15.07.2013 Views

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)

Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ENGLISH 10M/11M—ACADEMIC LITERACIES I & II:<br />

CRITICAL THINKING, READING AND WRITING FOR MULTILINGUALS<br />

A Project<br />

Presented <strong>to</strong> the faculty <strong>of</strong> the Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong><br />

California State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong><br />

Submitted in partial satisfaction <strong>of</strong><br />

the requirements for the degree <strong>of</strong><br />

MASTER OF ARTS<br />

in<br />

<strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>English</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Speakers</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Other</strong> <strong>Languages</strong> (<strong>TESOL</strong>)<br />

by<br />

Vu Tran<br />

SUMMER<br />

2012


© 2012<br />

Vu Tran<br />

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED<br />

ii


Approved by:<br />

ENGLISH 10M/11M—ACADEMIC LITERACIES I & II:<br />

CRITICAL THINKING, READING AND WRITING FOR MULTILINGUALS<br />

A Project<br />

by<br />

Vu Tran<br />

__________________________________, Committee Chair<br />

Julian Heather<br />

____________________________<br />

Date<br />

iii


Student: Vu Tran<br />

I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format<br />

manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is <strong>to</strong> be awarded for<br />

the project.<br />

__________________________, Graduate Coordina<strong>to</strong>r ___________________<br />

Mi-Suk Seo Date<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong><br />

iv


Abstract<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

ENGLISH 10M/11M—ACADEMIC LITERACIES I & II:<br />

CRITICAL THINKING, READING AND WRITING FOR MULTILINGUALS<br />

by<br />

Vu Tran<br />

This project is an integrated reading/writing program for freshmen multilingual students situated<br />

at California State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong>. This course seeks <strong>to</strong> incorporate a service-learning<br />

component that aims <strong>to</strong> eliminate the issue <strong>of</strong> the “empty assignment syndrome” by having<br />

students write <strong>to</strong> real audiences beyond the classroom. This course consists <strong>of</strong> 29 detailed step-<br />

by-step lessons and will be presented as a service-learning course based on the intensive approach<br />

<strong>to</strong> reading and the process approach <strong>to</strong> writing. The reading intensive approach sees the reading<br />

<strong>of</strong> academic texts in three “interrelated” phases—Before, During, and After—with each phase<br />

containing an array <strong>of</strong> different effective reading skills and strategies <strong>to</strong> help students’ achieve<br />

maximal reading comprehension <strong>of</strong> academic texts. Similarly, the writing process approach sees<br />

writing as a series <strong>of</strong> composing stages—planning, drafting, revising, and editing—with each<br />

stage containing an array <strong>of</strong> different effective writing skills and strategies <strong>to</strong> help students’<br />

achieve mastery <strong>of</strong> academic writing. This course also seeks <strong>to</strong> use online corpora for developing<br />

students’ overall writing skills during the composing process.<br />

_______________________, Committee Chair<br />

Julian Heather<br />

_______________________<br />

Date<br />

v


DEDICATION<br />

This is for my new family—my fiancée, Elizabeth Hernandez, and our baby boy,<br />

Alexander Jeremy Tran. Without you, Elizabeth, none <strong>of</strong> this would have been possible!<br />

Thank you for sacrificing a big part <strong>of</strong> your life <strong>to</strong> stay at home and become a full-time<br />

mother <strong>to</strong> our baby so I can complete my M.A. project in a timely manner. I would also<br />

like <strong>to</strong> thank my parents, Thu Le and Thanh Tran, for making the greatest sacrifice <strong>to</strong><br />

leave their home country so that I can have a better life in America. I am forever<br />

indebted! Finally, I would like <strong>to</strong> thank my brothers and sisters, Vinh, Joe, Kristy, and<br />

Jennifer for their continual support in all <strong>of</strong> my endeavors.<br />

vi


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

I would like <strong>to</strong> thank Julian Heather for his invaluable assistance and guidance he<br />

has given me throughout the course <strong>of</strong> my M.A. project. I am forever grateful for your<br />

commitment and dedication. I would also like <strong>to</strong> thank Dana Mattson, Jamie Ferrando,<br />

and Kelvyn Moran for taking the time out <strong>of</strong> their busy schedule <strong>to</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>read certain<br />

sections <strong>of</strong> my project. Finally, I would like <strong>to</strong> thank God for blessing me with the power<br />

and strength <strong>to</strong> complete such a task.<br />

vii


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Dedication .............................................................................................................................. vi<br />

Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ vii<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Tables ......................................................................................................................... ix<br />

Chapter<br />

1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1<br />

Overview ..................................................................................................................... 1<br />

Situational Analysis ................................................................................................... 2<br />

Course Description ..................................................................................................... 9<br />

Instructional Materials and Assessment ................................................................... 24<br />

Organization <strong>of</strong> the Project ...................................................................................... 27<br />

2. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ................................................................................. 28<br />

The Reading and Writing Connection ...................................................................... 30<br />

Service-Learning ...................................................................................................... 33<br />

Reading and Writing Workshops ............................................................................. 36<br />

Intensive Reading ..................................................................................................... 37<br />

Heuristic Approach <strong>to</strong> the Writing Process .............................................................. 46<br />

Building a Community <strong>of</strong> Writers (Peer Response) ................................................. 49<br />

Corpus-Based Writing Analysis ............................................................................... 51<br />

Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 52<br />

Appendix A. Course Syllabus ............................................................................................ 55<br />

Appendix B. Course Assignments....................................................................................... 68<br />

Appendix C. Course Lesson Plans & Materials .................................................................. 99<br />

Appendix D. Course Readings .......................................................................................... 248<br />

References........................................................................................................................... 254<br />

viii<br />

Page


LIST OF TABLES<br />

Tables Page<br />

1. <strong>English</strong> 10M………………………………… .……………………………….13<br />

2. <strong>English</strong> 11M……………………………….… ... ……………………………. 20<br />

3. Intensive Reading Framework… ………….…………………………………. 38<br />

4. Activities for Surveying Text……………………….…………………………40<br />

5. Bloom’s Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Cognitive Domains………… . .………………………45<br />

6. Benefits <strong>of</strong> Peer Review………………………........... .………………………49<br />

ix


Overview<br />

CHAPTER 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Traditionally, reading and writing have always been seen as separate distinct processes.<br />

In conventional basic college-level writing classes, for example, students are simply taught how<br />

<strong>to</strong> write, and in conventional basic college-level reading classes, students are simply taught how<br />

<strong>to</strong> read. This traditional approach <strong>to</strong> teaching academic literacy still exists in many colleges and<br />

universities across the nation. Generally, at the university level incoming freshmen who are in<br />

need <strong>of</strong> remediation (primarily “at-risk” and underrepresented students) are required <strong>to</strong> enroll in<br />

separate basic reading and writing classes before enrolling in first-year written composition. This<br />

conventional route <strong>of</strong> completing first-year composition generally takes several semesters.<br />

In recent years, however, there has been a growing interest in the processes <strong>of</strong> reading<br />

and writing as being interconnected and interrelated. Various universities across the nation such<br />

as Arizona State, Boise State, and San Francisco State have taken the initiative in creating Stretch<br />

programs (two semesters-long) in which instruction in reading and writing is fully integrated and<br />

interconnected. These Stretch programs are primarily designed <strong>to</strong> develop students’ academic<br />

literacies by giving them more time <strong>to</strong> read, think, and write in a variety <strong>of</strong> academic contexts<br />

within the university setting. In the California State University (CSU) system, students who<br />

successfully complete the Stretch program will not only meet the CSU remediation requirement<br />

within the first semester, but also satisfy the first-year written composition requirement in the<br />

second semester. The implementation <strong>of</strong> the Stretch program adopted by some universities within<br />

the CSU system shows promising results <strong>to</strong> not only reduce the need for remediation, but also<br />

significantly increase retention and graduation rates among “at risk” freshmen students.<br />

1


Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University has recently implemented a similar integrated<br />

reading/writing Stretch program with parallel ESL Stretch courses for “at-risk” multilingual<br />

students. Prior <strong>to</strong> this, all “at-risk” multilingual students were required <strong>to</strong> complete a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> two<br />

prepara<strong>to</strong>ry writing courses (<strong>English</strong> 86: College Language and <strong>English</strong> 87: Basic Writing for<br />

Multilingual) before enrolling in first-year composition (<strong>English</strong> 2: College Composition for<br />

Multilingual Writers). Instead <strong>of</strong> having <strong>to</strong> complete a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> three writing courses <strong>to</strong> fulfill the<br />

first-year written composition requirement, these students can now enroll in the year-long<br />

integrated reading/writing Stretch course specifically designed for multilingual students (<strong>English</strong><br />

10W/11W—Academic Literacies I & II), which satisfies both the CSU remediation requirement<br />

and first-year written composition requirement within the first year.<br />

This project is designed for multilingual freshman students who are enrolled in the<br />

integrated reading/writing Stretch program at California State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong>. The main<br />

goal <strong>of</strong> the course is <strong>to</strong> develop literate readers and writers, especially in regards <strong>to</strong> their academic<br />

literacies. Students in this Stretch course will strategically learn how <strong>to</strong> incorporate a number <strong>of</strong><br />

different academic reading and writing skills/strategies <strong>to</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> different <strong>English</strong> contexts,<br />

primarily in connection <strong>to</strong> their service-learning experience beyond the classroom.<br />

Situational Analysis<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University is the sixth-largest campus <strong>of</strong> the twenty-three state<br />

universities in California and is located in the capi<strong>to</strong>l city <strong>of</strong> Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, California. Currently,<br />

the university has a combined <strong>to</strong>tal enrollment <strong>of</strong> approximately 29, 000 students (California<br />

State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong> [CSUS], 2011).<br />

Institution. The Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> serves the whole undergraduate student<br />

population, including second language learners, with a variety <strong>of</strong> college composition writing<br />

courses as part <strong>of</strong> the general education requirements. In addition, the <strong>English</strong> Department is also<br />

2


esponsible for moni<strong>to</strong>ring “at-risk” students subject <strong>to</strong> EO665 and carefully continues <strong>to</strong> address<br />

the “remedial” needs <strong>of</strong> the University’s students through the implementation <strong>of</strong> various<br />

prepara<strong>to</strong>ry writing courses (<strong>English</strong> 15/86, <strong>English</strong> 1/87), small group tu<strong>to</strong>rials (<strong>English</strong> 1X/2X),<br />

and the newly formed first-year integrated reading/writing Stretch programs. About 50% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

first-year freshmen at Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State require some sort <strong>of</strong> remediation in the area <strong>of</strong> reading<br />

and writing as identified by the university’s <strong>English</strong> Placement Test (EPT) (CSUS <strong>English</strong> Self-<br />

Study, 2006; Learning Skills Self-Study, 2006). The majority <strong>of</strong> these “at-risk” students are<br />

generally minorities and/or multilingual students (i.e., Asians, Latino, Pacific Islander, Native<br />

Americans, and African Americans). To address the needs <strong>of</strong> these “at-risk” multilingual<br />

students, the <strong>English</strong> Department <strong>of</strong>fers parallel tracks not just in the prepara<strong>to</strong>ry and first-year<br />

composition writing courses (<strong>English</strong> 15/86, <strong>English</strong> 1/87, and <strong>English</strong> 1A/2), but also in the<br />

newly developed integrated reading/writing Stretch courses (<strong>English</strong> 10/10M and <strong>English</strong><br />

11/11M).<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M/11M (Academic Literacies I & II for Multilingual) is designed <strong>to</strong> promote<br />

academic literacies in developing critical thinking, reading and writing for multilingual students.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the course requirement, students are required <strong>to</strong> complete a minimum <strong>of</strong> 5,000 written<br />

words. Specific course grades are assigned at the end <strong>of</strong> each semester upon completion <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

requirements. The first semester is graded Credit/No Credit, while a final letter course grade is<br />

assigned at the completion <strong>of</strong> the second semester. This year-long course fulfills the GE Area A2<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> first-year written composition.<br />

The Students. The demographics <strong>of</strong> the actual students in the multilingual section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Stretch program are extremely diverse in terms <strong>of</strong> their ethnicities, background experiences, and<br />

languages. At Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University, the ethnic pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> first-year multilingual students<br />

in need <strong>of</strong> remediation ranges from Latinos, Pacific Islanders, Asians, American Indians, and<br />

3


other minority groups. Many <strong>of</strong> these students entering the multilingual Stretch program speak a<br />

language other than <strong>English</strong>. As for their educational backgrounds/experiences, the majority <strong>of</strong><br />

these students entering the Stretch program—predominantly Generation 1.5 students—have just<br />

graduated and studied <strong>English</strong> from various high schools in the U.S. (more specifically in<br />

California), while only a few students have studied <strong>English</strong> abroad in their home countries.<br />

Generally speaking, all <strong>of</strong> these students lack experience in reading and writing academic texts at<br />

the university level (H.S. Liu, personal communication, September 6, 2011). To fully address the<br />

students’ reading and writing needs in this course, we first need <strong>to</strong> carefully examine each<br />

student’s characteristics, learning styles, motivation, educational background/goals, and overall<br />

L2 language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency.<br />

International Students. Although relatively few in the Stretch program, international<br />

students have slightly different educational backgrounds/experiences, learning styles, motivation,<br />

and L2 language development compared <strong>to</strong> all other ESL students. According <strong>to</strong> Ferris (2009a),<br />

these students come from different countries <strong>to</strong> pursue their education in the United States on<br />

student visas “with the intent <strong>to</strong> return <strong>to</strong> their home countries <strong>to</strong> live and work upon the<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> their studies” (p. 12). Many <strong>of</strong> these students come from privileged and well-<br />

educated L1 backgrounds, while others rely on the meager subsistence <strong>of</strong> their families and<br />

relatives. Generally, they are highly pr<strong>of</strong>icient and literate in their L1s, and highly motivated <strong>to</strong><br />

succeed academically and/or culturally. Many <strong>of</strong> them come <strong>to</strong> the United States for several years<br />

(or sometimes more) <strong>to</strong> pursue educational degrees or athletic scholarships, while others come<br />

only for a fairly short amount <strong>of</strong> time <strong>to</strong> “broaden their cultural experience” (Ferris, 2009a, p. 12).<br />

Using Guadalupe Valdes’ (1992/2006) framework <strong>of</strong> defining the L2 audience, these students are<br />

considered elective bilinguals, in which they “choose <strong>to</strong> become bilingual for some type <strong>of</strong><br />

personal benefit—education, prestige, career advancement, or travel/cultural opportunities” (as<br />

4


cited in Ferris, 2009a, p. 9). In terms <strong>of</strong> their language learning styles, most international students<br />

would fall in the category <strong>of</strong> “eye” learners, as “they have learned <strong>English</strong> principally through<br />

their eyes, studying vocabulary, verb forms, and language rules” (Reid, 2006, p. 79). Hence, they<br />

are more likely <strong>to</strong> have acquired better formal/metalinguistic knowledge <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong> language<br />

than other second language learners (Ferris, 2009a, p. 31). As Reid (2006) notes, however, many<br />

<strong>of</strong> them may lack acquired intuitions about the L2 language “<strong>to</strong> produce more target-like<br />

utterances because <strong>of</strong> their limited exposure and contact with other native <strong>English</strong> speakers” (as<br />

cited in Ferris, 2009a, p. 33). International students who have inadequate exposure with the target<br />

language are considered incipient bilinguals, for the mere fact that they are still learning and<br />

acquiring the target language.<br />

Generation 1.5 Students. Unlike international students, the rest <strong>of</strong> the students enrolled<br />

in the Stretch program have been practically living in the United States for most <strong>of</strong> their lives<br />

prior <strong>to</strong> entering the university system. This group <strong>of</strong> students also includes “U.S.-born children<br />

<strong>of</strong> first-generation immigrant parents whose primary language was not <strong>English</strong>” (Ferris, 2009a, p.<br />

17). Generally speaking, these students are labeled Generation 1.5 because <strong>of</strong> their “in-between<br />

status,” as “their experiences, characteristics, and educational needs may lie somewhere between<br />

those <strong>of</strong> first generation adult immigrants and the U.S-born second generation children <strong>of</strong><br />

immigrants” (Ferris, 2009a, p. 15). These students may identify themselves as either being fully<br />

American, or culturally affiliated <strong>to</strong> both cultures (e.g., Vietnamese-American, Chinese-<br />

American, Hmong-American, etc.). In high school, these students were likely <strong>to</strong> attend “schools<br />

in less affluent areas with fewer resources and less qualified teachers” <strong>to</strong> support their academic<br />

development and their <strong>English</strong> language acquisition in general (Pre<strong>to</strong>-Bay, 2004, p. 94).<br />

Consequentially, those who lived in impoverished environments and attended schools with less<br />

resources may have been exposed <strong>to</strong> a nonstandard variety <strong>of</strong> the <strong>English</strong> language, thereby<br />

5


further hindering their acquisition <strong>of</strong> academic <strong>English</strong> (Ferris, 2009a; Pre<strong>to</strong>-Bay, 2004; Singhal,<br />

2004). According <strong>to</strong> Reid (2006), these students “have acquired <strong>English</strong> principally through their<br />

ears: They listened, <strong>to</strong>ok in oral language (from teachers, TV, grocery clerks, friends, peers), and<br />

subconsciously begin <strong>to</strong> form vocabulary, grammar, and syntax rules, learning <strong>English</strong>…” (p.<br />

77).<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> their unique status, these students are considered functional bilinguals rather<br />

than incipient bilinguals, for the mere fact that they all can use the language fluently in a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> everyday <strong>English</strong> settings. To further address the L2 pr<strong>of</strong>iciency levels <strong>of</strong> Generation 1.5<br />

students, Cummins (1979) made a distinction between Basic Interpersonal Communication<br />

Skills (BICS), the language needed <strong>to</strong> function successfully in everyday setting, and Cognitive<br />

Academic Language Pr<strong>of</strong>iciency (CALP), the language needed <strong>to</strong> succeed in academic or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional settings. In support <strong>of</strong> Cummins’ CALP distinction, recent research indicate that it<br />

can take L2 learners at least seven years <strong>to</strong> adequately develop CALP, even under optimal<br />

learning conditions (Scarcella, 1996, p. 144).<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> their early L2 educational experience, many Generation 1.5 students were<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> have attended bilingual or ESL programs in elementary school, and by middle school<br />

were “reclassified as <strong>English</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>icient and placed in mainstream classes with monolingual<br />

<strong>English</strong> speakers” (Ferris, 2009a, p. 20). As Ferris (2009a) notes, although many <strong>of</strong> them tend <strong>to</strong><br />

perform well in these mainstream classes, <strong>of</strong>ten times these mainstream classes “fall short <strong>of</strong><br />

providing them with the academic language skills they will need [<strong>to</strong> succeed] in college” (p. 20).<br />

Their exposure <strong>to</strong> grammar instruction in K-12 “has <strong>of</strong>ten been ignored” or vastly limited (Ferris,<br />

2009, p. 32). As a result, we can certainly assume that Generation 1.5 students entering the<br />

Stretch program will have adequately acquired BICS in the target language and not nearly enough<br />

CALP, as many <strong>of</strong> them continue <strong>to</strong> exhibit non-nativelike features in the <strong>English</strong> language,<br />

6


especially in regards <strong>to</strong> their writing abilities at the college level. On a positive note, however,<br />

having lived in the United States for most <strong>of</strong> their lives, Generation 1.5 students have by far the<br />

“greatest level <strong>of</strong> cultural awareness and assimilation” as well as more acquired L2 knowledge—<br />

more intuitions about the <strong>English</strong> language--compared <strong>to</strong> the international students (Ferris, 2009a,<br />

p. 33).<br />

Student Needs. For a variety <strong>of</strong> educational and socio-cultural reasons, nearly all “at<br />

risk” freshmen struggle with academic reading and writing at the university level (Ferris, 2009a;<br />

Petro-Bay, 2004; Singhal, 2004). One major complaint from the students in the Stretch program<br />

is that their <strong>English</strong> classes in high school did not fully prepare them for college level writing and<br />

reading (H.S. Liu, personal communication, 2011). According <strong>to</strong> Ferris (2009a), many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

students have limited experience with reading extensively, as well as limited instruction and<br />

practice in the types <strong>of</strong> intensive reading skills need for academic success (p. 38). More<br />

specifically, when it comes <strong>to</strong> academic reading tasks at the university level nearly all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

struggle with: (1) the amount <strong>of</strong> unknown or unfamiliar vocabulary in academic texts (general<br />

academic vocabulary and discipline-specific vocabulary), which negatively affects their overall<br />

reading comprehension <strong>of</strong> academic texts; and (2) the amount <strong>of</strong> academic reading required<br />

which is <strong>of</strong>ten far beyond their prior educational experiences (Ferris, 2009a, p.37). The<br />

inadequate amount <strong>of</strong> academic vocabulary knowledge (both general and discipline-specific)<br />

among L2 learners can lead <strong>to</strong> what Eskey (1986) calls the comprehension gap. As Eskey (1986)<br />

notes, the comprehension gap has a direct impact on the confidence gap, which can undermine<br />

L2 students’ reading behaviors, and ultimately lead <strong>to</strong> their dissatisfaction with reading academic<br />

texts al<strong>to</strong>gether (as cited in Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 61). As a result, many <strong>of</strong> the students<br />

entering the Stretch program may lack the confidence necessary <strong>to</strong> read academic texts.<br />

7


In terms <strong>of</strong> the students’ writing characteristics, nearly all <strong>of</strong> them exhibit non-nativelike<br />

features in their L2 writing regardless <strong>of</strong> whether or not they were born here in the United States.<br />

The primary reason for this, as noted by Ferris (2009a), is the fact that nearly all <strong>of</strong> these students<br />

“have had neither adequate prior writing instruction nor enough practice in writing in the L2,”<br />

especially in regards <strong>to</strong> academic writing (p. 40). As a result, many <strong>of</strong> these students, especially<br />

multilingual students at Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State, display language gaps in their writings. According <strong>to</strong><br />

Ferris (2009b), these language problems are <strong>of</strong> two types: (1) lack <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> language<br />

knowledge that leads <strong>to</strong> grammatical and syntactical errors; and (2) inadequate knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>English</strong> vocabulary and discourse structure that “limits their ability <strong>to</strong> write effectively and<br />

clearly in a variety <strong>of</strong> situations” (Ferris, 2009b, p.25). In addition <strong>to</strong> this, Ferrando et al. (2011),<br />

while tu<strong>to</strong>ring at the University Writing Center (UWC), consistently found that many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Generation 1.5 students at Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State tended <strong>to</strong> incorporate idiomatic expressions and<br />

slang in<strong>to</strong> their academic writing, further complicating their ability <strong>to</strong> write academically (p. 99)<br />

Finally, all <strong>of</strong> the students in this course are entering college for the first time and have <strong>to</strong><br />

learn a new culture. Those who attended schools with fewer resources typically have more<br />

difficulty transitioning <strong>to</strong> the university system and in<strong>to</strong> the “new academic community with new<br />

linguistic and socio-cultural practices and conventions” than the typical middle class American<br />

(Petro-Bay, 2004, p. 98). The reason for this is the discrepancy between the home culture and<br />

community in which they were raised and “those <strong>of</strong> the academic community they are seeking <strong>to</strong><br />

join,” which are entirely different, and <strong>of</strong>ten times, antithetical <strong>to</strong> one another (Pre<strong>to</strong>-Bay, 2004,<br />

p. 93). Because <strong>of</strong> this, nearly all <strong>of</strong> these students entering the Stretch program lack the basic<br />

academic literacy across disciplines needed for academic success within the university system.<br />

8


Course Description<br />

This course is designed <strong>to</strong> cover two consecutive semesters (15 weeks per semester),<br />

starting in the fall and ending in spring. Students will meet twice a week for seventy-five minutes<br />

each (all in the afternoons).<br />

Guiding Principles. Currently, the existing Stretch program takes an integrated approach<br />

<strong>to</strong> teaching reading and writing. The reading process and writing process are not taught as<br />

separate independent entities, but rather explored <strong>to</strong>gether as a whole <strong>to</strong> promote students’<br />

academic literacies. In other words, the teaching <strong>of</strong> the reading process does not necessarily<br />

precede the writing process, or vice-versa. Instead, they are interconnected and interrelated. This<br />

course is guided by six main academic literacy learning goals (see reading/writing goals &<br />

objectives below), and essentially evaluated by the submission <strong>of</strong> the final portfolio at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the second semester. While this is a year-long course, course grades are assigned at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

each semester. The first semester is graded credit/no credit. In order <strong>to</strong> receive credit at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the first semester, students must meet the main following criteria—regular attendance, active<br />

participation, and completion <strong>of</strong> both class work and take home writing assignments in a timely<br />

manner. Finally, a letter grade is assigned at the completion <strong>of</strong> the second semester, where the<br />

majority <strong>of</strong> the points come from the submission <strong>of</strong> the Final Portfolio.<br />

The following are the first-year reading/writing goals and outcomes for<br />

<strong>English</strong>10M/11M:<br />

Goal # 1: To help students understanding the ways that readers read and writers write in and<br />

beyond the university.<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will read and write a variety <strong>of</strong> texts for multiple purposes, audiences, and<br />

genres.<br />

Students will demonstrate intellectual curiosity and risk-taking.<br />

Students will use reading and writing for discovery, <strong>to</strong> make sense <strong>of</strong> themselves and<br />

the world around them.<br />

Students will understand extra-textual contexts that shape reading and writing.<br />

9


Students will value academic integrity and take responsibility as an engaged person<br />

in their roles as student, learner, and global citizen.<br />

Goal # 2: To help students understand processes <strong>of</strong> reading, writing, and research<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will develop various and flexible strategies for generating, revising, editing<br />

and pro<strong>of</strong>reading.<br />

Students will set purposes and goals for reading, writing, and research.<br />

Students will give and receive constructive criticism.<br />

Students will organize their essays <strong>to</strong> support their points <strong>of</strong> view in ways that are<br />

appropriate <strong>to</strong> their <strong>to</strong>pic, audience, and purpose.<br />

Goal # 3: To help students develop a metacognitive understanding <strong>of</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> reading,<br />

writing, and thinking.<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will moni<strong>to</strong>r and adjust their processes <strong>of</strong> reading and writing.<br />

Students will generate their own questions about texts.<br />

Students will engage in self-reflective activities assessing their reading and writing in<br />

relation <strong>to</strong> their learning goals and values.<br />

Students will internalize and apply a variety <strong>of</strong> effective reading, writing, and study<br />

strategies.<br />

Goal #4: To help students understand textual conventions<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will develop knowledge <strong>of</strong> genre conventions ranging from structure and<br />

paragraphing <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>ne and mechanics.<br />

Students will evaluate and cite sources appropriately.<br />

Students will develop syntactic maturity and sentence clarity.<br />

Students will edit their work for appropriate grammar and mechanics.<br />

Goal # 5: To help students understand and engage in reading and writing as communal processes<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will share their reading and writing with one another.<br />

Students will integrate their own ideas with those <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Students will work in collaborative groups <strong>to</strong> generate, critique, and revise their ideas<br />

in reading and writing.<br />

Students will use their reading and writing <strong>to</strong> engage discourse communities within<br />

and beyond the university.<br />

Goal # 6: To help students think critically about academic discourse communities as contact<br />

zones where different cultures both connect and come in<strong>to</strong> conflict.<br />

Outcomes<br />

Students will reflect on the ways that academic cultures and academic discourses<br />

connect and conflict with their home cultures and personal discourses.<br />

Students will explore the relationship between language and identity.<br />

Students will consider the politics <strong>of</strong> language use and standardization.<br />

Students will practice linguistic and cultural pluralism.<br />

Students will critically reflect on their literacy his<strong>to</strong>ries.<br />

10


Course Content. In addition <strong>to</strong> the guiding principles mentioned above, this<br />

reading/writing course will incorporate a service-learning approach for developing literate readers<br />

and writers as an alternative way <strong>to</strong> build both academic and pr<strong>of</strong>essional literacies within a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> socioliterate communities. Johns (2006) would characterize this course as a<br />

socioliterate classroom, where “written and spoken discourses are situated within specific<br />

contexts and produced and read by individuals whose values reflect those <strong>of</strong> the communities <strong>to</strong><br />

which they [seek <strong>to</strong>] belong” (p. 285). As a result, the reading and writing materials are<br />

developed within students’ socio-educational and pr<strong>of</strong>essional contexts and constraints. Students<br />

will be required <strong>to</strong> produce meaningful writing <strong>to</strong>pics (most <strong>of</strong> which will come from their<br />

service-learning experience), as well as produce writing materials for real intended audiences<br />

beyond the classroom. As Johns (1993) notes, having students write for a real audience, rather<br />

than an artificial one will produce “authentic genre in real contexts” that will help students<br />

“develop their understandings <strong>of</strong> the interaction between their purposes, the interests and values<br />

<strong>of</strong> real audiences, and the genres that are appropriate for specific rhe<strong>to</strong>rical contexts” (p. 85).<br />

More importantly, the teaching <strong>of</strong> audience awareness is critical for L2 writers, especially “if we<br />

are <strong>to</strong> educate our [L2] students for [the] breadth <strong>of</strong> communicative demands they will confront in<br />

<strong>English</strong> language contexts” (John, 1993, p. 87). The teaching <strong>of</strong> real audience awareness is<br />

grounded heavily in theories <strong>of</strong> second language acquisition, where language learners must be<br />

immersed in authentic and meaningful social interaction <strong>to</strong> achieve full communicative and<br />

pragmatic competence in a variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> language contexts. Not only will these writing<br />

assignments promote literate writers within the academic setting, but they will also develop<br />

students’ overall communicative competence in a variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> language contexts (John,<br />

1993, p. 4).<br />

11


In the first semester, students will learn how <strong>to</strong> use an array <strong>of</strong> reading strategies and<br />

skills as they tackle each reading assignment, especially during the intensive reading workshop.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Hedgcock & Ferris (2009), the “most important benefit <strong>of</strong> intensive reading lessons<br />

is strategy instruction” (p.175). During the reading workshop, students will develop and<br />

extensively practice key reading strategies on a variety <strong>of</strong> academic texts such as highlighting,<br />

annotating, predicting, questioning, outlining/charting, summarizing, and analyzing. These<br />

reading skills/strategies will help <strong>to</strong> increase each student’s overall reading comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />

academic and pr<strong>of</strong>essional texts.<br />

As for developing “strategic writers,” students will learn how <strong>to</strong> use an array <strong>of</strong> writing<br />

strategies and skills appropriate <strong>to</strong> each socio-cultural context and constraint <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

writing situation. In the first semester, students will first learn how <strong>to</strong> develop a heuristic<br />

approach <strong>of</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong> invention strategies (i.e., free-writing, looping, listing,<br />

clustering/mapping, cubing, etc.) that will equip them with different ways <strong>to</strong> generate ideas. The<br />

ideas generated will then help students plan and draft each <strong>of</strong> the writing tasks encountered in the<br />

course. Students will then learn how <strong>to</strong> compose various drafts by continually revising them<br />

throughout the semester, first focusing on content (organization, focus, development) and then on<br />

editing issues (mechanics, grammar, formatting) before submitting the final version at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the second semester. Since argumentation is commonplace in academic disciplines (Johns, 1993),<br />

the three major writing assignments in this course are argumentative in nature. The “ability <strong>to</strong><br />

identify the underlying argument, and its claims, warrants, and evidence, in reading and the<br />

ability <strong>to</strong> compose a high-quality argument, its claims, warrants, and evidence, in writing are<br />

critical skills for academic success” (Newell et al., 2011, p. 274).<br />

For the argumentative essay, students will learn how <strong>to</strong> identify and write strong thesis<br />

statements, relevant <strong>to</strong>pic sentences and supporting details/ examples, in-depth analyses, and<br />

12


strong concluding sentences. In addition <strong>to</strong> these academic writing skills, students will learn how<br />

<strong>to</strong> effectively conduct research <strong>of</strong> academic reading materials (i.e., scholarly articles, books, etc.)<br />

and critically evaluate these sources, as well as learning how <strong>to</strong> integrate these sources<br />

appropriately in<strong>to</strong> their academic writing. These basic writing and research skills will first be<br />

taught and practiced in the first semester, where students will be required <strong>to</strong> write a public policy<br />

research paper in connection with their service-learning experience. These skills will then be<br />

transferred over in<strong>to</strong> the second semester, where students will be required <strong>to</strong> complete a research<br />

grant proposal in connection with their service-learning experience. As Johns (1993) notes, it is<br />

the writing teacher’s responsibility “at every level <strong>to</strong> give students experiences writing authentic<br />

argumentative texts <strong>to</strong> real audiences” (p. 85). Writing a public policy research paper and grant<br />

proposal based upon their service-learning experience can “facilitate the understanding <strong>of</strong> some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the general, community-specific, and task-specific aspects <strong>of</strong> audience awareness and<br />

argumentation that confront writers” (p. 85).<br />

Course Sequencing. The first semester consists <strong>of</strong> detailed step-by-step lessons, starting<br />

with the course introduction on the first day and ending with the PowerPoint presentations in the<br />

final weeks (see Table 1).<br />

Table 1:<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M<br />

Weeks Topic Assignments Due<br />

Week 1<br />

Day 1 Course Introduction/Syllabus<br />

Day 2 Multiple Literacies<br />

Week 2<br />

Day 1<br />

Day 2<br />

Ethnographic Research: Writing<br />

Field Notes<br />

Conducting Interviews<br />

Hand out Course Syllabus, Service Learning<br />

Requirement & Timeline sheet.<br />

Handout Academic & Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Ethnographic Project<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry # 1<br />

13


Weeks Topics Assignments<br />

Week 3<br />

Day 1 Intensive Reading Process<br />

Workshop<br />

Pre-Reading Activities<br />

Day 2 During-Reading<br />

Activities<br />

Week 4<br />

Day 1 Textual Organization Bring in Boudreaux et. al.(2012)<br />

Day 2<br />

Week 5<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation &<br />

Strategies<br />

Post SaCT Journal Entry #2<br />

Day 1 Summarizing & Responding Handout Summary & Response Assignment<br />

Day 2 Analyzing Academic Writing<br />

Week 6<br />

Day 1 The Writing Process Workshop<br />

Invention Strategies<br />

Day 2<br />

Drafting: In-class writing<br />

Week 7<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Training<br />

Day 2 Peer Review Session<br />

Week 8<br />

Day 1 Work on Academic Discourse<br />

Project<br />

Day 2 Corpus Research<br />

Due: Summary-Response Draft A<br />

Handout Argumentative Essay (Project # 1)<br />

Write argumentative essay in-class<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #3<br />

Due: Summary-Response (Draft B)<br />

Bring in Project # 1 Argumentative Draft A<br />

Bring in fieldnotes & collection <strong>of</strong> artifacts<br />

Week 9<br />

Day 1 Editing Workshop I Post SacCT Journal Entry #4<br />

Day 2<br />

Unit 1: American Social<br />

Public Policy Issues<br />

Class Debate on Homelessness<br />

Handout Project # 2 Public Policy Research<br />

Paper<br />

Due: Project 1 Argumentative Essay Draft A<br />

14


Weeks Topic Assignments<br />

Week 10<br />

Day 1 Research Process: Finding a<br />

Research Topic/Question<br />

Day 2 Library Research Tour<br />

Week 11<br />

Day 1 & 2 Teacher-Student Conference<br />

Week 12<br />

Day 1 Evaluating Sources<br />

15<br />

Due: Project # 1Argumentative Essay Draft B<br />

Day 2 Integrating Sources Post SacCT Journal Entry #5<br />

Week 13<br />

Day 1 Peer-Review Session Bring in Project # 2 Public Policy Research<br />

Paper Draft 1A<br />

Day 2 Editing Workshop II<br />

Week 14<br />

Day 1 Oral Presentation & Visual<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric on PowerPoint<br />

Day 2<br />

Academic Discourse<br />

Community<br />

Week 15<br />

Day 1 Academic Discourse<br />

Community Presentation<br />

(PowerPoint)<br />

Due: Project # 2 Public Policy Research Paper<br />

Draft A<br />

1 st batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

2 nd batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

Day 2 (Continued) 3 rd batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

Week 16<br />

End <strong>of</strong> first semester (<strong>English</strong><br />

10M)<br />

Note: Adapted from daily course agenda listed in Appendix A.<br />

Due: Summary-Response Draft C, Project #<br />

1 Draft C, & Project # 2 Draft B<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M will begin with the notion <strong>of</strong> developing multiple literacies. In the first week,<br />

students will be required <strong>to</strong> participate in various class discussions that encourage them <strong>to</strong> bring


aspects <strong>of</strong> their home cultures in<strong>to</strong> the classroom and share them with other students. Students<br />

will have opportunities <strong>to</strong> participate in the various in-class discussions and online class<br />

discussions about the importance <strong>of</strong> multiliteracies.<br />

The second week focuses on how <strong>to</strong> conduct ethnographic research for the Academic<br />

Discourse & Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Project. For this project, students will participate in two small-<br />

scale ethnographic investigations in relation <strong>to</strong> (1) their chosen academic discourse community<br />

and (2) their chosen career/pr<strong>of</strong>essional discourse community. Students will work collaboratively<br />

in groups and present their research and findings <strong>to</strong> the entire class in a two part format. In the<br />

first semester, each group will be required <strong>to</strong> join an academic discourse community <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

interest at Sac State. Each group will then be required <strong>to</strong> observe the classroom environment, its<br />

subjects, as well as interviewing the teacher and students. The lessons on how <strong>to</strong> conduct<br />

ethnographic research will provide students with the <strong>to</strong>ols needed <strong>to</strong> write observation field notes<br />

and conduct effective interviews. In the final weeks <strong>of</strong> the first semester, each group will present<br />

their research and findings for about 15 minutes in the form <strong>of</strong> a PowerPoint presentation <strong>to</strong> the<br />

whole class. As preparation for the presentations, students will be exposed <strong>to</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> oral<br />

presentation delivery and visual rhe<strong>to</strong>ric (Week 14, day 1), where they will spend most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

class time completing a tu<strong>to</strong>rial activity on how <strong>to</strong> create an effective PowerPoint presentation for<br />

their academic discourse project. In the second semester, students will build upon this project and<br />

pick a related career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>to</strong> research and present <strong>to</strong> the entire class using PowerPoint.<br />

The third, fourth, and fifth weeks are devoted <strong>to</strong> an intensive reading workshop that is<br />

thematic in nature. For the duration <strong>of</strong> the intensive reading workshop, students will be required<br />

<strong>to</strong> read a variety <strong>of</strong> academic reading materials related <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Law and Order, and apply<br />

specific reading skills and strategies in comprehending these academic materials. In each <strong>of</strong> three<br />

16


eading phases (Before, During, After), the instruc<strong>to</strong>r will model effective reading skills and<br />

strategies, then scaffold these reading skills and strategies appropriately for each student, and<br />

finally, have students practice these reading skills and strategies independently on their own. In<br />

the first phase <strong>of</strong> the reading workshop (the before-reading phase), students will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

survey the text by using key reading strategies such as skimming, scanning, predicting, and<br />

questioning, while also looking for unfamiliar language. In the next phase <strong>of</strong> this reading<br />

workshop (during-reading phase), students will be required <strong>to</strong> read several academic texts a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> times for maximal reading comprehension by using some effective reading strategies<br />

such as highlighting, annotating, questioning/responding, and outlining/charting. In the last<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> the workshop (after-reading), students will be required <strong>to</strong>: (1) write summaries and<br />

responses; (2) think critically about what they just read; and (3) establish a reading-writing<br />

connection for elaborated discourse through the various reflective online journal entries and<br />

writing assignments. These reading skills and strategies will be recycled throughout the semester<br />

and for the remainder <strong>of</strong> the year, as students will apply some <strong>of</strong> these reading skills and<br />

strategies in future reading assignments encountered throughout the course. Finally, at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the reading workshop, students will be required <strong>to</strong> participate in online class discussions via<br />

SacCT with each other about their overall reading experiences. The purpose <strong>of</strong> the online class<br />

discussion is meant <strong>to</strong> not only help them self-reflect on their reading experiences, but also <strong>to</strong><br />

build a classroom <strong>of</strong> community learners.<br />

Weeks six and seven are devoted <strong>to</strong> the writing process workshop and the peer review<br />

workshop in the context <strong>of</strong> developing the argumentative essay (Project 1), which is heavily<br />

based upon the academic texts provided in the reading workshop on the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Law and Order.<br />

