15.07.2013 Views

A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines

A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines

A.M. No. RJ-10-2257. July 17, 2012 - Supreme Court of the Philippines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Decision <strong>10</strong> A. M. <strong>No</strong>. RTJ-<strong>10</strong>-2257<br />

responsible for order and efficiency in <strong>the</strong>ir courts, and <strong>the</strong> subordinates are<br />

not <strong>the</strong> guardians <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judge’s responsibility. 15<br />

The arbitrary actions <strong>of</strong> respondent judge, taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, give doubt<br />

as to his impartiality, integrity and propriety. His acts amount to gross<br />

misconduct constituting violations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> New Code <strong>of</strong> Judicial Conduct,<br />

particularly:<br />

15<br />

CANON 2. INTEGRITY IS ESSENTIAL NOT ONLY TO THE<br />

PROPER DISCHARGE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICE BUT ALSO TO<br />

THE PERSONAL DEMEANOR OF JUDGES.<br />

Section 1. Judges shall ensure that not only is <strong>the</strong>ir conduct above<br />

reproach, but that it is perceived to be so in <strong>the</strong> view <strong>of</strong> a reasonable<br />

observer.<br />

Section 2. The behavior and conduct <strong>of</strong> judges must reaffirm <strong>the</strong> people’s<br />

faith in <strong>the</strong> integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judiciary. Justice must not merely be done but<br />

must also be seen to be done.<br />

x x x<br />

CANON 3. IMPARTIALITY IS ESSENTIAL TO THE PROPER<br />

DISCHARGE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICE. IT APPLIES NOT ONLY<br />

TO THE DECISION ITSELF BUT ALSO TO THE PROCESS BY<br />

WHICH THE DECISION IS TO BE MADE.<br />

x x x<br />

Section 2. Judges shall ensure that his or her conduct, both in and out <strong>of</strong><br />

court, maintains and enhances <strong>the</strong> confidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public, <strong>the</strong> legal<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession and litigants in <strong>the</strong> impartiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judge and <strong>the</strong> judiciary.<br />

x x x<br />

Section 4. Judges shall not knowingly, while a proceeding is before, or<br />

could come before <strong>the</strong>m, make any comment that might reasonably be<br />

expected to affect <strong>the</strong> outcome <strong>of</strong> such proceeding or impair <strong>the</strong> manifest<br />

fairness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> process. <strong>No</strong>r shall judges make any comment in public or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise that might affect <strong>the</strong> fair trial <strong>of</strong> any person or issue.<br />

x x x<br />

Kara-an v. Lindo, A.M. <strong>No</strong>. MTJ-07-1674, 19 April 2007, 521 SCRA 423, citing Hilario v.<br />

Concepcion, 383 Phil. 843 (2000).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!