15.07.2013 Views

FINDING N-TH ROOTS IN NILPOTENT GROUPS AND ...

FINDING N-TH ROOTS IN NILPOTENT GROUPS AND ...

FINDING N-TH ROOTS IN NILPOTENT GROUPS AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

578 S. Sze, D. Kahrobaei, R. Dambreville, M. Dupas<br />

Proof. Let G be a torsion-free group, x ∈ G, x = 1. Then x generates an<br />

infinite cyclic subgroup which is an abelian torsion-free group of rank 1. Since<br />

the union of an ascending sequence of abelian torsion-free groups of rank 1 is<br />

a group of the same kind, x is contained in at least one subgroup A that is<br />

a maximal abelian torsion-free subgroup of G of rank 1. If G is an R−group,<br />

then A is contained in the isolator I(x) of x: for an arbitrary a ∈ A, the cyclic<br />

subgroups {x} and {a} have intersection other than {1}, but {x} ⊂ I(x).<br />

Suppose x is contained in two distinct maximal abelian torsion-free subgroups<br />

of rank 1, A and B; the intersection of these two subgroups will not<br />

be {1}. Let a ∈ A, b ∈ B be arbitrary elements, other than 1. Since there<br />

exists i,j ∈ Z such that a i = b j , this implies that a and b are permutable.<br />

Therefore, {A,B} is an abelian torsion-free group. However, in such a group<br />

distinct maximal subgroups of rank 1 cannot have intersection other than {1}.<br />

Thus the theorem follows.<br />

Proposition 3.10. Every nilpotent torsion-free group is an R−group.<br />

That is, unique extraction of roots in nilpotent torsion-free groups is possible.<br />

Proof. For abelian torsion-free groups, the statement is clear. We will prove<br />

by induction on the class of the nilpotent group. We assume that the statement<br />

is true for all nilpotent groups of class less than or equal to k − 1, k > 1. Let<br />

G be a torsion-free group of class k with upper central series<br />

{1} = Z0 Z1 · · · Zk−1 Zk = G<br />

and let x, y ∈ G such that x n = y n , n > 0. Consider the subgroup H =<br />

{Zk−1,x}. H is normal in G since G/Zk−1 is abelian. In addition, H is nilpotent<br />

of class less than or equal to k − 1: in any noncommutative group the factor<br />

group of the center cannot be cyclic. Hence, by the inductive hypothesis, H<br />

is an R−group. Therefore, x n = y n implies that y −1 x n = y n−1 = x n y −1 , or<br />

x n = y −1 x n y = (y −1 xy) n . Since x and y −1 x n y belong to the R−group H, we<br />

have x = y −1 xy, or xy = yx. Therefore, x n = y n may be rewritten (y −1 x) n = 1.<br />

Since G is torsion-free, this means that x = y.<br />

This proposition only states that if G is a torsion-free nilpotent group, then<br />

xn = a has a unique solution in G; it does not show us how to find x.<br />

A natural question that arises is if there is a relation between Černikov<br />

complete groups and R−groups. In Section 2, we showed that the Heisenberg<br />

group is not Černikov complete. Since a complete group is Černikov complete,<br />

this implies that the Heisenberg group is not complete. Hence, we may not take<br />

arbitrary n-th roots in the Heisenberg group. However, since the Heisenberg

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!