In this two-week long series <strong>of</strong> workshops, students will be required <strong>to</strong> develop not only<br />

a cognitive awareness <strong>of</strong> the process approach <strong>to</strong> writing, but also specific writing skills and<br />

17


strategies associated with each <strong>of</strong> the stages in the writing process—invention strategies,<br />

planning & drafting strategies, and revision and editing strategies. The invention strategies will<br />

cover the first day <strong>of</strong> the writing workshop, while the drafting, revising, and editing strategies will<br />

cover the rest <strong>of</strong> the workshops. As with the reading workshop, the instruc<strong>to</strong>r will model effective<br />

writing skills and strategies, then scaffold these writing skills and strategies appropriately for each<br />

student, and finally, have students practice these writing skills and strategies independently on<br />

their own in developing the argumentative essay for project 1. Similarly, during the peer review<br />

workshop students will be required <strong>to</strong> first practice appropriate models <strong>of</strong> effective feedback on<br />

previous students’ sample papers by participating in a variety <strong>of</strong> peer feedback activities, and then<br />

apply these appropriate models <strong>of</strong> effective feedback on their classmates’ argumentative papers.<br />

As for the argumentative assignment, students will be required <strong>to</strong> identify and write strong thesis<br />

statements, clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentences, relevant supporting details/examples, in-depth analysis, and<br />

concluding sentences. Students will be continually revising the argumentative paper throughout<br />

the course, and will have the option <strong>of</strong> submitting this assignment in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the year booklet<br />

for future students <strong>to</strong> read. At the end <strong>of</strong> the writing workshop, students will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

participate in an online class discussion list via SacCT with each other about their overall writing<br />

experiences in regards <strong>to</strong> the writing process and argumentative paper. Just like the reading<br />

workshop, the purpose <strong>of</strong> this online class discussion is meant <strong>to</strong> not only help them self-reflect<br />

on their writing experiences, but also <strong>to</strong> build a community <strong>of</strong> readers/writers.<br />

The next couple <strong>of</strong> class sessions are devoted <strong>to</strong> a corpus and editing workshop. In the<br />

corpus workshop, students will use computers <strong>to</strong> explore various online corpora as both a<br />

research and a reference <strong>to</strong>ol for developing discourse and metalinguistic awareness <strong>of</strong> specific<br />

academic language. In the first semester, students will use it <strong>to</strong> develop conventions and<br />

metalinguistic awareness about how <strong>to</strong> write an effective argumentative essay, as well as how <strong>to</strong><br />

18


write a problem-solution paper for the public policy research assignment. In the second semester,<br />

students will use online corpora <strong>to</strong> develop conventions and metalinguistic awareness about how<br />

<strong>to</strong> write an effective research grant proposal. In addition <strong>to</strong> this, the concordances collected from<br />

online corpora will be used for all the editing workshops encountered at various points in the year<br />

(two editing workshops per semester). At the end <strong>of</strong> the corpus and editing workshops, students<br />

will be required <strong>to</strong> participate in online class discussions via SacCT with each other <strong>to</strong> reflect on<br />

their corpus and editing experiences.<br />

Weeks nine <strong>to</strong> twelve are devoted <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Public Policy Issues, where the students<br />

will be required <strong>to</strong> complete a public policy research paper in connection with their service-<br />

learning experience. In this unit, students will watch various video clips; read articles,<br />

newspapers, magazines; as well as participate in class-debates about the issue <strong>of</strong> homelessness in<br />

America. For the public policy research paper (problem-solution pattern), students will self-<br />

select a public policy issue <strong>of</strong> interest taken from their service-learning experience and conduct<br />

in-depth research <strong>to</strong> come up with an appropriate research <strong>to</strong>pic. As part <strong>of</strong> the research process,<br />

students will visit the library and receive a library <strong>to</strong>ur by the university’s librarian. The librarian<br />

will then explain the research process, as well as what <strong>to</strong>ols are available at the CSUS library.<br />

The librarian will also show students how <strong>to</strong> use EUREKA (the library catalog) <strong>to</strong> find reading<br />

materials for their research assignments, and how <strong>to</strong> work with academic data-bases like EBSCO<br />

host & Infotrac and other specific subject data-bases. In the last week <strong>of</strong> this unit, students will<br />

learn how <strong>to</strong> critically evaluate and integrate these sources appropriately in<strong>to</strong> their public policy<br />

research paper. Like the other writing assignments encountered in this course, students will also<br />

continue <strong>to</strong> use online corpora as a reference and research <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong> develop appropriate conventions<br />

<strong>of</strong> how <strong>to</strong> write an effective paper in the specific genre, as students will continually work on<br />

revising and editing it throughout the entire course. Just like the argumentative essay, students<br />

19


will also have the option <strong>of</strong> submitting the final version in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the-year booklet for future<br />

students <strong>to</strong> read. Teacher-Student conferences will be held in week 11 <strong>to</strong> assess students’<br />

progresses, questions, or concerns, as well as provide assistance on the public policy research<br />

paper. At the end <strong>of</strong> the first semester (Week 16), students must turn in their summary-response<br />

(draft C), argumentative essay (draft C), and public policy research paper (draft B) <strong>to</strong> receive full<br />

credit and enroll in <strong>English</strong> 11M in the spring semester.<br />

Just like the unit on Public Policy in the first semester, the second semester will primarily<br />

be divided in<strong>to</strong> two different thematic units with each covering a span <strong>of</strong> at least 6 weeks (see<br />

Table 2).<br />

Table 2:<br />

<strong>English</strong> 11M<br />

Weeks Topic Assignments<br />

Week 1<br />

Day 1 Unit 2: Community & Civics<br />

Day 2 Introduction: Grant Seeking Process Handout Project # 3 Grant<br />

Proposal<br />

Week 2<br />

Day 1 Developing & Researching Proposal Idea Due: Project # 1 Draft D<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Due: Project # 2 Draft C &<br />

SacCT Journal Entry #6<br />

Week 3<br />

Day 1 Statement <strong>of</strong> Need/Problem Statement<br />

Day 2 (Continued)<br />

Week 4<br />

Day 1 Methods/Description <strong>of</strong> Project<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Post SacCT Journal Entry #7<br />

Week 5<br />

Day 1<br />

Day 2<br />

Evaluation<br />

Budget<br />

20


Weeks Topic Assignments<br />

Week 6<br />

Day 1 Proposal Summary/Abstract<br />

Day 2 Putting it all <strong>to</strong>gether Post Journal Entry #8<br />

Week 7<br />

Day 1 & 2 Teacher-Student Conference Due: SL log-in sheet<br />

Due: Project 1 Draft E & Project<br />

2 Draft D<br />

Week 8<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Session Bring in Project # 3 Grant<br />

Proposal Draft A<br />

Day 2 Editing Workshop III<br />

Week 9<br />

Day 1 Newsletter writing Handout Project # 4 Newsletter<br />

Assignment<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Handout Portfolio assignment<br />

Week 10<br />

Day 1 Unit 3: Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>ession Handout Project # 5 Resume &<br />

Cover Letter Assignment<br />

Due: Project # 3 Grant Proposal<br />

Draft A<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Post Journal Entry #9<br />

Week 11<br />

Day 1 Writing & Researching in Business &<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Settings<br />

Day 2 (Continued)<br />

Week 12<br />

Day 1 Resume & Cover Letter Writing<br />

Day 2<br />

(Continued)<br />

Due: Project # 4 Newsletter<br />

Assignment Draft A<br />

Post Journal Entry #10<br />

Week 13<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Bring in Project # 4 & # 5<br />

Day 2<br />

Editing Workshop IV<br />

Due: Project # 3 Draft B<br />

Due: Project# 4 Draft B &<br />

Project # 5 Draft A<br />

21


Weeks Topics Assignments<br />

Week 14<br />

Day 1 & 2 Student/Teacher Conference Bring in questions regarding<br />

Portfolio requirements<br />

Week 15<br />

Day 1 & 2 Career & Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Presentation<br />

(PowerPoint)<br />

Week 16<br />

Portfolio Assessment<br />

Note: Adapted from daily agenda in Appendix A.<br />

Due: Resume & Cover Letter<br />

Draft B<br />

3 polished works & additional<br />

works (summary-response and<br />

highlighting & annotating)<br />

The first unit is devoted <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Community and Civics, where students will once<br />

again be required <strong>to</strong> continue <strong>to</strong> participate in their service-learning experience throughout the<br />

semester, thereby completing the full 20 hours. As Adler-Kassner (1995) argues, service learning<br />

in writing courses should “provide students opportunities for critical and cultural analysis” while<br />

practicing academic discourse, especially as they include ‘exploring the role <strong>of</strong> writing in<br />

different contexts’” (as cited in Pine, 2008, p. 2). Using Thomas Deans’ taxonomy, the two<br />

writing assignments in this particular unit are both represented as writing-for and writing-about<br />

the community. According <strong>to</strong> Deans, in the writing-for model, “students compose documents for<br />

community organizations; the very act <strong>of</strong> composing these documents is the community service”<br />

(as cited in Pine, 2008, p. 5). In the writing-about model, on the other hand, students “perform<br />

some kind <strong>of</strong> community service—in the class, tu<strong>to</strong>ring—and then write about this experience,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten in community-based research projects” (cited in Pine, 2008, p. 5).<br />

In the second semester, students will be required <strong>to</strong> complete the full 20 hours at a local<br />

community organization. Near the end <strong>of</strong> the service-learning experience, students will be<br />

required <strong>to</strong> write a newsletter <strong>to</strong> inform the reader about their selected community organization.<br />

While writing the newsletter, students will use two well-known online corpora-- Corpus <strong>of</strong><br />

22


Contemporary American <strong>English</strong> (COCA) and Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Students Paper<br />

(MICUSP) –along with other in-class reading materials <strong>to</strong> develop appropriate conventions <strong>of</strong><br />

how <strong>to</strong> write an effective newsletter. Along with the major writing assignments in the first<br />

semester, students may have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing and submitting the newsletter <strong>to</strong> audiences<br />

beyond the classroom in the last week <strong>of</strong> the semester—<strong>to</strong> their selected community organization.<br />

Many educa<strong>to</strong>rs note that publishing students’ work can have a positive effect on their overall<br />

reading and writing skills (Dollieslager, 1993; Gordon, 2007; Sladky, 1994). By publishing<br />

students’ work, as Sladky (1994) states, we “engage students in genuinely communicative<br />

discourse acts that invite meaningful contributions and encourage readers <strong>to</strong> read with different,<br />

arguably more authentic, purposes” (p. 7). This is especially critical for second language writers,<br />

as writing-for-publication is heavily grounded in theories <strong>of</strong> second language acquisition that<br />

“assumes initiation in<strong>to</strong> a discourse community is linguistically a function <strong>of</strong> a speaker’s<br />

immersion in social situations where he or she can make inferences based on observed patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

linguistic interaction” (Sladky,1994, p. 19).<br />

In the early stages <strong>of</strong> service-learning, students will be required <strong>to</strong> identify a problem (or<br />

issue) encountered at their chosen community organization. This problem or issue will eventually<br />

turn in<strong>to</strong> a grant proposal project (write-about model), in which the students will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

address and provide solution(s) <strong>to</strong> the community’s problems by formally writing an effective<br />

grant proposal. In completing the grant proposal, students will be required <strong>to</strong> conduct research<br />

based upon their service-learning experience and develop a proposal idea by the third week <strong>of</strong> the<br />

second semester. The weeks after will focus on each <strong>of</strong> the sections needed <strong>to</strong> write a successful<br />

research grant proposal (i.e., problem/statement <strong>of</strong> need, solution /methods, organizational<br />

information/qualifications, evaluation, budget, conclusion, and abstract/summary). Like the<br />

newsletter assignment, students may have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing and sending out their<br />

23


final versions <strong>of</strong> the grant proposal <strong>to</strong> their selected organization. The final draft will also be<br />

submitted as part <strong>of</strong> the final portfolio requirement at the end <strong>of</strong> the second semester. Teacher-<br />

Student conferences will be held the following week (Week 7).<br />

The second unit (Weeks 8-13) is devoted <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Career and Pr<strong>of</strong>ession, an<br />

expansion <strong>of</strong> the ethnographic project in the first semester on academic discourse communities. In<br />

this unit, students will identify a potential major based upon their academic discourse<br />

communities chosen in the previous semester that will eventually lead <strong>to</strong> a potential career or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession. Students will use a variety <strong>of</strong> resources (i.e., course catalogue, online websites,<br />

brochures, experts/pr<strong>of</strong>essional in the field, etc.) within the university and beyond the university<br />

<strong>to</strong> help them pick the ideal major and career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession for them. Students will then present their<br />

research and findings in the form <strong>of</strong> a PowerPoint presentation <strong>to</strong> the entire class. As part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

PowerPoint presentation, students are required <strong>to</strong> include visual representations just like the first<br />

PowerPoint presentation in the first semester. For the writing assignment, students will apply for<br />

a job position in mind by writing an effective resume and cover letter. The resume and cover<br />

letter will be revised multiple times for a letter grade, and with the student’s authorization, may<br />

be sent out <strong>to</strong> a particular company or organization <strong>of</strong> interest by the end <strong>of</strong> the semester. To pass<br />

the course, students must submit their final works in a portfolio <strong>to</strong> receive a final letter grade.<br />

Instructional Materials and Assessment<br />

Currently, there is not a specific textbook <strong>to</strong> use throughout the course that would fulfill<br />

the needs <strong>of</strong> the students. As Ferris & Hedgcock (2005) note, “A textbook’s approach, content,<br />

and tasks may not be entirely relevant or appropriate <strong>to</strong> a particular cohort <strong>of</strong> students and their<br />

educational needs” (p. 126). Furthermore, textbook reading selections, activities, exercises, and<br />

visual enhancements may lack authenticity. In order <strong>to</strong> overcome this gap, the content <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course uses a genre approach <strong>to</strong> teaching reading and writing that incorporates a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

24


authentic texts, ranging from pr<strong>of</strong>essional and academic texts <strong>to</strong> journalistic and periodical<br />

literature, and even samples <strong>of</strong> previous students’ writings gathered from online corpora. In<br />

addition, selected chapters from various different books will also be incorporated in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

curriculum at various points in each semester. Steve Thomas’ JonBenet Ramsey: Inside the<br />

Murder Investigation will be used during the reading and writing workshops in the first semester,<br />

and eventually used as a springboard for writing the argumentative essay (project 1). The Student<br />

Writing Handbook will be used frequently during the course <strong>of</strong> the year as a supplemental <strong>to</strong>ol in<br />

providing more information about the reading, writing, and research processes expected at the<br />

university level. In the second semester, Carlson’s Winning Grants Step by Step will be used as a<br />

guide <strong>to</strong> help students write an effective grant proposal (project 3). The purpose <strong>of</strong> the genre<br />

approach is <strong>to</strong> develop students’ awareness <strong>of</strong> not only academic literacies that they may<br />

encounter in the university system, but also literacies they may encounter in their pr<strong>of</strong>essional,<br />

community, and home lives.<br />

In addition, I will incorporate the use <strong>of</strong> computer as a supplement <strong>to</strong> classroom<br />

instruction. Students will frequently use online corpora as both a research and reference <strong>to</strong>ol for<br />

developing discourse and metalinguistic awareness <strong>of</strong> specific academic and nonacademic texts<br />

throughout the course. The information will come from two primary online corpora: (1) the<br />

Corpus <strong>of</strong> Contemporary American <strong>English</strong> (COCA); and (2) MICASE, developed by a team <strong>of</strong><br />

researchers at the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan in Ann Arbor in coordination with their <strong>English</strong><br />

Language Institute. These two online corpora are free <strong>to</strong> the public. The first corpus, COCA, is an<br />

online, searchable 400 + million word corpus <strong>of</strong> American <strong>English</strong> arranged by register, including<br />

academic texts, news, fiction, magazine, and spoken discourses starting from 1990 through 2009.<br />

The second corpus, MICASE is a collection <strong>of</strong> nearly 1.8 million words <strong>of</strong> transcribed academic<br />

speech along with samples <strong>of</strong> students’ written academic texts across disciplines within various<br />

25


universities across the country. The primary purpose <strong>of</strong> online corpora is essentially <strong>to</strong> help<br />

improve students’ writing in three areas—namely, register awareness, vocabulary development,<br />

and accurate grammatical features—as they continually seek <strong>to</strong> revise each writing assignment<br />

throughout this course.<br />

As for the use <strong>of</strong> sample texts, the Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers<br />

(MICUSP), which is a part <strong>of</strong> the larger MICASE corpus, provides a collection <strong>of</strong> around 830<br />

“A” grade papers (full-texts), ranging from argumentative essays <strong>to</strong> research papers <strong>to</strong> proposals<br />

and reports in a myriad <strong>of</strong> disciplines across four major academic divisions/departments<br />

(Humanities and Arts, Social Sciences, Biological and Health Sciences, and Physical Sciences).<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> the argumentative essay and public policy research paper, a few sample texts will be<br />

extracted from MICUSP and analyzed for both discourse and metalinguistic awareness. Since<br />

online corpora do not cover all genres <strong>of</strong> texts, a few sample texts <strong>of</strong> successful grant proposals<br />

will be taken directly out <strong>of</strong> Carlson’s Winning Grant Step by Step for the grant proposal project<br />

and analyzed, while the final two writing assignments--the newsletter and resume/cover letter--<br />

will rely on texts gathered from various reliable websites for samples <strong>of</strong> newsletter and<br />

resume/cover letter writing. Students will be exposed and limited <strong>to</strong> a minimum <strong>of</strong> two samples<br />

in each <strong>of</strong> the specified writing genre above (i.e., “good” writing and “bad” writing).<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> using the internet <strong>to</strong> rely on sample texts, students will also be required <strong>to</strong><br />

frequently use the Internet (especially Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State online databases and other scholarly<br />

online search engines) for research purposes on the specific assigned writing projects mentioned<br />

above. Learning how <strong>to</strong> conduct effective research is an important skill in developing students’<br />

academic literacies. Finally, students will be required <strong>to</strong> participate in various online<br />

discussions via SacCT with each other about their reading, research, and writing experiences<br />

throughout both semesters.<br />

26


Organization <strong>of</strong> the Project<br />

This project consists <strong>of</strong> two chapters. Chapter 1 discusses the situational analysis<br />

(institution, course, and student needs), the course description (guiding principles, course content,<br />

and course organization), and instructional materials and assessment. Chapter 2 contains a review<br />

<strong>of</strong> the literature on teaching academic reading and writing at the university level for multilingual<br />

students. In addition, this project includes four appendices. Appendix A contains the course<br />

syllabus, which also includes the course requirements, policies, grading criteria, and daily agenda.<br />

Appendix B contains detailed outlines <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the seven major course assignments—(1)<br />

academic discourse community presentation, (2) summary-response writing, (3) argumentative<br />

essay, (4) public policy research paper, (5) grant proposal, (6) newsletter, and (7) resume/cover<br />

letter. Appendix C contains twenty-nine lessons, which consist <strong>of</strong> step-by-step lesson plans along<br />

with relevant materials, handouts, and PowerPoint slides specifically design for the first semester<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course. Appendix D contains summaries <strong>of</strong> the reading materials students will read over the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

27


CHAPTER 2<br />

REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE<br />

The Stretch program is a two-semester sequence that “stretches” first year <strong>English</strong><br />

composition over two semesters, primarily for students who are “at risk” or underrepresented<br />

(i.e., Asian, Hispanic, Blacks, Native Americans, etc.) at the university level. The research on<br />

stretch programs at the university level shows significantly positive results on students’ retention<br />

and pass rates, cumulative grade point average, reading comprehension, critical reasoning, and<br />

writing portfolios (Glau, 2007; Goen & Gillotte-Tropp, 2003; Peele, 2010; Goen-Salter, 2008).<br />

More than ten years after the existence <strong>of</strong> the first basic writing Stretch program at Arizona State<br />

University (ASU), Glau’s (2007) most recent statistical data <strong>of</strong> students enrolled in the Stretch<br />

program continues <strong>to</strong> indicate that the program helps a range <strong>of</strong> “at-risk” students succeed<br />

academically, especially underrepresented students who comprise nearly 40% <strong>of</strong> Stretch program<br />

students. According <strong>to</strong> Glau (2007), underrepresented Stretch students consistently pass first year<br />

<strong>English</strong> composition at a higher rate (90% passing rate) than underrepresented students who take<br />

the conventional route (85% passing rate) (p. 10). Similarly, Peele’s (2010) assessment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Boise State Stretch program (based on Glau’s ASU Stretch Program) shows that students who<br />

complete the Stretch program perform significantly better in all areas studied—retention and pass<br />

rates, portfolio assessment, and cumulative GPA—compared with the control group (students<br />

who take the conventional route for satisfying the first year composition requirement) (p. 51).<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Peele (2010), 80% <strong>of</strong> Stretch students continued on <strong>to</strong> enroll in first year<br />

composition as opposed <strong>to</strong> the 59% <strong>of</strong> students who <strong>to</strong>ok the traditional route <strong>to</strong> enroll in first<br />

year composition. In addition, students who completed the Stretch program achieved portfolio<br />

assessment results “largely indistinguishable from students who enrolled in Mainstream <strong>English</strong>”<br />

(p. 62).<br />

28


In response <strong>to</strong> the need <strong>to</strong> eliminate or limit remediation in the California State University<br />

(CSU) system, San Francisco State University (SFSU) has also implemented the Stretch sequence<br />

in<strong>to</strong> its program. Unlike the Stretch programs before where instruction was primarily on learning<br />

how <strong>to</strong> write (and not on learning how <strong>to</strong> read), San Francisco State University has taken the<br />

initiative in creating the first Stretch Program in which instruction in reading and writing is fully<br />

integrated. Rather than requiring the conventional two basic writing classes, two reading classes,<br />

and another first-year composition class required <strong>of</strong> all “at-risk” students, the new integrated<br />

reading/writing program (IRW) places these students in<strong>to</strong> a single year-long course in which<br />

instruction in reading and writing are explicitly interconnected. Students who successfully<br />

complete the new year-long course not only meet the CSU remediation requirement, but also<br />

satisfy SFSU’s first-year written composition requirement, completing in one year what would<br />

traditionally take three semesters <strong>to</strong> accomplish. As Goen-Salter (2008) reveals, the results for the<br />

first three years show that Stretch students had higher retention rates, completed the remediation<br />

requirement at a higher rate, received higher ratings on their writing portfolios, and passed<br />

second- year composition courses at a higher rate than the control group who <strong>to</strong>ok the traditional<br />

route <strong>of</strong> enrolling in second-year composition (p. 88).<br />

While all <strong>of</strong> the literature pertaining <strong>to</strong> the Stretch program focuses primarily on “at-risk”<br />

and underrepresented students, none fully addresses the needs <strong>of</strong> multilingual students in separate<br />

tracks. The research studies presented did not differentiate between students in the normal tracks<br />

and the multilingual tracks, nor did they differentiate between native speakers and non-native<br />

speakers in the data. Instead, the data in these research studies applies <strong>to</strong> all “at-risk” students<br />

(native speakers and non-native speakers) and those in all tracks. However, one ESL instruc<strong>to</strong>r,<br />

Vik<strong>to</strong>rija Todorovska, did present her perspective on the Stretch program at the Annual Meeting<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Conference on College Composition and Communication. In her paper titled “An ESL<br />

29


Instruc<strong>to</strong>r’s Perspective on the Stretch Program” (1996), she describes how Stretch 107, a first-<br />

year composition course for international students at Arizona State University, is designed <strong>to</strong><br />

provide international students with various strategies for writing acceptable prose in <strong>English</strong>. The<br />

Stretch program not only gives ESL students more time <strong>to</strong> work on their assignments by<br />

providing ample opportunities <strong>to</strong> generate ideas and revise their writings, but also makes it<br />

possible for these students <strong>to</strong> “improve their overall speaking, listening, reading, and grammar in<br />

addition <strong>to</strong> their writing skills” (p. 7). She mentions how she is able <strong>to</strong> put forth a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />

time working with students on an individual basis, “pointing out the kinds <strong>of</strong> errors they make,<br />

and finding ways <strong>to</strong> eliminate those errors one at a time” (p. 7). In addition, students develop a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> community since the Stretch classes are relatively small and the students spend two<br />

semesters working with the same instruc<strong>to</strong>r (p. 8) As Todorovska (1996) notes, “they start <strong>to</strong> feel<br />

more comfortable working with me and with their peers as the semester progresses and come <strong>to</strong><br />

see me as somebody who understands the kinds <strong>of</strong> problems that they are facing” (p. 8). Although<br />

Todorovska does shed some light on the ESL experience in the existing Stretch program at ASU,<br />

she only focuses on one specific group <strong>of</strong> ESL students—namely, the international students.<br />

There needs <strong>to</strong> be more research done on ESL students as a whole in these existing Multilingual<br />

Stretch programs, particularly in regards <strong>to</strong> Generation 1.5 students.<br />

The Reading and Writing Connection<br />

Overwhelming research on L1 and L2 writing instruction shows that one cannot<br />

successfully teach writing without also simultaneously teaching reading (Belcher & Hirvela,<br />

2001; Beach & Liebman-Kleine, 1986; Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009;<br />

Kroll, 2001; Hyland, 2002; Zamel, 1992). In order for one <strong>to</strong> become a skilled writer, one also<br />

needs <strong>to</strong> develop a host <strong>of</strong> literacy skills, “including the ability <strong>to</strong> comprehend written text<br />

efficiently—fluently and accurately” (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005, p. 31). In effect, reading and<br />

30


writing are essentially an integral part <strong>of</strong> the literacy process. Literacy then consists <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> cognitive abilities and knowledge <strong>of</strong> various sociocultural structures and<br />

ideologies (Cope & Kalantzis, 2000; Eskey, 1993; Hyland, 2002). Current L2 research<br />

predominantly aligns with the bidirectional model <strong>of</strong> the reading and writing relationship (an<br />

interactive approach), where “practice in writing promotes the development <strong>of</strong> reading skills, just<br />

as improved reading pr<strong>of</strong>iciency can enhance writing skills” (Zamel, 1992, p. 465). Unlike the<br />

directional model, where reading skills must precede writing skills, the reading and writing<br />

processes in the bidirectional model are not sequential in nature, but rather recursive, capable <strong>of</strong><br />

influencing each other at any point in the reading and writing processes (Grabe & Stroller, 2002;<br />

Heller, 1999). In essence, the bidirectional model focuses on the multiple relations and<br />

interrelated processes that seem <strong>to</strong> constitute the reading and writing relationship, thereby<br />

supporting the literacy aspects <strong>of</strong> reading and writing as always being situated in sociocultural<br />

contexts (Cope & Kalantzis, 2000; Fairclough, 2000; Hyland, 2002; Zamel & Spack, 1998).<br />

Street’s (1995) ideological model <strong>of</strong> literacy <strong>of</strong>fers educa<strong>to</strong>rs better opportunities for<br />

working with students <strong>of</strong> diverse backgrounds. In this model, literacy is viewed as a social<br />

construction, “as sets <strong>of</strong> practices shaped and carried out by different groups <strong>of</strong> people” (as cited<br />

in Au, 2006, p. 39). Consequently, essayist literacy, or the argumentative reading and writing<br />

practices reflected by the university system, is viewed as only one type <strong>of</strong> literacy (although this<br />

type <strong>of</strong> literacy is seen as the most dominant form <strong>of</strong> reading and writing within American<br />

universities) (Au, 2006). In accordance with this socioliterate model <strong>of</strong> the reading and writing<br />

connection, recent research suggests that L2 writing teachers should “adopt an approach <strong>to</strong><br />

writing instruction that nurtures learners’ participation in a rich diversity <strong>of</strong> academic and<br />

nonacademic literacies,” in addition <strong>to</strong> developing their pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in producing appropriate<br />

writing genres (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 47). Literacy must also include digital literacy<br />

31


(digital texts) such as those found on the Web, which we associate with “technologically<br />

mediated textual, communicative, and informational practices” (Eagle<strong>to</strong>n & Dobler, 2007;<br />

Ingraham, et al., 2007). More importantly, within the realm <strong>of</strong> academic literacy instruction, L2<br />

reading and writing instruc<strong>to</strong>rs should equip L2 learners with specific reading and writing<br />

skills/strategies <strong>to</strong> master the discourse patterns <strong>of</strong> the academic community in general and <strong>of</strong> the<br />

specific-disciplines they wish <strong>to</strong> join (Hyland, 2002; Johns, 1997; Lewis, 2001; Mavor &<br />

Trayner, 2001). The teaching <strong>of</strong> L2 composition should be seen as an opportunity <strong>to</strong> build<br />

“students’ academic, vocational, pr<strong>of</strong>essional, social, and cultural literacies, which clearly are<br />

multiple and informed by numerous types <strong>of</strong> expertise” (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2009, p. 33).<br />

In aligning with the teaching <strong>of</strong> L2 composition for developing students’ academic and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional literacies, all <strong>of</strong> the writing materials in this course will be developed and intended<br />

for real audiences within the academy and beyond (by being situated in their particular socio-<br />

cultural and educational contexts). Not only will all the writing assignments in this course be<br />

submitted <strong>to</strong> the instruc<strong>to</strong>r for a final grade, but students will also have the option <strong>of</strong> submitting<br />

their works <strong>to</strong> audiences situated beyond the classroom. Students will have the option <strong>of</strong><br />

submitting their own argumentative essay (project 1) and public policy research paper (project 2)<br />

in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the year booklet for future students <strong>to</strong> see, as well as optionally submitting their<br />

grant proposal research paper (project 3) and newsletter assignment (project 4) <strong>to</strong> real local<br />

organizations in connection <strong>to</strong> their service-learning experience. In addition, students will also<br />

have the option <strong>of</strong> submitting their own resume/cover letter writing (project 5) <strong>to</strong> various local<br />

companies and organizations for career/pr<strong>of</strong>essional job advancements. Because <strong>of</strong> the distinct<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the different writing genres presented in this course, students will be immersed in<br />

authentic and meaningful social interaction/transactions with real audiences, thereby enhancing<br />

their communicative competence within a variety <strong>of</strong> academic and pr<strong>of</strong>essional settings.<br />

32


Service-Learning<br />

The authentic and meaningful nature <strong>of</strong> the different writing genres is further increased<br />

by the implementation <strong>of</strong> the service-learning experience. In a service-learning course, students’<br />

community service experiences are essentially integrated with the academic learning objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the course. In this integrated model, “service and learning are reciprocally related; the service<br />

learning experiences inform and transform the academic learning, and the academic learning<br />

informs and transforms the service learning experience” (Howard, 1998, p. 22). The literature<br />

review on service-learning in higher education has shown exceedingly positive results. Students<br />

participating in service-learning have consistently shown academic improvements in critical<br />

thinking and writing skills, increased motivation, higher retention and passing rates, and greater<br />

civic engagement and responsibility within the community (Hertzberg, 1994; Kincaid & Sotiriou,<br />

2004; Kraemer, 2005; Rochford & Hock, 2010). Similarly, the literature on service-learning<br />

pertaining <strong>to</strong> students in first-year composition or basic writing courses has essentially achieved<br />

the same positive results. More specifically, research studies on these service-learning writing<br />

courses have shown notable outcomes in developing students’ basic writing and research skills<br />

(Adler-Kassner, et al., 1997; Brack & Hall, 1997; Hertzberg, 1994; Howard, 1998; Rochford &<br />

Hock, 2010; Stavrianopoulos, 2008; Thomas, 2000; Weigert, 1998).<br />

A primary motive among first-year writing instruc<strong>to</strong>rs for incorporating service-learning<br />

in<strong>to</strong> their classrooms is the fear <strong>of</strong> “isolating” student writing—what Thomas (2000) labels as the<br />

“empty assignment syndrome,” where writing activities are seen as purely academic exercises (p.<br />

93). Universities such as Stanford and San Francisco State have incorporated service-learning<br />

programs in<strong>to</strong> their freshman <strong>English</strong> courses as a mean <strong>to</strong> solve the “empty assignment<br />

syndrome” by providing “meaningful writing tasks with audience beyond the classroom” (Bacon,<br />

1997, p. 39). Similarly, the service-learning writing program at Arizona State University (ASU)<br />

33


has consistently found “in community service the source <strong>of</strong> promising <strong>to</strong>pics for student writing”<br />

(Thomas, 2000, p. 94). In Service-Learning <strong>English</strong> 102 at ASU, for example, students complete<br />

two synthesis assignments (argumentative & problem-solution) in which they must incorporate<br />

their service-learning experience with the reading assignments (Brack & Hall, 1997, p. 149).<br />

Along with the two synthesis assignments, students must also conduct semester-long research on<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics relevant <strong>to</strong> their service-learning experience. As Brack & Hall (1997) note, the research<br />

papers encourage “students <strong>to</strong> consider their [service-learning] experience as it relates <strong>to</strong> their<br />

research and <strong>to</strong> demonstrate effective analysis and synthesis <strong>of</strong> both” (p. 149).<br />

Although the literature on service-learning focuses primarily on the needs <strong>of</strong> basic writers<br />

in either first-year composition or basic writing courses, none fully addresses the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

multilingual students situated within these courses, particularly Generation 1.5 students.<br />

Generally, the literature makes no distinction between the writing and research improvements <strong>of</strong><br />

native and non-native speakers participating in community service at the college level. However,<br />

there are some documented instances <strong>of</strong> writing benefits gained by the recipients <strong>of</strong> service-<br />

learning, <strong>of</strong>ten times ESL college students. For example, Kincaid and Sotiriou (2004) discovered<br />

that when first year composition students men<strong>to</strong>red intermediate ESL writers within the same<br />

college, both groups reported (a) an improvement in their basic writing skills, (b) a greater<br />

awareness <strong>to</strong> attend <strong>to</strong> details in their own writing, and (c) the need for developing an array <strong>of</strong><br />

effective editing strategies. Beside these few documented instances where college ESL students<br />

have been paired with service-learning students, the literature for service-learning regarding<br />

college-level ESL students, specifically Generation 1.5 students enrolled in either first-year<br />

composition or a basic writing course, is essentially absent. Rather, service-learning as a<br />

pedagogy for language teaching--both for <strong>English</strong> as a Second Language and Foreign Language<br />

for native <strong>English</strong> speakers--has gained precedence in recent years. ESL instruc<strong>to</strong>rs who have<br />

34


incorporated service-learning in the classrooms have noted linguistic gains not only in their<br />

student’s acquisition <strong>of</strong> the language in all four areas--listening, speaking, reading, and writing--<br />

but also a significant increase in their motivation <strong>to</strong> learn the target language through community<br />

work (Heuser, 1999; Marlow, 2007; Minor, 2001; Mullaney, 1999; Steinke, 2009). In essence, the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>day’s ESL service-learning courses/programs is <strong>to</strong> provide second language learners<br />

ample opportunities outside <strong>of</strong> the classroom <strong>to</strong> practice authentic dialog with native speakers in<br />

the community as a means <strong>to</strong> improve their overall language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency, and not necessarily <strong>to</strong><br />

develop academic literacies.<br />

One particular study among the ESL literature, however, does reveal some promising<br />

results for college-level ESL students participating in service-learning. Elwell and Bean (2001)<br />

incorporated a service-learning component in<strong>to</strong> an ESL reading course at a public two-year<br />

college, detailing how the students participated in a collection drive <strong>to</strong> help the plight <strong>of</strong> migrant<br />

farm workers. The outcome <strong>of</strong> the community service was extremely positive as “the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

supplies gathered by this one class was greater than that gathered by the rest <strong>of</strong> the college’s<br />

entire student body” (Elwell & Bean, 2001, p. 57). Academically, the students noted that the<br />

community experience connected them more closely <strong>to</strong> their reading <strong>of</strong> Steinbeck’s novel and the<br />

related reflective assignments. As a result, not only did the students improve on their basic<br />

reading and writing skills by the end <strong>of</strong> the semester, but they also learned how <strong>to</strong> effectively<br />

conduct library research—particularly in using the “library’s on-line catalog and accessing,<br />

navigating, and retrieving information” for their in-class writing assignments (p. 57-58). On a<br />

personal level, these students began <strong>to</strong> view themselves as important members and valuable<br />

human beings who could make substantial contributions <strong>to</strong> society, even with their “less than<br />

fluent <strong>English</strong> skills” (p. 58). In the end, they saw Steinbeck’s reading and writing assignments<br />

35


not merely as isolated academic exercises, but as a “community service-project that possessed<br />

real-world relevance on several levels: academic, personal, and societal” (p. 59).<br />

As for this course, the service-learning experience will also be integrated in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

academic learning objectives as it seeks <strong>to</strong> remedy the “empty assignment syndrome” that is so<br />

prevalent among first-year composition and other basic writing courses. Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the research<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics for the writing assignments in this course will come directly from the students’ service-<br />

learning experience. In the first semester, students will use their service-learning experience <strong>to</strong><br />

develop a pertinent research <strong>to</strong>pic for the public policy research paper (Project 2). As a<br />

requirement for this assignment, they will be required <strong>to</strong> use the data gathered at their community<br />

site as a primary source in completing the research paper. In the second semester, students will<br />

once again use their service-learning experience <strong>to</strong> complete another research project—the grant<br />

proposal. For the grant proposal assignment, students will be required <strong>to</strong> collaborate with the site<br />

supervisor and come up with one potential project proposal (or idea). In completing this<br />

assignment, students must include the theoretical underpinnings or abstractions learned in class<br />

about how <strong>to</strong> write an effective research grant proposal appropriate <strong>to</strong> the specific discourse<br />

communities (i.e. the selected organization & potential fundraising agencies). Finally, students<br />

will end their service-learning experience by writing a newsletter about their selected<br />

organization. In sum, the service-learning component is meant <strong>to</strong> provide these students with a<br />

context that is meaningful and authentic, where the writing assignments are seen as genuine tasks,<br />

and not merely artificial academic exercises.<br />

Reading and Writing Workshops<br />

Recent research on reading and writing workshops reveal how useful these workshops<br />

can be for developing both L1 and L2 students’ reading and writing skills/strategies, especially at<br />

the university level (Au, 2006; Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009; Ransdell,<br />

36


2001). More specifically within the L2 community, classroom activities that are group oriented<br />

align greatly with current second language acquisition principles about the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

interaction for L2 development and pr<strong>of</strong>iciency. Beside developing L2 pr<strong>of</strong>iciency in general,<br />

workshops on reading and writing can provide L2 learners with the following 3 types <strong>of</strong> learning<br />

experiences: (1) learning by engaging in the full processes <strong>of</strong> reading and writing for an extended<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time; (2) learning by developing and practicing certain reading and writing<br />

skills/strategies; and (3) learning by using authentic texts for discourse awareness (An, 2006;<br />

Elbow & Belan<strong>of</strong>f, 1995; Lawrence & Sommers, 1996; Miller & Higgins 2008 ; Ransdell, 2001).<br />

As a result, the first semester <strong>of</strong> the course relies heavily on various reading and writing<br />

workshops. The reading and writing workshops are divided in<strong>to</strong> the following three components<br />

for building students’ overall reading and writing skills/strategies: (1) intensive reading<br />

workshop; (2) heuristic workshop approach <strong>to</strong> the writing process; and (3) peer review workshop.<br />

Intensive Reading<br />

In regards <strong>to</strong> developing effective reading strategies in order <strong>to</strong> aid in reading<br />

comprehension <strong>of</strong> academic texts, researchers note that intensive reading is by far the<br />

“predominant approach <strong>to</strong> L2 academic reading instruction, as well as language and literacy<br />

courses that feature reading as a major component (Grabe & Stroller, 2001; Hedgcock & Ferris,<br />

2009). The framework <strong>of</strong> the intensive reading model is conceptualized in<strong>to</strong> three distinct<br />

phases—namely, pre-reading, during-reading, and after-reading (Grabe & S<strong>to</strong>ller, 2001;<br />

Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009). Most L2 reading experts agree that one <strong>of</strong> the most important benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> intensive reading is teaching effective reading strategies (Aebersold & Field, 1997; Grabe &<br />

