<br />

for imaging NET-expressing neuroendocrine tumors.<br />

Fig. 1 PET imaging of PC-12 xenografted nude-mice<br />

A and B by using 76 Br-MBBG and 18 F-FDG. Yellow<br />

allows indicate the position of xenografted tumor, and<br />

red allows show the tumor detected by PET imaging.<br />

References<br />

1) S. Watanabe et al., <strong>JAEA</strong> Takasaki Ann. Rep. 2008<br />

(2009) 107.<br />

2) S. Watanabe et al., J. Nucl. Med. (<strong>2010</strong>) in press.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!