15.07.2013 Views

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

maximum snow melting r<strong>at</strong>e according to <strong>the</strong> regression equ<strong>at</strong>ion is 123 tonnes/hr, or 2,900<br />

tonnes per 24 hour day. The number <strong>of</strong> days (assuming 24 hour oper<strong>at</strong>ion) to dispose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

collected snow from <strong>the</strong> annual minimum, annual mean, and annual maximum snowfalls for<br />

present and future plant flow r<strong>at</strong>es were estim<strong>at</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> snow melting regression equ<strong>at</strong>ion,<br />

and <strong>the</strong> results are summarized in Table 5 (note th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> hourly flow r<strong>at</strong>e based on <strong>the</strong> present<br />

day flow is 1,390 m 3 /hr, and <strong>the</strong> future hourly flow r<strong>at</strong>e based on <strong>the</strong> average day flow is<br />

approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 1,900 m 3 /hr - <strong>the</strong> regression was assumed to be linear beyond <strong>the</strong> highest<br />

average hourly flow r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> 1,350 m 3 /hr used in <strong>the</strong> regression).<br />

TABLE 5<br />

SNOW DISPOSAL CAPACITY OF THE WWTC<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Days Required to Dispose <strong>of</strong> Collected <strong>Snow</strong><br />

Minimum <strong>Snow</strong>fall Mean <strong>Snow</strong>fall Maximum<br />

Present Future Present Future Present Future<br />

Melting 38 29 53 42 76 60<br />

Effluent TSS 45 42 64 61 91 87<br />

The <strong>the</strong>oretical calcul<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> plant melting capacity carried out in Section 4.1 can be applied to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> additional melting capacity th<strong>at</strong> would be realized from a gre<strong>at</strong>er temper<strong>at</strong>ure<br />

drop between <strong>the</strong> tank influent and effluent than was observed during <strong>the</strong> test (assuming th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mixing power in <strong>the</strong> tank were increased to allow a faster r<strong>at</strong>e <strong>of</strong> snow addition). If <strong>the</strong><br />

mean temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlorine tank influent were lowered from 11 degrees C to say 3<br />

degrees C by snow additions, repe<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>the</strong> rough calcul<strong>at</strong>ion described in Section 4.1 shows<br />

th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> melting capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WWTC <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> average daily flow <strong>of</strong> 33,400 m 3 /d would<br />

increase from 96 tonnes per hour to 125 tonnes per hour, an increase <strong>of</strong> 30%. The <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

calcul<strong>at</strong>ion shows th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> melting capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WWTC during <strong>the</strong> test was not limited by <strong>the</strong><br />

available he<strong>at</strong> energy in <strong>the</strong> chlorine tank effluent. In general, <strong>the</strong> factors determining <strong>the</strong><br />

melting capacity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> WWTC will be <strong>the</strong> temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlorine tank influent, <strong>the</strong><br />

temper<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snow added to <strong>the</strong> tank, and <strong>the</strong> tank mixing capacity. The melting capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plant shown in Table 5 applies only to <strong>the</strong> conditions under which <strong>the</strong> test was<br />

conducted. The melting capacity will increase with an increasing temper<strong>at</strong>ure drop between<br />

<strong>the</strong> chlorine tank influent and effluent. An increase in mixing power in <strong>the</strong> tank should also<br />

increase <strong>the</strong> melting capacity, since <strong>the</strong> melting r<strong>at</strong>e during <strong>the</strong> test was limited by <strong>the</strong> capacity<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tank mixers to circul<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> added snow.<br />

Dayton & Knight Ltd. Page 5-5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!