Stroller, 2001; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009) In fact, one <strong>of</strong> the primary goals <strong>of</strong> intensive reading is<br />

not overt attention <strong>to</strong> specific texts, but <strong>to</strong> build “strategy readers” by “developing and improving<br />

reading skills that will help them throughout their academic, pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and personal lives”<br />

37


(Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 69). The development <strong>of</strong> these reading strategies and skills are<br />

adopted within the California State University Exposi<strong>to</strong>ry Reading and Writing Task Force ‘s<br />

(2008) framework, which “outline[s] crucial academic reading skills and strategies for intensive<br />

reading” needed for L2 learners <strong>to</strong> succeed in the academic setting (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p.<br />

163). In this framework (see Table 3), each discrete skill is neatly categorized within each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three reading phases (e.g. pre-reading, during-reading, post-reading).<br />

Table 3:<br />

Intensive Reading Framework<br />

Pre-Reading During-Reading After-Reading<br />

1. Getting ready <strong>to</strong> read<br />

2. Surveying the text<br />

3. Introducing language<br />

1. First reading<br />

2. Re-reading the text<br />

3. Looking at language<br />

4. Considering the<br />

structure <strong>of</strong> the text<br />

Note: Adapted from Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 163<br />

1. Summarizing and<br />

responding<br />

2. Thinking critically<br />

3. Reading-Writing<br />

connection<br />

Like the intensive reading framework shown in Table 3, this course will also<br />

conceptualize the reading process in<strong>to</strong> three distinct phases (pre-reading, during-reading, and<br />

after-reading) with each discrete skill organized accordingly within each <strong>of</strong> the three reading<br />

components. By organizing the reading process this way, this course hopes <strong>to</strong> develop strategic<br />

readers by providing a meaningful context for reading that can be transferable <strong>to</strong> a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

different contexts, rather than learning these strategies in isolated incidents and in<br />

decontextualized situations.<br />

38


Pre-Reading<br />

Scanning and Skimming. In the “surveying the text” component <strong>of</strong> the pre-reading<br />

phase, several reading strategies are commonly employed. Most research studies suggest that<br />

scanning and skimming are highly effective reading skills in facilitating reading comprehension<br />

prior <strong>to</strong> reading the text (Grabe & S<strong>to</strong>ller, 2001; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009; Mikulecky & Jeffries,<br />

1996). According <strong>to</strong> Mikulecky and Jeffries (1996), the purpose <strong>of</strong> scanning is <strong>to</strong> examine a text<br />

before reading with a purpose in mind; whereas, the purpose <strong>of</strong> skimming is <strong>to</strong> get an overall<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> the text (p. 15). Scanning and skimming give the reader a “quick sense <strong>of</strong> the text’s<br />

main ideas and macrostructure” by strategically looking at the title, information on the author,<br />

subtitles or subheadings, and visual aids (e.g. pictures, graphs, tables), as well as the different<br />

typography before the actual reading <strong>of</strong> the text at hand (Grabe & Stroller, 2002; Hedgcock &<br />

Ferris, 2009; Mikulecky & Jeffries, 1996). Both L1 and L2 reading studies consistently indicate<br />

that comprehension is enhanced by gaining an overview <strong>of</strong> a text prior <strong>to</strong> reading it (Aebersold &<br />

Field, 1997; Eskey, 1986; Grabe & S<strong>to</strong>ller, 2001, 2002; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009). Throughout<br />

the years, teachers and educa<strong>to</strong>rs have identified some common activities for surveying the text<br />

(see Table 4), which highly incorporate both scanning and skimming techniques prior <strong>to</strong> reading<br />

the text for increased overall reading comprehension (Aebersold & Field, 1997; Grabe and<br />

Stroller, 2001; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009).<br />

Since these skimming and scanning activities have been proven <strong>to</strong> build reading<br />

comprehension, students in this course will also practice these activities on a variety <strong>of</strong> academic<br />

texts, more extensively during the reading process workshop (Weeks 3 <strong>to</strong> 5). Before the actual<br />

reading <strong>of</strong> the texts, students will perform nearly all <strong>of</strong> the pre-reading activities for surveying the<br />

text (as shown in Table 4) as ways <strong>to</strong> increase overall reading comprehension <strong>of</strong> the various<br />

39


academic texts they will encountered in the first semester. Students will reflect on their scanning<br />

and skimming experiences with other students online via SacCT.<br />

Table 4:<br />

Activities for Surveying Texts<br />

1. Examine the title; identify and define key words; paraphrase title.<br />

2. Read the introduction.<br />

3. Read the conclusion.<br />

4. Sample the first sentence <strong>of</strong> each body paragraph <strong>to</strong> get an overview.<br />

5. Skim the entire text for overall meaning.<br />

6. Scan the text for specific details that could assist overall comprehension.<br />

7. Outline the macrostructure <strong>of</strong> the text (e.g. introduction, body, and conclusion).<br />

Note: Adapted from Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 167<br />

Making Prediction and Asking Questions. Making reasonable predictions and asking<br />

questions before reading a text have been proven <strong>to</strong> increase student’s overall comprehension <strong>of</strong><br />

the text (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009; Grabe & Stroller, 2001). Students take information gathered<br />

from surveying the text <strong>to</strong> make reasonable predictions or form questions about the text at hand.<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Hedgcock & Ferris (2009), the more that students’ predictions are later confirmed,<br />

the more confidence they can develop in terms <strong>of</strong> building their comprehension skills. On the<br />

other hand, if students’ predictions and questions prove <strong>to</strong> be inaccurate, then “the mismatches<br />

teach learners that careful reading, not just quick assumptions or guessing, is critical” <strong>to</strong> the<br />

overall comprehension <strong>of</strong> the text (p.168). In addition, many L2 experts mention the need for<br />

teachers <strong>to</strong> guide students on how <strong>to</strong> formulate reasonable predictions so that the students<br />

themselves can turn those predictions in<strong>to</strong> relevant questions. A number <strong>of</strong> studies and reviews<br />

have shown that one <strong>of</strong> the best ways <strong>to</strong> teach students these effective reading strategies is<br />

through explicit modeling (Aebersold & Field, 1997; Grabe & Stroller, 2001; Janzen, 1996). In<br />

40


Janzen’s (1996) strategic reading course, for example, she explicitly modeled these reading<br />

strategies through a reading-and-thinking-aloud technique. In the reading-and-thinking aloud<br />

activity, students were required <strong>to</strong> predict and ask certain questions before embarking on the<br />

reading task, as well as predicting and asking questions about what would come next after reading<br />

a small portion <strong>of</strong> the text. Similarly, students in this course will use a reading-and-thinking-aloud<br />

technique <strong>to</strong> come up with predictions and questions during the reading workshop. Before<br />

embarking on the specific reading task, students will share their predictions and questions aloud<br />

<strong>to</strong> the students next <strong>to</strong> them. This pre-reading activity will be modeled and practiced during the<br />

weeks <strong>of</strong> the reading process workshop, in the hope that students will use this strategy throughout<br />

the semester as they continue <strong>to</strong> read a variety <strong>of</strong> other academic texts. Students will also reflect<br />

on this particular experience with other students online via SacCT.<br />

During-Reading<br />

Highlighting & Annotating. Many L2 reading experts have noted the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

highlighting and annotating during the “during-reading” phase, especially in regards <strong>to</strong> the re-<br />

reading <strong>of</strong> the text for a more careful examination (Aeberersold & Field, 1997; Grabe & Stroller,<br />

2001; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009). Hedgcock & Ferris (2009) point out that reading the text a<br />

second time can “ensure student comprehension” and provide opportunities <strong>to</strong> “teach and practice<br />

effective reading strategies” (p. 175). Highlighting and annotating are valuable intensive reading<br />

skills, both for “comprehension moni<strong>to</strong>ring while reading and for review after reading”<br />

(Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 176). However, most incoming freshmen are unclear about what <strong>to</strong><br />

highlight and annotate when reading most academic texts. Effective highlighting should focus<br />

primarily on key ideas and quotations in a passage; whereas, effective annotations give readers<br />

the opportunity <strong>to</strong> “jot notes, comments, and questions in the margins <strong>of</strong> texts as they read them”<br />

(Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 176). In addition, effective annotations should vary “according <strong>to</strong><br />

41


one’s purpose(s) for reading, the genre, and individual text” (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 177).<br />

Most research studies and reviews suggest that both teacher modeling and structured practice can<br />

be helpful in providing students with effective highlighting and annotating skills. They<br />

recommend that teachers can help students develop highlighting and annotating strategies by<br />

giving them a reading purpose(s) and multiple opportunities <strong>to</strong> practice throughout the semester.<br />

In line with this approach, the instruc<strong>to</strong>r will first model some appropriate ways <strong>to</strong> annotate and<br />

highlight specific academic texts. Students will then have ample opportunities <strong>to</strong> practice these<br />

effective highlighting and annotating skills throughout the course with many <strong>of</strong> the reading<br />

materials presented in the class. Finally, students will be required <strong>to</strong> submit one example <strong>of</strong> their<br />

best highlighting and annotating skills in the final portfolio submission.<br />

Graphic Organizer (GO). As a comprehension <strong>to</strong>ol, graphic organizers have been highly<br />

recommended by many L2 reading experts in reading and writing courses (Hedgcock & Ferris,<br />

2009; Grabe & Stroller, 2001; Jiang & Grabe, 2007). Using a graphic organizer for text structure<br />

(how texts are structured rhe<strong>to</strong>rically) will facilitate the understanding <strong>of</strong> meaning and ideas in a<br />

particular text. In the “during-reading” phase, students can create graphic organizers as ways <strong>to</strong><br />

discern text structure and organization, as well as <strong>to</strong> pull “out key facts and relationships and <strong>to</strong><br />

record them in a visual format different from the information contained in potentially dense and<br />

lengthy paragraphs” <strong>of</strong> many academic texts (Grabe & S<strong>to</strong>ller, 2001). In the study by Jiang<br />

& Grabe (2007), the authors found that use <strong>of</strong> GOs “facilitate comprehension <strong>of</strong> macrostructures<br />

and recall <strong>of</strong> main ideas” <strong>of</strong> different discourse texts (p. 34). They also found that different texts<br />

require a different GO depending on the “discourse structure <strong>of</strong> the text” (p. 34). The most<br />

common types <strong>of</strong> GOs are definitions, compare-contrast, cause-effect, process and sequence,<br />

problem-solving, classification, argument, and for-against. More importantly, they discovered<br />

that GOs constructed by students themselves were found <strong>to</strong> be more effective than those<br />

42


constructed by teachers. As Jiang & Grabe (2007) note “The active involvement <strong>of</strong> readers in<br />

constructing a GO, even simply finishing a partially complete graph, provides them with an<br />

opportunity for deeper processing <strong>of</strong> the materials than studying GO produced by others” (p. 42).<br />

Most L2 reading experts, including Jiang & Grabe (2007), suggest the need for teachers <strong>to</strong> model<br />

appropriate GOs for students so that they can eventually learn how <strong>to</strong> do it independently.<br />

During the reading workshop, the instruc<strong>to</strong>r will first model appropriate GOs for students <strong>to</strong><br />

analyze and evaluate. Students will then receive the opportunity <strong>to</strong> practice constructing GOs<br />

independently throughout the semester as they tackle new reading materials.<br />

After-Reading<br />

Summary and Response Writing. Summary and response-writings are excellent<br />

“comprehension check <strong>to</strong>ols” for the after-reading phrase. An important element <strong>of</strong> summary<br />

writing is that it “requires the writer <strong>to</strong> express the main points <strong>of</strong> a text she [or he] has read<br />

succinctly and in her [or his] own words” (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009, p. 185). As noted by many<br />

L2 reading experts, the summary writing activity is a perfect springboard for the response writing<br />

activity (Aebersold & Field, 1997; Grabe & Stroller, 2001; Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009). In the<br />

response writing activity, students have the opportunity <strong>to</strong> react <strong>to</strong> the text based on their personal<br />

experiences and beliefs. But more importantly, as noted by Ferris & Hedgcock (2009), the<br />

response activity “is a necessary precursor <strong>to</strong> critical evaluation <strong>of</strong> textual content, as our own<br />

emotional responses and prior experiences impact our ability <strong>to</strong> analyze an author’s ideas and<br />

arguments objectively” (p. 186). As a result, these writing activities can aid in the development <strong>of</strong><br />

students’ critical thinking skills. In addition, many L2 reading experts have noted that<br />

summarizing is a complex skill <strong>to</strong> master and suggest teachers should train students by modeling<br />

this process repeatedly throughout the entire course (Grabe & S<strong>to</strong>ller, 2001; Mikulecky, 1990). In<br />

Robb’s (2001) reading course, for example, during the first three weeks he trained his<br />

43


students how <strong>to</strong> write effective summaries by providing several models <strong>of</strong> “good” summary<br />

writings and “bad” summary writings, while also using a guided checklist <strong>to</strong> evaluate these<br />

writings. He repeatedly evaluated each student’s summary writing with this guided checklist<br />

throughout the course.<br />

Similar <strong>to</strong> Robb’s reading course, students in this course will be trained how <strong>to</strong> write an<br />

effective summary and response paper during the reading process workshop (in week 5) by<br />

analyzing several models <strong>of</strong> “good” and “bad” summary-response writings, while also using a<br />

rubric. Students will continue <strong>to</strong> use this rubric as a checklist throughout the semester, as they<br />

continually seek <strong>to</strong> revise the summary-response paper for submission in the final portfolio. In<br />

addition, students will transfer these writing skills in<strong>to</strong> other writing assignments encountered<br />

throughout the course, as they are required <strong>to</strong> present a brief summary <strong>of</strong> their chosen public<br />

policy issue in their public policy research paper, as well as <strong>to</strong> write an abstract section in their<br />

grant proposal project.<br />

Thinking Critically. Although this may be a new experience for some L2 students who<br />

have grown up in cultures that never criticize or disrespect authority, helping students <strong>to</strong> think<br />

critically is a major part <strong>of</strong> succeeding in U.S. postsecondary education (Aebersold & Field,<br />

1997; Hirvela, 2004). As a result, it is essential for both reading and writing teachers <strong>to</strong> help<br />

develop L2 students’ critical thinking skills. Bloom’s Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Cognitive Domains has<br />

proven <strong>to</strong> be a useful framework for describing these critical thinking skills. According <strong>to</strong><br />

Bloom’s framework, there are six different types <strong>of</strong> cognitive abilities---namely, Knowledge,<br />

Comprehension, Application, Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation. Of these cognitive abilities,<br />

the analysis, synthesis, and evaluation domains are essential for developing students’ critical<br />

skills (see Table 5).<br />

44


Table 5:<br />

Bloom’s Taxonomy <strong>of</strong> Cognitive Domains<br />

Competence Demonstrated Skills<br />

Analysis (making<br />

connections among details)<br />

Synthesis (combining<br />

elements in<strong>to</strong> a new coherent<br />

whole)<br />

Evaluation (judging the<br />

adequacy <strong>of</strong> materials or<br />

ideas for a given purpose)<br />

Seeing patterns; organization <strong>of</strong> parts; and recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

components.<br />

Note: Adapted from Singhal, M. (2004). p. 5-6.<br />

Use old ideas <strong>to</strong> create new ones; generalize from given<br />

facts; and relate knowledge from several areas; predict,<br />

draw conclusions.<br />

Compare and discriminate between ideas; assess value<br />

<strong>of</strong> theories, presentations; make choices based on<br />

reasoned argument; verify value <strong>of</strong> evidence; recognize<br />

subjectivity; and apply logos, ethos, & pathos.<br />

A variety <strong>of</strong> in-class activities can help students <strong>to</strong> think critically about a text in the post-<br />

reading stage. For example, in-class debates are extremely helpful in developing students’ critical<br />

thinking skills, especially when a text presents two sides <strong>of</strong> an issue. In addition, students can<br />

respond in writing or in a whole class discussion <strong>to</strong> questions about the text at hand, or even<br />

compose an argumentative essay in which they take a position on the issues presented in the text.<br />

Generally speaking, thinking critically about the text not only “promotes deeper comprehension<br />

and good reading strategies but should also give students ideas and models for their own writing”<br />

(Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009). Like the in-class activities mentioned above, this course will also<br />

incorporate some <strong>of</strong> the same post-reading activities <strong>to</strong> develop students’ critical thinking skills as<br />

well. For example, in all <strong>of</strong> the reading assignments encountered in the first semester, students<br />

will first be required <strong>to</strong> critically analyze and evaluate the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view, his/her<br />

45


he<strong>to</strong>rical situation (purpose, persona, and audience), and his/her rhe<strong>to</strong>rical strategies (logs,<br />

pathos, ethos). Students will then synthesize these elements in which they must take position <strong>of</strong><br />

the ideas/issues presented in<strong>to</strong> a coherent piece <strong>of</strong> academic prose acceptable at the university<br />

level for the argumentative essay and public policy research paper. For the unit on Public Policy,<br />

students will be required <strong>to</strong> participate in debates pertaining <strong>to</strong> certain social issues in order <strong>to</strong><br />

further develop their critical thinking skills needed <strong>to</strong> tackle the public policy research paper.<br />

Heuristic Approach <strong>to</strong> the Writing Process<br />

L2 students need <strong>to</strong> develop specific writing strategies and skills for composing fluently<br />

and accurately, especially in postsecondary education in the United States (Ferris & Hedgcock,<br />

2005; Hyland, 2002; Kroll, 2001). Broadly speaking, the composing process is essentially made<br />

up <strong>of</strong> the following three broad phrases—namely, the invention phase, the planning and drafting<br />

phase, and the revising and editing phase. As research shows, the composing process is highly<br />

recursive and interactive, and not sequential in nature (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005; Flower &<br />

Hayes, 1981; Zamel, 1983). In addition, depending on the writing situation, some writing<br />

strategies and skills will be more appropriate, and more relevant than others within the particular<br />

socio-cultural context and constraint <strong>of</strong> the writing situation. As a result, teachers should equip<br />

students with an array <strong>of</strong> heuristics and writing strategies, as some strategies will be a better fit <strong>to</strong><br />

the particular composing writing task at hand than will others, especially in regards <strong>to</strong> academic<br />

writing (Hedgcock & Ferris, 2009; Flower & Hayes, 1981). In essence, a heuristic procedure <strong>to</strong><br />

writing uses an array <strong>of</strong> writing strategies and skills during the composing process appropriate <strong>to</strong><br />

the socio-cultural context and constraint <strong>of</strong> the particular writing situation.<br />

Invention Strategies. Unstructured prewriting techniques such as freewriting,<br />

brains<strong>to</strong>rming, and listing are all important invention strategies <strong>to</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> writing. These<br />

unstructured prewriting techniques aim <strong>to</strong> stimulate creative thought and invention under<br />

46


uninhibited conditions (Elbow & Belan<strong>of</strong>f, 1995; Glenn et al., 2003) Structured prewriting tasks,<br />

on the other hand, such as loop-writing, clustering, cubing, and reflective writing (i.e., journal<br />

logs) tend <strong>to</strong> be more systematic in nature. These structured prewriting tasks help students<br />

“explore <strong>to</strong>pics, generate ideas, gather information, relate new knowledge <strong>to</strong> existing knowledge,<br />

and develop strategies” as preparation for the planning and drafting processes (Ferris &<br />

Hedgcock, 2005, p. 150). Regardless <strong>of</strong> their differences, these invention strategies can <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

students ideas for focusing on a broad <strong>to</strong>pic and can provide a direction for their writing,<br />

especially as scaffolding processes <strong>to</strong> the planning and drafting stages <strong>of</strong> the writing process.<br />

However, L2 researchers caution teachers <strong>to</strong> respect their students’ divergent learning styles by<br />

having students practice a variety <strong>of</strong> these prewriting tasks rather than strictly adhering <strong>to</strong> one or<br />

the other (Hillocks, 1986; Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005). The main objective <strong>of</strong> the writing process<br />

workshop in this course is <strong>to</strong> provide students with a variety <strong>of</strong> pre-writing activities so that they<br />

can use them in their argumentative essay (project 1), public policy research paper (project 2),<br />

grant proposal (project 3), and newsletter assignment (project 4). Students will practice a host <strong>of</strong><br />

unstructured and structured pre-writing activities such as free-writing, listing, loop-writing,<br />

clustering/mapping, and cubing <strong>to</strong> help generate ideas before the writing the first draft <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong><br />

the major assignments.<br />

Planning & Drafting Strategies. Research on the composing processes have shown that<br />

planning and drafting occurs simultaneously and recursively during the writing event, as<br />

“planning does not necessarily precede drafting, nor does drafting begin only after a definitive<br />

‘plan’ for a piece <strong>of</strong> writing has been formalized” (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005, p.155). In fact,<br />

many skillful L1 and L2 writers plan as they move though the different stages <strong>of</strong> the drafting<br />

processes (Bamberg, 2003; Clark, 2003; Flower & Hayes, 1981; Zamel, 1983). In effect,<br />

successful planning processes can take a variety <strong>of</strong> different forms, as writers’ initial tentative<br />

47


plans are changed, altered, modified, or essentially revised throughout the drafting stage <strong>of</strong> the<br />

composing process. As a result, teachers should provide students with a host <strong>of</strong> planning<br />

techniques, as well as ample opportunities for practicing these techniques (Clark, 2003).<br />

Outlines, whether written on paper or developed internally, can serve as an effective prewriting<br />

and planning <strong>to</strong>ol for many skilled writers. As Ferris & Hedgcock (2005) note, preparing an<br />

outline gives the writer “a sense <strong>of</strong> the hierarchical and linear structure <strong>of</strong> the themes,<br />

propositional content, and rhe<strong>to</strong>rical links that bind the prose text on which the outline is based”<br />

(p. 157). In other words, outlines can serve as advanced organizers for the writer as he/she begins<br />

<strong>to</strong> create his/her draft.<br />

As for the drafting phase, many composition specialists recommend guiding novice L1<br />

and L2 writers though more than one drafting phase, especially within the classroom environment<br />

(Flowerdew, 1993; Kroll, 2001; Zamel, 1982). The purpose is <strong>to</strong> provide students with ample<br />

practice, as well as explicit examples <strong>of</strong> how skilled writers benefit from multidrafting. Many<br />

writing experts have sought <strong>to</strong> categorize the drafting component in<strong>to</strong> several manageable stages<br />

(Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005; Kroll, 2001; Tarvers, 1993). Tarvers (1993), for example, reduced the<br />

multi-drafting stage in<strong>to</strong> five incremental stages <strong>of</strong> development: (1) zero draft; (2) shaping draft<br />

(focus on organization, audience, and voice); (3) style draft (focus on paragraphing, syntax, and<br />

diction); (4) editing draft (focus on grammatical, mechanical, and formatting features); and (5)<br />

final draft (submit in final portfolio for teacher’s evaluation). As Ferris & Hedgcock (2005) note,<br />

a multistage drafting sequence such as Tarvers (1993) should not be seen as a “prescription for<br />

rigid sequencing,” but rather a multistage drafting sequence that can be “reduced or expanded<br />

according <strong>to</strong> students’ pr<strong>of</strong>iciency levels, features <strong>of</strong> the writing task, and amount <strong>of</strong> class time<br />

available” (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005, p. 161). During the writing process workshop <strong>of</strong> the<br />

course, students will receive the opportunity <strong>to</strong> create a zero draft in-class <strong>of</strong> the first writing<br />

48


assignment (argumentative essay). Students will then receive the opportunity <strong>to</strong> revise and edit<br />

the same paper multiple times in-class, first focusing on the content (organization, focus, and<br />

development) and then on the mechanical features (grammar, sentence structure, etc.). Students<br />

will also pay careful attention <strong>to</strong> revising/editing their thesis statements, <strong>to</strong>pic sentences,<br />

supporting details/examples, analysis, and concluding sentences.<br />

Building a Community <strong>of</strong> Writers (Peer Response)<br />

As Ede (1989) states, revision is “the heart <strong>of</strong> the writing process,” as we are able <strong>to</strong><br />

create a community <strong>of</strong> writers through this process (p. 95). Both teachers and peers work <strong>to</strong>gether<br />

<strong>to</strong> provide feedback at various points in the writing process. As agreed by many writing teachers,<br />

peer response activities in the classroom fit extremely well “with the increased emphasis on<br />

cognitive processes and social constructionism in composition teaching” (as cited in Ferris &<br />

Hedgcock, 2005, p. 225). As research on peer response has consistently shown, there are many<br />

benefits for using peer response in the writing classroom (see Table 6), which highly aligns with<br />

Second Language Acquisition (SLA) principles <strong>of</strong> interaction for language learning development.<br />

Table 6:<br />

Benefits <strong>of</strong> Peer Review<br />

1. Students become active learners.<br />

2. Students can revise their writing in response <strong>to</strong> their peers’ feedback.<br />

3. Students receive feedback from a real audience.<br />

4. Students receive a better understanding <strong>of</strong> the reader’s expectations.<br />

5. Responding <strong>to</strong> peers’ texts build critical thinking skills.<br />

6. Students gain confidence by witnessing peers’ weaknesses in writing.<br />

7. Peer response activities build a community environment within the classroom.<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock. (2005). p. 225-26<br />

49


As for effective instructional implications on peer response, Mittan (1989) suggests<br />

“integrating and weaving peer review” throughout the writing course, rather than treating it in<br />

isolated situations (as cited in Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005, p.233). In regards <strong>to</strong> L2 students, most<br />

research on peer response stress the importance <strong>of</strong> teacher input and modeling before peer<br />

response sessions (Carson & Nelson, 1996; Liu & Hansen, 2002). As a result, it is extremely<br />

important for teachers <strong>to</strong> model appropriate feedback patterns for their students through a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> peer review activities. Studies dealing with training in peer review have consistently found<br />

that students’ performance and attitudes improve if they are carefully prepared for such peer<br />

review activities (Berg, 1999; Rothschild & Klingenberg, 1990). The basic format and structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> peer review should remain consistent throughout the entire writing course. As Ferris &<br />

Hedgcock (2005) note, the reader should “<strong>of</strong>fer a positive, encouraging response <strong>to</strong> the writer,<br />

identify the purpose or main point or points <strong>of</strong> the sample being reviewed, direct questions <strong>to</strong> the<br />

writer, and <strong>of</strong>fer concrete suggestions for revising or expanding the text” (p. 235). As for the<br />

editing stage, a variety <strong>of</strong> peer response activities can be useful for “helping students develop<br />

self-editing skills and metalinguistic awareness” (Ferris & Hedgcock, 2005, p. 240). The teacher,<br />

for example, can ask students <strong>to</strong> mark any errors or look for specific error patterns. This process<br />

can eventually lead students <strong>to</strong> identify their own errors, thereby helping them become more<br />

au<strong>to</strong>nomous and independent, specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> developing self-editing skills. Because <strong>of</strong><br />

its numerous benefits, this course has implemented a peer review workshop (during week 8),<br />

where students are trained <strong>to</strong> provide appropriate feedback on other students’ papers. In addition,<br />

regular peer review sessions throughout the year will be an integral part <strong>of</strong> the course, as students<br />

will be required <strong>to</strong> provide feedback on other students’ major writing assignments.<br />

50


Corpus-Based Writing Analysis<br />

Literature on corpus linguistics has contributed <strong>to</strong> a wealth <strong>of</strong> research addressing both<br />

discourse and metalinguistic awareness (Biber, 1988; Conrad, 1996; Hyland, 2002; Reppen,<br />

2010). The various genres <strong>of</strong> written authentic texts (i.e. academic prose, newspaper articles,<br />

fiction, biographies, <strong>of</strong>ficial documents, academic published work, etc.) s<strong>to</strong>red in the corpus data<br />

have allowed researchers <strong>to</strong> “describe regularities in the use <strong>of</strong> discoursal, sytntactic, lexical,<br />

semantic, and collocational features <strong>of</strong> language” (Hyland, 2002, p.10). These analyses have<br />

resulted in the inclusion <strong>of</strong> “specific linguistic features, lexis, and collocations in learner<br />

dictionaries, textbooks, and other instructional materials,” as well as comprehensive grammar<br />

volumes and learner workbooks (Hyland, 2002, p.10). According <strong>to</strong> Hyland (2002), online<br />

corpora can be used as reference <strong>to</strong>ols “<strong>to</strong> be consulted for examples when problems arise while<br />

writing, or as research <strong>to</strong>ols “<strong>to</strong> be systematically investigated as a means <strong>of</strong> gaining greater<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> language use” (p. 122).<br />

By using online corpora as a research <strong>to</strong>ol, students can focus on the range <strong>of</strong> academic,<br />

business, legal, fiction, and newspaper genres. This kind <strong>of</strong> research has been useful in assisting<br />

learners <strong>to</strong> compare features <strong>of</strong> their own writing with the types <strong>of</strong> writing by experts in the field<br />

<strong>of</strong> study (Mil<strong>to</strong>n & Hyland, 1999). In addition, the online corpora can be used <strong>to</strong> generate KWICs<br />

(key word in context indexes) and provide information about the context <strong>of</strong> use for particular<br />

words or phrases (Hyland, 2002; Reppen, 2010). As Hyland (2002) notes, “L2 writers need <strong>to</strong><br />

know what is typical rather than what is possible,” and a concordance can provide invaluable<br />

information about the use <strong>of</strong> a particular word or phrase within a specific discourse, thereby<br />

assisting “novice writers in controlling more text-level features <strong>of</strong> their writing” (p. 123). In<br />

Gilmore’s (2000) study <strong>of</strong> Japanese university writing classes, the author incorporated the use <strong>of</strong><br />

online corpora in<strong>to</strong> a process writing approach <strong>to</strong> help develop students’ writing skills. After only<br />

51


a 90-minute training session, the majority <strong>of</strong> the students in the study were able <strong>to</strong> significantly<br />

improve the “naturalness <strong>of</strong> their writing.” In addition, the majority <strong>of</strong> the students believed that<br />

an online corpus was beneficial in helping <strong>to</strong> make their essays sound more natural (both<br />

grammatically and syntactically) (p. 368-9). Similarly, Varely’s (2009) study on “concordancers”<br />

reveals that students demonstrated an increased awareness <strong>of</strong> grammatical usage, specifically in<br />

regards <strong>to</strong> vocabulary acquisition and collocational use <strong>of</strong> frequent words. Clearly, online corpora<br />

have proven <strong>to</strong> be an effective research <strong>to</strong>ol as well as a reference <strong>to</strong>ol for not only bringing about<br />

discourse and metalinguistic awareness, but also in helping <strong>to</strong> improve students’ overall writing<br />

skills during the writing process. Similarly, students in this course will be trained how <strong>to</strong> use<br />

online corpora as a reference and research <strong>to</strong>ol in order <strong>to</strong> develop discourse and metalinguistic<br />

awareness <strong>of</strong> certain academic texts during week 8 (in the first semester) <strong>to</strong> improve the<br />

naturalness <strong>of</strong> their writing. Throughout the course, students will continue <strong>to</strong> use online corpora<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> the revision process on nearly all writing assignments.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Improving each student’s overall reading and writing skills/strategies, which are essential<br />

for academic success at the university level and beyond, is a critical component <strong>of</strong> this integrated<br />

reading/writing Stretch program. The various reading and writing workshops should not only<br />

equip students with an array <strong>of</strong> academic reading and writing skills/strategies, but more<br />

importantly, should make these students become better strategic readers and writers ready <strong>to</strong><br />

confront the variety <strong>of</strong> situations they will encounter in their future education, pr<strong>of</strong>ession,<br />

community, and home lives. In other words, the ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> this course (as explained by<br />

the six main learning goals and supported by the literature review) is <strong>to</strong> create self-sufficient, life-<br />

long literate readers and writers among multilingual students. As the old Chinese proverb goes,<br />

“Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man <strong>to</strong> fish and you feed him for a<br />

52


lifetime.” All <strong>of</strong> the reading and writing skills/strategies acquired by the students in the first part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the course are meant <strong>to</strong> transfer over in<strong>to</strong> the writing genres <strong>of</strong> the second part <strong>of</strong> the course<br />

and beyond the classroom in connection with their service-learning experience.<br />

53


APPENDICES<br />

54


APPENDIX A<br />

COURSE SYLLABLUS<br />

55


Instruc<strong>to</strong>r: Vu Tran<br />

Office: Calaveras XXX<br />

Office Hours: 12:00-1:00<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M & 11M—Academic Literacies I & II<br />

Critical Thinking, Reading, & Writing for Multilinguals<br />

Section 01, MW 1:30-2:45, Calaveras XXX<br />

Office Phone: 278-XXXX<br />

E-mail: mr.tran.rfdc@gmail.com<br />

“If you don't have the time <strong>to</strong> read, you don't have the time or the <strong>to</strong>ols <strong>to</strong> write.”--Stephen King<br />

“No skill is more crucial <strong>to</strong> the future <strong>of</strong> a child, or <strong>to</strong> a democratic and prosperous society, than<br />

literacy.” –Los Angeles Times<br />

Course Description<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M/11M (Academic Literacies I & II) is an intensive one-year, six-unit course designed<br />

<strong>to</strong> help multilingual students use reading, writing, discussion, and research for discovery,<br />

intellectual curiosity, and personal academic growth. Within this literary framework, students (1)<br />

engage in reading and writing as communal and diverse processes; (2) read and write effectively<br />

in and beyond the university; (3) develop metacognitive understanding <strong>of</strong> their reading, writing,<br />

and thinking processes; and (4) understand that everyone develops and uses multiple discourses.<br />

Moreover, students work collaboratively <strong>to</strong> share, critique, and revise their reading and writing<br />

throughout the program. <strong>English</strong> 10M is credit/no credit, while a final letter course grade will be<br />

assigned at the end <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong> 11M. This year-long course fulfills the GE Area A2 requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

first-year written composition.<br />

First-Year Reading/Writing Program Goals<br />

Students should be able <strong>to</strong>:<br />

1) Understand processes <strong>of</strong> reading, writing, and research.<br />

2) Develop a metacognitive understanding <strong>of</strong> processes <strong>of</strong> reading, writing, and thinking.<br />

3) Understand textual conventions.<br />

4) Understand and engage in reading and writing as communal processes.<br />

5) Understand the ways that readers and writers write in and beyond the university.<br />

6) Think critically about academic discourse communities as contact zones where different<br />

cultures both connect and come in<strong>to</strong> conflict.<br />

Course Texts<br />

Carlson, M., & O’Neal-McElrath, T. (2008). Winning Grants: Step by Step (3 rd Ed.). San<br />

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass<br />

CSUS Student Writing Handbook (available at Kinko’s/FedEx on J st)<br />

Thomas, S. (2000). JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation. New York, NY: St.<br />

Martin’s Press.<br />

56


Course Requirements<br />

1. Attendance<br />

Attendance is required for passing this course. You are expected <strong>to</strong> be prepared and<br />

attend class on a regular basis. More than four absences per semester will result in a<br />

failing grade for the course, while two tardies will be counted as an absence. If you are<br />

unable <strong>to</strong> attend a class, please notify me in advance either by e-mail or phone.<br />

2. Participation<br />

You are expected <strong>to</strong> actively participate in all class discussions, group activities, peer<br />

reviews, and workshops throughout the entire year. In addition, you will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

complete a service-learning component by volunteering at a pre-approved organization or<br />

agency <strong>of</strong> your choice. Participation for the service-learning component is necessary <strong>to</strong><br />

complete most <strong>of</strong> the writing projects in this class. Non-participation <strong>of</strong> the service-<br />

learning project will result in an au<strong>to</strong>matic failing grade for writing projects 2, 3, & 4,<br />

which make up about 70% <strong>of</strong> the materials needed in the final portfolio submission. As a<br />

result, non-participation for the service-learning component will ultimately result in a<br />

failing grade for the course.<br />

3. Service-Learning Component & Requirements<br />

Through your service-learning experience, you will have the opportunity <strong>to</strong> apply<br />

concepts, ideas, and issues learned in class <strong>to</strong> “real-world” settings. In conjunction with<br />

the goals <strong>of</strong> the course, the service-learning experience will enhance your academic and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional literacies by directly affecting your classroom experience as well as the<br />

community in which you live and work. As a result, you will come <strong>to</strong> understand and<br />

value the different discourse communities that exist not only within the university, but<br />

also in your community, pr<strong>of</strong>ession, and personal life.<br />

You will be required <strong>to</strong> complete several service-learning projects by participating in a<br />

pre-approved organization or agency <strong>of</strong> your choice. You will observe, research, and<br />

collect in-depth data from a variety <strong>of</strong> sources (i.e. interviews, field notes, and artifacts,<br />

etc.) about your selected agency or organization during the entire service-learning<br />

experience and use the data <strong>to</strong> complete a great deal <strong>of</strong> the writing assignments in this<br />

course (see service-learning requirements & timeline sheet).<br />

4. Assignments<br />

Academic & Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Ethnographic Project & Presentation (20%)<br />

Part I: Academic Discourse Community (Group PowerPoint Presentation)<br />

Each group will be required <strong>to</strong> conduct a mini-ethnography study on campus <strong>of</strong><br />

an academic discourse community <strong>of</strong> their choice. Your group will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

carefully observe the classroom setting as well as interview the teacher about the<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> reading and writing commonly used in that specific academic<br />

discourse community. During weeks 14 &15 (in the 1 st semester), each group<br />

will be required <strong>to</strong> share what they found <strong>to</strong> the class using PowerPoint (see<br />

assignment handout on SacCT).<br />

57


Part II: Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Discourse Community (Individual PowerPoint Presentation)<br />

Based upon the selected academic discourse community in the first project, you<br />

will then pick an academic major that will lead <strong>to</strong> a potential career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

Once you choose the major and career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession, you will conduct a miniethnography<br />

study about the specific discourse community in your chosen<br />

career/pr<strong>of</strong>essional field. During week15 (in the 2 nd semester), you will be<br />

required <strong>to</strong> share your information <strong>to</strong> the classing using PowerPoint (see<br />

assignment handout on SacCT).<br />

Summary-Response Paper (included in final portfolio)<br />

After reading Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation, you<br />

must write a summary-response paper in which you choose a chapter in the book<br />

<strong>to</strong> (1) summarize and (2) respond <strong>to</strong> any idea or issue expressed by the author in<br />

his book. The final version <strong>of</strong> your summary-response paper will be submitted in<br />

your portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> your final grade (see assignment handout on SacCT).<br />

Project 1: Argumentative Essay (included in final portfolio)<br />

You must write a 3 - 4 page argumentative essay in which you take a<br />

position/stance regarding a specific issue or idea presented in Thomas’ JonBenet:<br />

Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation. The final version <strong>of</strong> your essay will be<br />

submitted in your portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> your final grade (see assignment handout<br />

on SacCT). In addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing the final version<br />

<strong>of</strong> your essay in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the year booklet for future freshmen <strong>to</strong> read who are<br />

planning <strong>to</strong> enroll in this course<br />

Project 2: Social Public Policy Research Paper (included in final portfolio)<br />

You must write a 5-7 page research paper about a social public policy issue <strong>of</strong><br />

your choice based upon the data gathered from your pre-approved agency or<br />

organization as part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning experience. In this paper, you must<br />

first present the social issue or problem in its entirety (his<strong>to</strong>rically and currently),<br />

and then advocate for a change by providing concrete solutions (using research<br />

evidence/support) <strong>to</strong> either reduce or eliminate the issue/problem. The final<br />

version <strong>of</strong> your research essay will be submitted in your portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> your<br />

final course grade (see assignment handout on SacCT). In addition, you will have<br />

the option <strong>of</strong> publishing the final version <strong>of</strong> this assignment in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the<br />

year booklet for future freshmen students <strong>to</strong> read who are planning <strong>to</strong> enroll in<br />

this course.<br />

Project 3: Grant Proposal (included in final portfolio)<br />

You must write a 5-10 page grant proposal based upon the particular<br />

organization you are going <strong>to</strong> volunteer for as part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning project<br />

in the 2 nd semester. The final version <strong>of</strong> your grant proposal will be submitted in<br />

your portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> your final course grade (see assignment handout on<br />

SacCT). In addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing the final version <strong>of</strong><br />

this assignment <strong>to</strong> your pre-approved agency or organization in hopes that they<br />

58


find the right funding agency.<br />

Project 4: Newsletter (included in final portfolio)<br />

You must write a 2-3 page newsletter in which you inform the public about the<br />

organization you are volunteering for as part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning project in the<br />

second semester. The final version <strong>of</strong> your newsletter will be submitted in your<br />

portfolio as part <strong>of</strong> your final grade (see assignment handout on SacCT). In<br />

addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing your newsletter and sending it<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> your selected organization.<br />

