<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Conf</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>002</strong> (T1/2=8,900,000 year) and 60 Fe (T1/2=1,500,000 year) might be considered, even though not included in Table 3. The Hf is used for control rods of BWR as a strong neutron absorber and the 182 Hf is produced by two step neutron capture reaction as 180 Hf (n,g) 181 Hf (n,g) 182 Hf. The 60 Fe is created by also two step capture reaction and decays to 60 Co! It should be also noted it is difficult to measure half-lives for these RIs accurately. Table 3 Nuclides Listed in Table 2 of IAEA Safety Guideline RS-G-1.7 3 H, 7 Be, 14 C, 18 F, 22,24 Na, 31 Si, 32,33 P, 35 S, 36,38 Cl, 42,43 K, 45,47 Ca, 46,47,48 Sc, 48 V, 51 Cr, 51,52,52m,53,54,56 Mn, 52,55,59 Fe, 55,56,57,58,58m,60,60m,61,62m Co, 59,63,65 Ni, 64 Cu, 65,69,69m Zn, 72 Ga, 71 Ge, 73,74,76,77 As, 75 Se, 82 Br, 86 Rb, 85,85m,87m,89,90,91,92 Sr, 90,91,91m,92,93 Y, 93,95,97 Zr, 93m,94,95,97,98 Nb, 90,93,99,101 Mo, 96,96m,97,97m,99,99m Tc, 97,103,105,106 Ru, 109,115,115m Cd, 111,113m,114m,115m In, 123m,125m,127,127m,129,129m,131,131m,132,133,133m,134 Te, 103m,105 Rh, 103,109 Pd, 105,110m,111 Ag, 113,125 Sn, 122,124,125 Sb, 123,125,126,129,130,131,132,133,134,135 I, 129,131,132,134,134m,135,136,137,138 Cs, 131,140 Ba, 140 La, 139,141,143,144 Ce, 142,143 Pr, 147,149 Nd, 147,149 Pm, 151,153 Sm, 152,152m,154,155 Eu, 153,159 Gd, 160 Tb, 165,166 Dy, 166 Ho, 169,171 Er, 170,171 Tm, 175 Yb, 177 Lu, 181 Hf, 182 Ta, 181,185,187 W, 186,188 Re, 185,191,191m,193 Os, 190,192,194 Ir, 191,193m,197,197m Pt, 198,199 Au, 197,197m,203 Hg, 200,201,202,204 Tl, 203 Pb, 206,207 Bi, 203,205,207 Po, 211 At, 225,227 Ra, 226,229 Th, 230,233 Pa, 230,231,232,233,236,237,239,240 U, 237,239,240 Np, 234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,244 Pu, 241,242,242m,243 Am, 242,243,244,245,246,247,248 Cm, 249 Bk, 246,248,249,250,251,252,253,254 Cf, 253,254,254m Es, 254,255 Fm Under Line: Nuclides considered in the Japanese Clearance Regulation (+ 41 Ca, 44 Ti, 49 V, 67 Ga, 68 Ge, 81 Rb, 108m Ag, 133 Ba, 169 Yb, 188 W, 195 Au) Shielding calculation (radiation transport and deep penetration) is also needed for the human radiation protection. For this purpose, elastic scattering cross section and angular distribution, neutron disappearance cross section, nuclear structure and decay data are required. And also PKA and KERMA data with charged-particle spectra is needed for the dose evaluation as the Linear Energy Transfer (LET). 2.4 Nuclear Security and Forensics for Nuclear Non-proliferation The nuclear forensics and nuclear detection are necessary for the nuclear non-proliferation. The nuclear forensics is to determine the origin of fissionable materials, by analyzing isotope abundances, impurities, etc. with irradiation and/or mining histories. Nuclear data are needed for this irradiation history by estimating isotope productions. For nuclear detection, candidate techniques such as the Neutron Interrogation Method (NIM) and Laser-Induced Breakdown Plasma (LIBP) + Resonance Absorption Spectroscopy (RAS) are being developed. For these, neutron and photo fission cross sections, FPY, decay data and photonuclear reaction data are requested. The objective mentioned in this chapter can be achieved by producing JENDL General Purpose File, JENDL/HE, JENDL/PD and JENDL/PK. Furthermore, JENDL Activation File including RI production cross sections and FPY is required for the down-stream applications near future.
