15.07.2013 Views

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

City of Prince George - Snow Disposal at the Lansdowne Road ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

methodology used by ASL is included in Appendix 3.<br />

3.3 St<strong>at</strong>istical Analysis <strong>of</strong> D<strong>at</strong>a<br />

The student t test for paired comparisons was used to st<strong>at</strong>istically evalu<strong>at</strong>e significant<br />

differences in <strong>the</strong> chlorine tank influent and effluent for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> w<strong>at</strong>er quality parameters <strong>of</strong><br />

interest. A st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis is advisable in comparing two d<strong>at</strong>a sets, particularly in cases<br />

where rel<strong>at</strong>ively large vari<strong>at</strong>ions in d<strong>at</strong>a values are possible. If a d<strong>at</strong>a set contains values which<br />

vary over a wide range, <strong>the</strong> mean (average) value <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> set may not be very meaningful. For<br />

example, if two measurements were taken in <strong>the</strong> same way, <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time, in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

place, and one result turned out to be 100 mg/L while <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r was 1,000 mg/L, it would be<br />

risky to conclude th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> average <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two (550 mg/L) was <strong>the</strong> true result. The risk is<br />

increased when trying to compare two d<strong>at</strong>a sets which both contain wide vari<strong>at</strong>ions. A<br />

st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis takes <strong>the</strong> vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> each d<strong>at</strong>a set into account, and provides a m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ical<br />

means <strong>of</strong> determining whe<strong>the</strong>r any observed differences between <strong>the</strong> two sets are meaningful<br />

(i.e., Ast<strong>at</strong>istically significant@), or whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> random vari<strong>at</strong>ion among <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a is so large th<strong>at</strong><br />

it is not reasonable to conclude th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> two sets are different. The more random vari<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is among <strong>the</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a, <strong>the</strong> less chance <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis detecting a significant<br />

difference between <strong>the</strong> two sets.<br />

In this case, <strong>the</strong> st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis was used to determine whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> a<br />

particular w<strong>at</strong>er quality parameter (say BOD) in <strong>the</strong> chlorine chamber effluent was significantly<br />

different from th<strong>at</strong> in <strong>the</strong> chlorine chamber influent. The t test was used to m<strong>at</strong>hem<strong>at</strong>ically<br />

determine whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong> mean (average) value <strong>of</strong> one d<strong>at</strong>a set (say <strong>the</strong> BOD5 concentr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlorine chamber influent) was significantly different from <strong>the</strong> mean value <strong>of</strong> a second<br />

d<strong>at</strong>a set (say <strong>the</strong> BOD5 concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chlorine tank effluent).<br />

The advantage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> t test for paired comparisons is th<strong>at</strong> it can be used to make comparisons<br />

between m<strong>at</strong>ched pairs <strong>of</strong> d<strong>at</strong>a. Each m<strong>at</strong>ched pair in this case was made up <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample <strong>of</strong><br />

influent and effluent taken <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> same time <strong>of</strong> day. The difference between <strong>the</strong> influent and<br />

effluent concentr<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong> each sampling time was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed (i.e., effluent concentr<strong>at</strong>ion minus<br />

influent concentr<strong>at</strong>ion), and <strong>the</strong> st<strong>at</strong>istical analysis was conducted on <strong>the</strong> differences. In this<br />

Dayton & Knight Ltd. Page 3-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!