Project 5: Resume & Cover Letter (10%)<br />

You must write a resume and cover letter based on an actual job listing from a<br />

company or organization <strong>of</strong> your interest. The final version <strong>of</strong> your resume and<br />

cover letter will not be included in the final portfolio, but graded separately as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the final grade (see assignment handout on SacCT). In addition, you will<br />

have the option <strong>of</strong> sending out the final version <strong>of</strong> your resume and cover letter<br />

<strong>to</strong> a company or organization <strong>of</strong> your interest.<br />

<br />

Journal Entries (10%)<br />

You must log on<strong>to</strong> SacCT and complete all 10 journal entries over the course <strong>of</strong><br />

the year. To receive full credit for each online journal posting, you must (1)<br />

critically reflect on what you have learned about the <strong>to</strong>pic assigned for each unit,<br />

and (2) respond or comment <strong>to</strong> at least two other classmates’ journal entries on<br />

the same <strong>to</strong>pic. During the first week, you will be grouped up with four other<br />

students in the classroom. This group will remain with you for the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

year.<br />

5. Formatting/Citation<br />

All writing projects must be typed and must follow the formatting guidelines outlined<br />

either in the 7 th edition <strong>of</strong> the MLA Publication Manual or in the 6th edition <strong>of</strong> the APA<br />

Publication Manual. Each <strong>of</strong> the writing assignments will specifically adhere <strong>to</strong> one <strong>of</strong><br />

the two formatting guidelines. Nearly all <strong>of</strong> the writing assignments in the first semester<br />

will require the use <strong>of</strong> MLA formatting; while a great deal <strong>of</strong> the writing assignments in<br />

the second semester will require the use <strong>of</strong> APA formatting (see each assignment handout<br />

on SacCT for more details).<br />

6. Peer Review<br />

In-class peer review will be required for some <strong>of</strong> the major writing assignments. Failure<br />

<strong>to</strong> participate in these peer review sessions will result in a 1-point deduction <strong>to</strong>wards your<br />

final grade.<br />

7. Student/Teacher Conference<br />

You are required <strong>to</strong> attend several manda<strong>to</strong>ry student/teacher conferences throughout the<br />

year. Failure <strong>to</strong> attend will result in an absence. In the first semester, student/teacher<br />

59


conferences will be held in week 11, while in the second semester student/teacher<br />

conferences will be held first in week 7 and later in week 14.<br />

8. Final Portfolio<br />

You will be required <strong>to</strong> submit a portfolio at the end <strong>of</strong> the second semester for a final<br />

letter grade. Throughout the year (for 2 semesters-long) you will draft, revise, and edit<br />

essays and research papers for audiences and purposes not just within the classroom<br />

setting, but beyond the classroom setting. The final drafts <strong>of</strong> your writing materials<br />

included in the portfolio must be thoughtfully developed, well supported, and carefully<br />

edited. The portfolio will be assessed as a whole <strong>to</strong> largely determine whether or not you<br />

will ultimately pass the course. Your portfolio is 50% <strong>of</strong> your final grade. The final<br />

submission <strong>of</strong> the portfolio will include these assignments:<br />

Final Portfolio Assignments Evaluation<br />

(I) Polished Works (choose the best three) (see portfolio handout)<br />

Polished work # 1 (final version and all<br />

drafts included)<br />

Polished work # 2 (final version and all<br />

drafts included)<br />

Polished work # 3 (final version and all<br />

drafts included)<br />

Course Grading<br />

(II) Additional work<br />

Summary-Response<br />

Highlighting & Annotating<br />

<br />

(see portfolio handout)<br />

Assignments Course Grade (100 points possible)<br />

Service Learning Log-In Hours 10 points<br />

SacCT Journals 10 points<br />

PowerPoint Presentations (I & II) 20 points<br />

Resume & Cover Letter 10 points<br />

Final Portfolio 50 points<br />

Total 100 points<br />

Course Policies<br />

A = 93-100 C- = 69-72<br />

A - = 89-92 D = 63-68<br />

B = 83-88 D- = 59-62<br />

B- = 79-82 F = 0-58<br />

C = 73-78<br />

1. Deadlines/Late Papers<br />

All papers are due by the assigned day and time listed on the daily schedule and<br />

assignment handout sheets. Late papers will be penalized a 1 point deduction <strong>to</strong>wards the<br />

final course grade for each day they are late unless actual documentation <strong>of</strong> an emergency<br />

is provided <strong>to</strong> me before the deadline.<br />

60


2. SacCT<br />

All class materials (handouts & readings) will be available through SacCT. You are<br />

responsible for downloading all assigned class materials from SacCT prior <strong>to</strong> each class<br />

session. You will also use the online discussion <strong>to</strong>ol on SacCT <strong>to</strong> complete all <strong>of</strong> the 10<br />

assigned writing journals.<br />

3. Plagiarism<br />

When you quote, paraphrase, or use facts from another source, you must give that source<br />

credit for his or her material in your paper. You will receive a failing grade on the<br />

particular assignment if you are caught plagiarizing. As a CSUS student, you are<br />

responsible for knowing the policies regarding the use <strong>of</strong> another person’s work or<br />

materials and for documenting sources appropriately within the university setting. Please<br />

read the CSUS policy on cheating and plagiarism.<br />

.<br />

4. Disability Accommodation<br />

If you have a disability and need accommodations, you need <strong>to</strong> provide this information<br />

<strong>to</strong> SSWD, Lassen Hall 1008, (916) 278-6955. For specific accommodations pertaining <strong>to</strong><br />

the classroom environment, please discuss it with me as soon as possible so that your<br />

needs can be met.<br />

5. Academic Resource<br />

The CSUS University Writing Center is available for your assistance and is located in<br />

CLV 128. Qualified writing tu<strong>to</strong>rs will help you with all stages <strong>of</strong> your writing process<br />

(i.e., planning stage, drafting stage, and revision stage).<br />

Daily Schedule<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M (Fall 2012):<br />

Weeks Topic Assignments<br />

Week 1<br />

Day 1 Course Introduction/Syllabus<br />

I. Service Learning (SL)<br />

Experience<br />

61<br />

Handout Course Syllabus, Service Learning<br />

Requirement & Timeline sheet, and Time-log.<br />

Day 2 Multiple Literacies Read Linda S. Bausch’s (2003) “ Just Words:<br />

Living and Learning the Literacies <strong>of</strong> Our<br />

Student’s Lives”<br />

Week 2<br />

Day 1 Ethnographic Research<br />

Field Notes<br />

Handout Academic & Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

Ethnographic Project<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry # 1


Day 2 Conducting Interviews<br />

Week 3<br />

Day 1 Intensive Reading Process<br />

Pre-Reading Activities<br />

(Survey/Preview, Prediction<br />

& Questioning)<br />

Day 2 During-Reading Activities<br />

(Annotating/Highlighting,<br />

Exploring Vocabulary)<br />

Week 4<br />

Day 1 Textual Organization<br />

Graphic Organizer,<br />

Charting, Outlining<br />

Day 2 Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation (Purpose,<br />

Audience, and Context) &<br />

Strategies (Ethos, Pathos, and<br />

Logos)<br />

Read Kajornboon’s (2005) “Using<br />

Interviews as Research Instrument”<br />

Read Student Writing Handbook (SWH)<br />

Watch “Ana<strong>to</strong>my <strong>of</strong> an Investigation”<br />

Read Smith’s “Part One: Little Miss<br />

Christmas” (pp.1 -42)<br />

Read C.F. Johnson’s (2000)<br />

Read Smith’s “Part One: Little Miss<br />

Christmas” (pp. 43-84)<br />

Bring in Boudreaux et. al.(2012)<br />

62<br />

Read Smith’s “Part Two: A Gathering S<strong>to</strong>rm<br />

(pp. 85-115)<br />

Read SWH, pp.28-33<br />

Read Smith’s “Part Two: A Gathering<br />

S<strong>to</strong>rm” (pp. 116-156)<br />

Post SaCT Journal Entry #2<br />

Week 5<br />

Day 1 Summarizing & Responding Handout Summary & Response Assignment<br />

Day 2 Analyzing Academic Writing<br />

Week 6<br />

Day 1 The Writing Process Workshop<br />

Unstructured Pre-Writing<br />

Activities<br />

Structured Pre-Writing<br />

Activities<br />

Read Smith’s “Part Three: Rocky Road <strong>to</strong><br />

Nowhere”<br />

Due: Get teacher’s approval for selected<br />

academic discourse community project<br />

Read SWH (pp. 18-23, pp.34-38)<br />

Read Smith’s “Part Four: Not So Grand<br />

Jury”<br />

Due: Summary-Response Draft A<br />

Read Smith’s “Part Five: Laying Down the<br />

Case”<br />

Handout Argumentative Paper Assignment<br />

(Project # 1)


Day 2 Drafting: In-class writing<br />

Week 7<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Training<br />

Day 2 Peer Review Session<br />

Week 8<br />

Day 1 Work on Academic Discourse<br />

Project<br />

Day 2 Corpus Research (Computer<br />

Lab)<br />

Week 9<br />

Day 1 Editing Workshop I<br />

Sentence Boundaries (i.e.<br />

fragments, run-on, and comma<br />

splice.)<br />

Day 2 Unit 1: American Social Public<br />

Policy Issues<br />

Class Debate on Youth<br />

Homelessness<br />

Week 10<br />

Day 1 Research Process: Finding a<br />

Research Topic/Question<br />

Day 2 Library Research Tour<br />

Week 11<br />

Day 1 &<br />

2<br />

Teacher-Student Conference<br />

63<br />

Write first draft <strong>of</strong> Argumentative paper in-class<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #3<br />

Read SWH, pp. 49-51<br />

Due: Summary-Response (Draft B)<br />

Bring in Project # 1 Argumentative Draft A<br />

Bring in fieldnotes & collection <strong>of</strong> artifacts<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #4<br />

Handout Public Policy Research Paper (Project<br />

# 2)<br />

Watch “Voices From the Street: Homeless<br />

Youth Speak Out on State Policy”<br />

(www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmHHcv-<br />

SLVE&feature=relmfu)<br />

Read “Fundamental Issues <strong>to</strong> Prevent and End<br />

Youth Homelessness (YH)”<br />

Read Colby (2011)<br />

Due: Project # 1 Argumentative Essay (Draft A)<br />

Read SWH, pp. 79-93<br />

Bring in research question and preliminary<br />

bibliography<br />

Bring in service learning log-in sheet<br />

(completion <strong>of</strong> at least 10 <strong>of</strong> the 20 hours<br />

requirement)<br />

Due: Project # 1Argumentative Essay (Draft B)


Week 12<br />

Day 1 Evaluating Sources<br />

Read SWH, pp.94-105<br />

Day 2 Integrating Sources Post SacCT Journal Entry #5<br />

Week 13<br />

Day 1 Peer-Review Session Bring Project # 2 Public Policy Research<br />

Paper (Draft 1A)<br />

Day 2 Editing Workshop II<br />

Subject-Verb agreement<br />

Week 14<br />

Day 1 Oral Presentation Delivery &<br />

Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric on PowerPoint<br />

Day 2 Academic Discourse Community<br />

64<br />

Due: Project # 2 Public Policy Research Paper<br />

(Draft A)<br />

Read SWH(Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric), pp. 58-66<br />

1 st batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

Week 15<br />

Day 1 Academic Discourse Community<br />

Presentation (PowerPoint)<br />

2 nd batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

Day 2 (Continued) 3 rd batch <strong>of</strong> groups present<br />

Week 16<br />

End <strong>of</strong> first semester (<strong>English</strong><br />

10M)<br />

Due: Summary-Response (Draft C)<br />

Due: Project # 1 Argumentative Essay (Draft<br />

C)<br />

Due: Project # 2 Public Policy Research<br />

Paper (Draft B)<br />

<strong>English</strong> 11M (Spring 2013):<br />

Weeks Topic Assignments<br />

Week 1<br />

Day 1 Unit 2: Community & Civics<br />

Day 2 Introduction: An Overview <strong>of</strong> the Grant<br />

Seeking Process<br />

Week 2<br />

Day 1 Developing and Researching Proposal<br />

Idea<br />

Read SWH’s “Writing &<br />

Researching in the Social<br />

Sciences,” pp. 118-137<br />

Handout Project # 3 Grant<br />

Proposal Assignment<br />

Read Carlson & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s “Winning Grants: Step<br />

by Step,” pp. 1-11<br />

Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 1 “Developing the<br />

Proposal Idea,” pp.11-17<br />

Due: Project # 1 Argumentative<br />

Essay (Draft D)\


Day 2 (Continued) Due: Project # 2 Public Policy<br />

Research Paper (Draft C)<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #6<br />

Week 3<br />

Day 1 Statement <strong>of</strong> Need/Problem Statement Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 3 “Writing a<br />

Compelling Need Statement,” pp.-<br />

28-37<br />

Day 2 (Continued)<br />

Week 4<br />

Day 1 Methods/Description <strong>of</strong> Project Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 5 “Developing the<br />

Methods,” pp. 44-51<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Post SacCT Journal Entry #7<br />

Week 5<br />

Day 1 Evaluation Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 6 “Preparing the<br />

Evaluation Component,” pp. 51-62<br />

Day 2 Budget Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 8 “Preparing the<br />

Program Budget,” pp. 68-77<br />

Week 6<br />

Day 1 Proposal Summary/Abstract Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 10 “Writing the<br />

Proposal Summary,” pp. 85-90<br />

Day 2 Putting it all <strong>to</strong>gether Read Carlson’s & O’Neal-<br />

McElrath’s Step 11 “Putting the<br />

Package Together,” pp. 91-96<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #8<br />

Week 7<br />

Day 1 & 2 Teacher-Student Conference Completion <strong>of</strong> the full 20 hours<br />

requirement for SL<br />

65<br />

Due: Argumentative Essay Draft E<br />

Due: Public Policy Research Draft<br />

D<br />

Week 8<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Session Bring in Project # 3 Grant<br />

Proposal Draft A


Day 2 Editing Workshop III<br />

Verb Tenses<br />

Phrasal Verbs<br />

Week 9<br />

Day 1 Newsletter writing Handout Project # 4 Newsletter<br />

Assignment<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Handout Portfolio assignment<br />

Week 10<br />

Day 1 Unit 3: Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>ession Handout Project # 5 Resume &<br />

Cover Letter Assignment<br />

Due: Project # 3 Grant Proposal<br />

(Draft A)<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Read Occupational Outlook<br />

Handbook, 2010-11 Edition<br />

(http://www.bls.gov/oco/)<br />

Week 11<br />

Day 1 Writing & Researching in Business &<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Settings<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #9<br />

Read SWH, pp. 152-157, pp.167-<br />

168<br />

Due: Project # 4 Newsletter<br />

Assignment (Draft A)<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Read Nancy Martin-Young’s<br />

“Communication Skills in the<br />

Workplace: Employers Talk Back”<br />

Week 12<br />

Day 1 Resume & Cover Letter Writing Read “Career Directions: Resume<br />

& Cover Letter Writing Tips”<br />

Day 2 (Continued) Read Schullery, N. M, Ickes, L., &<br />

Schullery, S.E (2009)<br />

Post SacCT Journal Entry #10<br />

Week 13<br />

Day 1 Peer Review Bring in Project # 4 Newsletter &<br />

Project # 5 Resume & Cover letter.<br />

Day 2 Editing Workshop IV<br />

Articles<br />

Prepositions<br />

66<br />

Due: Project # 3 Grant Proposal<br />

(Draft B)<br />

Due: Project# 4 Newsletter<br />

Assignment (Draft B) &Project # 5<br />

Resume & Cove Letter (Draft A)


Week 14<br />

Day 1 & 2 Student/Teacher Conference Questions regarding Portfolio<br />

requirements<br />

Week 15<br />

Day 1 & 2 Career & Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Presentation<br />

(PowerPoint)<br />

Week 16<br />

Due: Resume & Cover Letter (Draft<br />

B)<br />

Portfolio Assessment Portfolio Submission (3 polished<br />

works & additional works included)<br />

______________________________<br />

Optional<br />

* Final Drafts <strong>of</strong> Project 1 & 2 submit<br />

in the end-<strong>of</strong>-year booklet.<br />

67<br />

*Final Drafts <strong>of</strong> Project 3 & Project 4<br />

sent out <strong>to</strong> selected organization or<br />

agency.<br />

*Final Draft <strong>of</strong> Project 5 Resume &<br />

Cover Letter sent out <strong>to</strong><br />

Company/Organization <strong>of</strong> interest.


APPENDIX B<br />

COURSE ASSIGMENTS<br />

68


Phase 1: Getting Started (Weeks 1-2)<br />

Service Learning Requirements & Timeline<br />

Weeks 1 -2: Students complete Online Service Learning Survey (Pre-Service) and Risk<br />

Management Forms<br />

Step 1: You must complete manda<strong>to</strong>ry online service learning orientation. Orientations will<br />

last about 20 minutes. For more details visit http://www.csus.edu/cec/sl_admin.stm<br />

Step 2: Complete and submit the required service learning forms. During the online<br />

orientation, you will be required <strong>to</strong> print out the Emergency Contact and Information form<br />

and service-learning Time Log. Students over the age <strong>of</strong> 18 will electronically submit the<br />

required Student Guidelines and Limitations, Informed Consent, Agreement, Release, Waiver<br />

<strong>of</strong> Liability, and Assumption <strong>of</strong> Risk forms.<br />

Note: Students who are under 18 will need <strong>to</strong> print out and submit the Minor Release form<br />

completed by a legal parent or guardian <strong>to</strong> the Community Engagement Center prior <strong>to</strong><br />

starting service-learning. For questions regarding these forms or the online orientation, please<br />

contact me or the Community Engagement Center at (916)278-4610 or email<br />

cecenter@csus.edu.<br />

Phase 2: Pick a Community Partner (Weeks 2-3)<br />

The Community Engagement Center partners with organizations that provide service <strong>to</strong><br />

underserved and underrepresented populations through the Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Region.<br />

Weeks 2-3: In order for you <strong>to</strong> be placed with a community partner, the Community Partner<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ile (CPP) and Service-Learning Agreement (SLA) must be complete and submitted <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Community Engagement Center by the end <strong>of</strong> the 3 rd week.<br />

Step 1: Pick a Community Partner (see List <strong>of</strong> Community Partner below)<br />

Step 2: Complete and submit the Service Learning Agreement (SLA) and Community<br />

Partner Pr<strong>of</strong>ile (CPP) <strong>to</strong> the Community Engagement Center. Download forms at<br />

www.csus.edu/cec/sl_forms.stm. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact<br />

the Community Engagement at (916) 278-4610 or email cecenter@csus.edu.<br />

Phase 3: Beginning Service Learning (Weeks 4-14)<br />

Weeks 4-5: Students must attend one onsite orientation<br />

Note: Some service learning placement sites may require background checks,<br />

fingerprinting and/or pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a recent TB test. The agency will let you know at the onsite<br />

placement orientation whether fingerprinting and TB testing are required before<br />

beginning service. For more information about these requirements please visit<br />

www.cusus.edu/cec/tb.stm<br />

Weeks 5-14: Students participate in regular ongoing service.<br />

69


Step 1: You must complete at least 10 hours at the placement site by the end <strong>of</strong> 12 week<br />

in the first semester during teacher-student conference. You are responsible for tracking<br />

the actual hours served at the placement site in your time log-in sheet.<br />

Step 2: You must complete at least 20 hours by the 7 th week during teacher-student<br />

conference in the second semester.<br />

Note: Once service-learning hours have been completed, you must obtain<br />

verification/approval signatures from your placement site supervisor.<br />

Phase 4: Service Learning Connected w/ Writing Assignments<br />

Project 2 Public Policy Research Paper (Starting Week 9 and Beyond)<br />

You must write a 5-7 page research paper about a social public policy issue <strong>of</strong> your<br />

choice based upon the data gathered from your pre-approved agency or organization as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning experience. In this paper, you must first present the social<br />

issue or problem in its entirety (his<strong>to</strong>rically and currently), and then advocate for a<br />

change by providing concrete solutions (using research evidence/support) <strong>to</strong> either reduce<br />

or eliminate the issue/problem. You will have the option <strong>of</strong> choosing <strong>to</strong> publish this<br />

assignment in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the-year booklet.<br />

Project 3 Grant Proposal Paper (Starting Week 2 and Beyond)<br />

You must write a 6-10 page grant proposal based upon the data/information collected<br />

from your particular organization as part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning experience in the 2 nd<br />

semester. You will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing your grant proposal and sending it<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> your pre-approved agency or organization in hopes that they find the right<br />

funding agency.<br />

Project 4 Newsletter Assignment (Starting Week 9 and Beyond)<br />

You must write a 2-3 page newsletter in which you inform the public about the<br />

organization you are volunteering for as part <strong>of</strong> the service-learning project in the 2 nd<br />

semester. You will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing your newsletter and sending it directly<br />

<strong>to</strong> your selected organization.<br />

Note: You will plenty <strong>of</strong> time <strong>to</strong> revise and edit all <strong>of</strong> these writing assignments throughout<br />

the course.<br />

Phase 5: Finishing Up<br />

Weeks 14-15 (2 nd semester): Students end service-learning and turn in time-logs with site<br />

supervisor and faculty signatures and submit <strong>to</strong> Engagement Community Center, Library 4208.<br />

Students will submit a copy <strong>of</strong> the time-log <strong>to</strong> the instruc<strong>to</strong>r for grading purposes.<br />

Weeks 14-15: Students complete Online Service Learning Survey (Post-service) after time-<br />

logs are submitted<br />

70


City <strong>of</strong> Sacramen<strong>to</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Parks and Recreation<br />

Ethel MacLeod Hart Senior Center<br />

Neighborhood Services Divisions<br />

Youth Development Network<br />

Community-Based Organizations (CBOs)<br />

Service Learning Community Partners<br />

Alliance Francaise de Sacramen<strong>to</strong><br />

Asian Resources Inc.<br />

A Touch <strong>of</strong> Understanding<br />

Boys and Girls Club <strong>of</strong> Greater Sacramen<strong>to</strong> (Lemon Hill)<br />

Elder Options Inc.<br />

Eska<strong>to</strong>n Properties Incorporated<br />

Family Youth Connection<br />

Folsom Cordova Community Partnership<br />

Freedom Bound Center/Sol Collective<br />

Greater Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Vietnamese American Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce<br />

Hank Fisher Properties: Chateau at Rivers Edge<br />

Hank Fisher Properties: Leisure Manor<br />

Health Education Council<br />

Lilliput Children's Services<br />

My Sisters House<br />

NCADD National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence, Inc.<br />

NorCal Services for Deaf & Hard <strong>of</strong> Hearing<br />

Our Kids Community Breakfast Club<br />

Placer Nature Center<br />

People Reaching Out<br />

Project R.I.D.E.<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Children's Home<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Children's Home: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Crisis Nurseries - North/South<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Food Bank & Family Services<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Food Bank & Family Services: Saca Community Center<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Mutual Housing Association (SMHA)<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Philharmonic Orchestra<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> Tree Foundation<br />

Sisters <strong>of</strong> Nia Incorporated<br />

Soil Born Farms<br />

Stanford Home for Children<br />

St. Johns Shelter Program for Women and Children<br />

Strategies for Change<br />

Valley Hi Family Resource Center<br />

Washing<strong>to</strong>n Neighborhood Center<br />

71


WEAVE Inc.<br />

Wellspring Women's Center<br />

Faith-Based Organizations<br />

Salvation Army<br />

Loaves & Fishes: Maryhouse<br />

Loaves & Fishes: Mustard Seed School<br />

Hospitals<br />

Sutter Medical Center Child Life Program<br />

Elk Grove Unified School District (EGUSD)<br />

Anna Kirchgater Elementary School<br />

After School Education & Safety Program (ASES):<br />

Charles Mack Elementary School - ASES<br />

David Reese Elementary School – ASES<br />

Florin Elementary - ASES<br />

Herman Leimbach Elementary – ASES<br />

Prairie Elementary – ASES<br />

Union House Elementary School - ASES<br />

Cal-SAFE Adult Education with Elk Gove Unified<br />

CW Dillard Elementary School<br />

Edward Harris Jr. Middle School<br />

EGACE Even Start Family Literacy Program EGUSD<br />

Healthy Start:<br />

David Reese<br />

Prairie Elementary<br />

Valley High School<br />

Jessie Baker Elementary School<br />

Na<strong>to</strong>mas Unified School District (NUSD)<br />

Discovery High School<br />

Westlake Charter School<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> City Unified School District (SCUSD)<br />

Abraham Lincoln Elementary School<br />

A.M. Winn Elementary<br />

Breakthrough Sacramen<strong>to</strong> at SCUSD<br />

David Lubin Elementary<br />

Ethel I. Baker Elementary<br />

Hiram Johnson High School<br />

Jedediah Smith Elementary<br />

John Morse Therapeutic Center<br />

Matsuyama Children's Center<br />

72


Sequoia Elementary School<br />

Sutter Middle School<br />

Tahoe Elementary<br />

Will C. Wood Middle School<br />

Woodbine Elementary<br />

San Juan Unified School District (SJUSD)<br />

Bridges After School Program:<br />

Del Paso Manor Elementary<br />

Dyer Kelly Elementary<br />

Howe Avenue Elementary<br />

Starr King Elementary<br />

Thomas Edison Elementary<br />

Will Rogers Elementary<br />

Whitney Avenue Elementary<br />

Greer Elementary School<br />

Twin Rivers Unified School District (TRUSD)<br />

Grant Union High School<br />

Hagginwood Elementary School<br />

Harmon Johnson Elementary School<br />

Martin Luther King Jr. Technology Academy<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State On-Campus Partners<br />

Alumni Center<br />

Associated Students Inc. (ASI) Children's Center<br />

Center for Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Excellence<br />

College Assistance Migrant Program (CAMP)<br />

<strong>English</strong> Language Institute (ELI)<br />

Educational Opportunity Program (EOP)<br />

Honors Program<br />

Multi-Cultural Center<br />

Project P.L.A.Y.<br />

Student Activities<br />

UNIQUE Programs<br />

University Enterprises Inc.<br />

73


Assignment<br />

Academic Discourse Community & PowerPoint Presentation (Part I)<br />

For this project, each group (2 students per group) will be required <strong>to</strong> observe an academic<br />

discourse community <strong>of</strong> interest on campus. You and your partner will be required <strong>to</strong> conduct a<br />

close observation <strong>of</strong> the classroom setting, as well as interview the teacher and some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

students in the classroom. During weeks 14 & 15 in the first semester, each group will present<br />

what they found about their chosen academic discourse community <strong>to</strong> the class using PowerPoint.<br />

You will have additional class time <strong>to</strong> work on this assignment as preparation for your<br />

PowerPoint presentation (see daily schedule).<br />

Task<br />

Step 1: Choose an academic discourse community at Sac State<br />

Discourse communities are social entities with share practices as a result <strong>of</strong> the communities’<br />

shared specialized vocabulary, cultural or content knowledge, traditions, values, and goals. This<br />

membership could be something that is <strong>of</strong>ficial such as belonging <strong>to</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>essional sport team or<br />

un<strong>of</strong>ficial such as belonging <strong>to</strong> a group <strong>of</strong> people who like a certain hobby (i.e. fishing, hiking,<br />

etc.). Similarly, members within certain academic discourse communities share distinctive<br />

academic practices pertaining <strong>to</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> language, knowledge, traditions, values, and goals.<br />

For this assignment, you and your partner must choose an academic discourse community at Sac<br />

State and get the teacher’s approval by the 5 th week <strong>of</strong> the first semester. You can observe any<br />

class (on any subject) as long as it is one you are not currently enrolled in. You and your partner<br />

will get the opportunity <strong>to</strong> work on this project in class during weeks 8 (day 1) & 14 (day 1) as<br />

preparation for the PowerPoint presentation at the end <strong>of</strong> the first semester.<br />

Step 2: Mini-Ethnographic Research<br />

Once the class has been approved by the teacher, you will be required <strong>to</strong> conduct a miniethnography<br />

study in which you will attend at least three class sessions and perform the following<br />

duties:<br />

I. Observe & Write Fieldnotes<br />

Record specific observations you see in the classroom environment. Ethnographers<br />

must learn how <strong>to</strong> take useful and reliable notes regarding the details <strong>of</strong> life in their<br />

research context. These fieldnotes will constitute a major part <strong>of</strong> the data on which<br />

you will draw your results or conclusion for the PowerPoint presentation.<br />

A) Observe the natural setting (i.e. classroom environment).<br />

How is the classroom organized? Is there anything posted on the walls <strong>of</strong> the<br />

classroom? Does the classroom have a whiteboard/chalkboard, or a projec<strong>to</strong>r?<br />

What other kinds <strong>of</strong> equipments are available in the classroom?<br />

B) Observe the participants in the natural setting<br />

What type <strong>of</strong> language and/or thinking is commonly used or expressed by the<br />

teacher and students?<br />

74


How does the teacher interact with his or her students? And how do the students<br />

interact with the teacher?<br />

How do the students interact with one another?<br />

II. Conduct Interview<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> observing the culture <strong>of</strong> the classroom, you must also interviews these<br />

members—the teacher and the students. Interviewing your research subject allows<br />

you <strong>to</strong> obtain an in-depth perspective <strong>of</strong> the members in the classroom.<br />

A) Interview the instruc<strong>to</strong>r about the relationship between the assignments in the<br />

class and the nature <strong>of</strong> literacy in the field. Here are some examples <strong>of</strong> questions<br />

<strong>to</strong> ask the instruc<strong>to</strong>r:<br />

1. What is the role <strong>of</strong> research, reading, and writing in your discourse community?<br />

2. What kinds <strong>of</strong> reading and writing assignments do you usually assign in this field?<br />

3. What type <strong>of</strong> writing style is most valued in this field?<br />

4. What type <strong>of</strong> language and/or thinking is most valued in this field?<br />

5. What skills or qualifications are needed in your discourse community?<br />

B) Interview at least two students in the class about their reading and writing<br />

experience in this field. Here are some examples <strong>of</strong> questions <strong>to</strong> ask the students:<br />

1. What kinds <strong>of</strong> reading skills/strategies do you use most <strong>of</strong>ten when reading a text for this<br />

class and/or in this field?<br />

2. What kinds <strong>of</strong> writing skills/strategies do you use most <strong>of</strong>ten when writing an assignment<br />

for this class and/or in the field?<br />

3. What kinds <strong>of</strong> reading and writing assignments do you commonly encounter in this field?<br />

4. What type <strong>of</strong> language and/or thinking is most valued in this field?<br />

5. What skills or qualifications are needed <strong>to</strong> become successful in this field?<br />

III. Collecting & Analyzing Artifacts<br />

You are required <strong>to</strong> collect at least 3 artifacts: (1) a reading material—any book,<br />

article, or journal in the field, (2) a writing/research assignment sheet, and (3)<br />

relevant samples <strong>of</strong> students’ writings that pertain <strong>to</strong> that particular writing/research<br />

assignment sheet.<br />

A) Analyzing artifacts<br />

When analyzing artifacts, consider the following rhe<strong>to</strong>rical situations:<br />

Audience Awareness: Who is the targeted audience?<br />

Purpose: What do you think is the purpose <strong>of</strong> the reading and/or writing<br />

material?<br />

75


Language, Style, & Tone: What specific discourse-community words are used?<br />

What is the <strong>to</strong>ne and style? How are the sentences and paragraph organized?<br />

Step 3: Prepare a PowerPoint presentation<br />

During weeks 14 & 15, each group will have 15 minutes <strong>to</strong> share information about their<br />

chosen academic discourse community with the rest <strong>of</strong> the students in the class (with<br />

another 2-3 minutes for questions and discussions). Each group will be required <strong>to</strong> signup<br />

for the day in which they would like <strong>to</strong> present.<br />

Your PowerPoint presentation must include:<br />

o A brief summary <strong>of</strong> what you have learned through your observation, fieldnotes,<br />

interviews, and collection <strong>of</strong> artifacts.<br />

o Examples <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> reading and writing commonly used in the field<br />

o A separate handout for your classmates that summarizes the presentation<br />

o A minimum <strong>of</strong> 2 visual aids in PowerPoint presentation itself<br />

Guidelines & Presentation Dates<br />

PowerPoint presentation (5-8 slides)<br />

A minimum <strong>of</strong> 2 visual aids in the PowerPoint presentation itself<br />

Separate presentation handout<br />

Fieldnotes, interview questions, and collection <strong>of</strong> reading and writing artifacts included<br />

for submission<br />

All group members must contribute equally <strong>to</strong> the presentation.<br />

Weeks 14 & 15 In-class Presentation (includes submission <strong>of</strong> PowerPoint Slides,<br />

handouts, fieldnotes, interview questions, and artifacts)<br />

Grading<br />

This assignment is worth 10% <strong>of</strong> your final grade.<br />

An “A” grade (9-10 points) for this research project & presentation will meet the following<br />

criteria.<br />

o PowerPoint Presentation slides, handout, fieldnotes and interview questions submitted by<br />

deadline<br />

o Handout follows specifications and is clearly written and well edited.<br />

o PowerPoint presentation adheres <strong>to</strong> requirements specified by the assignment (i.e.,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> visuals, number <strong>of</strong> slides, essential contents, etc.).<br />

o Oral presentation is well prepared and effectively delivered: clear, good use <strong>of</strong> time<br />

management, well organized, good volume and energy, and good eye contact.<br />

o Teamwork: All members contribute equally<br />

A “B” paper (or below) will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

76


Career/ Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Discourse Community & PowerPoint Presentation (Part II)<br />

Assignment<br />

In this assignment, you will build upon the first field research assignment and pick an academic<br />

major within the same academic discourse community (chosen in the first semester) that will lead<br />

<strong>to</strong> a potential career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession. During week 15 in the second semester, you will present the<br />

information about your chosen pr<strong>of</strong>essional discourse community <strong>to</strong> the class using PowerPoint.<br />

Tasks<br />

Step 1: Chose an academic major and potential career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

You will select an academic major within the same academic discourse community you had<br />

chosen for the first PowerPoint presentation. You may use the course catalogue (as well as other<br />

resources on campus) <strong>to</strong> assist you in finding an academic major <strong>of</strong> interest. Once you have<br />

decided on an academic major, you will pick a potential career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession that is related <strong>to</strong> your<br />

selected academic major.<br />

Step 2: Mini-Ethnographic Research<br />

Once the academic major and career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession have been chosen, you will be required <strong>to</strong><br />

conduct another mini-ethnography study in which you will perform the following duties:<br />

A) Research more about the academic major and career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession by using a host <strong>of</strong><br />

resources available on campus and <strong>of</strong>f campus (i.e. course catalogue, internet websites,<br />

information gathered from actual company or organization, etc.)<br />

B) Interview experts/pr<strong>of</strong>essionals in the field (in-person or through e-mail). Here are some<br />

questions <strong>to</strong> ask when conducting the interview:<br />

1. What is your job title?<br />

2. What are your job duties? Expectations?<br />

3. What kinds <strong>of</strong> benefits do you receive? Salary?<br />

4. What degree/certification or experience has helped you <strong>to</strong> get <strong>to</strong> where you are at now?<br />

5. What type <strong>of</strong> education is required <strong>to</strong> attain a position within this field?<br />

6. What qualities or experience do you need <strong>to</strong> be successful in this field?<br />

7. What kinds <strong>of</strong> materials do you read in this field?<br />

8. What types <strong>of</strong> writing is required in this field?<br />

9. What type <strong>of</strong> thinking and/ or language is valued most in this field?<br />

C) Collect & analyze artifacts (i.e. reading and writing samples)<br />

When you analyze the artifacts, you will need <strong>to</strong> consider the following rhe<strong>to</strong>rical situations<br />

below:<br />

Audience Awareness: Who is the targeted audience?<br />

Purpose: What do you think is the purpose <strong>of</strong> the reading and/or writing material?\<br />

77


Language, Style, & Tone: What specific discourse-community words are used? What is<br />

the <strong>to</strong>ne and style? How are the sentences and paragraph organized?<br />

Step 3: Prepare a PowerPoint Presentation<br />

During week 15 in the second semester, you will have 5-7 minutes <strong>to</strong> share some<br />

information about your chosen academic major and potential career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession with the<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the students in the class (with another 1-2 minutes for questions and discussions).<br />

Each group will be required <strong>to</strong> sign-up for the day in which they would like <strong>to</strong> present<br />

(Week 15, day 1 & 2)<br />

Your presentation must include:<br />

o A brief summary <strong>of</strong> what you have learned through your research, observation, and<br />

interviews about your potential academic major and career/pr<strong>of</strong>ession (i.e., required<br />

degree/education, job duties, expectations, salary, benefits, etc.)<br />

o What types <strong>of</strong> degree, certification or experience are required in the field<br />

o Examples <strong>of</strong> the types <strong>of</strong> reading and writing commonly used<br />

o A separate handout for your classmates that summarizes the presentation<br />

o A minimum <strong>of</strong> two visual aids in the PowerPoint presentation itself<br />

Due Date<br />

PowerPoint presentation (5-8 slides)<br />

A minimum <strong>of</strong> 2 visual aids in the PowerPoint presentation itself<br />

Separate presentation handout<br />

Research notes, interview questions, and artifacts included for submission<br />

Week 15 In-class Presentation (includes submission <strong>of</strong> PowerPoint Slides,<br />

handouts, research notes, interview questions, and artifacts)<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment is worth 10% <strong>of</strong> your final grade.<br />

An “A” grade (9-10 points) for this research project & presentation will meet the following<br />

criteria.<br />

o PowerPoint Presentation slides, handout, observation notes, and interview questions<br />

submitted by deadline.<br />

o Handout follows specifications and is clearly written and well edited.<br />

o PowerPoint presentation adheres <strong>to</strong> requirements specified in this assignment (i.e.<br />

number <strong>of</strong> slides, number <strong>of</strong> visual aids, essential contents, etc.).<br />

o Oral presentation is well prepared and effectively delivered: clear, good use <strong>of</strong> time<br />

management, well organized, good volume and energy, and good eye contact.<br />

A “B” paper (or below) will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

78


Assignment<br />

Summary-Response Assignment<br />

For this assignment, you will develop your critical thinking skills by (1) summarizing and (2)<br />

responding <strong>to</strong> one <strong>of</strong> the chapters in Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation<br />

as preparation for the Argumentative Essay (Project 1).<br />

Task<br />

Step 1: Choose one chapter that interests you from Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey<br />

Murder Investigation . The chapters are listed below.<br />

1) “Part One: Little Miss Christmas”<br />

2) “Part Two: A Gathering S<strong>to</strong>rm”<br />

3) “Part Three: Rocky Road <strong>to</strong> Nowhere”<br />

4) “Part Four: Not so Grand Jury”<br />

5) “Part Five: Laying Down the Case”<br />

Step 2: Write a summary-response paper in which you perform the following tasks in the exact<br />

order below:<br />

I. Summarize the chapter in a concise manner (target length = ½-1 page)<br />

Guiding tips for writing an effective summary:<br />

A summary is a condensed or reduced version <strong>of</strong> a text. It is written in paragraph form and<br />

contains all <strong>of</strong> the most essential information. A well-written summary should:<br />

A) Identify the author’s name and the title <strong>of</strong> the text<br />

B) State the overall main idea <strong>of</strong> the selection<br />

C) Identify only the most important examples and supporting details.<br />

D) State the author’s main conclusion<br />

II. Discuss your reactions <strong>to</strong> one or two issues or ideas presented in the selected<br />

chapter (target length = 1<strong>to</strong> 1 ½ page)<br />

Guiding tips for writing an effective response:<br />

A response is your critical reaction <strong>to</strong> the text. You may have positive or negative reactions <strong>to</strong> a<br />

text, but you must support those reactions with reasons and examples. A well-developed<br />

response, for example, describes why you liked (or disliked) the text or why you agree (or<br />

disagree) with the author’s points presented in the text. A thoughtful response should:<br />

A) State your reaction <strong>to</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the author’s ideas.<br />

B) Express your opinion on the writer’s point <strong>of</strong> view and explain why you agree or disagree<br />

with that point <strong>of</strong> view.<br />

C) Include your interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text (i.e. what it means <strong>to</strong> you)<br />