<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Conf</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>002</strong> 3. Perspective of Future Nuclear Data Activities The 2nd Period Mid-term Plan of <strong>JAEA</strong> (2010-2014) is “incident energy expansion of JENDL” for nuclear data to produce Intermediate Energy Files (JENDL/HE, JENDL/PD, etc.). For update of the general purpose file of JENDL (JENDL-4.1?), covariance data and quality assurance are also important. Furthermore, JENDL Activation File (JENDL/A) with error data is also mentioned above. To prepare and update nuclear data files, the development of original nuclear reaction model code is necessary for easily and timely nuclear data evaluation and/or improvement to meet user requirements. For this purpose, the code CCONE is the strong candidate. In the short period, the CCONE is planned to be improved by adding some models, such as multiple nucleon and light charged particle emissions from pre-equilibrium stage, to expand the incident energy region, and for unknown (at this moment) user needs. This improvement is also useful to prepare for the next generation. As the preparation for the next generation, some items related to nuclear data activities not only in Japan and also in the world stand on the edge of precipice. They are crisis of the human resources for nuclear data evaluation (especially for decay and nuclear structure data), the budget (especially for nuclear data measurements), and presence (appearing) to the stake-holders. Those should be considered as soon as possible so that nuclear data activity level is kept for next generations. To avoid the crisis of human resources, the urgent fostering talents (tutorials, production of textbook, etc.) are required for nuclear data producers, especially for the items of “Endangered Species” such as ENSDF evaluators, resonance analyzers, producers of the thermal scattering law, etc. And the next generation evaluators for fission reaction (neutron spectra, delayed neutron, FPY, etc.), light-mass nuclides and evaluation tool makers should also be considered. Collaborations with the people of nuclear physics fields such as fundamental theories, microscopic approaches are getting more important. To produce evaluated nuclear data file, the international collaborations and considering TENDL-like approaches might be necessary. Though the certain level budget is desired to keep measurement facilities for nuclear data, recently if faces to some difficulty. It is true that nuclear data is an item like air, however, producers cannot live on air. Here international collaborations to share the experiments into the several facilities like European example should be convinced urgently. For obtaining the budget, it is also important to show the presence of nuclear data with the impact to the stake-holders such as the government (both nuclear power developments and regulation sides), industry users and plant makers. 4. Summary The JENDL-4 has been released in 2010 as one of goals of the first period mid-term research plan for <strong>JAEA</strong>. In the plan for the second period, the objective is “incident energy expansion of JENDL”. The objective can be achieved by producing JENDL/HE, JENDL/PD, and JENDL/PK. For this purpose, CCONE is planned to be improved by adding some models. The nuclear data for the burn-up, activation, and PKA/DPA calculations will be prepared for the applications of reactors, safety research, material science, nuclear forensics, etc. The urgent problems for human resources, presence to the stake-holders, and budget should be solved for example, by efforts of the international collaborations, etc.
- Page 3: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Proceedings of t
- Page 7: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 31. Preliminary
- Page 12 and 13: 6.2 Measurement of neutron-induced
- Page 14 and 15: This is a blank page.
- Page 16 and 17: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Table 1 Comparis
- Page 20 and 21: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Though words too
- Page 22 and 23: JENDL-3.3 showed better applicabili
- Page 24 and 25: ENDF. Thus this cross section store
- Page 26 and 27: Acknowledgement JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 28 and 29: In the MALIBU program, isotope conc
- Page 30 and 31: some minor actinides. For major act
- Page 32 and 33: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 code MVP-BURN an
- Page 34 and 35: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 [3] Measurements
- Page 36 and 37: 3.1 Experimental Set up JAEA-Conf 2
- Page 38 and 39: References JAEA-Conf 2011-002 [1] N
- Page 40 and 41: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 was large. The a
- Page 42 and 43: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 4. Results and D
- Page 44 and 45: Acknowledgments Present study inclu
- Page 46 and 47: Fig. 1 A conceptural picture of the
- Page 48 and 49: 4. Theoretical studies Theoretical
- Page 50 and 51: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Fig.9 Comparison
- Page 52 and 53: Ion source JAEA-Conf 2011-002 LE
- Page 54 and 55: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 3. Readiness
- Page 56 and 57: JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 58 and 59: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Figure 1. An exa
- Page 60 and 61: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Figure 6. Compar
- Page 62 and 63: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 calculation of d
- Page 64 and 65: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 equilibrium emis
- Page 66 and 67: JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Cowley et al. [1
- Page 68 and 69:
4. Conclusions We have compared nuc
- Page 70 and 71:
of MeV region with highest cosmic-r
- Page 72 and 73:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 events can be id
- Page 74 and 75:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 models and its p
- Page 76 and 77:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 78 and 79:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 80 and 81:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 xx
- Page 82 and 83:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 1. The recent ac
- Page 84 and 85:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 4. Conceptual de
- Page 86 and 87:
This is a blank page.
