15.07.2013 Views

Ex-Situ updates (March 2012) - Ministry of Environment and Forests

Ex-Situ updates (March 2012) - Ministry of Environment and Forests

Ex-Situ updates (March 2012) - Ministry of Environment and Forests

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The table given below will make the situation amply clear:<br />

6<br />

Year <strong>of</strong><br />

Establishment<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Zoos (Area Category wise in ha )<br />

≥50 20-50 10-20 5-10 ≤5 Total<br />

Prior to 1950 1 3 2 7 6 19<br />

1951 to 1960 4 1 3 4 7 19<br />

1961 to 1970 0 2 4 3 5 14<br />

1971 to 1980 11 11 9 7 55 93<br />

1981 to 1990 11 7 8 9 86 121<br />

1991 to 1993 13 22 4 134 175<br />

Total 27 37 38 34 294 440<br />

*Besides there were 23 mobile zoos also<br />

Identification <strong>of</strong> zoos which<br />

had the potential to develop<br />

The task ahead <strong>of</strong> the Central Zoo<br />

Authority was to categorize the existing<br />

zoos in two categories i.e. those zoos<br />

continuance <strong>of</strong> which was in the interest<br />

<strong>of</strong> wildlife conservation <strong>and</strong> the zoos<br />

the continuance <strong>of</strong> which was not in<br />

the interest <strong>of</strong> wildlife conservation. To<br />

achieve this goal the authority finalized<br />

the st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> norms regarding<br />

housing, upkeep, health care <strong>and</strong> other<br />

matters related to zoos <strong>and</strong> got them<br />

notified as Recognition Of Zoo Rules<br />

1992 by the Government. Thereafter<br />

the long drawn process <strong>of</strong> evaluation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the zoos was taken up.<br />

The zoos whose continuation was<br />

not found in the interest <strong>of</strong> wildlife<br />

conservation were given time to<br />

improve <strong>and</strong> if needed shift to<br />

alternative site. The zoos which failed<br />

to improve were asked to close down<br />

<strong>and</strong> the zoos which had the potential<br />

to improve <strong>and</strong> showed willingness<br />

to improve were granted recognition<br />

<strong>and</strong> allowed to continue operation.<br />

At the time <strong>of</strong> the first evaluation no zoo<br />

in the country conformed to any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> norms notified in the<br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> Zoo Rules. Therefore<br />

the zoos which had the potential to<br />

Area-wise break up <strong>of</strong> zoos granted recognition <strong>and</strong> still operational<br />

≥50 ha 20-50ha 10-20ha 5-10 ha ≤ 5 ha TOTAL<br />

33 25 29 31 58* 176<br />

*includes 24 rescue centres, 3 breeding centres <strong>and</strong> 5 snake parks<br />

come up to the prescribed st<strong>and</strong>ards<br />

<strong>and</strong> norms had to be given conditional<br />

recognition, prescribing a time frame<br />

in which the inadequacies were to be<br />

redressed. However it was amply clear<br />

that the zoos had neither the resources<br />

nor the technical know how to redress<br />

the problem on their own. Therefore<br />

the next priority <strong>of</strong> the authorities was<br />

to facilitate the zoos in their development<br />

on scientific lines.<br />

Hornbill at Sepahijala Zoo<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> zoos which<br />

had the potential to develop<br />

The Central Zoo Authority requested<br />

the Government <strong>of</strong> India to allocate<br />

sufficient funds for meeting the<br />

Photo credit: Himanshu Malhotra

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!