D) Make connections <strong>to</strong> your personal experience.<br />

79


Submission Guidelines & Deadlines<br />

o All papers should be typed and double-spaced.<br />

o All papers must use Times New Roman 12-point font with 1 inch margins.<br />

o Use either MLA or APA style for this paper.<br />

o Your final grade will be lowered by 1/2 point each day the assignment is late.<br />

Summary-Response Drafts Due Dates<br />

Draft A Week 5, Day 2<br />

Draft B Week 7, Day 1<br />

Draft C (Final Version) Week 16<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment will be submitted in your final portfolio.<br />

An “A” paper will meet the following criteria:<br />

o Fully addresses all requirements <strong>of</strong> the writing assignment (i.e., length requirements, 12<br />

point font, 1 inch margin)<br />

o Each section is clearly written and well-organized<br />

o Each section contains essential information—and nothing extra.<br />

o Follow either MLA or APA specifications.<br />

o Spell-checked and carefully pro<strong>of</strong>read and edited<br />

A “B” or below paper will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

80


Assignment<br />

Project 1 Argumentative Essay<br />

In this assignment, you will write a 3-5 page essay in which you argue for a position/stance on a<br />

specific issue presented in Steve Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation.<br />

Once you take a position/stance, you will need <strong>to</strong> support it. To support your position/stance, you<br />

must use and integrate relevant evidence and examples from (1) Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the<br />

Ramsey Murder Investigation; (2) related articles assigned in class for this unit; and (3) any<br />

relevant personal examples or observations. No outside sources will be necessary other than the<br />

ones assigned for this unit!<br />

Audience<br />

You will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing the final version <strong>of</strong> this assignment in the end-<strong>of</strong>-the year<br />

booklet for future freshmen students who are planning <strong>to</strong> enroll in this course. If you willingly<br />

chose <strong>to</strong> do so, your research paper will be published for a specific group <strong>of</strong> members within the<br />

university discourse community (i.e. CSUS’ students).<br />

Topic & Essay Prompt<br />

Steve Thomas, a former Boulder detective, takes us on a step-by-step investiga<strong>to</strong>r’s journey and<br />

reveals facts and information about the six-year old beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey known only<br />

<strong>to</strong> detectives and cops closest <strong>to</strong> the case. In JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder Investigation<br />

(2000), Thomas describes the mistakes made during the crucial early hours, and then details<br />

where the subsequent investigation led and where it went wrong. In the end, Thomas believes that<br />

there existed reasonable evidence <strong>to</strong> arrest Patsy Ramsey in connection with the death <strong>of</strong> her<br />

daughter, but because <strong>of</strong> a careless investigation from the beginning, the Ramseys successfully<br />

hid behind a group <strong>of</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rneys, where Mrs. Ramsey was never arrested and charged <strong>of</strong> the<br />

murder.<br />

Essay Question Prompt:<br />

Do you agree with Thomas’ position that there exists reasonable evidence <strong>to</strong> arrest Pat Ramsey <strong>of</strong><br />

the murder connected <strong>to</strong> her daughter’s death?<br />

In a well-organized, well-developed essay, explain Thomas’ position on the JonBenet Ramsey<br />

case and explain whether or not you agree with him. In your essay you must discuss at least two<br />

<strong>of</strong> his specific arguments as well as other arguments (from assigned readings for this unit) <strong>to</strong><br />

support your position.<br />

Tasks<br />

Step 1: Read-<strong>to</strong>-Write<br />

Read Steve Thomas’ JonBenet Ramsey: Inside the Murder Investigation<br />

81


Annotate Articles:<br />

Read “Part One: Little Miss Christmas”<br />

Read “Part Two: A Gathering S<strong>to</strong>rm”<br />

Read “Part Three: Rocky Road <strong>to</strong> Nowhere”<br />

Read “Part Four: Not so Grand Jury”<br />

Read “Part Five: Laying Down the Case”<br />

Read and annotate C.F. Johnson’s (2000) “Death from Child Abuse and Neglect”<br />

Read and annotate Boudreaux et al.’s (2012) “Child Abduction: An Overview <strong>of</strong><br />

Current and His<strong>to</strong>rical Perspectives.”<br />

Step 2: Write-<strong>to</strong>-Read (Writing an Argumentative Essay)<br />

After you have read the book and annotated the articles above, read the question prompt again<br />

and write an essay in which you agree (or disagree) with Thomas’ arguments and analyses.<br />

Explain Thomas’s position in your own words and discuss the extent <strong>to</strong> which you agree or<br />

disagree with his arguments and analyses. In addition <strong>to</strong> Thomas’s arguments, also support your<br />

position by providing reasons, evidence, and examples from (1) the articles assigned for this unit<br />

and (2) any <strong>of</strong> your own personal experiences and/or observations.<br />

When writing your argumentative essay, you must include the following major components:<br />

I. Introduction<br />

Attention grabber or hook<br />

Introduce <strong>to</strong>pic and provide background<br />

Clear thesis<br />

II. Body <strong>of</strong> Essay (3-5 paragraphs)<br />

Body Paragraph # 1 Body Paragraph # 2, # 3, etc.<br />

(A). Topic sentence (Major point) “ ”<br />

(B). Evidence/support “ ”<br />

(C). Analysis/commentary “ ”<br />

(D). Concluding sentence “ ”<br />

Note: Evidence and support must come from (1) Thomas’ JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey Murder<br />

Investigation ; (2) related articles assigned for this unit; and (3) relevant personal examples and/or<br />

observations. <strong>Other</strong> outside sources will not be necessary, and should not be included in this<br />

essay!<br />

III. Conclusion<br />

Restate your argument<br />

Call for action<br />

Concluding sentence<br />

82


Guidelines & Deadlines<br />

o Length 3- 5 pages<br />

o All papers must be typed and double-spaced.<br />

o All papers must use Time New Roman12-point font with 1 inch margins.<br />

o Use MLA style for this paper.<br />

o Your course grade will be lowered by 1-point each day the assignment is late.<br />

First semester Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 9, Day 2 Argumentative Essay Draft A<br />

Week 11<br />

(Student/Teacher<br />

Conference)<br />

Argumentative Essay Draft B<br />

Week 16 Argumentative Essay Draft C<br />

Second semester Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 2, Day 1 Argumentative Essay Draft D<br />

Week 7<br />

(Student/Teacher<br />

Conference)<br />

Argumentative Essay Draft E<br />

Week 16 Final Draft for Portfolio Submission<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment will be included in your portfolio.<br />

Content, Organization, Language Use & Mechanics<br />

Excellent paper<br />

o Carefully follows all instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources/texts, essay formatting, number <strong>of</strong> pages etc.)<br />

o Each section is clearly organized and carefully written.<br />

o Effective thesis statement and clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentences<br />

o Evidence has been carefully selected and integrated, supporting the thesis statement<br />

throughout the paper.<br />

o Effective use <strong>of</strong> analysis<br />

o The paper is carefully spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA is used correctly<br />

throughout the paper.<br />

Strong paper<br />

o Consistently follows instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources/texts, essay formatting, number <strong>of</strong> pages etc.)<br />

o Contains a few minor flaws in organization and style.<br />

o Clear thesis statement and <strong>to</strong>pic sentences<br />

o Selection and integration <strong>of</strong> evidence contain only a few minor weaknesses.<br />

o Analysis is consistently effective, with perhaps a few minor weaknesses.<br />

o A few minor flaws in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. MLA is consistently used<br />

correctly, with perhaps a few minor flaws.<br />

83


Adequate paper<br />

o Adequately follows instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources/texts, essay formatting, number <strong>of</strong> pages etc.)<br />

o Contains more than a few minor flaws in organization and style, but is satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

o Thesis statement and <strong>to</strong>pic sentences is clear, with perhaps a few weaknesses.<br />

o Selection and integration <strong>of</strong> evidence contains more than a few minor weaknesses.<br />

o Analysis contains more than a few minor weaknesses, but is adequate.<br />

o The paper is adequately spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA is adequately used<br />

correctly throughout the paper<br />

An “inadequate” paper will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

84


Assignment<br />

Project 2 Public Policy Research Paper<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> your service learning experience, you will use the information gathered from your<br />

selected organization <strong>to</strong> research a social public policy issue within the community, write a 4-6<br />

page paper in which you first address the social issue from a his<strong>to</strong>rical perspective, and then<br />

provide concrete solutions as possible ways <strong>to</strong> reduce or eliminate the social problem. Your<br />

solutions and evidence must come from (1) the ethnographic research/data gathered from your<br />

pre-approved agency or organization and (2) research evidence gathered from a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

academic texts-- articles, journals, and books, etc.<br />

Topic<br />

Your chosen <strong>to</strong>pic for this research paper must deal with current social issues that affect the<br />

community in which your pre-approved agency or organization serves. It must deal with an issue<br />

in one <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> health care, human services, criminal justice, inequality, education, and<br />

labor. For example, if you plan <strong>to</strong> complete your service learning experience for an organization<br />

such as St. Johns Shelter Program for Women and Children, which dedicates a lot <strong>of</strong> their<br />

resources <strong>to</strong> supporting and assisting homeless women and children in the Sacramen<strong>to</strong> region,<br />

then you might want <strong>to</strong> pick a <strong>to</strong>pic regarding homelessness, especially for homeless women and<br />

children living in Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, and from there develop a potential research question based on that<br />

chosen <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Audience<br />

Your social public policy research paper will be submitted in your portfolio for a final grade. In<br />

addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing the final version <strong>of</strong> this assignment in the end-<strong>of</strong>the<br />

year booklet for future freshmen students <strong>to</strong> read who are planning <strong>to</strong> enroll in this course. If<br />

you willingly choose <strong>to</strong> do so, your research paper will be published for a specific group <strong>of</strong><br />

members within the university discourse community (i.e. CSUS’ students).<br />

Task<br />

Step 1: Identifying a research <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

Your research <strong>to</strong>pic must be approved by me before you start writing the first draft <strong>of</strong><br />

your social public policy research paper. Upon approval <strong>of</strong> your <strong>to</strong>pic, you must complete<br />

the first assignment in which you will turn in your proposed research <strong>to</strong>pic along with a<br />

works cited page (4-6 sources) as part <strong>of</strong> your preliminary bibliography investigation.<br />

Bring this part <strong>of</strong> the assignment with you during our student/teacher conference in week<br />

11.<br />

Step 2: Writing your Public Policy Research Paper<br />

I. Social Policy His<strong>to</strong>ry & Development (Length 2-3 pages)<br />

You must describe and discuss the his<strong>to</strong>rical aspect <strong>of</strong> your chosen social issue, specifically in<br />

regards <strong>to</strong> its political, social, and cultural climate.<br />

85


Guiding questions <strong>to</strong> help you write this section:<br />

What is the policy his<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> your problem/issue?<br />

What agents, institutions, and organizations have played a big role in the past and present<br />

in regards <strong>to</strong> your problem/issue?<br />

Has Congress passed laws? Did the Supreme Court rule on this issue? What has<br />

been the impact <strong>of</strong> the government on the process?<br />

What has been the impact <strong>of</strong> organizations/foundations (especially your selected<br />

organization) and institutions on the process thus far?<br />

Where do we stand currently on this issue?<br />

II. Policy Solutions & Alternative Solutions (Length 2-3pages)<br />

This section requires you <strong>to</strong> critically analyze not only the current policy that is in place, but also<br />

propose some alternative policy solutions (using both the ethnographic research/data gathered<br />

from your selected agency or organization as well as relevant research evidence from a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

academic texts—articles, journals, books, etc.) as possible ways <strong>to</strong> either reduce or eliminate the<br />

issue or problem.<br />

Guiding questions <strong>to</strong> help you write this section:<br />

Is there an already existing policy in place? If so, what is it?<br />

What is your agency or organization doing <strong>to</strong> solve or reduce this issue?<br />

Are there any alternative solutions beside the current policy in place? What are they?<br />

What are the strengths and weaknesses <strong>of</strong> each alternative solution?<br />

Who are the agents in support <strong>of</strong> each solution? Who are against it?<br />

What approaches/methods are being used <strong>to</strong> enact the solution (e.g. lobbying Congress or<br />

state legislature, bringing lawsuits, creating grass-root networks, promoting media<br />

campaigns, making campaign contributions, etc.)?<br />

How might it be implemented and who will be in charge?<br />

Is this solution politically feasible? Does this solution have a chance <strong>of</strong> being enacted<br />

given the political, social, and economic climate?<br />

Guidelines & Deadlines<br />

o Length 4-6 pages.<br />

o All paper must be typed and double-spaced.<br />

o All paper must be Time New Roman 12-point font with 1 inch margins.<br />

o Use MLA style for this paper.<br />

o A minimum <strong>of</strong> 4 sources.<br />

o Late paper will be penalized 1 point deduction <strong>to</strong>wards the final grade every day that it is<br />

late.<br />

First semester Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 11 (Teacher-<br />

Student Conference)<br />

Research <strong>to</strong>pic, preliminary bibliography, and log-in sheet<br />

Week 14, Day 1 Social public policy research paper Draft A<br />

Week 16 Social public policy research paper Draft B<br />

86


2 nd semester Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 2, Day 2 Social public policy research paper Draft C<br />

Week 7<br />

Social public policy research paper Draft D<br />

(Student/Teacher<br />

Conference)<br />

Week 16 Final Draft for Portfolio Submission<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment will be included in your portfolio.<br />

Content, Organization, Language Use & Mechanics<br />

Excellent paper<br />

o Carefully follows all instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. number <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources, number <strong>of</strong> pages, major sections included, etc.)<br />

o Each section is clearly organized and carefully written.<br />

o Evidence has been carefully selected and integrated<br />

o The paper is carefully spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA<br />

is used correctly throughout the paper.<br />

Strong paper<br />

o Consistently follows instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. number <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources, number <strong>of</strong> pages, major sections included, etc.)<br />

o Contains a few minor flaws in organization and style.<br />

o Selection and integration <strong>of</strong> evidence contain a few minor flaws.<br />

o The paper is consistently spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited, with perhaps a few minor<br />

flaws. MLA is consistently used correctly throughout the paper.<br />

Adequate paper<br />

o Adequately follow instructions for this writing assignment (i.e., number <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sources, number <strong>of</strong> pages, major sections included, etc.)<br />

o Contains more than a few minor flaws in organization and style, but is satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

o Adequate selection and integration <strong>of</strong> evidence, with perhaps more than a few minor<br />

flaws.<br />

o The paper is adequately spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA is adequately used<br />

throughout the paper.<br />

An “inadequate” paper will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

87


Assignment<br />

Project 3 Grant Proposal<br />

In this assignment, you will write a 5-10 page Grant Proposal in which you persuade your<br />

intended audience (i.e. selected organization and grant funding agency) <strong>of</strong> your proposal idea as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> your service learning experience. You will collaborate closely with some <strong>of</strong> the staff<br />

members within your selected organization <strong>to</strong> come up with a proposal idea or project plan. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> writing a grant funding proposal is <strong>to</strong> convince your targeted audience that your<br />

selected organization has a solid plan that meets an important need (or problem) within your<br />

particular community. In addition, your proposal idea will seek <strong>to</strong> make a positive impact on the<br />

population it will serve. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> this assignment, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> sending<br />

a copy <strong>of</strong> this assignment <strong>to</strong> your selected organization in hopes that they will find the right<br />

funder <strong>to</strong> support your proposal idea.<br />

Audience<br />

Your intended audience for this assignment will vary depending on the different types <strong>of</strong> funders<br />

available during your grant writing process. Funders typically will consist <strong>of</strong> wealthy individuals,<br />

corporations, foundations, or governmental agencies. Refer <strong>to</strong> “Resource A-F” <strong>of</strong> Carlson’s<br />

“Winning Grants: Step by Step,” pp. 105-122 for more information on funding agencies,<br />

foundations, corporations, etc.<br />

Task<br />

Step 1: Developing and Researching Proposal Idea<br />

(A) To develop a sound proposal idea you need <strong>to</strong> continue conducting ethnographic research<br />

(i.e., close observation, field notes, interviews, etc.) about your selected organization and<br />

its surrounding community during the volunteering phase <strong>of</strong> your service learning<br />

experience.<br />

(B) Collaborate closely with staff members in your selected organization <strong>to</strong> see what proposal<br />

projects and grants are worth pursuing before you decide on a proposal idea. Most likely<br />

they will already have a proposal idea or project plan already established for you <strong>to</strong> write<br />

about.<br />

(C) Once you and your selected organization have decided on a proposal idea or project,<br />

conduct a thorough research investigation by gathering relevant research materials (i.e.,<br />

scholarly articles, research studies, interview experts in the field, etc.) <strong>to</strong> see if your<br />

proposal idea is something that is entirely new or has already been previously<br />

implemented/established in the program or somewhere else.<br />

Guiding questions for developing your proposal idea:<br />

What is your community’s problem or need?<br />

What can your organization do <strong>to</strong> address this problem or need?<br />

88


What would an improved community’s program look like?<br />

How will you know if your organization’s program or service will succeed based on your<br />

proposal idea?<br />

How much funding resources will it take <strong>to</strong> make your proposal idea successful?<br />

Step 2: Writing a Grant Proposal<br />

After you have developed a basic foundation <strong>of</strong> what your proposal idea will look like, follow the<br />

grant proposal’s structure and format below when writing your grant proposal.<br />

Your grant proposal should include the following major components:<br />

Section I. Need Statement (1-2 pages)<br />

A need statement sets the framework for the entire proposal, as it describes sets <strong>of</strong> conditions, or<br />

a social need affecting certain people or things in a specific place at a specific time.<br />

Here are some helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your need statement:<br />

Is your need statement focused on your organization’s population (and not on your<br />

organization)?<br />

Does your need statement directly connect <strong>to</strong> your organization’s mission statement?<br />

Is your need statement supported by solid quantitative and qualitative data on the nature,<br />

size, and scope <strong>of</strong> the need (or problem) <strong>to</strong> be addressed?<br />

Is your need statement persuasive enough <strong>to</strong> convince any funding agency?<br />

Section II. Goals & Objectives (Length ½ <strong>to</strong> 1 page)<br />

This section shows what your organization is trying <strong>to</strong> accomplish through its program by<br />

establishing “measurable” objectives that will indicate your organizations’ progress <strong>to</strong>ward its<br />

goals.<br />

Here are some helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your program’s goals & objectives:<br />

Are your program’s goals stated as end results?<br />

Are your organization’s objectives stated as specific outcomes that directly relate back <strong>to</strong><br />

each <strong>of</strong> your program’s goals?<br />

Can your organization’s objectives be quantified, assessed, and evaluated?<br />

Section III. Method Section (Length 1-2 pages)<br />

The method component <strong>of</strong> the proposal outlines the specific activities or methods <strong>of</strong> your<br />

proposal idea in a systematic fashion.<br />

Here are some helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your method section:<br />

Do the methods discussed in the proposal derive logically from the program’s need<br />

statement and the goals and objectives?<br />

What specific activities or methods are needed in order <strong>to</strong> meet the program’s goals and<br />

objectives?<br />

Why did you select these specific methods or activities<br />

89


Have you explained the timing and order <strong>of</strong> these specific activities?<br />

Who will perform these specific activities?<br />

Are the proposed activities feasible given the organization’s available resources?<br />

Section IV. Evaluation (1-2 pages)<br />

This section determines the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> your proposed program. You should describe how<br />

the program will evaluate its overall success and how it will go about documenting and recording<br />

these activities or methods.<br />

Here are some helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your evaluation section:<br />

Does the evaluation section focus on assessing the program’s methods, activities, and<br />

results?<br />

Who will be evaluated and what will be measured?<br />

What information will be collected in the evaluation process?<br />

Who will be responsible for making the assessments?<br />

How will the information and results be used <strong>to</strong> improve the program’s future status?<br />

Section V. Budget (Length 1-2 pages)<br />

This section describes the program’s overall financial plan, which directly translates the methods<br />

section <strong>of</strong> the proposal in<strong>to</strong> dollars (i.e., words in<strong>to</strong> numbers). The program budget is your best<br />

“guesstimate”—a projection—<strong>of</strong> the income and expenses you anticipate for your proposal idea.<br />

Helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your budget section:<br />

Is the budget consistent with your proposal’s program plan?<br />

Does the budget include all revenues and expenses (i.e. administrative cost, staffing,<br />

supplies and resources, etc.)?<br />

Is the budget realistic? In other words, can your organization accomplish the intended<br />

objectives with your proposed budget?<br />

Section VI. Summary/Abstract (Length 1/2-1 page)<br />

This section summarizes what your proposal is basically all about in a reduced version. The<br />

summary is a clear, one- <strong>to</strong> two-page abstract <strong>of</strong> the proposal, and is positioned at the very<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> the grant proposal. You will write your summary/abstract only after all sections (I-<br />

V) have been completed.<br />

Helpful questions <strong>to</strong> consider when writing your summary/abstract section:<br />

Does it clearly identify the applicants(s) involved?<br />

Does it describe or address the specific need <strong>of</strong> the organization, as well as the specific<br />

objectives <strong>to</strong> be achieved?<br />

Does it mention the program’s <strong>to</strong>tal cost and the amount <strong>of</strong> funding you are requesting?<br />

Is it brief (no more than one page)?<br />

Note: Questions adapted from Carlson’s Winning Grants: Step by Step<br />

90


Guidelines & Due Dates<br />

o Length between 5 <strong>to</strong> pages 10<br />

o All papers must be typed and double-spaced.<br />

o All papers must be in Time New Roman 12-point font with 1 inch margins.<br />

o Use APA style for this paper.<br />

o Your grade will be lowered by 1 point <strong>to</strong>wards the final grade each day the assignment is<br />

late.<br />

Due Dates Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 10, Day 1 Grant Proposal Draft A<br />

Week 13, Day 2 Grant Proposal Draft B<br />

Week 16 Grant Proposal Draft C (Final Version)<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment will be included in your portfolio.<br />

Content, Organization, Language Use & Mechanics<br />

Excellent paper<br />

o Fully takes in<strong>to</strong> account principles learned in this community service unit.<br />

o Each section <strong>of</strong> the grant proposal is clearly organized and carefully written.<br />

o The paper is carefully spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. APA is used correctly<br />

throughout the paper.<br />

Strong paper<br />

o Consistently takes in<strong>to</strong> account principles learned in this community service unit.<br />

o A few flaws in organization and style.<br />

o A few minor flaws in grammar, punctuation, and spelling. APA is consistently used<br />

correctly, with perhaps a few minor flaws.<br />

Adequate paper<br />

o Takes in<strong>to</strong> account some principles learned in this community service unit.<br />

o Contains more than a few flaws in organization and style, but is adequate.<br />

o The paper is adequately spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. APA is adequately used<br />

correctly throughout the paper.<br />

An “inadequate” paper will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

91


Assignment<br />

Project 4 Newsletter<br />

For this assignment, you will write a 2-3 page newsletter about your selected organization and the<br />

population it serves as part <strong>of</strong> your service learning project. There are two primary purposes for<br />

writing this assignment. The first purpose <strong>of</strong> writing this newsletter is <strong>to</strong> practice summary<br />

writing. The second purpose <strong>of</strong> writing this newsletter is <strong>to</strong> give you the opportunity <strong>to</strong> (1) work<br />

with computers and (2) develop essential skills in using Micros<strong>of</strong>t Word.<br />

Audience<br />

Your newsletter will be submitted in your portfolio and read by me at the end <strong>of</strong> the second<br />

semester for a final grade. In addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> publishing your newsletter for<br />

your selected organization <strong>to</strong> read, as well as its targeted population within the community. As a<br />

result, if you willingly choose <strong>to</strong> do so, your newsletter will be published for a discourse<br />

community that is more general in nature (i.e. your selected organization and the community it<br />

serves).<br />

Task<br />

Step 1: Conducting a Mini-Ethnographic Study <strong>of</strong> Program’s Site<br />

During the 20 hours <strong>of</strong> volunteer service (as part <strong>of</strong> your service learning experience),<br />

you must continue <strong>to</strong> conduct careful observation <strong>of</strong> your program’s site.<br />

Play careful attention and record notes in your notebook about the daily<br />

activities and events that are happening there, as well as future events and<br />

activities.<br />

Interview staff members and a few <strong>of</strong> the clients they serve about their attitudes<br />

or perceptions regarding the program.<br />

Read the program’s mission statement and other related information <strong>to</strong> find out<br />

more about the program’s his<strong>to</strong>ry, philosophy, and goals.<br />

Step 2: Writing the Newsletter<br />

Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the 20 hours <strong>of</strong> volunteer work, you will design the newsletter<br />

assignment with the following essential components:<br />

Section 1<br />

Section 2<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> program’s his<strong>to</strong>ry, philosophy, and goals<br />

Inform readers about the nature <strong>of</strong> the program—its his<strong>to</strong>ry,<br />

philosophy, and goals.<br />

Daily activities/events<br />

Inform readers about the program’s daily activities/events using<br />

specific details and examples.<br />

92


Section 3<br />

Guidelines & Deadlines<br />

Future events/activities<br />

Inform readers about upcoming events/activities as a mean <strong>to</strong><br />

promote more participation and interaction among the community.<br />

o Length 2–3 pages<br />

o Use MLA style for this assignment<br />

o Use a two-column format<br />

o Minimum <strong>of</strong> one visual aid (i.e. picture, table, figure, etc.)<br />

o Must have title, headings, and subheadings<br />

o Must use some bullets or numbering<br />

o Your final grade will be lowered by 1 point each day the assignment is late.<br />

Due Dates Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 11, Day 1 Newsletter Draft A<br />

Week 13, Day 2 Newsletter Draft B<br />

Week 16 Final Draft<br />

Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment will be included in your portfolio.<br />

Content, Organization, & Language Use<br />

Excellent paper<br />

o Carefully follows all instructions and requirements for this writing assignment (i.e.<br />

number <strong>of</strong> required sections, number <strong>of</strong> pages, number <strong>of</strong> visual aids, two-side columns,<br />

etc.)<br />

o Each section is clearly organized and carefully written.<br />

o The paper is carefully spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA is used correctly<br />

throughout the paper.<br />

Strong paper<br />

o Consistently follows instructions and requirements for this writing assignment (i.e.<br />

number <strong>of</strong> required sections, number <strong>of</strong> pages, number <strong>of</strong> visual aids, two-side columns,<br />

etc.)<br />

o Contains a few flaws in organization and style.<br />

o The paper is consistently spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited, with perhaps a few minor<br />

flaws. MLA is also consistently used correctly.<br />

Adequate paper<br />

o Adequately follows instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. number <strong>of</strong> required<br />

sections, number <strong>of</strong> pages, number <strong>of</strong> visual aids, two-side columns etc.)<br />

o Contains more than a few minor flaws in organization and style, but is satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

o The paper is adequately spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited. MLA is adequately used<br />

correctly throughout the paper.<br />

An “inadequate” paper will fail <strong>to</strong> meet these criteria in one or more areas.<br />

93


Assignment<br />

Project 5 Resume & Cover Letter<br />

For this assignment, you will create a resume and cover letter based on an actual job position<br />

from a company or organization <strong>of</strong> your interest. Not only will you choose where you want <strong>to</strong><br />

apply, but you will also conduct research about your targeted company or organization as<br />

preparation for writing this assignment. Upon researching and evaluating the job position <strong>of</strong> your<br />

interest, you will then analyze your own assets and qualifications by writing an effective resume<br />

and cover letter in response <strong>to</strong> the selected job position.<br />

Audience<br />

Your resume & cover letter will be submitted <strong>to</strong> me at the end <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd semester for a final grade<br />

(and not part <strong>of</strong> the portfolio evaluation). In addition, you will have the option <strong>of</strong> sending out the<br />

final version <strong>of</strong> your resume and cover letter <strong>to</strong> any employer or organization <strong>of</strong> your interest. If<br />

you choose <strong>to</strong> do so, your resume and cover letter will be viewed by a specific discourse<br />

community within the business and pr<strong>of</strong>essional world.<br />

Tasks<br />

Step 1: Researching the company or organization <strong>of</strong> your interest<br />

o Look through the classified job section in the local newspaper (i.e. Sac Bee) and job<br />

listings posted on various career websites (i.e. career-builder.com, monster.com,<br />

craiglists.com, etc.), or through the websites <strong>of</strong> actual companies and organizations<br />

themselves <strong>to</strong> find a real job position that you would like <strong>to</strong> apply for.<br />

o Once you find the job position you would like <strong>to</strong> apply for, you must conduct in-depth<br />

research about the job position (i.e., job’s qualifications/requirements, essential duties,<br />

skills needed, salary, benefits, etc.), as well as the company or organization’s core values,<br />

beliefs, and expectations (i.e. mission statement, goals, philosophy, and his<strong>to</strong>ry, etc.) as<br />

preparation for writing your resume and cover letter.<br />

o Next, you will analyze your own qualifications, assets, and work experience and write an<br />

effective resume and cover letter in response <strong>to</strong> the actual job listing.<br />

Step 2: Resume Writing<br />

I. RESUME (Length 1-2 page)<br />

A resume is an effective marketing <strong>to</strong>ol that outlines your education, skills, and experience <strong>to</strong><br />

your potential employer. Everything in the resume needs <strong>to</strong> be exact—from how the information<br />

is presented and organized <strong>to</strong> how clearly it’s written. The purpose <strong>of</strong> writing a resume is <strong>to</strong> help<br />

you get selected for the interview process, and eventually, hired for the job position you are<br />

applying for.<br />

Make sure you include the following major components in this specific order when writing your<br />

resume:<br />

(A) Your name<br />

(B) Address<br />

(C) Contact information (i.e., e-mail, cell phones, etc.)<br />

94


(D) Career Objective<br />

(E) Education<br />

(F) Work experience<br />

Optional:<br />

(G) Qualifications/skills<br />

(H) License and/or certifications<br />

(I) Achievements<br />

(J) Volunteer work<br />

Step 3: Cover Letter Writing<br />

II. COVER LETTER (Length 1 page)<br />

The cover letter is another important marketing <strong>to</strong>ol <strong>to</strong> go along with your resume. Nearly all<br />

companies/organization <strong>to</strong>day require you <strong>to</strong> send your resume along with a cover letter attached.<br />

Each cover letter must be individualized <strong>to</strong> fit the job<br />

position you are applying for. The language use in the cover letter should be polite, clear, and <strong>to</strong><br />

the point.<br />

Make sure the following components are organized in the following manner when writing your<br />

cover letter:<br />

(A) Your address, telephone number, e-mail address, and the date (in this specific order).<br />

(B) Name, title, and address <strong>of</strong> the person <strong>to</strong> whom the cover letter and resume should be<br />

sent.<br />

(C) Skip a line, write “Dear Ms./Mr./Mrs., etc, and then skip another line.<br />

(D) The body <strong>of</strong> your cover letter must consist <strong>of</strong> at least two paragraphs.<br />

You should tell your reader who you are, what position you are applying for, and<br />

why you think your assets and qualifications make you the perfect candidate for<br />

the job position. Mention only a few <strong>of</strong> your achievements/accomplishments and<br />

skills, since all this essential information is detailed in your resume.<br />

(E) The concluding paragraph should be brief, in which you request an interview and provide<br />

your contact information. Close by thanking your reader for his or her time and<br />

consideration.<br />

Guidelines & Deadlines<br />

o Times New Roman 12 point font and 1 inch margins.<br />

o Must use bold, italic type, upper-case lettering, and bullet list for emphasis on resume<br />

writing.<br />

o Must use full-block style and blank line between each paragraph for cover letter (all<br />

paragraphs and lines being flush left (no indentation)<br />

Due Dates Assignment Drafts<br />

Week 13, Day 2 Resume & Cover Letter Draft A<br />

Week 15, Day 1 Resume & Cover Letter Draft B<br />

Week 16 Final Draft sent out <strong>to</strong> company/organization<br />

95


Grading Criteria<br />

This assignment is worth 10% <strong>of</strong> your final grade and will not be included in your final portfolio.<br />

Content & Organization<br />

A (9-10 points)<br />

o Carefully follows all instructions and requirements for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong><br />

bullet lists, boldface, italic, and uppercase letters for resume, use <strong>of</strong> full-block style for<br />

cover letter, number <strong>of</strong> pages, etc.)<br />

o Each section is clearly organized and carefully written.<br />

B (8 points)<br />

o Consistently follows instructions and requirements for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong><br />

bullet lists, boldface, italic, and uppercase letters for resume, use <strong>of</strong> full-block style for<br />

cover letter, number <strong>of</strong> pages, etc.)<br />

o Contains a few flaws in organization and style.<br />

C (7 points)<br />

o Adequately follow instructions for this writing assignment (i.e. use <strong>of</strong> bullet lists,<br />

boldface, italic, and uppercase letters for resume, use <strong>of</strong> full-block style for cover letter,<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pages, etc.)<br />

o Contains more than a few flaws in organization and style, but is satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry.<br />

Mechanics<br />

-0 point The paper is carefully spell-checked, pro<strong>of</strong>read, and edited.<br />

-1 point A few minor flaws in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.<br />

-2 points More than a few flaws in grammar, punctuation, and spelling.<br />

96


Assignment<br />

Portfolio Requirements & Evaluation<br />

A major part <strong>of</strong> this course is the submission <strong>of</strong> a portfolio <strong>of</strong> your writing at the end <strong>of</strong> the 2 nd<br />

semester. A writing portfolio is basically a collection <strong>of</strong> a writer’s work from a given period <strong>of</strong><br />

time. Throughout the course you will draft, revise, and edit essays and research papers so that you<br />

can include them in your portfolio. At the end <strong>of</strong> the second semester, I will collect your portfolio<br />

and grade your collection <strong>of</strong> writings holistically for a final course grade (see portfolio evaluation<br />

below).<br />

Guidelines/Requirements<br />

You portfolio must be organized using a 3-ring binder with individual tab labeled for each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sections below:<br />

Contents <strong>of</strong> portfolio<br />

□ Cover Sheet Include your name, instruc<strong>to</strong>r’s name, class/section, & date.<br />

□ Table <strong>of</strong> Contents Include page numbers for each <strong>of</strong> the following sections provided<br />

Below.<br />

□ Background Info. Consist <strong>of</strong> an introduction letter about yourself as a reader/writer and<br />

your reading/writing goals & objectives at Sac State. The introduction<br />

letter will not be evaluated for a final course grade, but is nonetheless<br />

a necessary component <strong>of</strong> the portfolio submission (without this<br />

writing piece your portfolio will not be accepted and graded).<br />

□ Polished Works Pick THREE <strong>of</strong> your best works <strong>to</strong> include in this section (final<br />

versions and all drafts and feedback must be included as well). I want<br />

<strong>to</strong> see your overall improvement from the first draft <strong>to</strong> the final draft.<br />

In addition, you must write a short report in which you tell me what<br />

significant changes you have made in each <strong>of</strong> the writing assignments.<br />

Attach this report in front <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the polished work assignment.<br />

□ Additional Works Include Summary-Response paper (final version) and ONE <strong>of</strong> your best<br />

example <strong>of</strong> your highlighting and annotating skills on any <strong>of</strong> the class<br />

readings.<br />

Note: An incomplete portfolio with any missing section will not be accepted and graded.<br />

Due Dates/Deadlines<br />

Due Dates Portfolio Assessment<br />

Week 16 (2 nd<br />

semester)<br />

Portfolio submission (All sections and works included; any portfolio<br />

with missing section(s) and/or work(s) will not be accepted and graded.)<br />

97


Portfolio Evaluation<br />

Your portfolio is worth 50% <strong>of</strong> your final grade. I will use the following scoring criteria below <strong>to</strong><br />

assess your collection <strong>of</strong> works holistically for a final course grade.<br />

HIGH PASS<br />

Portfolio provides evidence <strong>of</strong> exceptional ability in the areas below (see pass).<br />

PASS<br />

Portfolio provides evidence <strong>of</strong> adequate ability <strong>to</strong>:<br />

FAILING<br />

o Apply a variety <strong>of</strong> effective reading and writing strategies through highlighting,<br />

annotation, and summary-response writing.<br />

o Write a variety <strong>of</strong> texts for multiple purposes, audiences and genres.<br />

o Organize essays <strong>to</strong> support the writer’s points <strong>of</strong> view in ways that are<br />

appropriate <strong>to</strong> his/her <strong>to</strong>pic, audience, and purpose.<br />

o Evaluate and cite sources appropriately.<br />

o Develop various and flexible strategies for generating and revising texts in<br />

response <strong>to</strong> constructive criticism/feedback.<br />

o Develop syntactic maturity and sentence clarity by editing and pro<strong>of</strong> reading for<br />

appropriate grammar and mechanics.<br />

Portfolio fails <strong>to</strong> provide evidence <strong>of</strong> adequate ability in the areas mentioned above.<br />

98


APPENDIX C<br />

COURSE LESSON PLANS & MATERIALS<br />

99


Materials:<br />

Course Introduction (Lesson 1)<br />

Course Syllabus<br />

Service-Learning Requirement & Timeline<br />

Homework assignment (handout 1): “Bringing Your World in<strong>to</strong> the Classroom”<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

5 min Attendance T takes attendance Whole Class<br />

25min Teacher & Students’<br />

Introduction:<br />

40min Course Introduction:<br />

5min Wrap-Up:<br />

Task 1: Teacher introduces<br />

himself <strong>to</strong> the entire class<br />

Task 2: T does an Ice Breaker<br />

Activity: “Twenty Questions”<br />

In this game, T selects<br />

a personal hobby that<br />

is not known by the<br />

Ss.<br />

Task 1: T goes over course<br />

syllabus (i.e. course<br />

description, goals,<br />

requirements, and policies)<br />

Task 2: T goes over Service<br />

Learning (SL) requirements<br />

sheet<br />

T hands out homework<br />

assignment (Handout 1)<br />

“Bringing Your World in<strong>to</strong> the<br />

Classroom” and reads it <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Ss.<br />

Task 1: Ss pay<br />

attention and listen<br />

100<br />

Task 2: During the<br />

game, Ss try <strong>to</strong> guess<br />

the hobby by asking a<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 20 questions<br />

which can only be<br />

answered by either a<br />

“yes” or “no” until the<br />

hobby is revealed.<br />

Task 3: After the<br />

game, Ss briefly<br />

introduce themselves<br />

(grade level, major,<br />

and hobbies)<br />

Task 1: Ss can ask any<br />

questions about the<br />

course requirements.<br />

Task 2: Ss read Service<br />

Learning (SL)<br />

requirement handout<br />

Ss follow along and<br />

ask any questions<br />

about homework<br />

assignment.


Bringing Your World in<strong>to</strong> the Classroom (Handout 1)<br />

“Our children need <strong>to</strong> know that their lives count. That their cultures count. That their literacies<br />

count. We must place value on who they are and where they are from, and we must navigate the<br />

course, <strong>to</strong>gether, <strong>to</strong> where they are going” --- Linda S. Bausch<br />

Literacy His<strong>to</strong>ries<br />

Task 1: Read Linda S. Bausch’s (2003) “Just Words: Living and Learning the Literacies <strong>of</strong> Our<br />

Students’ Lives.”<br />

Task 2: After reading Bausch’s article, complete the following activities below <strong>to</strong> research more<br />

about your literacy practices at home and/or within the community:<br />

Going on an Archaeological Dig:<br />

Task 3: Reflection<br />

101<br />

Collect information/data about various literacy practices that you encounter<br />

in your home and/ or within your community.<br />

Home: Choose areas in your home from which <strong>to</strong> collect data—on<br />

your refrigera<strong>to</strong>r, kitchen counter, living room, bedrooms, etc. Also<br />

examine household items as well as personal items (i.e. decorations,<br />

purse, wallets, album pictures, etc.).<br />

Community: Choose areas in your community from which <strong>to</strong> collect<br />

data—local grocery s<strong>to</strong>res, friend’s houses, restaurants, etc. Examine<br />

flyers, advertisements, menus, and other items within your<br />

community.<br />

Once you have gathered some information about your literacy practices at home and/or within the<br />

community, take out a separate piece <strong>of</strong> paper and answer the following questions below:<br />

What type <strong>of</strong> literacy activities do you participate in on a regular basis at<br />

home and/or within your community? (Explain in 2-3 sentences)<br />

What type <strong>of</strong> language and/or thinking is most valued within these specific<br />

literacy activities (i.e. formal versus informal, written versus spoken, what<br />

knowledge is most valued, etc.)? (Explain in 2-3 sentences)<br />

Are any types <strong>of</strong> reading and writing involved? If so, what kinds?<br />

How are these literacy activities similar or different <strong>to</strong> academic literacies<br />

encountered in school? (Explain in 3-5 sentences)<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

Task 4: Bring in one artifact and share it with the whole class for next class session.