- Page 88 and 89:
The Institute's staff of about 280
- Page 90 and 91:
3. Nuclear Theory Laboratory JAEA-C
- Page 92 and 93:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 References [1] P
- Page 94 and 95:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 reaction 6 Li +
- Page 96 and 97:
Using the approximated distribution
- Page 98 and 99:
This is a blank page.
- Page 100 and 101:
momentum of the constituents of P.
- Page 102 and 103:
dσ/dΩ (mb/sr) c.m. scattering ang
- Page 104 and 105:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 [2] N. Austern,
- Page 106 and 107:
moderating fast neutrons emitted fr
- Page 108 and 109:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 3. Results and d
- Page 110 and 111:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 the detection de
- Page 112 and 113:
Fig.1. Experimental arrangement for
- Page 114 and 115:
in this work was confirmed. (2) 153
- Page 116 and 117:
Neutron Capture Cross Section of 15
- Page 118 and 119:
ENDF resonance parameters are based
- Page 120 and 121:
sample changer. The measured flux s
- Page 122:
REFERENCES JAEA-Conf 2011-002 [1] W
- Page 125 and 126:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Fig. 4: The rela
- Page 127:
Fig. 10: The PHITS2 calculation geo
- Page 130 and 131:
for such a low energy region should
- Page 132 and 133:
MCNPX calculation was performed bas
- Page 134 and 135:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 We measured dou
- Page 136 and 137:
1mm-thick carbon target 22mm in dia
- Page 138 and 139:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Figure 2 shows e
- Page 140 and 141:
The double-differential (n,xp) and
- Page 142 and 143:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 forward angles.
- Page 144 and 145:
Fig.3. Two-dimensional plot of PI v
- Page 146 and 147:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Fig. 7. Deuteron
- Page 148 and 149:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 The new detector
- Page 150 and 151:
4. Off line data analysis Double di
- Page 152 and 153:
eports of data of carbon-ion incide
- Page 154 and 155:
Count [-] 4 10 3 10 2 10 10 1 Charg
- Page 156 and 157:
Acknowledgement We are grateful to
- Page 158 and 159:
Beam Line BM1 Copper Target BM2 5×
- Page 160 and 161:
φ = φbm · ρtof · ρmulti (2) E
- Page 162 and 163:
References [1] K. Ishibashi, H. Tak
- Page 164 and 165:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 hint at the orig
- Page 166 and 167:
Neutron Dose Rate [Sv/hr/src neutro
- Page 168 and 169:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 radiation protec
- Page 170 and 171:
Ztarget, Atarget are the numbers fo
- Page 172 and 173:
We described our formalism for calc
- Page 174 and 175:
2. Model
- Page 176 and 177:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 178 and 179:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 180 and 181:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 reactions. Figur
- Page 182 and 183:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Fig. 3. The angu
- Page 184 and 185:
This is a blank page.
- Page 186 and 187:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 188 and 189:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 190 and 191:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 192 and 193:
analysis of integral experiments [6
- Page 194 and 195:
A modified SRAC library was prepare
- Page 196 and 197:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 approximately 0.
- Page 198 and 199:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 constructing the
- Page 200 and 201:
Fig.9 Spectrum of gamma-ray followi
- Page 202 and 203:
This is a blank page.
- Page 204 and 205:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 in the same way
- Page 206 and 207:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 [7]. For example
- Page 208 and 209:
This is a blank page.
- Page 210 and 211:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 For
- Page 212 and 213:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 214 and 215:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 216 and 217:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 (5.0-9.0MeV), a
- Page 218 and 219:
components, the 0.56Wt% for hydroge
- Page 220 and 221:
This is a blank page.
- Page 222 and 223:
Sensitivities of curium isotope con
- Page 224 and 225:
decreases of (n,g) reaction rates,
- Page 226 and 227:
5. Conclusion JAEA-Conf 2011-002 Wi
- Page 228 and 229:
2. Foundation of sensitivity analys
- Page 230 and 231:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002 where f g and f
- Page 232 and 233:
Fig.1 Sensitivity coefficient of th
- Page 234 and 235:
An outline of core configurations o
- Page 236 and 237:
0.010% 0.000% -0.010% -0.020% -0.03
- Page 238 and 239:
To clarify what nuclides and reacti
- Page 240 and 241:
Calculation was performed by the MV
- Page 242 and 243:
among these libraries, and the diff
- Page 244 and 245:
This is a blank page.
- Page 246 and 247:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 248 and 249:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002
- Page 250 and 251:
JAEA-Conf 2011-002