A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines
A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines
A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Decision <strong>10</strong> A. M. <strong>No</strong>. RTJ-<strong>10</strong>-2257<br />
responsible for order and efficiency in <strong>the</strong>ir courts, and <strong>the</strong> subordinates are<br />
not <strong>the</strong> guardians <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judge’s responsibility. 15<br />
The arbitrary actions <strong>of</strong> respondent judge, taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, give doubt<br />
as to his impartiality, integrity and propriety. His acts amount to gross<br />
misconduct constituting violations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Code <strong>of</strong> Judicial Conduct,<br />
particularly:<br />
15<br />
CANON 2. INTEGRITY IS ESSENTIAL NOT ONLY TO THE<br />
PROPER DISCHARGE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICE BUT ALSO TO<br />
THE PERSONAL DEMEANOR OF JUDGES.<br />
Section 1. Judges shall ensure that not only is <strong>the</strong>ir conduct above<br />
reproach, but that it is perceived to be so in <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a reasonable<br />
observer.<br />
Section 2. The behavior and conduct <strong>of</strong> judges must reaffirm <strong>the</strong> people’s<br />
faith in <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judiciary. Justice must not merely be done but<br />
must also be seen to be done.<br />
x x x<br />
CANON 3. IMPARTIALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO THE PROPER<br />
DISCHARGE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICE. IT APPLIES NOT ONLY<br />
TO THE DECISION ITSELF BUT ALSO TO THE PROCESS BY<br />
WHICH THE DECISION IS TO BE MADE.<br />
x x x<br />
Section 2. Judges shall ensure that his or her conduct, both in and out <strong>of</strong><br />
court, maintains and enhances <strong>the</strong> confidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public, <strong>the</strong> legal<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession and litigants in <strong>the</strong> impartiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judge and <strong>the</strong> judiciary.<br />
x x x<br />
Section 4. Judges shall not knowingly, while a proceeding is before, or<br />
could come before <strong>the</strong>m, make any comment that might reasonably be<br />
expected to affect <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> such proceeding or impair <strong>the</strong> manifest<br />
fairness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process. <strong>No</strong>r shall judges make any comment in public or<br />
o<strong>the</strong>rwise that might affect <strong>the</strong> fair trial <strong>of</strong> any person or issue.<br />
x x x<br />
Kara-an v. Lindo, A.M. <strong>No</strong>. MTJ-07-1674, 19 April 2007, 521 SCRA 423, citing Hilario v.<br />
Concepcion, 383 Phil. 843 (2000).