SWBATS:<br />

Multiliteracies (Lesson 2)<br />

Identify and reflect on their literacy his<strong>to</strong>ries, especially in relation <strong>to</strong> their home cultures<br />

and academic discourses.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> develop appreciation for multiliteracy and cultural pluralism within the<br />

university setting and beyond.<br />

Materials:<br />

Bausch’s (2003) “Just Words: Living and Learning the Literacies <strong>of</strong> Our Students’ Lives”<br />

Homework Assignment: “Bringing Your World in<strong>to</strong> the Classroom”<br />

Student’s artifacts<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2 min Attendance T takes attendance Whole Class<br />

15-20min Review<br />

50min Activity #1: Artifact<br />

Sharing<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

SacCT Posting # 1 (see<br />

question prompt below)<br />

Task 1: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> get<br />

in<strong>to</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> 2 and<br />

discuss what they found<br />

interesting about Bausch’s<br />

article.<br />

Task 2: As a whole class<br />

T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> share their<br />

ideas/inputs about what<br />

they found interesting.<br />

Task 3: After the class<br />

discussion, T tells Ss <strong>to</strong><br />

stay in groups and share<br />

what they wrote down for<br />

their reflection on the<br />

homework assignment.<br />

T picks on Ss<br />

alphabetically <strong>to</strong> share<br />

their artifact <strong>to</strong> the class<br />

until everyone has<br />

participated.<br />

T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> go home and<br />

log on <strong>to</strong> SacCT and<br />

complete Posting # 1 by<br />

next class session.<br />

102<br />

Task 1 & 2: Ss bring in<br />

Bausch’s article and<br />

discuss with a partner<br />

(for 5 min) and then<br />

share their ideas/inputs<br />

with the whole class<br />

Task 3: Ss share their<br />

reflections w/ a partner.<br />

Ss will have 2-3 min<br />

each <strong>to</strong> present their<br />

artifacts <strong>to</strong> the whole<br />

class.<br />

Whole Class


SacCT Journal Entry 1<br />

Look at the Service-Learning Community Partners list on your Service Requirement & Timeline<br />

sheet. From the list, pick 3-5 potential organizations that are <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>to</strong> you and research more<br />

about each organization. You can either visit the organization online or visit the Engagement<br />

Community Center (Library, 2406) <strong>to</strong> find out more information about these organizations.<br />

Question:<br />

A. What did you learn about each organization? How are they different? Similar?<br />

B. Which <strong>of</strong> these organizations interest you the most? And Why?<br />

Note: Be sure <strong>to</strong> comment on at least two other class members’ responses.<br />

103


SWBATS:<br />

Ethnography Research (Lesson 3)<br />

Identify and practice using some effective ethnographic research methods (i.e. observing<br />

and taking field notes, analyzing data, etc.) for writing and research purposes.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> critically evaluate and analyze research data.<br />

Materials:<br />

Project # 1: Academic & Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Ethnographic Investigation<br />

Ethnographic Research Slides (1-6)<br />

Handout 1: Writing Field Notes<br />

Handout 2: Analyzing Field Notes<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

5-7min Attendance/<br />

Announcements<br />

Task 1: T takes attendance<br />

Task 2: T hands out Task 1: Ss read<br />

“Academic &<br />

assignment sheet and<br />

Career/Pr<strong>of</strong>essional” Project<br />

Assignment<br />

ask questions if needed<br />

10-13min Presentation:<br />

Introduction <strong>to</strong><br />

Ethnography Research<br />

50min Practice Activity # 1:<br />

Writing Field Notes<br />

(Handout 1)<br />

5min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Task 3: T answers any<br />

question about assignment<br />

T presents Ethnography<br />

Research Slides (1-6)<br />

T gives Ss handout 1 and<br />

takes Ss outside <strong>of</strong> class <strong>to</strong><br />

observe the Union Center on<br />

campus.<br />

Task 1: T passes out<br />

“Analyzing Field Notes”<br />

sheet (see Handout 2). T<br />

tells Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

assignment for homework<br />

and bring it back <strong>to</strong> next<br />

class session for a whole<br />

class discussion.<br />

Task 2: T also tells Ss <strong>to</strong><br />

Read A.B. Kajornboon’s<br />

(2005) “Using Interviews as<br />

Research Instruments”<br />

104<br />

Ss use the slides<br />

handout <strong>to</strong> take notes<br />

Ss take notes using the<br />

chart in handout 1 and<br />

write down what they<br />

observe at the site.<br />

Task 1: Ss analyze data<br />

and complete questions<br />

on Handout 2 for<br />

homework.


Introduction <strong>to</strong> Ethnographic<br />

Research<br />

Overview<br />

*What is Ethnography? (Slides 3 & 4)<br />

Data Collection Methods<br />

How <strong>to</strong> Write Field Notes (Slides 5 & 6)<br />

Conducting Interviews (discussed in detail<br />

next class session)<br />

What is Ethnography?<br />

• Involves participating in people’s daily lives<br />

• Observing what happens<br />

• Listening <strong>to</strong> what is said<br />

• Taking field notes & collecting data<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

105


How <strong>to</strong> write Field Notes<br />

• Write what you observe as soon as possible<br />

after leaving the fieldsite.<br />

• Should plan <strong>to</strong> leave a block <strong>of</strong> time for<br />

writing (may be very time-consuming)<br />

• Organize your field notes in<strong>to</strong> categories or<br />

sections.<br />

What <strong>to</strong> include?<br />

1. Date, time, and place <strong>of</strong> observation<br />

2. Specific facts, numbers, details<br />

3. Sensory impressions: sights, sounds, textures,<br />

smells, taste<br />

4. Personal responses<br />

5. Specific words/phrases <strong>of</strong> conversations<br />

6. Questions about people or behaviors for future<br />

investigation<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

106


Writing Field Notes (Handout 1)<br />

You will observe a specific place on the campus. As you observed, be sure <strong>to</strong> write down as much<br />

information (or data) on the setting and its subjects (people). Use the four columns below <strong>to</strong> help<br />

you organize your observation as you complete your field notes.<br />

Date, Time, & Place<br />

<strong>of</strong> Observation<br />

Description<br />

(Specific facts &<br />

details <strong>of</strong> what<br />

happens at the site)<br />

Personal<br />

Reponses/Reactions<br />

(Observer’s<br />

Comments)<br />

107<br />

Future Questions<br />

(about people or<br />

behaviors at the site<br />

for future<br />

investigation)


Analyzing Field Notes (Handout 2)<br />

Use your field notes chart <strong>to</strong> answer the following questions below:<br />

1. What kinds <strong>of</strong> activities and events are distinct <strong>to</strong> this site?<br />

2. What kind <strong>of</strong> people (and age groups) did you observe the most at this site?<br />

3. How did they behave? What type <strong>of</strong> language did they use?<br />

4. How did they dress? Was it similar or different <strong>to</strong> each other?<br />

5. What themes or patterns can you begin <strong>to</strong> identify based on your data collection (i.e. what<br />

you observed at the specified site)?<br />

108


SWBATS:<br />

Conducting Interviews (Lesson 4)<br />

Identify, understand, and use the interviewing process as a research method.<br />

Conduct and practice using some effective interviewing techniques for data<br />

collection purposes.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> analyze interviews for their overall<br />

effectiveness.<br />

Materials:<br />

PowerPoint Presentation Sign-Up Sheet<br />

Handout 1 (Helpful Guide): Conducting Interviews<br />

Video Clip (5:25min): 20/20 Interview <strong>of</strong> JonBenet Ramsey’s Parents<br />

(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nltc6UeKigw)<br />

Handout 2: Analyzing T.V. Interview<br />

Handout 3: Evaluating Interview Questions<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

5- Attendance/ Task 1: T takes attendance<br />

7min Announcements<br />

Task 1: Ss briefly<br />

Task 2: T selects groups for the introduce themselves <strong>to</strong><br />

“Academic Ethnographic<br />

Investigation” Project<br />

their group members.<br />

Task 2: Each group then<br />

Task 3: T passes out sign-up sheet for discusses and picks a<br />

the PowerPoint presentation in weeks day <strong>to</strong> sign up for the<br />

14 & 15.<br />

PowerPoint presentation<br />

in weeks 14 & 15.<br />

5min Review As a whole class T reviews<br />

Ss share what they wrote<br />

homework assignment (Analyzing<br />

Field Notes) w/ Ss.<br />

down.<br />

20min Presentation: How<br />

<strong>to</strong> Conduct an<br />

Interview<br />

Note: Handout<br />

adapted from<br />

Davies &<br />

Beaumont, 2007<br />

Task 1: T hands outs “Conducting an<br />

Interview” helpful sheet (Handout 1)<br />

and asks Ss a question:<br />

“What do you think are the steps<br />

needed <strong>to</strong> conduct an effective<br />

interview?”<br />

Task 2: T summarizes the handout<br />

and shows that there are 5 critical<br />

steps <strong>to</strong> conducting an effective<br />

interview.<br />

Task 1: Ss share their<br />

ideas/inputs.<br />

109<br />

Task 2: Ss follow along<br />

on the handout


20min Activity # 1:<br />

Analyzing a T.V.<br />

Interview<br />

20min Activity # 2:<br />

Evaluating<br />

Interview Question<br />

2min Wrap-Up:<br />

Homework<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Analyzing a<br />

T.V. Interview” (Handout 2) and<br />

plays a video clip (20/20 Interview <strong>of</strong><br />

JonBenet Ramsey’s Parents.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

necessary<br />

Task 3: As a whole class T asks Ss <strong>to</strong><br />

share what they wrote down.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Evaluating<br />

Interview Question” (Handout 3) as<br />

preparation for Academic Discourse<br />

Project.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

necessary.<br />

T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> read SWH (pp. 67-75)<br />

and Smith’s “Part One: Little Miss<br />

Christmas” for next class session.<br />

Task 1: Ss watch video<br />

and analyze it by<br />

completing the<br />

questions on Handout<br />

2.<br />

110<br />

Task 2: Ss share what<br />

they wrote down <strong>to</strong> the<br />

whole class.<br />

Task 1: Ss get in<strong>to</strong><br />

groups and create a<br />

question they might ask<br />

for their academic<br />

discourse project using<br />

Handout 3.<br />

Task 2: Ss then<br />

evaluate their own<br />

question using the<br />

checklist attached in<br />

Handout 3.<br />

Whole Class


1. Designing Questions<br />

Conducting Interviews (Handout 1)<br />

Closed questions<br />

Are easy <strong>to</strong> answer and lead <strong>to</strong> “yes” or “no” response, or lead <strong>to</strong> some other brief reply.<br />

Begin with whom, where, when, which, does or did.<br />

Can be a disaster for qualitative data collection because they limit the data being<br />

collected. Use open-ended follow-ups <strong>to</strong> avoid this problem!<br />

Open-ended questions<br />

Cannot be answered with a simple “yes” or “no” response.<br />

Encourage the interviewee <strong>to</strong> provide more information, leading <strong>to</strong> rich and useful data.<br />

Begin with such words as what, how or tell me.<br />

Problems <strong>to</strong> avoid when designing questions<br />

1. Ambiguous questions: Questions where there is more than one meaning will lead <strong>to</strong> confusion<br />

and/or misleading data. Example: “Describe the best way <strong>to</strong> get <strong>to</strong> the airport?” (Does “best<br />

way” mean quickest or cheapest?)<br />

2. Double-barreled questions: These ask for more than one response. Example: “Do you think<br />

that this company is operating efficiently or does it just need more employee commitment?”<br />

3. Leading questions: These lead the answer in the way they are asked: “Many senior employees<br />

think that X. I suppose this is your view as well. Is it?”<br />

4. Negative questions: Questions that use the word “not” and can be hard <strong>to</strong> answer. Example:<br />

“Why is it not easy <strong>to</strong> do a master’s degree?” Compare: “What are the fac<strong>to</strong>rs that cause<br />

difficulties for master’s students?” Always phrase questions in the positive form!<br />

6. Denial questions: These will almost certainly lead <strong>to</strong> denial, understatement, or some form <strong>of</strong><br />

socially acceptable answers. Some questions have “socially acceptable” answers that may<br />

misrepresent subjects’ beliefs and actions. For example, respondents may understate or falsify<br />

their age, level <strong>of</strong> prejudice, etc.<br />

7. Artificial opinion questions: These questions create an opinion on a <strong>to</strong>pic on which the<br />

interviewee really may have no opinion. Example: “Do you think everyone is happy working in<br />

this company?”<br />

II. Starting and Finishing the Interview<br />

Always ensure your interviewee is clear about your purpose and objectives. Here are some<br />

appropriate guidelines for opening and closing an interview:<br />

To open an interview:<br />

*introduce yourself<br />

*state the purpose <strong>of</strong> the interview<br />

*explain that brief notes will be taken (or a tape recording will be made) and shared with the<br />

interviewee after they have been organized<br />

111


To close an interview:<br />

*Signal a closing statement after the last question<br />

*In closing, you must thank the interviewee for his/her time<br />

IV. Conducting the Interview<br />

When conducting the interview, your aim is three-fold:<br />

1. Keeping the interviewee at ease and comfortable <strong>to</strong> maximize their responses.<br />

2. Ensuring that the interview proceeds smoothly in a structured way.<br />

3. Maintaining an efficient way <strong>of</strong> recording the information collected.<br />

Things <strong>to</strong> keep the interviewee at ease using both verbal and non-verbal communication<br />

Body language & posture.<br />

Eye contact.<br />

Facial expressions.<br />

Tone <strong>of</strong> voice<br />

V. Managing Data Collected During the Interview<br />

Managing the data you collect during an interview is critical. You need <strong>to</strong> decide on how<br />

information is <strong>to</strong> be recorded.<br />

• Note taking<br />

• Taping an interview<br />

• Video recording<br />

You must ask the person you are going <strong>to</strong> interview whether or not he/she feels comfortable with<br />

how the information will be recorded and with the type <strong>of</strong> instrument you will be using.<br />

Note: Adapted from Davies, W. M., & Beaumont, T. J. (2007). Conducting An Interview. [PDF<br />

document]. Retrieved from http://tlu.fbe.unimelb.edu.au/<br />

112


Analyzing a T.V. Interview (Handout 2)<br />

Use the Handout “Conducting Interviews” <strong>to</strong> assist you in answering the following questions<br />

below about the interview between Barbara Walters (interviewer) and the Ramsey’s parents<br />

(interviewee) on CNN.<br />

1. What kinds <strong>of</strong> questions did the interviewer asked? (For example: closed or open-ended?)<br />

How did you know? (Consider: How the interviewee responded <strong>to</strong> the questions asked?<br />

Was it a simple yes or no, or was it an elaborated response?)<br />

2. How did the interviewer open and close the interview? Did she follow some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

guidelines proposed by Kremer as specified in the “Conducting Interview” Handout?<br />

Briefly explain.<br />

3. Did the interviewer keep the interviewee(s) at ease? (Consider: verbal & non-verbal<br />

communication—body language, facial expressions, eye contact, postures, <strong>to</strong>ne and<br />

voice.)<br />

113


Evaluating Interview Questions (Handout 3)<br />

Get in<strong>to</strong> your assigned group for the Academic Discourse Project and come up with three<br />

interview questions you might want <strong>to</strong> ask your selected discourse community. Then, pick one<br />

and evaluate it using the evaluation checklist shown in Box 1. After you have evaluated your<br />

question, give your question <strong>to</strong> your partner and let him/her evaluate your question using the<br />

evaluation checklist in Box 2. Finally, revise your question based on your peer’s feedback.<br />

Possible Questions<br />

1.____________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

2.____________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

3.____________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Box 1: Evaluate Your Own Question<br />

1. What type <strong>of</strong> question did you create? Closed or opened-end? Why?<br />

2. Do you think your question suffers from any <strong>of</strong> the problems identified in Handout 1?<br />

(e.g., ambiguous questions, double-barreled questions, leading questions, negative<br />

questions, denial questions, artificial opinion questions). If so, which one(s)? (Explain in<br />

1-2 sentences.)<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall Evaluation: Effective Ineffective<br />

Check (√)________ Check-minus (√)__________<br />

114


Box 2: Classmate Evaluation<br />

1. What type <strong>of</strong> question did he/she create? Closed or opened-end? How do you know?<br />

2. Do you think his/her question suffers from any <strong>of</strong> the problems identified in Handout 1?<br />

(e.g., ambiguous questions, double-barreled questions, leading questions, negative<br />

questions, denial questions, artificial opinion questions). If so, which one(s)? (Explain in<br />

1-2 sentences.)<br />

Overall Evaluation: Effective Ineffective<br />

Check (√)________ Check-minus (√)__________<br />

Refine Your Question<br />

Now refine (revise) your question based on your partner’s suggestion(s). Make sure your new<br />

question doesn’t suffer from the problems identified in Handout 1.<br />

Revised Question:_______________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

115


SWBATS:<br />

Intensive Reading Process Workshop (Lesson 5)<br />

Before Reading Strategies<br />

Identify and practice using various effective pre-reading strategies (i.e. scanning,<br />

skimming, prediction, questioning, etc.) on a variety <strong>of</strong> academic texts.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> set purposes and goals before embarking on a reading<br />

task.<br />

Materials:<br />

Video Clip (9:31 min): JonBenet: Ana<strong>to</strong>my <strong>of</strong> an Investigation Part 1<br />

(www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cw13zZXeY)<br />

Handout 1: Reading Passage<br />

Reading Process and Strategies Slides (1-4)<br />

Handout 2: Applying Your Pre-Reading Strategies<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

15min Debriefing: Intro <strong>to</strong><br />

JonBenet Ramseys’ Case<br />

(unsolved mystery)<br />

Task 1: T plays video:<br />

“JonBenet: Ana<strong>to</strong>my <strong>of</strong> an<br />

Investigation” (9:31 min)<br />

Task 2: As a whole class T<br />

tells Ss that they will be<br />

writing an argumentative<br />

paper about the JonBenet<br />

Ramseys Case, and that all <strong>of</strong><br />

the reading materials will be<br />

about <strong>to</strong>pics related <strong>to</strong> this<br />

case.<br />

8 min Warm-up Activity: T hands out a reading passage<br />

without the title for Ss <strong>to</strong> read<br />

(see Handout 1)<br />

10min Presentation: Reading<br />

Process (Before reading)<br />

T goes over slides:<br />

1. What is Reading? (1-2)<br />

2. BEFORE reading strategies<br />

(2-4)<br />

Task 1: Ss watch<br />

video<br />

Ss read passage and<br />

guess at what they<br />

think the passage is<br />

about.<br />

Ss take notes using<br />

slide handout<br />

116


40min Activity # 1: Applying<br />

BEFORE reading skills<br />

2min Wrap-up:<br />

Read C.F. Johnson’s<br />

(2000) article<br />

Read Smith’s “Part One:<br />

Little Miss Christmas”<br />

Task 1: T passes out C.F.<br />

Johnson’s (2000) article and<br />

instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> use some<br />

effective pre-reading<br />

strategies <strong>to</strong> complete this<br />

activity.<br />

Task 2: T walks around,<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss progress, and<br />

provides assistance if needed<br />

Task 3: As a whole class T<br />

tells Ss <strong>to</strong> share their<br />

predictions and questions.<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

reading assignments<br />

117<br />

Task 1: Ss examine<br />

journal article and use<br />

pre-reading strategies<br />

<strong>to</strong> complete this<br />

activity.<br />

Task 2: Ss then make<br />

predictions and ask<br />

questions based on<br />

their initial<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the<br />

article (see Handout<br />

3)<br />

Task 3: Ss discuss<br />

their predictions and<br />

questions with<br />

another class member<br />

(for 2-3 min) and then<br />

with the whole class.<br />

Whole class


Reading Passage (Handout 1)<br />

Read the passage below and then answer the following questions <strong>to</strong> figure out what the passage is<br />

about. You may re-read the passage again <strong>to</strong> help you with this process.<br />

________________?_______________________<br />

The procedure is quite simple. First you arrange things in<strong>to</strong> different groups. Of<br />

course, one pile may be sufficient depending on how much there is <strong>to</strong> do. If you have <strong>to</strong><br />

go somewhere else due <strong>to</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> facilities that is the next step. <strong>Other</strong>wise, you are<br />

pretty well set. It is important not <strong>to</strong> overdo things. That is, it is better <strong>to</strong> do <strong>to</strong>o few<br />

things at once than <strong>to</strong>o many. In the short run this may not seem important but<br />

complications can easily arise. A mistake can be expensive as well. At first the whole<br />

process will seem complicated. Soon, however, it will become just another facet <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

It is difficult <strong>to</strong> foresee any end <strong>to</strong> the necessity for this task in the immediate future, but<br />

then one can never tell. After the procedure is completed one arranges the materials in<br />

different groups again. Eventually they will be used once more and the whole cycle will<br />

then have <strong>to</strong> be repeated. However, that is part <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

Note: Taken form Bransford, J. D., & McCarrell, N. S. (1975). A sketch <strong>of</strong> a cognitive approach<br />

<strong>to</strong> comprehension. In Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart &<br />

Wins<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

Questions:<br />

1. What do you think the passage is about? (Explain in 1-2 sentences)<br />

2. How did you figure this out? (Consider: Did you have <strong>to</strong> re-read the passage? Did your<br />

background knowledge provide you with the information? What clues in the reading<br />

passage lead you <strong>to</strong> figure this out?)<br />

118


What is Reading?<br />

Add picture<br />

The Reading Process<br />

Context Text<br />

*Classroom * Academic<br />

*Workplace *Non-Academic<br />

*<strong>Other</strong> settings<br />

Reading<br />

Process<br />

Reader<br />

*Purpose, Motivation, Background<br />

Knowledge, Reading Strategies<br />

119<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

_________________________________________<br />

______________________________________<br />

______________________________________<br />

______________________________________<br />

______________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________


Reading Strategies for Academic Text<br />

• BEFORE Reading Strategies<br />

Activities you do before you read a text <strong>to</strong><br />

facilitate comprehension.<br />

• DURING Reading Strategies<br />

Activities you do while you’re reading <strong>to</strong> further<br />

facilitate comprehension.<br />

• AFTER Reading Strategies<br />

Activities you do <strong>to</strong> assess your comprehension.<br />

Previewing Activities<br />

• Examine the title.<br />

• Skim the introduction.<br />

• Skim the conclusion.<br />

• Sample the first sentence <strong>of</strong> each body<br />

paragraph.<br />

• Skim the entire text for overall meaning.<br />

• Scan the text for specific details (i.e. tables,<br />

figures, pictures, etc.).<br />

120<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

_____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________


Applying Your Pre-reading Strategies (Handout 2)<br />

You will examine an academic text related <strong>to</strong> the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> children’s homicide (in relation <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Ramsey case). Use the “Text Surveying Checklist” in the box <strong>to</strong> practice your pre-reading skills.<br />

Text Surveying Checklist<br />

1. Examine the title and author.<br />

2. Read the table <strong>of</strong> contents.<br />

3. Find out the patterns <strong>of</strong> the text by skimming the subtitles or subheadings, pho<strong>to</strong>graphs,<br />

drawings, illustrations, graphs, charts, and tables.<br />

4. Skim the introduction.<br />

5. Skim the conclusion.<br />

6. Scan the first sentence <strong>of</strong> each body paragraph <strong>to</strong> get an overview <strong>of</strong> its information.<br />

7. Skim the whole text for overall meaning.<br />

Task 1: Using Your Pre-Reading Skills<br />

Use the “Text Surveying Checklist” above <strong>to</strong> examine C.F. Johnson’s (2000) article and answer<br />

the following questions in the spaces provide below:<br />

1. Is there a title and author? If so, what is the title and who is it written by?<br />

2. Are there any tables, figures, pictures, or charts? If so, what information do they present?<br />

3. What is the text’s pattern and structure? Are there subtitles or subheadings?<br />

A. Making a prediction<br />

1. What do you think this article will be about after examining the title, author, and textual<br />

structure? (Explain in1-2 sentences)<br />

Task 2: Skimming and Scanning Skills<br />

121<br />

1. Skim the introduction and summarize it in one sentence.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________


122<br />

2. Skim the conclusion and summarize it in one sentence.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

3. Scan the first sentence <strong>of</strong> each body paragraph and summarize what you found below in<br />

one sentence.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

4. Skim the whole text and summarize what you found in one sentence.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

B. Asking questions<br />

After completing the previewing activities, what do you want <strong>to</strong> know more about when you begin<br />

<strong>to</strong> read this article?<br />

Ask your questions here:<br />

1.___________________________________________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________<br />

2.___________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

3.____________________________________________________________________________<br />

_____________________________________________________________________________


SWBATS:<br />

Intensive Reading Process Workshop (Lesson 6)<br />

During-Reading Strategies<br />

Identify and practice using effective during-reading strategies <strong>to</strong> facilitate reading<br />

comprehension, specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> developing their highlighting and annotating<br />

skills.<br />

Continue <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> establish a purpose before embarking on any<br />

reading activity.<br />

Materials:<br />

PowerPoint Slides for During Reading Strategies (slides 1-3)<br />

Handout 1: Highlighting and Annotating (Key Sheet)<br />

Handout 2: The House<br />

Handout 3: Annotating What You Read<br />

Time Lesson Activity Teacher Action Participation (Student’s<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole Class<br />

10min Review: Before<br />

reading<br />

Strategies<br />

(homework)<br />

10min Presentation:<br />

DURING reading<br />

strategies<br />

20min Modeling Activity:<br />

T asks 3 questions:<br />

Was your initial<br />

prediction accurate?<br />

Did the article answer<br />

your questions or<br />

concerns?<br />

What activities can you<br />

do <strong>to</strong> facilitate reading<br />

comprehension before<br />

you read?<br />

T presents slides:<br />

DURING reading<br />

strategies (slides 1-3)<br />

Task 1: T models effective<br />

highlighting & annotation skills<br />

on a sample passage using the<br />

“Highlighting and Annotating”<br />

key sheet as a<br />

guide (Handout 1).<br />

Note: During this modeling<br />

activity, T annotates the sample<br />

passage by jotting down the<br />

123<br />

Ss share their<br />

predictions, questions,<br />

and ideas/input with the<br />

whole class.<br />

Ss take notes using slide<br />

handout<br />

Task 1: Ss pay attention<br />

and take notes.<br />

Task 2: During<br />

modeling activity, Ss<br />

share their<br />

answers/inputs and help<br />

T complete modeling<br />

activity.


15-20min Activity # 2:<br />

Annotation<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

Homework<br />

Read Smith’s Part<br />

Two: A Gathering<br />

S<strong>to</strong>rm(pp.85-115)<br />

author’s main points in the right<br />

margins and T’s responses/reactions<br />

in the left margins. T also takes<br />

answers/inputs from Ss, thereby<br />

making it more interactive.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Annotating<br />

What You Read” sheet (Handout 3)<br />

and has Ss annotate an excerpt<br />

passage on the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> Dangers <strong>of</strong><br />

Cell Phone Use.<br />

Task 2: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if needed.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class T<br />

discusses main points <strong>of</strong> the<br />

excerpt.<br />

T reminds Ss about homework<br />

assignments<br />

124<br />

Task 1: Ss complete<br />

handout by annotating<br />

each paragraph using the<br />

“Highlighting and<br />

Annotating” sheet as<br />

guide.<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

reactions about the<br />

excerpts.<br />

Whole Class


DURING Reading Strategies<br />

DURING Reading Activities<br />

1. First Reading<br />

• <strong>to</strong> develop sense <strong>of</strong> its main points.<br />

• use skimming and scanning strategies. Do not<br />

read every single word!<br />

2. Re-reading the text.<br />

• Careful re-reading <strong>of</strong> text using effective<br />

during-reading strategies.<br />

Develop Effective Reading Strategies<br />

Highlighting<br />

• Highlight key ideas and quotations that<br />

capture the author’s main points.<br />

Annotating<br />

• Write notes, comments, and questions in the<br />

margins <strong>of</strong> texts.<br />

Outlining and Charting<br />

• Develop graphic organizer (discussed in next<br />

class session).<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

125<br />

____________________________________


Highlighting & Annotating: Marking What You Read (Handout 1)<br />

126<br />

I. MARK TO UNDERSTAND IDEAS<br />

1. After you have previewed the article, read it through quickly and completely<br />

before marking, looking for the main idea. Then, mark the writer’s main idea <strong>to</strong><br />

make it stand out clearly <strong>to</strong> you.<br />

Options:<br />

If the main idea is directly stated, underline it and write “thesis” next <strong>to</strong> it<br />

in the margin.<br />

If it is not directly stated, write it out in your own words at the <strong>to</strong>p or<br />

bot<strong>to</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the article.<br />

2. Determine the PURPOSE <strong>of</strong> the reading. Understanding the author’s purpose<br />

will help you <strong>to</strong> decide on the best marking system for that particular article.<br />

Questions <strong>to</strong> think about:<br />

Does the reading express the author’s opinion on an issue and reasons for<br />

that opinion?<br />

Highlight each point or reason that supports the author’s opinion.<br />

Next, restate each point briefly in your own words in the margin.<br />

Does the reading explain (or compare) two or more sides <strong>of</strong> an issue?<br />

Use different color highlighters, marking each side <strong>of</strong> the argument<br />

in a different color.<br />

Does the reading explain a problem and possible causes and/or solutions?<br />

Highlight each cause <strong>of</strong> the problem discussed. Number the causes<br />

in the margins.<br />

Highlight any solutions <strong>to</strong> the problem that the author might<br />

suggest.<br />

3. Highlight important examples, quotations, or statistics that the author uses as<br />

support.<br />

4. Develop your own symbols and abbreviations <strong>to</strong> use in the text and the margins.<br />

Here are some examples:<br />

“Def”—important definition.<br />

Bracket [ ] <strong>to</strong>gether two or more paragraphs that are about the same<br />

idea.<br />

Use “Ex” in the margin <strong>to</strong> note important examples.<br />

“?” for ideas or words you do not understand.<br />

1, 2, 3: Use numbers in the margins when a series <strong>of</strong> points are listed or<br />

discussed.<br />

Circle key words and phrases.<br />

*Asterisk, arrow, lighting<br />

Determine what each symbol will mean <strong>to</strong> you and try <strong>to</strong> use the symbol<br />

consistently.<br />

5. Mark <strong>to</strong> record your own reaction <strong>to</strong> the ideas:


“!” for something you feel strongly about or something that surprises<br />

you.<br />

Short margin comments: “good point,” Hmmm...,” Never thought <strong>of</strong><br />

that!,” “interesting,” “No!,” “Where’s the pro<strong>of</strong>?,” “So What?,”<br />

“Agree,” “Disagree,” etc.<br />

When something you read reminds you <strong>of</strong> something in your own<br />

experience, write a phrase in the margin like: “Just like Uncle Bob!”<br />

Note: You will be assigned <strong>to</strong> write a Summary-Response <strong>to</strong> a reading after you have highlighted<br />

and annotated it. If your annotation has been done well, it already reflects the main ideas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reading and your own feelings about what you have read; therefore, your summary and response<br />

should be based on your annotation <strong>of</strong> the reading. Using your own annotations <strong>to</strong> write your<br />

summary and response will give you practice in putting the ideas <strong>of</strong> other writers in<strong>to</strong> your own<br />

words, demonstrating that you understand the issues you have read about. It also helps you <strong>to</strong><br />

avoid plagiarism!<br />

Note: Adapted from Learning Skills Center (LS). (2006). Course Materials: LS 86. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>,<br />

CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

127


Establishing a Purpose Before Reading<br />

The House (Handout 2)<br />

For this reading assignment, you must think <strong>of</strong> yourself as a robber or buyer and highlight all the<br />

things you would steal or buy at Mark’s house. This excerpt comes from a book called I read It,<br />

But I Don’t Get It.<br />

The two boys ran until they came <strong>to</strong> the driveway. “See, I <strong>to</strong>ld you <strong>to</strong>day was good for<br />

skipping school,” said Mark. “Mom is never home on Thursday,” he added. Tall hedges hid the<br />

house from the road so the pair strolled across the finely landscaped yard. “I never knew your<br />

place was so big,” said Pete. “Yeah, but it’s nicer now than it used <strong>to</strong> be since Dad had the new<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ne siding put on and added the fireplace.”<br />

There were front and back doors and a side door which led <strong>to</strong> the garage which was<br />

empty except for three parked 10 speed bikes. They went in the side door, Mark explaining that it<br />

was always open in case his younger sisters got home earlier than their mother.<br />

Pete wanted <strong>to</strong> see the house so Mark started with the living room. It, like the rest <strong>of</strong> the<br />

downstairs, was newly painted. Marked turned on the stereo, the noise <strong>of</strong> which worried Pete.<br />

“Don’t worry, the nearest house is a quarter mile away,” Mark shouted. Pete felt more<br />

comfortable observing that no houses could be seen in any direction beyond the huge yard.<br />

The dining room, with all the china, silver and cut glass, was no place <strong>to</strong> play so the boys<br />

moved in<strong>to</strong> the kitchen where they made sandwiches. Mark said they wouldn’t go <strong>to</strong> the basement<br />

because it had been damp and musty every since the new plumbing had been installed.<br />

“This is where my Dad keeps his famous paintings and his coin collection,” Mark said as<br />

they peered in<strong>to</strong> the den. Mark bragged that he could get spending money whenever he needed it<br />

since he’d discovered that his Dad kept a lot in the desk drawer.<br />

There were three upstairs bedrooms. Mark showed Pete his mother’s closet which was<br />

filled with furs and the locked box which held her jewels. His sisters’ room was uninteresting<br />

except for the color TV which Mark carried <strong>to</strong> his room. Mark bragged that the bathroom in the<br />

hall was his since one had been added <strong>to</strong> this sisters’ room for their use. The big highlight in his<br />

room, though, was a leak in the ceiling where the old ro<strong>of</strong> had finally rotted.<br />

Note: Taken from Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. (2000). Taking Different Perspective on a<br />

S<strong>to</strong>ry. In Tovani, C. (Ed.), I Read it, But I Don’t Get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent<br />

readers. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers<br />

128


Annotating What You Read (Handout 3)<br />

Read the excerpt below and annotate each paragraph. On the left column write your reaction(s) in<br />

the space provided and on the right column write the author’s main point(s) in the space provided.<br />

Use the “Highlighting and Annotation” key sheet <strong>to</strong> guide you as you complete this activity.<br />

Reader’s<br />

Responses<br />

Danger <strong>of</strong> Cell Phones on The Road<br />

WASHINGTON—Nicole Dilks had two kids in the back<br />

seat, a cell phone in her hand and a lot on her mind the<br />

night last August when she slammed her minivan in<strong>to</strong> a<br />

telephone pole in Minneapolis. Amid growing concern<br />

about people who talk on the phone while they drive, more<br />

than half the states in the nation have considered<br />

regulating cell phone use in cars. But so far only New<br />

York has enacted a partial prohibition. It does not allow<br />

drivers <strong>to</strong> use hand-held phones.<br />

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration<br />

estimates that inattention causes 20 percent <strong>of</strong> accidents,<br />

about 1.6 million <strong>of</strong> the 6.3 million wrecks last year.<br />

While the number <strong>of</strong> accidents attributable <strong>to</strong> cell phones<br />

is unknown, an NHTSA survey found that 54 percent <strong>of</strong><br />

drivers reported having a cell phone in their car and threefourths<br />

<strong>of</strong> them have talked on the phone while driving.<br />

“The cell phone…has become a significant highway safety<br />

concern.” NHTSA Executive Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Robert Shel<strong>to</strong>n<br />

said.<br />

However, some people point out that wireless phone use is<br />

by no means the biggest menace on the roads. A<br />

University <strong>of</strong> North Carolina study released by the<br />

American Au<strong>to</strong>mobile Association showed that changing<br />

a radio station or a CD in the car was eight times more<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> cause a crash than using a cell phone, which was<br />

identified as the cause <strong>of</strong> only 1.5 percent <strong>of</strong> traffic<br />

accidents between 1995 and 1999. In addition, alcoholrelated<br />

crashes accounted for 17, 448 deaths last year,<br />

while accidents involving speeding <strong>to</strong>ok 12, 850 lives<br />

according <strong>to</strong> federal statistics.<br />

129<br />

Writer’s Points<br />

Note: Adapted from Learning Skills Center (LS). (2006). Course Materials: LS 86. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>,<br />

CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.


SWBATS:<br />

Academic Textual Organization (Lesson 7)<br />

Identify five common academic discourse patterns <strong>of</strong> organization—list, sequence,<br />

comparisons/contrast, cause /effect, and problem/solution.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> outline/chart the discourse patterns <strong>of</strong> organization in<br />

academic texts.<br />

Materials:<br />

PowerPoint Slides (1-5): Discourse patters <strong>of</strong> organization<br />

Handout 1:Academic Discourse Structure<br />

Bourdreaux et al.’s “Child Abduction: An Overview <strong>of</strong> Current and His<strong>to</strong>rical<br />

Perspectives (2012)<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENTS ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole Class<br />

20min Presentation: Discourse<br />

patterns <strong>of</strong> organization<br />

40min Activity # 1: Academic<br />

Discourse Structure:<br />

Jigsaw Activity<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

T presents PowerPoint Slides:<br />

Discourse patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

organization (slides 1-<br />

5)<br />

Task 1: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> take out<br />

Boudreaux (2012), while also<br />

passing out “Academic<br />

Discourse Structure: Jigsaw<br />

Activity” assignment sheet<br />

(Handout 2).<br />

Task 2: T walks around,<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss progress, and<br />

provides assistance if needed.<br />

Task 1: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

reading Boudreaux et al.<br />

(2012) and create an outline<br />

for the entire article (see<br />

Handout 2, task 4)<br />

Ss take notes<br />

130<br />

Task 1: After receiving the<br />

handout, Ss get in<strong>to</strong> groups<br />

<strong>of</strong> four and are assigned a<br />

specific section <strong>to</strong> read<br />

from.<br />

Task 2: Ss then create their<br />

own graphic organizer <strong>of</strong><br />

the specific section using<br />

the “Academic Discourse<br />

Structure: Jigsaw Activity”<br />

assignment sheet.<br />

Task 3: Each S then<br />

summarizes his/her section<br />

<strong>to</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the group<br />

members using the graphic<br />

organizer as a guide.<br />

Whole class


Task 2: Read Smith’s Part<br />

Two: A Gathering S<strong>to</strong>rm<br />

(pp.116-165)<br />

Task 3: Post SacCT 2 (see<br />

question prompt below)<br />

SacCT Journal Entry 2<br />

Reading experts agree that the utilization <strong>of</strong> reading strategies on academic texts can improve<br />

reading comprehension.<br />

A. Of all the reading strategies you have used thus far in class, which one has helped<br />

improved your reading comprehension the most? What piece <strong>of</strong> text did you apply this<br />

reading strategy on? (Describe in 3-5 sentences)<br />

Note: Be sure <strong>to</strong> comment on at least two other class members’ responses.<br />

131


Discourse Pattern <strong>of</strong> Organization<br />

(Outlining/Charting)<br />

Outlining/Charting<br />

1. Description<br />

Describes a <strong>to</strong>pic by listing characteristics,<br />

features, and examples.<br />

Outlining/Charting<br />

2. Sequence<br />

Lists items or events in numerical or<br />

chronological order.<br />

1. ________________________________<br />

2. ________________________________<br />

3. ________________________________<br />

4. ________________________________<br />

5. ________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

132


Outlining/Charting<br />

3. Comparison/Contrast: Explains how two or more<br />

things are alike and/or how they are different.<br />

Outlining/Charting<br />

4. Cause & Effect: Lists one or more causes and<br />

the resulting effect or effects.<br />

Outlining/Charting<br />

5. Problem & Solution: Introduce problems(s) and<br />

lists one or more solutions for the problem.<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

__________________________________<br />

__________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

133


Jigsaw Activity<br />

Academic Discourse Structure (Handout 2)<br />

Task # 1: In groups <strong>of</strong> four, each member will be assigned a particular section in Boudreaux et<br />

al.’s (2012) article.<br />

Member # 1 reads the section on “Operational Definitions” (pp.64-65).<br />

Member # 2 reads the sections on “Victim Characteristics” (pp.65-66) and “Offenders<br />

Characteristics” (pp.66-67).<br />

Member # 3 reads the section on “Motivation” (pp.67-69).<br />

Member # 4 reads the “Conclusion” section (pp.69-70).<br />

Task # 2: After reading your assigned section, try <strong>to</strong> figure out your section’s discourse pattern<br />

by creating a graphic/visual representation in the box below. Remember, the five distinctive<br />

pattern <strong>of</strong> organization we discussed earlier in class when creating your graphic organizer.<br />

Task # 3: Once you have created your chart/outline, you must then summarize your section <strong>to</strong> the<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the group using your chart/outline as a guide. The rest <strong>of</strong> your group members will also do<br />

the same, thereby completing the jigsaw activity.<br />

134


Homework: Create a Chart/Outline for the Whole Article<br />

Finish reading Boudreaux et al.’s (2012) article for homework and use the box below <strong>to</strong> create a<br />

chart/outline that summarizes the whole article (not its individual sections).<br />

135


SWBATS:<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation & Appeals (Lesson 8)<br />

Identify and understand the rhe<strong>to</strong>rical situation <strong>of</strong> a writer’s text (i.e. the writer’s purpose,<br />

persona, and audience).<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> analyze the writer’s text in relation <strong>to</strong> his/her purpose,<br />

intended audience, persona, and context.<br />

Identify and understand some effective rhe<strong>to</strong>rical strategies done by writers—namely,<br />

Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> analyze the writer’s use <strong>of</strong> persuasion (or point <strong>of</strong><br />

view), specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> how the writer uses Ethos, Pathos, and Logos<br />

Materials:<br />

PowerPoint Slides (1-8): Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation & Appeals<br />

Handout 1: Analyze Newspaper Advertisement<br />

Handout 2: Analyzing John Ramsey’s Letter<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENTS ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance Take attendance Whole Class<br />

5-7 Review T reviews homework Ss share their<br />

10min Presentation:<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation<br />

(i.e. purpose,<br />

audience, persona)<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Appeals<br />

(Ethos, Pathos,<br />

Logos)<br />

25min Activity # 1: Analyze<br />

Newspaper Ad<br />

30min Activity # 2: Analyze John<br />

Ramsey’s Letter <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Boulder Police Department<br />

assignment<br />

T shows presentation<br />

slides 1-8<br />

Task 1: T passes out<br />

“Analyzing Newspaper<br />

Advertisement” (Handout<br />

1) <strong>to</strong> Ss.<br />

Task 2: T walks around<br />

and provides assistance if<br />

needed.<br />

Task 3: T discusses the<br />

advertisement as a whole<br />

class<br />

T passes out “Analyzing<br />

John Ramsey’s Letter”<br />

(Handout 2)<br />

charts/outlines<br />

Ss take notes<br />

136<br />

Task 1: Ss analyze the<br />

newspaper advertisement<br />

and complete the questions<br />

on Handout 1.<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

ideas/inputs<br />

Ss read and analyze the<br />

letter and complete the<br />

questions on Handout 2.


