16.07.2013 Views

JAEA-Conf 2011-002 - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Conf 2011-002 - 日本原子力研究開発機構

JAEA-Conf 2011-002 - 日本原子力研究開発機構

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

layout of the RPI LINAC facility.<br />

<strong>JAEA</strong>-<strong>Conf</strong> <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>002</strong><br />

The RPI capture detector 9 is a 30.5-cm-diam30.5-cm-high hollow cylinder that contains 16 sections<br />

of thallium activated sodium iodide NaI(Tl) scintillator crystals. The cylinder is split perpendicular to its axis<br />

into two rings, and each ring contains eight equally sized pie-shaped NaI(Tl) segments. Each NaI(Tl) segment is<br />

optically isolated and hermetically sealed within an aluminum can and mounted on an RCA 8575 photomultiplier.<br />

The samples are placed by a computer-controlled sample changer into the center of the capture detector. The<br />

sample changer is capable of holding up to eight samples. The boron carbide liner (enriched in 10 B) around the<br />

sample reduces the scattering background by absorbing the neutrons that are scattered from the sample and<br />

preventing the scattered neutrons from being detected in the NaI(Tl) crystal. The detector system discriminates<br />

against the 478-keV gamma-ray from 10 B (n;,) reactions. The efficiency of the capture detector is ~75 % for a<br />

single 2 MeV gamma-ray. The efficiency of a detecting a capture event in gadolinium is close to 100 % and<br />

varies slightly by isotope and sample thickness. Reference 10 contains a description of the detector and its<br />

signal-processing electronics. Neutron capture data-taking and data-reduction techniques at the RPI are<br />

described in Refs. 11 and 12.<br />

The large amount of data collected in each capture measurement was subject to statistical integrity<br />

checks to verify the stability of the linac, the capture detector, and associated beam monitors. Any data that failed<br />

the integrity test were eliminated. Next, the data were dead-time corrected, normalized to beam monitors, and<br />

summed. The background was determined using normalized data measured with an empty aluminum can<br />

mounted on the sample changer. This background was subtracted from the normalized and summed capture<br />

spectra. The 16 individual capture spectrums were then summed into a single total spectrum.<br />

When an incident neutron is captured in the sample, a compound nucleus in an excited state is formed.<br />

The compound nucleus then de-excites to the ground state with the subsequent emission of gamma rays. The<br />

detection of these gamma rays allows one to measure the fraction of neutrons of a given energy that are captured<br />

if the incident neutron flux is known. This fraction of captures is known as the capture yield. Thus, for a uniform<br />

thickness sample and a parallel neutron beam incident perpendicularly to this sample, the capture yield is defined<br />

as the number of detected capture gamma rays divided by the product of the detector efficiency times the number<br />

of incident neutrons. Mathematically speaking, the capture yield is defined as the number of captures per<br />

incident neutron. In time of flight measurements the capture yield, Yi in TOF channel i was calculated by<br />

Y<br />

C B<br />

i i<br />

i <br />

Ksmi<br />

where<br />

Ci= dead-time-corrected and monitor-normalized count rate of the sample measurement<br />

Bi= dead-time-corrected and monitor-normalized background counting rate<br />

K= detector efficiency and flux normalization factor<br />

smi= smoothed, background-subtracted, and monitor-normalized neutron flux shape.<br />

The incident neutron flux shape was determined with the use of a thick 10 B4C sample that is mounted on the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!