JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
JAEA-Review-2010-065.pdf:15.99MB - 日本原子力研究開発機構
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3-32<br />
Carbon-ion Microbeam Induces Behavioral Changes in<br />
the Salt Chemotaxis Learning of C. elegans<br />
T. Sakashita a) , M. Suzuki a) , Y. Mutou a) , Y. Yokota a) , T. Funayama a) , N. Hamada b) ,<br />
K. Fukamoto c) and Y. Kobayashi a)<br />
a) Radiation-Applied Biology Division, QuBS, <strong>JAEA</strong>,<br />
b) Radiation Safety Research Center, Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry,<br />
c) Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University<br />
Introduction<br />
An increasing body of data indicates that ionizing<br />
radiation affects the nervous system and alters its function 1) .<br />
Chemotaxis of C. elegans during the salt chemotaxis<br />
2)<br />
learning was modulated by gamma irradiation . Our<br />
preliminary results showed the similar response of the salt<br />
chemotaxis learning to whole-body carbon-ion irradiation.<br />
However, we have no direct evidence for the interaction of<br />
ionizing radiation with the central neuronal tissue (nerve<br />
ring) in C. elegans. Microbeam irradiation is useful to<br />
analyze direct radiation effects at a cellular or tissue level.<br />
Thus, we investigate the effects of energetic carbon ions<br />
( 12 C 5+ , 18.3 MeV/u, LET = 119 keV/µm) on the salt<br />
chemotaxis learning of C. elegans using microbeam<br />
irradiation to its nerve ring and also combined effects with<br />
anesthesia that inhibits nerve function.<br />
Materials and Methods<br />
Well-fed adults of C. elegans grown at 20 ˚C on the plate<br />
spread with E. coli OP50 were used in all experiments.<br />
The area of nerve ring, “Head”, of non-anesthetized C.<br />
elegans with S-basal (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM KPO4 pH 6.0,<br />
and 5 mg/L cholesterol) in a ditch of the micro total analysis<br />
systems (µTAS) 3) was irradiated with 12,000 carbon ions<br />
corresponding to 500 Gy at 20 µmφ micro-aperture area<br />
(Fig. 1). Immediately after irradiation, chemotaxis to NaCl<br />
during learning was measured. The TaKaRa Slide Seal<br />
(Fig. 2; TKR 9066, TaKaRa Bio Inc., Shiga, Japan) was<br />
4)<br />
used for the microbeam irradiation of anesthetized animals .<br />
Irradiation effects during learning could not be evaluated in<br />
anesthetized animals, so that the ability of the salt<br />
chemotaxis learning was tested. Using the assay plate with<br />
a gradient of NaCl concentration, we evaluated chemotaxis<br />
based on the chemotaxis index (CI) that was calculated as<br />
{(number of animals at the high-concentration spot) –<br />
(number of animals at the control spot)}/ (total number of<br />
animals in the assay plate) 5) . The results of CI were<br />
evaluated as mean ± 95% confidential interval.<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
To investigate direct radiation effects, non-anesthetized<br />
animals was irradiated with carbon-ion microbeam, and<br />
showed the modulation of the chemotaxis to NaCl during<br />
learning (CI: 0.26 ± 0.12 in non-irradiated animals, -0.13 ±<br />
0.09 in “Head” locally irradiated animals). It demonstrates<br />
the direct evidence by the hit of carbon ions at the nerve ring.<br />
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Review</strong> <strong>2010</strong>-065<br />
- 88 -<br />
Also, to test the effects of carbon ion-induced damage in<br />
Head area, we evaluated defects in the salt chemotaxis<br />
learning of anesthetized animals. The ability of the salt<br />
chemotaxis learning was not affected by carbon ions (CI:<br />
0.33 ± 0.07 in non-irradiated animals, 0.32 ± 0.10 in “Head”<br />
locally irradiated animals). Our findings indicate that the<br />
modulation of the salt chemotaxis learning is induced by the<br />
direct hit of ionizing radiation at the nerve ring of C. elegans,<br />
and the salt chemotaxis learning in anesthetized C. elegans<br />
is not affected by microbeam irradiation.<br />
References<br />
1) T. Sakashita et al., J. Radiat. Res. 51 (<strong>2010</strong>) 107.<br />
2) T. Sakashita et al., FASEB J. 22 (2008) 713.<br />
3) Lockery et al., J. Neurophysiol. 99 (2008) 3136.<br />
4) Sugimoto et al., Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 82 (2006) 31.<br />
5) Saeki et al., J. Exp. Biol., 204 (2001) 1757.<br />
Head<br />
60 µm<br />
200 µm<br />
Fig. 1 Non-anesthetized C. elegans in a ditch of µTAS.<br />
Circle shows the area of nerve ring, “Head”.<br />
1 cm<br />
Fig. 2 Image of TaKaRa Slide Seal which is a gray frame,<br />
and 25 µL buffer with anesthetized C. elegans is<br />
instilled into this area.