3min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Select your Academic<br />

Discourse<br />

Community<br />

Read Smith’s Part<br />

Three: Rocky Road<br />

<strong>to</strong> Nowhere<br />

T reminds each group <strong>to</strong> pick<br />

an academic discourse<br />

community by next class<br />

session.<br />

Note: Those that have not<br />

picked one will get a 1/3 point<br />

deduction <strong>to</strong>ward PowerPoint<br />

presentation grade.<br />

Whole class<br />

137


Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation & Strategies<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation<br />

Purpose<br />

A writer’s purpose could include:<br />

• The writer’s goals<br />

• Type <strong>of</strong> text (Academic versus Non-Academic)<br />

• Audience awareness<br />

Persona<br />

• A writer’s persona is the way she presents<br />

herself in her writing.<br />

• --Tone is the writer’s attitude.<br />

• --Voice is an expression <strong>of</strong> the writer’s<br />

personality.<br />

• --Style is the writer’s distinctive way <strong>of</strong><br />

expressing message, <strong>to</strong>ne, and voice.<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

138


Context<br />

• Writer’s context—past experience as a writer<br />

• Audience—their expertise, their ethnic<br />

background, their personal beliefs, etc.<br />

• Type <strong>of</strong> text—timed essay versus out-<strong>of</strong>-class<br />

essay.<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Appeals<br />

• Ethos refers <strong>to</strong> the credibility <strong>of</strong> the writer or<br />

speaker.<br />

• Pathos appeals <strong>to</strong> the audience’s emotions.<br />

• Logos refers <strong>to</strong> the logic <strong>of</strong> the message and<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> its supporting evidence.<br />

Ethos (Credibility)<br />

Questions about the Writer:<br />

• Does this author have the appropriate<br />

background <strong>to</strong> speak with authority on this<br />

subject?<br />

• Is this author knowledgeable?<br />

• Does this author seem trustworthy or<br />

deceptive<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

139


Pathos (Emotional)<br />

Questions about Emotions:<br />

• Does this piece affect you emotionally?<br />

• Do you think the author is trying <strong>to</strong><br />

manipulate your emotions?<br />

• Do your emotions conflict with the logical<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> the arguments?<br />

Logos (Logical)<br />

Questions about Logic (Logos):<br />

• Do you agree with the author’s claim that…?<br />

• Is there any claim that appears <strong>to</strong> be weak or<br />

unsupported?<br />

• Can you think <strong>of</strong> counter-arguments that the<br />

author doesn’t consider?<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

140


Analyzing Newspaper Advertisement (Handout 1)<br />

Part I: Examine the Newspaper Advertisement<br />

Instruction: Carefully read and examine the newspaper advertisement below.<br />

141


Part II: Analyzing Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation & Appeals<br />

After examining the advertisement taken from www.dogwoodalliance.org, answer the following<br />

questions in relation <strong>to</strong> its rhe<strong>to</strong>rical situation and appeals below. Write your answers on a<br />

separate piece <strong>of</strong> paper.<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation<br />

1. What do you think the purpose <strong>of</strong> the advertisement is?<br />

2. What types <strong>of</strong> people do you think the ad targets and why? Is it successful?<br />

3. How would you describe the <strong>to</strong>ne and style <strong>of</strong> the ad? Are they appropriate <strong>to</strong> the<br />

advertiser’s intended audience and goals?<br />

Pathos (Emotions)<br />

4. What responses does the organization that created the ad hope <strong>to</strong> provoke from its<br />

readers? How does the ad appeal <strong>to</strong> our emotions?<br />

Logos (Reason)<br />

5. Is there an assertion or argument made by the advertisement? What is/are the claim(s)<br />

and what features <strong>of</strong> the ad led you <strong>to</strong> this conclusion?<br />

6. Does the ad provide any evidence that the claim(s) is/are true? (Consider: What data<br />

does the ad present? Or does it simply ask viewers <strong>to</strong> make assumptions?)<br />

Ethos (Credibility)<br />

7. How credible is the organization? Are they well-known? How do you know?<br />

8. Do you think they have the authority <strong>to</strong> make these types <strong>of</strong> claims? Why?<br />

142


Analyzing John Ramsey’s Letter (Handout 2)<br />

Part I: Read John Ramsey’s letter (a copy <strong>of</strong> the original letter)<br />

Sept. 29 - The following letter from John Ramsey was sent <strong>to</strong> media outlets late Monday. As you<br />

know, our family has not <strong>of</strong>ten spoken publicly in the past because so much <strong>of</strong> what surrounds<br />

our tragedy is used <strong>to</strong> entertain for pr<strong>of</strong>it. For my family, the loss <strong>of</strong> JonBenet was a crushing loss<br />

that left us crying out, "Why did this happen <strong>to</strong> such a precious child? Why did this happen <strong>to</strong> a<br />

good family?"<br />

JonBenet's murder has inflicted the worst pain imaginable on my family, and it is simply cruel <strong>to</strong><br />

exploit her death for pr<strong>of</strong>it, as much <strong>of</strong> the media has, so we have been unwilling <strong>to</strong> provide<br />

fodder for their talk shows. We do feel compelled <strong>to</strong> speak out at this time as a result <strong>of</strong> Detective<br />

Lou Smit's resignation after 16 months <strong>of</strong> working <strong>to</strong> find the killer <strong>of</strong> our daughter and sister<br />

JonBenet. While we are grateful for Detective Smit's work <strong>to</strong> find JonBenet's killer, we are<br />

discouraged <strong>to</strong> lose his <strong>of</strong>ficial participation in this case. Detective Smit is the only experienced<br />

homicide detective who has ever been assigned long-term <strong>to</strong> find the killer <strong>of</strong> JonBenet.<br />

Our biggest concern as a family has always been that the Boulder Police Department has little<br />

experience or training in homicide cases. They had decided they had solved this case on the very<br />

first day by reaching the incredible conclusion that because the parents were in the house, they<br />

must have done it. Furthermore, the fact that we obtained lawyers <strong>to</strong> protect ourselves against<br />

their abuse <strong>of</strong> our rights was conclusive <strong>to</strong> them <strong>of</strong> our guilt. The law in the hands <strong>of</strong> the unskilled<br />

and the unknowing is a terrifying thing.<br />

Detective Smit was an exception, but his help was not welcomed by the police. We have always<br />

expressed our eagerness <strong>to</strong> participate fully in a competent investigation <strong>of</strong> this horrible crime,<br />

but I have been unwilling <strong>to</strong> submit my family <strong>to</strong> what seems <strong>to</strong> be little more than a lynch mob<br />

hiding behind the authority <strong>of</strong> police badges. It is not true that you can buy justice in this country,<br />

but sadly, it does take money <strong>to</strong> protect your rights against abuse <strong>of</strong> the law by those charged with<br />

its application. My experience has made me wonder how many innocent victims <strong>of</strong> police<br />

misconduct there are who were not able or did not know how <strong>to</strong> protect their basic rights as<br />

citizens. Our fight with the Boulder police started when they refused <strong>to</strong> release JonBenet's body<br />

<strong>to</strong> us for the burial until we complied with their demands. It has continued ever since.<br />

To Governor Romer, I would say we were encouraged that you committed additional resources <strong>to</strong><br />

this case but were disappointed that you s<strong>to</strong>pped short by only assigning more at<strong>to</strong>rneys and not<br />

the needed qualified investiga<strong>to</strong>rs. We ask you for only one thing as parents <strong>of</strong> a precious child<br />

who was murdered in your state, and that is for you <strong>to</strong> additionally commit significant, qualified<br />

investigative resources on a long-term basis if necessary <strong>to</strong> solve this case. Don't do this for us<br />

because no amount <strong>of</strong> revenge can bring an easing <strong>of</strong> our pain. Don't do this only for JonBenet<br />

because her future has been lost. But do it for the child this killer will prey upon <strong>to</strong>morrow. No<br />

child should suffer as I'm afraid JonBenet suffered and no family should suffer as mine has. It<br />

will happen again if this killer is not caught. And please don't just listen and react <strong>to</strong> those who<br />

scream the loudest. Commit qualified investigative resources in addition <strong>to</strong> the prosecu<strong>to</strong>rs you<br />

have committed <strong>to</strong> find this killer. We have and will continue <strong>to</strong> participate fully in a competent<br />

investigation. We stated in writing <strong>to</strong> the Boulder district at<strong>to</strong>rney many months ago that we had<br />

143


no confidence in the leadership <strong>of</strong> this investigation under the Boulder police but that every<br />

member <strong>of</strong> our family would be willing <strong>to</strong> meet with the district at<strong>to</strong>rney's investiga<strong>to</strong>rs,<br />

anywhere, anytime, for as long as they want with no questions left unanswered and no<br />

information left unprovided. We have done this, and that commitment still stands. There can be<br />

no one who wants <strong>to</strong> find the killer <strong>of</strong> JonBenet as much as my family does.<br />

To the fanatic fringe who surround this case, making demands, creating sensationalism and<br />

calling for <strong>of</strong>ficials' heads, I say <strong>to</strong> you whether you are driven by tabloid money or simply<br />

ignorance, you are being cruel and are compromising progress in this case. A child's life has been<br />

taken, and the important thing now is that we prevent this from happening again.<br />

To the Boulder police, I would say we have known that the moment you responded <strong>to</strong> our cry for<br />

help that you began <strong>to</strong> voice the single theory that Patsy or I or my 9-year-old son Burke must<br />

have committed this horrible crime. The killer could never have guessed that he or she would be<br />

so lucky as <strong>to</strong> have the resulting investigation conducted by such closed-minded police. We don't<br />

fault you for initially including us under your "umbrella <strong>of</strong> suspicion," but we will forever hold<br />

you accountable for following a theory rather than the evidence. You have wasted almost two<br />

years trying <strong>to</strong> prove your original theory. Meanwhile, my family knows a vicious child killer still<br />

walks your streets.<br />

To the killer, I would say that we can and will find you. There is a $100,000 reward for your<br />

arrest that still stands. You have the opportunity <strong>to</strong> do one good thing in your life by turning<br />

yourself in <strong>to</strong> the authorities and confessing. We have been <strong>to</strong>ld that the authorities have your<br />

DNA. They will know it is you. If you surrender and are proven <strong>to</strong> be the killer, the $100,000 will<br />

be paid <strong>to</strong> anyone you choose. Surely you have a mother or spouse or child or friend <strong>to</strong> whom this<br />

money would be significant. Help them and help yourself. You know you will kill again, so do<br />

this one good thing in your life. Turn yourself in and ask for God's forgiveness. Your fellow man<br />

will be grateful and our family will be grateful.<br />

Finally, <strong>to</strong> Detective Smit, we would like <strong>to</strong> say thank you for your dedication and commitment <strong>to</strong><br />

finding the killer <strong>of</strong> our daughter, and we are thankful for your honesty and candor and what we<br />

know is your commitment <strong>to</strong> the truth.<br />

Note: Ramsey, J. (1998). Text <strong>of</strong> John Ramsey Letter. Retrieved from<br />

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/jon0929b.htm<br />

Part 2: Analyzing the Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation & Appeals<br />

Once you finish reading the letter, answer the following questions below on a separate piece <strong>of</strong><br />

paper:<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation:<br />

1. What do you think is Mr. Ramsey’s purpose in writing this letter?<br />

2. Who is the target audience?<br />

144


3. How would you describe the <strong>to</strong>ne and style <strong>of</strong> the letter?<br />

Pathos (Emotions):<br />

1. Does this piece affect you emotionally? What parts? Why?<br />

2. Do you think the writer is trying <strong>to</strong> manipulate your emotions? In what ways?<br />

Ethos (Writer):<br />

3. What does the author’s style and language tell you about him or her?<br />

4. Does he seem <strong>to</strong> be trustworthy or deceptive? Explain.<br />

Logos (Logos):<br />

5. Do you agree with the writer’s claim that the killer is an intruder? Why or why not?<br />

6. Is there any claim that appears <strong>to</strong> be weak or unsupported? Which one(s) and why?<br />

7. Do you think the author has left something out on purpose? Why?<br />

145


SWBATS:<br />

Summarizing and Responding (Lesson 9)<br />

Identify and understand the difference between summary writing and response writing.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> evaluate the distinction between “good summary<br />

writing and “bad” summary writing.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> evaluate the difference between “good” response<br />

writing and “bad” response writing.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Writing a Summary & Response (Guide Sheet)<br />

Handout 2: Sample Text Passage Summaries<br />

Handout 3: Sample Responses<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENTS ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance/<br />

Announcements<br />

Task 1: T take attendance Whole Class<br />

Task 2: T verifies each group’s Task 2: The groups must<br />

academic discourse community tell T their chosen<br />

academic discourse<br />

community.<br />

5 -10min Introduction: Task 1: T asks two questions: Tasks 1 & 2: Ss share<br />

their ideas/inputs first w/<br />

1.What important elements do the person next <strong>to</strong> them<br />

you include in a summary? (for 5 min) and then with<br />

the whole class during the<br />

2.What important elements do<br />

you include in a response paper?<br />

class discussion.<br />

10min Presentation:<br />

Summary-Response<br />

Guide Sheet<br />

(Note: Adapted<br />

from <strong>English</strong> 86<br />

Course Materials,<br />

2006)<br />

25min Activity # 1:<br />

Analyze Summary<br />

paper<br />

Task 2: As a whole class T asks<br />

Ss <strong>to</strong> share their inputs/ideas.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Summary-<br />

Response” Guide sheet (Handout<br />

1) <strong>to</strong> Ss.<br />

Task 2: T then talks about how<br />

<strong>to</strong> write effective summaries and<br />

responses using the handout as a<br />

guide.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Sample<br />

Text Passage Summaries”<br />

(Handout 2) and tells Ss <strong>to</strong> read<br />

original passage and annotate it.<br />

Ss may raise any<br />

questions or concerns<br />

about summary and<br />

response writing.<br />

146<br />

Task 1: Ss read and<br />

annotate original passage.


25min Activity # 2: Analyze<br />

Sample Responses<br />

Note: Sample<br />

Responses taken from<br />

MICUSP.<br />

3min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Summary-Response<br />

Assignment<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> use<br />

summary checklist <strong>to</strong> evaluate<br />

the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> each<br />

sample summary (<strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 3)<br />

Task 3: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if<br />

necessary.<br />

Task 4: As a whole class, T<br />

tells Ss <strong>to</strong> share their opinions<br />

<strong>of</strong> each summary. T also tells<br />

Ss what he thinks about each<br />

summary.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Sample<br />

Responses” sheet <strong>to</strong> Ss<br />

(Handout 3).<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> read each<br />

sample response and evaluate<br />

it using the response checklist<br />

attached.<br />

Task 3: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if needed<br />

Task 4: As a whole class, T<br />

goes over each response,<br />

making sure Ss share their<br />

opinions/ideas.<br />

T reminds Ss that Draft A <strong>of</strong><br />

Summary-Response<br />

assignment is due next class<br />

session.<br />

147<br />

Task 2: Ss read each<br />

summary and use summary<br />

checklist <strong>to</strong> evaluate its<br />

overall effectiveness.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class Ss<br />

share their opinions about<br />

each summary<br />

Task 1: Ss read each sample<br />

response and use the<br />

response checklist <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

each response.<br />

Task 2: Ss discuss their<br />

opinions/ideas about each<br />

response <strong>to</strong> the whole class.<br />

Whole class


Writing a Summary and Response (Handout 1)<br />

What is a summary?<br />

A summary is a condensed or reduced version <strong>of</strong> a text. It is written in paragraph form and<br />

contains all <strong>of</strong> the most essential information—and nothing extra. Therefore, a summary is much<br />

shorter than the original text. A well-written summary should:<br />

1. Identify the author’s name and the title <strong>of</strong> the text in the first sentence.<br />

2. State the overall main idea <strong>of</strong> the text (the thesis) in the first sentence.<br />

3. Identify only the most important examples and supporting details.<br />

4. Mention the points and important examples in the same order as the original.<br />

5. State the author’s main conclusion from the information presented.<br />

Summary Don’ts<br />

Don’t use the author’s words or include large quotes from the text. Use your own words<br />

and style.<br />

Don’t try <strong>to</strong> figure out the main idea <strong>of</strong> the text until you have finished reading through<br />

the entire article. When you’ve finished reading, write out the text’s main idea. Then, go<br />

back and briefly reread the text <strong>to</strong> make sure what you have written is really the author’s<br />

main idea.<br />

Don’t include your own ideas; don’t use “I.” Save your reaction for the response section.<br />

What is a response?<br />

A response is your critical reaction <strong>to</strong> the text. The word “critical” does not necessarily mean<br />

negative. You may have positive or negative reactions <strong>to</strong> a text, but you must support those<br />

reactions with reasons and examples. An academic response doesn’t end with, “I thought the<br />

article was good,” or “I agree with the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view.” A well-developed response<br />

describes why you liked the article or why you agree with the author. A thoughtful response<br />

should:<br />

1. State your reaction <strong>to</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the author’s ideas.<br />

2. Express your opinion on the writer’s point <strong>of</strong> view and explain why you agree or<br />

disagree.<br />

3. Include your interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text (what it means <strong>to</strong> you); you will use “I.”<br />

4. Make connections <strong>to</strong> your own personal experience. What does the article remind you <strong>of</strong><br />

in your own life?<br />

Response Don’ts<br />

Don’t just repeat the author’s ideas. State your impression/opinions about ideas in the<br />

article.<br />

Note: Adapted from Learning Skills (LS). (2006). <strong>English</strong> 86 Course Materials<br />

148


Sample Text Passage Summaries (Handout 2)<br />

Task 1: Annotate Summary<br />

Instructions: Carefully read the passage below and annotate it by jotting down the writer’s main<br />

point(s) in the right-column and your responses in the left-column.<br />

Reader’s<br />

Response(s)<br />

An Introduction <strong>to</strong> Auctions<br />

There are basically two types <strong>of</strong> auctions: ascendingbid<br />

auctions and descending-bid auctions. Ascendingbid<br />

auctions start out with a low bid for an object. The<br />

price <strong>of</strong> the object is gradually raised until only one<br />

bidder remains. By contrast, descending-bid auctions<br />

start out with a high bid and the price is progressively<br />

lowered until a cus<strong>to</strong>mer expresses a willingness <strong>to</strong><br />

purchase the object. Both procedures have a number <strong>of</strong><br />

variants. For example, in some types <strong>of</strong> auctions a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional auctioneer declares the suggested bids. In<br />

other types <strong>of</strong> auctions, however, the cus<strong>to</strong>mers make<br />

their own bids. Another variant, used at places such as<br />

eBay or Yahoo Auction, is called a "buyout option". A<br />

high price for an item is declared. Anyone willing <strong>to</strong><br />

pay that price is guaranteed a purchase. This variant<br />

seems <strong>to</strong> appeal consumers who dislike uncertainty: for<br />

a fixed price they are guaranteed an object. "Buyout<br />

options" are most commonly used if the seller has a<br />

s<strong>to</strong>ck <strong>of</strong> several copies <strong>of</strong> the same item.<br />

Writer’s main<br />

points(s)<br />

Both ascending-bid and descending-bid auctions can be<br />

conducted in either open or closed formats. In open<br />

formats, all participants know exactly how much an<br />

object is going for. For example, at many Japanese fish<br />

markets, wholesalers gather around the fish <strong>to</strong> be<br />

purchased and raise their hands as the auctioneer names<br />

progressively higher prices. In closed auctions,<br />

participants are unaware <strong>of</strong> how much other<br />

participants are willing <strong>to</strong> pay for an object. For<br />

example, a case in which participants used sealed<br />

envelopes <strong>to</strong> place their bids on a piece <strong>of</strong> real estate<br />

represents this type <strong>of</strong> auction. Though open auctions<br />

generally yield higher prices, closed formats are<br />

sometimes preferred in situations in which the privacy<br />

<strong>of</strong> the prospective buyers is considered paramount or<br />

the need <strong>to</strong> document precisely how much each party<br />

bid is high.<br />

Note: Adapted from Tim Newfields. (2001). Sample Text Passage Summaries. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.tnewfields.info/Articles/sum1.htm<br />

149


Task 2: Evaluating Summaries<br />

Instructions: Read each sample summary below and use the summary checklist attached <strong>to</strong> each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the summaries <strong>to</strong> evaluate whether or not you think the summary is “excellent,” “acceptable,”<br />

or “unacceptable.” You may also use your annotation <strong>of</strong> the passage above in helping you <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate each summary.<br />

SAMPLE SUMMARY # 1<br />

There are two types <strong>of</strong> auctions: those in which the price starts out low and is gradually raised,<br />

and those in which the price starts out high and is gradually lowered. Both auction types have<br />

variants, such as a "buyout option" in which a cus<strong>to</strong>mer is guaranteed an object if he/she is<br />

willing <strong>to</strong> pay a high price. Moreover, auctions can be conducted in open or closed formats. In<br />

closed formats, participants don't know how much others are willing <strong>to</strong> pay for an object since<br />

they use sealed envelopes or some secret method <strong>to</strong> make their bids. Though open auctions <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

result in higher sale prices, closed formats are sometimes preferred when privacy or the need for<br />

documentation is paramount.<br />

Summary Checklist<br />

Yes or No<br />

________Does the writer include the title <strong>of</strong> the essay in the first sentence <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

________Is the title in quotation marks?<br />

________Does the first sentence clearly state the main idea <strong>of</strong> the article?<br />

________Does the writer include all <strong>of</strong> the important ideas or supporting points from the<br />

essay? If not, which ideas did he/she leave out?<br />

________Does the writer use his/her own words?<br />

________Does the writer keeps his/her own opinions out <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall evaluation:<br />

Excellent Adequate Inadequate<br />

Check-plus (√+)________ Check (√)__________ Check-minus (√)_________<br />

SAMPLE SUMMARY # 2<br />

In some types <strong>of</strong> auctions bids begin low and then gradually become higher. <strong>Other</strong>s auctions use<br />

the opposite approach: commencing with a high bid and gradually becoming lower. There are lots<br />

<strong>of</strong> variants <strong>of</strong> these two basic approaches. For example, the "buyout option" available at some<br />

online auctions enables cus<strong>to</strong>mers who dislike the uncertainty <strong>of</strong> bidding <strong>to</strong> obtain an object for a<br />

fixed, but high price. Although some auctions are held in open formats in which all cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

know the going price for an object, other auctions are held in a closed format in which cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

do not know how much their rivals are willing <strong>to</strong> pay for an object. Open auctions tend <strong>to</strong><br />

generate higher bids, however closed auctions <strong>of</strong>fer more privacy and better documentation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respective bids.<br />

150


Summary Checklist<br />

Yes or No<br />

________Does the writer include the title <strong>of</strong> the essay in the first sentence <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

________Is the title in quotation marks?<br />

________Does the first sentence clearly state the main idea <strong>of</strong> the article?<br />

________Does the writer include all <strong>of</strong> the important ideas or supporting points from the<br />

essay? If not, which ideas did he/she leave out?<br />

________Does the writer use his/her own words?<br />

________Does the writer keeps his/her own opinions out <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall evaluation:<br />

Excellent Adequate Inadequate<br />

Check-plus (√+)________ Check (√)__________ Check-minus (√)_________<br />

SAMPLE SUMMARY # 3<br />

Basically, two types <strong>of</strong> auctions exist. I like the first, but not the second. In ascending-bid<br />

auctions the price for an object starts out low and is increased by degrees. In descending-bid<br />

auctions a high bid is first made, and then the price is consecutively lowered until someone<br />

expresses a willingness <strong>to</strong> pay the object. Numerous variations <strong>of</strong> these two patterns can be<br />

found. For example, the "buyout option" used in eBay, Yahoo Auction, and other places lets<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers who detest uncertainty procure an object for a high price. “A high price for an item is<br />

declared. Anyone willing <strong>to</strong> pay that price is guaranteed a purchase.” Auctions can also be held in<br />

open or closed formats. The open format is better for people like me because everyone knows<br />

what current price is for an object is. Whereas, closed formats are opaque: only the seller is able<br />

<strong>to</strong> tell how much each cus<strong>to</strong>mer is willing <strong>to</strong> pay for an object. I don’t like the closed formats<br />

because I want <strong>to</strong> know how much the cus<strong>to</strong>mer price is.<br />

Summary Checklist<br />

Yes or No<br />

________Does the writer include the title <strong>of</strong> the essay in the first sentence <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

________Is the title in quotation marks?<br />

________Does the first sentence clearly state the main idea <strong>of</strong> the article?<br />

________Does the writer include all <strong>of</strong> the important ideas or supporting points from the<br />

essay? If not, which ideas did he/she leave out?<br />

________Does the writer use his/her own words?<br />

________Does the writer keeps his/her own opinions out <strong>of</strong> the summary?<br />

____________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall evaluation:<br />

Excellent Adequate Inadequate<br />

Check-plus (√+)________ Check (√)__________ Check-minus (√)_________<br />

Note: Adapted from Tim Newfields. (2001). Sample Text Passage Summaries. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.tnewfields.info/Articles/sum1.htm<br />

151


Sample Responses (Handout 3)<br />

Instructions: Read each sample response below taken from MICUSP and use the response<br />

checklist attached <strong>to</strong> evaluate whether or not you think the response is “excellent,” “acceptable,”<br />

or “unacceptable.”<br />

Sample Response # 1<br />

I found the "Betrayal <strong>of</strong> the American Man" <strong>to</strong> be lacking in a good argument. As a<br />

woman, I find it difficult <strong>to</strong> agree with her claim that, "men have lost a useful role in public life, a<br />

way <strong>of</strong> earning a decent living, respectful treatment in the culture." While it is commonly<br />

believed that the Vietnam War was a betrayal <strong>to</strong> the men who fought and returned home <strong>to</strong> find<br />

protest rather than glory, that is the only such betrayal <strong>of</strong> which I am aware. It seems possible <strong>to</strong><br />

me that men may be missing opportunities <strong>to</strong> feel as though they are men. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>day's men do<br />

not enjoy a rite <strong>of</strong> passage <strong>to</strong> manhood, but Faludi blames the problem on media and<br />

consumerism.<br />

In "Blame it on Feminism", I was surprised <strong>to</strong> realize how the backlash against the<br />

women's movement has hindered women's participation in it. As the media blames feminism for<br />

many <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>day's common ills, more and more women leave the cause or begin <strong>to</strong> even fight<br />

against it. This has affected me. I have always thought that equality among humans was a noble<br />

cause, but I have been hesitant <strong>to</strong> consider myself a feminist. It seems as though the feminists<br />

make it more difficult for women <strong>to</strong> make their own choices between traditional and<br />

nontraditional relationship roles and career goals. I have also fallen victim <strong>to</strong> the media-hype that<br />

career women are lacking in femininity and have difficulty maintaining relationships with men.<br />

Before reading this article, I never considered the agenda <strong>of</strong> such a backlash.<br />

Response Checklist<br />

Yes or No<br />

________ Does the writer respond <strong>to</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the author’s ideas?<br />

________Does the writer express his/her opinion on the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view and explain why<br />

he/she agree or disagree.<br />

________Does the writer include his/her interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text and what it means <strong>to</strong> him/her?<br />

________Does the writer make connections <strong>to</strong> his/her own personal experience?<br />

________Does the writer refrain from summarizing the author’s ideas by stating his/her<br />

opinions about ideas in the article?<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall Evaluation:<br />

Excellent Adequate Inadequate<br />

Check-plus (√+)________ Check (√)__________ Check-minus (√-)_________<br />

Sample Response # 2<br />

In Faludi's first article, "Blame it on Feminism," much attention is paid <strong>to</strong> the anguish and<br />

frustration experienced by women who choose careers outside <strong>of</strong> the home, as opposed <strong>to</strong><br />

domesticated lives. She says that these women are "paying for their liberty with an empty bed and<br />

an empty womb" (25). Many women hold the conviction that the only way <strong>to</strong> achieve equality is<br />

<strong>to</strong> acquire masculine roles and enter a world powered by men, leaving their femininity behind.<br />

152


The antifeminist backlash <strong>of</strong> this movement "push[es] women back in<strong>to</strong> their 'acceptable' roles"<br />

(29). While some women are struggling, in a sense, <strong>to</strong> be men, the American men are witnessing<br />

a threat <strong>to</strong> their masculinity. Women have men <strong>to</strong> blame for their perceived injustices, but who<br />

can men blame when they hold the power? Faludi discusses a "culture <strong>of</strong> ornament" in her article<br />

entitled "The Betrayal <strong>of</strong> the American Man." This is a dilemma shaped by popular culture in<br />

which "manhood is defined by appearance, by youth and attractiveness, by money and<br />

aggression, by posture and swagger... These are the same traits that have long been designated as<br />

the essence <strong>of</strong> feminine vanity" (55). I view the underlying problem as a lack <strong>of</strong> appreciation<br />

between men and women. Men, by nature, are protec<strong>to</strong>rs and breadwinners. Women, on the other<br />

hand, are socially recognized as being nurturers. Equality should not stem from men and women<br />

being equal within the same domain. Instead, equal amounts <strong>of</strong> pride and prestige should be<br />

earned based upon mastery <strong>of</strong> separate domains. The pressure currently rests upon the women <strong>to</strong><br />

gain respect in the work force. We should challenge the men <strong>to</strong> acknowledge women as equals<br />

for being feminine and achieving their goals and dreams, even when they assume the role <strong>of</strong><br />

homemaker.<br />

Response Checklist<br />

Yes or No<br />

________ Does the writer respond <strong>to</strong> one or more <strong>of</strong> the author’s ideas?<br />

________Does the writer express his/her opinion on the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view and explain why<br />

he/she agrees or disagrees.<br />

________Does the writer include his/her interpretation <strong>of</strong> the text and what it means <strong>to</strong> him/her?<br />

________Does the writer make connections <strong>to</strong> his/her own personal experience?<br />

________Does the writer refrain from summarizing the author’s ideas by stating his/her<br />

opinions about ideas in the article?<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Overall Evaluation:<br />

Excellent Adequate Inadequate<br />

Check-plus (√+)________ Check (√)__________ Check-minus (√-)_________<br />

Note: Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). (2009). Ann Arbor, MI: The<br />

Regents <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan.<br />

153


SWBATS:<br />

Academic Writing: Analyzing Arguments (Lesson 10)<br />

Identify and understand common academic textual conventions ranging from structure<br />

and paragraphing, specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> argumentative writing<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> evaluate argument in academic writing.<br />

Materials:<br />

Academic Writing Slides (1-8)<br />

Handout 1: Analyzing Argumentative Essay<br />

Different colors <strong>of</strong> highlighters<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

3min Attendance/ T collects Summary-Response Whole Class<br />

Announcement Draft A<br />

15-20min Presentation: T present Academic Writing<br />

Slides (1-8)<br />

Ss take notes<br />

50min Activity # 1: Task 1: T passes out<br />

Task 1: Ss read sample<br />

Analyzing<br />

“Analyzing Argumentative essay and use the checklist<br />

argumentative essay Essay” and checklist attached attached as a guide for<br />

<strong>to</strong> Ss (Handout 2)<br />

evaluating each paragraph.<br />

2min Wrap-Up:<br />

Read Smith’s “Part<br />

Five: Laying Down<br />

the Case”<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> read each<br />

paragraph and use the checklist<br />

as an evaluation guide.<br />

Task 3: T walks around,<br />

moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss progress, and<br />

provides assistance if needed<br />

Task 4: As a whole class T goes<br />

over the checklist w/ the Ss.<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

reading assignment<br />

154<br />

Task 2: When using the<br />

checklist, Ss are required<br />

<strong>to</strong> highlight essential<br />

elements in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

paragraphs (T will provide<br />

different color<br />

highlighters).<br />

Task 3: When done, Ss<br />

evaluate the entire essay<br />

and share their<br />

thoughts/opinions about<br />

the essay with the person<br />

next <strong>to</strong> them.<br />

Task 4: Ss share their<br />

thoughts w/ the whole<br />

class.<br />

Whole class


Academic Writing<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation<br />

Writer’s Purpose:<br />

• To inform<br />

• To instruct<br />

• To analyze<br />

• To persuade<br />

• To argue<br />

• To evaluate<br />

Rhe<strong>to</strong>rical Situation<br />

Audience Awareness<br />

• Discourse community: Teachers are<br />

representatives <strong>of</strong> their academic field (i.e.<br />

biologists, sociologists, etc.)--groups <strong>of</strong> people<br />

who have similar interests and shared<br />

knowledge.<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

155


Persona<br />

Formal persona since most writing in college will<br />

be academic types <strong>of</strong> texts for audience <strong>of</strong><br />

scholars in the academic field.<br />

Argument as a Genre<br />

The argumentative essay:<br />

• a genre <strong>of</strong> writing that requires students <strong>to</strong><br />

investigate a <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

• evaluate evidence<br />

• establish a position on the <strong>to</strong>pic in a<br />

convincing manner.<br />

Argumentative Essay<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

makes the reader want <strong>to</strong> continue reading..<br />

establishes the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> the essay.<br />

establishes the writer’s position on the <strong>to</strong>pic,<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten in a thesis statement.<br />

May be one or more paragraphs long.<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

156


Argumentative Essay<br />

BODY<br />

• clear and logical transition between<br />

introduction, body, and conclusion.<br />

• each paragraph is limited <strong>to</strong> one idea.<br />

• Ideas are supported with evidence and/or<br />

examples.<br />

• paragraphs contain specific details & analysis.<br />

Argumentative Essay<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

• draws a conclusion based on the ideas<br />

presented.<br />

• <strong>of</strong>ten relates back <strong>to</strong> the thesis statement .<br />

• Signals the end <strong>of</strong> the essay.<br />

• may be one or more paragraphs long.<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

157


Analyzing Argumentative Essay (Handout 1)<br />

Read the sample argumentative essay below taken from MICUSP and use the checklist in the<br />

right column <strong>to</strong> evaluate the overall effectiveness <strong>of</strong> each section (introduction, body paragraphs,<br />

and conclusion). In addition, you will be given different colors <strong>to</strong> highlight the essential elements<br />

in each <strong>of</strong> the paragraphs. Finally, you will evaluate the essay as a whole and decide whether it is<br />

an “excellent,” “adequate,” or “inadequate” paper.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

I wish I had a different life. I wish braver, and prettier, or just happy<br />

(Vardalos, 2002). All <strong>of</strong> us have different perceptions <strong>of</strong> who we<br />

are, who we would like <strong>to</strong> be, and how we want others <strong>to</strong> view us.<br />

There are numerous fac<strong>to</strong>rs that can influence the self, each one<br />

having a different impact than the one before it. One important<br />

dynamic is culture. The movie My Big Fat Greek Wedding raises<br />

several important questions about the relationship between the self<br />

and one's ethnic background. What effect does being raised in a<br />

close-knit collectivistic culture have on someone's self-esteem? Do<br />

people feel it is necessary <strong>to</strong> change the way in which they portray<br />

themselves so they can be accepted in<strong>to</strong> another culture? My Big Fat<br />

Greek Wedding depicts how culture can shape the self through its<br />

influence on au<strong>to</strong>biographical memories, self-discrepancy, and self-<br />

presentation<br />

Introduction Checklist<br />

Does the writer use a<br />

“hook” <strong>to</strong> engage the<br />

reader’s interest? Y/N<br />

Highlight the “hook” in<br />

red.<br />

158<br />

Does the writer introduce<br />

the <strong>to</strong>pic or background<br />

information? Y/N<br />

Highlight the <strong>to</strong>pic in<br />

yellow.<br />

Does the writer move<br />

from the general <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>to</strong><br />

the specific issue or point<br />

<strong>of</strong> the essay? Y/N<br />

Highlight this transition<br />

in green.


BODY PARAGRAPH # 1<br />

There are several important scenes that provide us with insight in<strong>to</strong><br />

the self. At the beginning <strong>of</strong> the movie, Toula reflects upon her life<br />

by recollecting specific instances <strong>to</strong> show what it was like being<br />

raised in a Greek family. The moments she is remembering are<br />

known as au<strong>to</strong>biographical memories, which are recollections that a<br />

person has about a series <strong>of</strong> events that have had a meaningful<br />

impact on his or her life (Rubin, 1996; Thompson et al., 1998). Her<br />

memories are used <strong>to</strong> show how her life has been affected by her<br />

culture. People generally seem <strong>to</strong> recall instances that occurred<br />

during transitional periods in their lives. In Toula's case, she talks<br />

about specific times when she was in elementary school, middle<br />

school, and high school. These are all important intermediary phases<br />

in a person's life. Her memories only reflect upon ways in which her<br />

culture made her stand out from others in school, thus causing her a<br />

great deal <strong>of</strong> awkwardness and humiliation. Studies have shown that<br />

when remembering things that occurred in the past, we tend <strong>to</strong><br />

exaggerate circumstances or inflate our roles in situations in order <strong>to</strong><br />

make ourselves look better and boost our self-esteem. For example,<br />

in 1996 Harry Bahrick and his colleagues conducted an experiment<br />

in which they asked college students <strong>to</strong> recall all <strong>of</strong> their grades from<br />

Does the write have a<br />

159<br />

position on the argument?<br />

(Thesis statement) Y/N<br />

Highlight the thesis<br />

statement in grey.<br />

Body Checklist<br />

Does the paragraph have<br />

a clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence that<br />

states the main idea?<br />

Highlight the main idea in<br />

red<br />

Does that idea clearly<br />

support the thesis<br />

statement? Y/N<br />

Does the paragraph have<br />

enough specific support<br />

for the <strong>to</strong>pic sentence or<br />

main idea? Y/N<br />

Highlight the specific<br />

support in yellow.<br />

Does the paragraph


high school. After checking the accuracy <strong>of</strong> their reports with the<br />

real high school transcripts, the researchers found that students had a<br />

tendency <strong>to</strong> embellish any bad grades that they had received (Bahric<br />

et al., 1996). Toula only talks about events that fostered her feelings<br />

<strong>of</strong> inadequacy and lowered her self-esteem, such as being ridiculed<br />

for eating ethnic food at school or her father embarrassing her in<br />

front <strong>of</strong> her friends by talking about his Greek heritage. This does<br />

not seem <strong>to</strong> go along with the research done on au<strong>to</strong>biographical<br />

memories. I feel that this situation could be looked at from a<br />

different perspective. Perhaps Toula was exaggerating her past <strong>to</strong><br />

make her life look bad. That way, when she does become happy and<br />

successful in her life, people will view it as an incredible triumph<br />

and praise her for it. This is a form <strong>of</strong> self-handicapping, which<br />

occurs when people take actions <strong>to</strong> hurt their own performance or<br />

image in order <strong>to</strong> protect their own self-esteem (Berglas & Jones,<br />

1978). Some people do this so they can claim more recognition if<br />

they succeed.<br />

Is there anything missing from the introduction as specified in the<br />

checklist? If so, what?<br />

BODY PARAGRAPH # 2<br />

Another important psychological principle depicted during the movie<br />

is the notion <strong>of</strong> self-discrepancy. According <strong>to</strong> this theory, there are<br />

discrepancies between how we see ourselves and the way in which<br />

160<br />

analyze the specific point<br />

or example? Y/N<br />

Highlight the analysis in<br />

grey.<br />

Does the paragraph flow<br />

smoothly from one<br />

sentence <strong>to</strong> the next? Y/N<br />

Highlight some<br />

transitional words in<br />

green.<br />

Does the paragraph come<br />

<strong>to</strong> a conclusion at the<br />

end? Y/N<br />

Highlight the concluding<br />

sentence in purple<br />

Body Checklist<br />

Does the paragraph have


eally want <strong>to</strong> see ourselves. This match can be used <strong>to</strong> define one's<br />

self-esteem. For example, a person with a large discrepancy between<br />

their real and ideal selves would most likely have a negative self-<br />

image and a low self-esteem (Higgins, 1989). Early on in the movie<br />

there is a part where Toula is sitting in an alley outside <strong>of</strong> her<br />

restaurant looking at a flyer for college. She talks about her desire <strong>to</strong><br />

have a different life and <strong>to</strong> be happy. Her current self-perception is<br />

that she is unattractive, boring, and cowardly. It is clear that there is a<br />

large discrepancy between the way she views herself and the way she<br />

would like <strong>to</strong> be viewed. Toula does not act in a positive or up-beat<br />

manner during the beginning <strong>of</strong> the movie and she does not have any<br />

confidence in herself. For example, when Ian and his friend come <strong>to</strong><br />

the restaurant for c<strong>of</strong>fee, it becomes obvious that Toula is attracted <strong>to</strong><br />

Ian, but she has difficulties talking <strong>to</strong> him. She even tries <strong>to</strong> hide<br />

behind the counter so she can observe him from afar. The self-<br />

discrepancy that exists within Toula has greatly lowered her self-<br />

esteem making it hard for her <strong>to</strong> even carry on a simple conversation<br />

with a person <strong>of</strong> the opposite sex. She au<strong>to</strong>matically assumes that he<br />

would not want <strong>to</strong> have anything <strong>to</strong> do with her because she is not<br />

good-looking or assertive. This is consistent with the self-discrepancy<br />

theory. Toula's poor self-image stems from the pressure placed upon<br />

her by her culture <strong>to</strong> marry a Greek man at an early age and have<br />

many children. People like Ian, who do not have a specific heritage<br />

that he or she can clearly identify with, do not experience these types<br />

<strong>of</strong> demands from a large group or society. For this reason, Ian appears<br />

<strong>to</strong> be much more comfortable with who he is and does not spend time<br />

dwelling on who he could be. A number <strong>of</strong> studies have been done on<br />

the self-discrepancy theory, including one by Higgins, Friedman, and<br />

Shah. In this study, participants were asked <strong>to</strong> list several attributes<br />

a clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence<br />

161<br />

that states the main idea?<br />

Y/N<br />

Highlight the main idea<br />

in red<br />

Does that idea clearly<br />

support the thesis<br />

statement? Y/N<br />

Does the paragraph have<br />

enough specific support<br />

for the <strong>to</strong>pic sentence or<br />

main idea? Y/N<br />

Highlight the specific<br />

support in yellow.<br />

Does the paragraph<br />

analyze the specific<br />

point or example? Y/N<br />

Highlight the analysis in<br />

grey.<br />

Does the paragraph flow<br />

smoothly from one<br />

sentence <strong>to</strong> the next?<br />

Y/N


that they would like <strong>to</strong> possess (ideal-self attributes) and several that<br />

they feel they should possess (ought-self attributes). Next, they had <strong>to</strong><br />

fill out a questionnaire in which they rated how much they would like<br />

<strong>to</strong> possess these traits and how much they thought they really did<br />

have them. To determine self-discrepancy, the average score for how<br />

much they thought they actually possessed these traits was subtracted<br />

from the average score <strong>of</strong> how much they would like <strong>to</strong> possess their<br />

ideal-self traits. The same was done for the ratings <strong>of</strong> ought-self<br />

attributes. Afterwards, the subjects <strong>to</strong>ok an emotional frequency<br />

survey in which they were asked how <strong>of</strong>ten they experienced certain<br />

emotions in the last week. This survey included emotions associated<br />

with dejection and agitation. Participants who had a high self-<br />

discrepancy with regards <strong>to</strong> the ideal-self characteristics were more<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> report that they had felt dejection-related emotions more<br />

frequently in the last week. Similarly, those who had a high self-<br />

discrepancy with their ought-self traits reported feeling agitation-<br />

related emotions more <strong>of</strong>ten in the last week (Higgins, et al., 1997).<br />

Is there anything missing from the body paragraph as specified by the<br />

checklist? If so, what?<br />

BODY PARAGRAPH # 3<br />

A common theme throughout My Big Fat Greek Wedding is the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> self-presentation. This is basically the way in which we<br />

choose <strong>to</strong> portray ourselves <strong>to</strong> others and the tactics we employ<br />

in the process (Schlenker & Weigold, 1992). There are several<br />

moments where this aspect can be identified in the movie.<br />

Highlight some<br />

transitional words in<br />

green.<br />

Does the paragraph<br />

162<br />

come <strong>to</strong> a conclusion at<br />

the end? Y/N<br />

Highlight the concluding<br />

sentence in purple<br />

Body Checklist<br />

Does the paragraph have a<br />

clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence that states<br />

the main idea? Y/N


First, Toula can be seen changing her appearance by wearing<br />

contacts, putting on makeup, and dressing differently. She is<br />

later shown, with her new look, socializing with others at<br />

college. In another scene Ian tells Toula that he will do<br />

whatever it takes <strong>to</strong> make her family accept him, including<br />

being baptized in the Greek Orthodox Church. Immediately<br />

after Ian is baptized, there is a scene in which he is welcomed<br />

by Toula's entire family. Later on we see a part where Toula's<br />

father complains that he went out <strong>of</strong> his way <strong>to</strong> be nice <strong>to</strong> Ian's<br />

family so they would like him, but they did not seem <strong>to</strong> respond<br />

<strong>to</strong> any <strong>of</strong> his endeavors. All <strong>of</strong> these are examples <strong>of</strong> strategic<br />

self-presentation, which consists <strong>of</strong> the techniques we use <strong>to</strong><br />

form other people's impressions <strong>of</strong> us in order <strong>to</strong> assure that we<br />

will gain some sort <strong>of</strong> approval. People tend <strong>to</strong> have an easier<br />

time accurately presenting themselves, rather than<br />

manufacturing a personality (Pontari & Schlenker, 2000). In a<br />

study done by Pontari and Schlenker in 2000, experimenters<br />

asked subjects who were introverted or extroverted <strong>to</strong> act in a<br />

manner that either contradicted or was consistent with their true<br />

selves. The subjects were able <strong>to</strong> do this without a problem.<br />

However, the researches later asked the participants <strong>to</strong> do the<br />

same thing while keeping an eight-digit number in mind for a<br />

memorization test later on. When assigned with this task,<br />

participants were successfully able <strong>to</strong> act in accordance with<br />

their true selves, but had difficulties trying <strong>to</strong> act in a way that<br />

was out <strong>of</strong> character. In reference <strong>to</strong> the movie, it can by<br />

hypothesized that Toula's father was not able <strong>to</strong> make a good<br />

impression upon Ian's parents because he was <strong>to</strong>o preoccupied<br />

with the notion that his daughter was marrying someone outside<br />

163<br />

Highlight the main idea in red<br />

Does that idea clearly support<br />

the thesis statement? Y/N<br />

Does the paragraph have<br />

enough specific support for the<br />

<strong>to</strong>pic sentence or main idea?<br />

Y/N<br />

Highlight the specific support<br />

in yellow.<br />

Does the paragraph analyze the<br />

specific point or example? Y/N<br />

Highlight the analysis in grey.<br />

Does the paragraph flow<br />

smoothly from one sentence <strong>to</strong><br />

the next? Y/N<br />

Highlight some transitional<br />

words in green.<br />

Does the paragraph come <strong>to</strong> a<br />

conclusion at the end? Y/N<br />

Highlight the concluding<br />

sentence in purple.


<strong>of</strong> their culture. This could have prevented him from presenting<br />

himself as a more <strong>to</strong>lerant person, which is why Ian's parents<br />

didn’t respond positively <strong>to</strong> him.<br />

Is there anything missing from the body paragraph as specified<br />

by the checklist? If so, what?<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

The movie My Big Fat Greek Wedding shows us how the<br />

responsibilities and expectations that come with cultural<br />

orientation can affect the self. The three principles that have<br />

been discussed in this paper-au<strong>to</strong>biographical memories, self-<br />

discrepancy, and self-presentation-have all been affected in<br />

some manner by the characters' cultural identifications. This<br />

means that the ideas and values we were raised with play a<br />

critical role in forming how we see ourselves, how we want <strong>to</strong><br />

see ourselves, and how we feel about ourselves. Everyday we<br />

interact with people from a variety <strong>of</strong> different heritages, some<br />

<strong>of</strong> which have played a stronger role in their lives than others.<br />

It is important for us <strong>to</strong> take this fact in<strong>to</strong> consideration before<br />

passing judgment on people. For example, we may perceive<br />

someone's enthusiasm for their culture as over-bearing or even<br />

a little inappropriate, when we are really neglecting the fact<br />

that they may have been raised <strong>to</strong> be very knowledgeable about<br />

and have great pride for their heritage. This person could<br />

define who he is by his ethnicity and might believe that the<br />

best way <strong>to</strong> gain approval from others is <strong>to</strong> present himself in a<br />

Conclusion Checklist<br />

164<br />

Does the conclusion relate back<br />

<strong>to</strong> the thesis statement?<br />

Y/N<br />

Highlight this in yellow.<br />

Does the conclusion reinforce<br />

the main ideas by summarizing<br />

or restating them in a different<br />

way? Y/N<br />

Highlight this in red.<br />

Does the conclusion make a<br />

prediction or call for action?<br />

Y/N Highlight this in green.


manner that is consistent with his heritage. I think it would be<br />

very interesting <strong>to</strong> conduct research with people who were<br />

raised in the United States and belong <strong>to</strong> a culture that is very<br />

close-knit or more collectivistic, such as the Greeks. I would<br />

like <strong>to</strong> see how <strong>of</strong>ten events dealing with their cultural<br />

identification are present in their au<strong>to</strong>biographical memories<br />

and how the expectations <strong>of</strong> their ethnicity have affected the<br />

discrepancy between who they are and who they want <strong>to</strong> be.<br />

<strong>Other</strong> research should be done with people who come from<br />

individualistic cultures, or who do not have a strong cultural<br />

identity, and have been accepted in<strong>to</strong> groups where a great<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> pride and importance is placed on one's ethnicity.<br />

For example, people who have married in<strong>to</strong> a culture that is<br />

very different from their own should be observed <strong>to</strong> see if they<br />

present themselves in a different way when socializing with<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the other culture and analyze how that has<br />

affected their self-esteem. Everyone has been affected<br />

differently by the manner in which they were raised and we<br />

must make an effort <strong>to</strong> respect and understand these<br />

differences in order <strong>to</strong> maintain a balance within our society.<br />

Is there anything missing in the conclusion as specified by the<br />

checklist? If so, what?<br />

165<br />

Does the conclusion pose a final<br />

question, create an analogy, use<br />

a powerful quote, or tell a s<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

<strong>to</strong> may his/her point? (i.e. use a<br />

different technique than the one<br />

in the introduction)<br />

Y/N<br />

Highlight this in blue.<br />

Overall Evaluation:<br />

Strong paper Adequate paper Inadequate<br />

Check-Plus (√+)_________ Check (√)_______ Check-Minus (√--)________<br />

Note: Taken from Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). (2009). Ann<br />

Arbor, MI: The Regents <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan.


SWBATS:<br />

The Writing Process Workshop (Lesson 11)<br />

Invention Strategies<br />

Identify and understand the distinct stages <strong>of</strong> the writing process<br />

Identify, practice, and develop using various invention strategies for generating ideas<br />

during the planning stage <strong>of</strong> the writing process.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> use invention strategies for a variety <strong>of</strong> writing tasks.<br />

Materials:<br />

Overhead Projec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Writing Process Slides (1-9)<br />

Handout 1: Utilizing Invention Strategies<br />

Handout 2: Creating an Outline<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes roll Whole Class<br />

5min Review<br />

25min Presentation<br />

40min Activity 1: Invention<br />

Strategies<br />

3min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Creating an Outline<br />

(Handout 2)<br />

T asks: “What does the structure<br />

<strong>of</strong> an argumentative essay look<br />

like?”<br />

T presents “Writing Process”<br />

slides (1-9)<br />

For free-write, clustering,<br />

and cubing, T will give<br />

Ss a few minutes <strong>to</strong><br />

practice (as indicated in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the slides).<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Utilizing<br />

Invention Strategies” (Handout 1)<br />

<strong>to</strong> Ss.<br />

Task 2: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> create<br />

two invention strategies as<br />

preparation for Argumentative<br />

Essay.<br />

Task 3: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Ss progress, and provides<br />

assistance if necessary.<br />

Task 1: T reminds Ss they will<br />

write first draft <strong>of</strong> Essay 1 in the<br />

computer lab next class session.<br />

Ss share their<br />

ideas/inputs<br />

Ss take notes and<br />

practice a few <strong>of</strong> the<br />

invention strategies, as<br />

well as ask any<br />

questions or concerns<br />

that may arise.<br />

Task 1: Ss create two<br />

different invention<br />

strategies as specified<br />

in the handout 2.<br />

Task 2: Ss then reflect<br />

on which invention<br />

strategy they like<br />

better.<br />

Whole class<br />

166


Post SacCT # 3 (see<br />

question below<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

homework assignment (Handout<br />

2) by writing an effective outline<br />

as preparation for the in-class<br />

essay.<br />

SacCT Journal Entry 3<br />

1. Which invention strategy do you feel most comfortable doing? Why? (Explain in 3-5<br />

sentences)<br />

2. Will you use the same strategy on future assignments? Or, will you try out other<br />

invention strategies? (Explain in 3-5 sentences)<br />

Note: Be sure <strong>to</strong> comment on at least two other class members’ responses.<br />

167


Writing Process<br />

Planning Stages<br />

1. Planning:<br />

• Generating ideas—creating new ideas<br />

• Organizing ideas— grouping ideas in<strong>to</strong> a<br />

meaningful structure<br />

• Goal-setting—Writer’s goals for the particular<br />

assignment<br />

Pre-Writing (Invention) Strategies<br />

1. Freewrite<br />

2. Loop Writing<br />

3. Listing<br />

4. Clustering<br />

5. Cubing<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

___________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

168


Freewrite<br />

• Write for a short period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

• Don’t s<strong>to</strong>p writing until the time has expired.<br />

• Never s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> look back, <strong>to</strong> cross something<br />

out, or how <strong>to</strong> spell something.<br />

• Put down whatever is in your mind.<br />

• Practice: Let’s free-write for few minutes on<br />

the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> movies!<br />

Loop-Writing<br />

• Freewrite about a given <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

• Extract a sentence from the first freewrite.<br />

• This sentence will be used <strong>to</strong> write the second<br />

frewrite, starting the second loop, and so on.<br />

Listing<br />

Listing involves generation <strong>of</strong> words, phrases,<br />

and ideas.<br />

Ex. “The Benefits and Challenges <strong>of</strong> Being a<br />

College Student.”<br />

Benefits Challenges<br />

• independence social responsibility<br />

• Living away from home paying bills<br />

• Freedom <strong>to</strong> come and go managing time<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

169


Clustering<br />

Classify and cluster ideas, concepts, and<br />

abstractions captured in words and phrases.<br />

Practice clustering your ideas for a few minutes<br />

about the benefits <strong>of</strong> social networking.<br />

Cubing<br />

.Answer each question below on the <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong><br />

driving and texting in California.<br />

1.Describe: What is it?<br />

2.Compare: What is it similar <strong>to</strong>? Different?<br />

3.Analyze: How do the two fit <strong>to</strong>gether?<br />

4.Associate: What do you associate each with?<br />

5. Apply: How does it apply <strong>to</strong> our society?<br />

6. Argue: What positions can be argued?<br />

For or Against?<br />

Organizing Ideas<br />

4. Outlining—list your ideas in a meaningful and<br />

organized manner.<br />

* Research shows that outlining can serve as<br />

both an effective prewriting and planning <strong>to</strong>ol<br />

for many writers.<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

____________________________________<br />

170


Utilizing Invention Strategies (Handout 1)<br />

In this activity, you will receive the opportunity <strong>to</strong> practice using various invention strategies as<br />

preparation for writing the first draft <strong>of</strong> Project 1 (Argumentative Essay). You may use this <strong>to</strong><br />

guide you during the in-class writing <strong>of</strong> this assignment. Examine the question prompt below for<br />

the argumentative paper and then complete the each task.<br />

Do you agree with Thomas’ argument that there exists reasonable evidence <strong>to</strong> arrest Pat Ramsey<br />

for the murder connected <strong>to</strong> her daughter’s death?<br />

Task 1: Pick One Invention Strategy<br />

Read the position statement below and chose ONE pre-writing strategy <strong>to</strong> help you generate ideas<br />

for Project # 1 Argumentative essay. Generate your ideas on a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper.<br />

Position: You agree with Thomas’ argument and believe there is enough evidence <strong>to</strong> arrest Pat<br />

Ramsey for the murder connected <strong>to</strong> her daughter’s death.<br />

Task 2: Pick Another Invention Strategy<br />

Read the position statement below and choose ANOTHER pre-writing strategy other than the one<br />

you created in task 1. Generate your new ideas on a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper.<br />

Position: You disagree with Thomas’ argument and believe that there is not enough evidence <strong>to</strong><br />

arrest Pat Ramsey for the murder connected <strong>to</strong> her daughter’s death.<br />

Task 3: Reflection<br />

1. Which <strong>of</strong> the two invention strategies do you like better? Why? (Explain in 3-5<br />

sentences)<br />

171


Creating an Outline (Handout 2)<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> creating an outline is <strong>to</strong> show the logical ordering or hierarchical relationship <strong>of</strong><br />

information. There are many different ways <strong>to</strong> create an outline. For example, you may list all <strong>of</strong><br />

your ideas down on paper, group related ideas <strong>to</strong>gether, order your ideas from general <strong>to</strong> specific,<br />

or label your ideas in<strong>to</strong> different sections--main and sub headings. Read the essay prompt again<br />

and pick a position you would like <strong>to</strong> argue for (using the ideas you generated from one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

two invention strategies in Handout 1). Then organize your ideas by creating an outline as<br />

preparation for the in-class writing. Use the space below <strong>to</strong> complete this task.<br />

Essay Outline<br />

172


SWBATS:<br />

In-Class Writing (Lesson 12)<br />

Practice using some effective writing strategies for generating academic essays.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> set purposes and goals for writing academically.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> organize their essays <strong>to</strong> support their points <strong>of</strong> view in<br />

ways that are appropriate <strong>to</strong> their <strong>to</strong>pic, audience, and purpose.<br />

Materials:<br />

Computer Lab<br />

Project 1: Argumentative Essay Assignment<br />

Assigned class readings for this unit<br />

Handouts 1 & 2: Utilizing Invention Strategies & Creating Effective Outline (last class)<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

70min In-Class Writing T tells Ss that the in-class<br />

writing will not be graded.<br />

Instead, T will use it <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate Ss overall writing<br />

ability. In addition, T tells Ss<br />

that they will have ample<br />

opportunity <strong>to</strong> revise this inclass<br />

writing throughout the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> the year.<br />

3min Wrap-up: Homework<br />

Summary-Response Draft B<br />

Read SWH (pp. 49-51)<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> complete all<br />

reading and homework<br />

assignments by next class<br />

session.<br />

173<br />

Ss use the computer <strong>to</strong><br />

complete the writing<br />

assignment. They can<br />

refer <strong>to</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assigned class<br />

readings and related<br />

handouts. Once done,<br />

Ss will print out a<br />

copy and give it <strong>to</strong> T.<br />

Whole class


Peer Review Workshop (Lesson 13)<br />

Goal for entire peer review workshop: To facilitate collaborative learning through the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> peer review sessions for students <strong>to</strong> build effective feedback strategies and self-editing skills<br />

(particularly for academic essays) through the implementation <strong>of</strong> various peer response exercises<br />

and activities.<br />

SWBATs (for Day 1 & 2):<br />

Identify the essential parts <strong>of</strong> the Introduction and Body paragraphs in an argumentative<br />

essay.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> show evidence <strong>of</strong> using some effective feedback strategies through various peer<br />

response exercises and activities.<br />

Become more comfortable and confident in providing feedback on other student’s paper.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> show evidence <strong>of</strong> incorporating their peers’ comments in<strong>to</strong> their own essays.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Student Written Sample<br />

Handout 2: Revision Checklist for Introduction<br />

Handout 3: Student Body Paragraph<br />

Handout 4: Revision Checklist for Body Paragraph<br />

Overhead Projec<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Day 1<br />

TIME LESSON ACTIVITY TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

3 min Attendance/<br />

Announcement<br />

30min Modeling Activity 1:<br />

Effective Feedback<br />

Strategies<br />

Task 1: T takes roll<br />

Task 2: T collects Summary-<br />

Response Draft B<br />

Task 1: T provides Ss w/ a sample<br />

introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph <strong>of</strong> a student’s<br />

writing (Handout 1), and “Revision<br />

checklist for Introduction” (Handout<br />

2)<br />

Task 2: T models effective feedback<br />

strategies on the sample introduction<br />

using the revision checklist and peer<br />

response form (Handout 2), focusing<br />

only on content.<br />

Task 3: After the modeling activity,<br />

T asks two questions:<br />

174<br />

(STUDENT ACTION)<br />

Whole class<br />

Task 1: Ss read sample<br />

paragraph<br />

Task 2: Students<br />

observe and follow<br />

along with T as he<br />

models this activity.<br />

Task 3: Ss respond <strong>to</strong><br />

the questions asked by<br />

T.


1.What types <strong>of</strong> feedback strategies<br />

did I use during the modeling<br />

activity?<br />

2.What types <strong>of</strong> errors did I provide<br />

feedback on the most?<br />

40min Activity 2: Practice Task 1: T provides sample <strong>of</strong> a body<br />

paragraph (Handout 3) and revision<br />

checklist and peer response form<br />

(Handouts 4).<br />

2min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

needed.<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> bring in Draft A <strong>of</strong><br />

Argumentative Essay for the peer<br />

review session.<br />

175<br />

Ss use the revision<br />

checklist and peer<br />

response form for the<br />

body paragraph <strong>to</strong><br />

practice constructing<br />

effective feedback<br />

strategies.<br />

Whole class


Introduction<br />

Student Written Sample (Handout 1)<br />

Do social networking sites help or benefit us in any way, or do they harm us? In the 21 st<br />

century, social networking came in<strong>to</strong> popularity with a big rise coming from mostly the younger<br />

generation. Today that is all you would hear teens talking about, whether you have accounts on<br />

MySpace, Face book, and Twitter. These social networks are free online sites where you can<br />

create your own pr<strong>of</strong>ile in your liking, and express yourself <strong>to</strong> your friends or <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> meet<br />

new people you would like <strong>to</strong> get <strong>to</strong> know. Marilyn Rose, a high school teacher with 20 years <strong>of</strong><br />

experience argues that by using social networking we simply aren’t developing face-<strong>to</strong>-face social<br />

skills <strong>to</strong> create meaningful relationships. Also, she claims that anonymous bullying and impulsive<br />

posting which can lead <strong>to</strong> destroying relationships, rather than developing them. Rose says that<br />

<strong>to</strong>day’s children are missing the opportunity <strong>to</strong> develop deep childhood relationships such as their<br />

parents did. I disagree with Marilyn Roses argument, that social networks are destroying our<br />

relationships instead <strong>of</strong> developing them. In fact, social networking keeps people in <strong>to</strong>uch with<br />

each other, even distant friendships, and can help meet new people <strong>to</strong> develop meaningful<br />

relationships.<br />

Note: Adapted from Learning Skills 86 Course Materials<br />

176


Essay Revision Checklist for Introduction (Handout 2)<br />

Writer’s Name:________________________________________________<br />

Reviewer’s Name: ______________________________________________<br />

Part A<br />

Instructions: You will assist your classmates by helping them analyze their introduc<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

paragraphs. This will also help you <strong>to</strong> be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the<br />

content areas <strong>of</strong> your own writing. Before you begin, read the introduction and highlight the<br />

background information in “yellow,” the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view in “green,” and the thesis in<br />

“blue.” Using the checklist provided <strong>to</strong> put a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement needed <strong>to</strong> make a<br />

successful introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph.<br />

Introduction (organization):<br />

_______ Provides background information <strong>to</strong> introduce the <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

_______ Provides information about the prompt (Author’s point <strong>of</strong> view).<br />

_______ Responds clearly and completely <strong>to</strong> the prompt (Agree/disagree).<br />

_______ The essay has a clear thesis (main idea).<br />

_______ The thesis is well supported with several major points or arguments.<br />

Part B<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s draft and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Be as specific as possible<br />

when referring <strong>to</strong> particular parts <strong>of</strong> the introduction in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about the introduction? From the checklist presented above,<br />

choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the introduction is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them better?<br />

4. On a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper, write a short response (3 <strong>to</strong> 5 sentences) <strong>to</strong> your partner<br />

explaining how his or her writing can be improved. Begin your letter with your partner’s<br />

name and sign your own name at the end. Remember <strong>to</strong> “sandwich” any suggestions with<br />

positive comments. Follow this model:<br />

Dear Joe,<br />

Positive comment—1-2<br />

Suggestions (improvements)—2 – 4<br />

Positive comment (encouragement)—1-2<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Bob<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample peer response forms, 2005, p. 238 & 257<br />

177


Student’s Body Paragraph (Handout 3)<br />

Social networking does not destroy face-<strong>to</strong>-face relationships. However, these social<br />

networking sites improve their face-<strong>to</strong>-face relationships. In fact, it develops stronger<br />

relationships with distant friends. In the article, “Teenage Social Media Butterflies may not be<br />

such a Bad Idea”, Amari Yee Mikami, a Psychologists from the University <strong>of</strong> Virginia, says ,<br />

“adolescents are largely using social networking sites <strong>to</strong> keep in <strong>to</strong>uch with friends they already<br />

know, not <strong>to</strong> converse with strangers”. I myself have a “Face book”, which I only use <strong>to</strong> talk <strong>to</strong><br />

friends I already know or met in person also, so every friend I have as my friends each <strong>of</strong> them<br />

have the same mutual friends as I. There is no possible way you are able <strong>to</strong> be destroying<br />

relationships or coming more distant <strong>to</strong> your friends by talking <strong>to</strong> them through a social network<br />

site. In fact, social networking sites increase human interactions with “online” friends that are just<br />

as meaningful.<br />

Note: Adapted from Learning Skills 86 Course Materials<br />

178


Essay Revision Checklist for Body Paragraph (Handout 4)<br />

Writer’s Name:________________________________________________<br />

Reviewer’s Name: ______________________________________________<br />

Part A<br />

Instructions: You will assist your classmate by analyzing his/her body paragraph. This will help<br />

you <strong>to</strong> also be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the content areas <strong>of</strong> your own<br />

writing. Before you begin, read through your classmate’s body paragraph and highlight the <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

sentence in “green,” the supporting details (either reference from the reading or personal<br />

example) in “yellow,” analysis in “blue,” and the concluding sentence in “red.” Using the<br />

checklist below, put a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement below needed <strong>to</strong> make a successful body<br />

paragraph.<br />

Body paragraph (organization):<br />

_______ Transition words are used effectively between paragraphs.<br />

_______ Include a clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence that is directly tied <strong>to</strong> the thesis statement (main<br />

idea).<br />

_______ The supporting points are developed with ideas from the readings, facts, or other<br />

examples from the writer’s own experiences or observation.<br />

_______ The ideas and facts in the readings have been reported accurately.<br />

_______ The supporting evidence is carefully analyzed.<br />

_______ The conclusion ties the ideas in the body back <strong>to</strong> the thesis (main idea).<br />

Part B<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s body paragraph and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Be as specific as<br />

possible when referring <strong>to</strong> particular parts <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about the body paragraph? From the checklist presented<br />

above, choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them<br />

better?<br />

179


Dear Joe,<br />

4. On a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper, write a short response (3 <strong>to</strong> 5 sentences) <strong>to</strong> your partner<br />

explaining how his or her writing can be improved. Begin your letter with your<br />

partner’s name and sign your own name at the end. Remember <strong>to</strong> “sandwich” any<br />

suggestions with positive comments. Follow this model:<br />

Positive comment—1-2<br />

Suggestions (improvements)—2 – 4<br />

Positive comment (encouragement)—1-2<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Bob<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample peer response forms, 2005, p. 238 & 257<br />

180


Peer Review Session (Lesson 14)<br />

SWBATS: Same objectives (see previous lesson)<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Revision Checklist & Peer Response Form for Introduction and Body<br />

Paragraphs<br />

Handout 2: Reflection on Peer Review Session<br />

Draft A: Argumentative Essay<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENT ACTION)<br />

2 min Attendance T takes roll Whole Class<br />

50min Peer Review<br />

Session<br />

Task 1: T provides Handout 1 <strong>to</strong> Ss<br />

(Revision Checklist & Peer Response<br />

Form)<br />

Task 2: T forms Ss in<strong>to</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> 3 for<br />

peer review session.<br />

Task 3: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> read each<br />

other’s whole paper first and then reread<br />

the introduction and body<br />

paragraphs using the revision checklist<br />

(part A) and peer response questions<br />

(part B) in the Handout 1.<br />

Task 4: T walks around and provides<br />

assistance if needed.<br />

20min Reflection Activity Task 1: After the peer review session, T<br />

passes out reflection activity (Handout<br />

2), where Ss reflect on the peer review<br />

session as a whole, as well as <strong>to</strong><br />

specific comments in regards <strong>to</strong> their<br />

essays made by their classmates.<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

Task 2: T walks around and provides<br />

assistance if needed<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> bring in their Field<br />

Notes and collection <strong>of</strong> Artifacts as they<br />

will have the entire period next class<br />

session <strong>to</strong> work on their academic<br />

discourse project w/ their members.<br />

Task 1: Ss get in<strong>to</strong><br />

groups and exchange<br />

papers.<br />

181<br />

Task 2: Ss read each<br />

other’s paper first and<br />

then provide feedback<br />

using the revision<br />

checklist and peer<br />

response form.<br />

Task 1: Students will<br />

reflect on their<br />

experience by<br />

answering questions on<br />

Handout 2, as well as<br />

write a paragraph about<br />

what was helpful and<br />

not as helpful about<br />

their peers’ comments.<br />

Whole class


Essay Revision Checklist for Introduction & Body Paragraphs (Handout 1)<br />

Writer’s Name:________________________________________________<br />

Reviewer’s Name: ______________________________________________<br />

Part A: Whole Essay<br />

Exchange papers with your group member and quickly read his/her entire essay. Do not provide<br />

any sort <strong>of</strong> feedback or s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> use the revision checklists for the introduction and body<br />

paragraphs until you have completely read your partner’s whole essay. Your main goal is <strong>to</strong> get a<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> your group member’s main points and ideas before commenting on them. Once you have<br />

completed this task, you may complete parts B, C, & D.<br />

Part B: Introduction<br />

You will assist your classmates by helping them analyze their introduction paragraphs. This will<br />

help you <strong>to</strong> also be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the content areas <strong>of</strong> your<br />

own writing. Before you begin, read through their introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph(s) and highlight the<br />

background information in “yellow,” the author’s point <strong>of</strong> view in “green,” and the thesis in<br />

“blue.” Use the checklist provided <strong>to</strong> put a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement below needed <strong>to</strong><br />

make a successful introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph.<br />

Introduction (organization):<br />

_______ Provides background information <strong>to</strong> introduce the <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

_______ Provides information about the prompt (Author’s point <strong>of</strong> view).<br />

_______ Responds clearly and completely <strong>to</strong> the prompt (Agree/disagree).<br />

_______ The essay has a clear thesis (main idea).<br />

_______ The thesis is well supported with several major points or arguments.<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph(s) and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Be as<br />

specific as possible when referring <strong>to</strong> particular parts <strong>of</strong> the introduction in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about your partner’s introduction? From the checklist presented<br />

above, choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the introduction is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them better?<br />

182


Part C: Body Paragraphs<br />

You will assist your classmates by helping them analyze their body paragraphs. This will help<br />

you <strong>to</strong> also be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the content areas <strong>of</strong> your own<br />

writing. Before you begin, read through their body paragraphs and highlight the <strong>to</strong>pic sentence in<br />

“green,” the supporting details (either reference from the reading or personal example) in<br />

“yellow,” analysis in “blue,” and the concluding sentence in “red.” Use the checklist provided <strong>to</strong><br />

put a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement below needed <strong>to</strong> make a successful body paragraph.<br />

Body paragraph (organization):<br />

_______ Transition words are used effectively between paragraphs.<br />

_______ Include a clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence that is directly tied <strong>to</strong> the thesis statement (main<br />

idea).<br />

_______ The supporting points are developed with ideas from the readings, facts, or other<br />

examples from the writer’s own experiences or observation.<br />

_______ The ideas and facts in the readings have been reported accurately.<br />

_______ The supporting evidence is carefully analyzed.<br />

_______ The conclusion ties the ideas in the body back <strong>to</strong> the thesis (main idea).<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s body paragraphs and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Choose one body<br />

paragraph <strong>to</strong> answer the questions below. Be as specific as possible when referring <strong>to</strong> particular<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about your partner’s body paragraph? From the checklist<br />

presented above, choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them<br />

better?<br />

183


Part D: Constructive Feedback<br />

Dear Joe,<br />

1. On a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper, write a short letter (3 <strong>to</strong> 5 sentences) <strong>to</strong> your partner<br />

explaining how his or her writing can be improved. Begin your letter with your<br />

partner’s name and sign your own name at the end. Remember <strong>to</strong> “sandwich” any<br />

suggestions with positive comments. Follow this model:<br />

Positive comment—1-2<br />

Suggestions (improvements)—2 – 4<br />

Positive comment (encouragement)—1-2<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Bob<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample peer response forms, 2005, pp. 238 & 257.<br />

184


Part I<br />

Reflection on Peer Review Session (Handout 2)<br />

1. What did you learn from reading your classmate’s paper?<br />

2. Now look over your paper and read your peer’s comments. What did he/she say about your<br />

introduction and body paragraphs? Summarize his/her comments in 2-3 sentences.<br />

3. Do you agree with his/her comments? Do you find them helpful? Do you think you will use<br />

them in your revision? Why or why not?<br />

Part II<br />

Write 1 -2 paragraphs on the back side <strong>of</strong> this paper in which you explain (a) which <strong>of</strong> your<br />

classmate’s comments you found most helpful and (b) any comments you did not find helpful or<br />

with which you disagree, and (c) your own ideas (from your own rereading and from your peer’s<br />

comments) about what you need <strong>to</strong> change when you revise the introduction and body<br />

paragraphs.<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample follow-up activities, 2005<br />

185


SWBATS:<br />

Work on Academic Discourse Project (Lesson 15)<br />

Work collaboratively in groups <strong>to</strong> evaluate and analyze research data collection.<br />

Show evidence <strong>of</strong> integrating their own ideas with those <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

Materials:<br />

Field notes (includes observation and interview notes)<br />

Collection <strong>of</strong> Artifacts<br />

Writing Assignment: Academic Discourse Community Project<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

70min Activity: Academic<br />

Discourse Project<br />

3 min Wrap-up<br />

Task 1: T tells Ss that they have the<br />

whole class time <strong>to</strong> evaluate and<br />

analyze their research data collection<br />

w/ their group members.<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> take out the<br />

“Academic Discourse Community<br />

Project” assignment sheet and use the<br />

questions specified in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sections (Field notes, Interview, &<br />

Artifacts) <strong>to</strong> guide them in evaluating<br />

and analyzing the data collected.<br />

Task 3: T walks around and moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Ss progress and provide assistance by<br />

spending at least 5 minutes w/ each<br />

group<br />

T reminds Ss that they will meet in<br />

the computer lab next class session <strong>to</strong><br />

use online Corpus<br />

186<br />

Ss get in<strong>to</strong> their<br />

groups and work<br />

<strong>to</strong>gether <strong>to</strong> evaluate<br />

and analyze their<br />

research data<br />

collection using the<br />

questions specified in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the sections <strong>of</strong><br />

the “Academic<br />

Discourse Community<br />

Project” assignment.<br />

Whole class


SWABTS:<br />

Introduction <strong>to</strong> Corpus Research (Lesson 16)<br />

Identify and practice using online corpus for research and writing purposes.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> develop another strategy for revising, editing, and<br />

pro<strong>of</strong>reading one’s own writing.<br />

Materials:<br />

Computer Lab<br />

Handout 1: Corpus: An Introduction<br />

Handout 2: Using Corpus <strong>of</strong> Contemporary American <strong>English</strong> (COCA)<br />

Handout 3: Using Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP)<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance/<br />

Announcement<br />

Task 1: T takes attendance.<br />

Task 2: T collects Argumentative<br />

paper draft A.<br />

Whole class<br />

50min Introduction <strong>to</strong> Task 1: T goes over “Introduction Task 1: Ss read Handout 1<br />

COCA: Tu<strong>to</strong>rial<br />

Activity<br />

<strong>to</strong> Corpus (Handout 1) w/ Ss. and follow along w/ T.<br />

Task 2: T gives Ss Handout 2 Task 2: Ss carefully<br />

(Using COCA). T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete all steps as<br />

read and complete all steps as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the corpus tu<strong>to</strong>rial.<br />

specified in Handout 2.<br />

Task 3: Using COCA, Ss<br />

Task 3: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete are required <strong>to</strong> research<br />

“Application: Data-Driven something in the <strong>English</strong><br />

Learning” section on the same Language they want <strong>to</strong><br />

Handout 2.<br />

find out more about.<br />

Task 4: Ss share their<br />

Task 4: As a whole class , we ideas/inputs about the<br />

discuss the benefits <strong>of</strong> using benefits <strong>of</strong> using online<br />

COCA <strong>to</strong> improve Ss writing. corpus.<br />

20min Introduction <strong>to</strong><br />

MICUSP:<br />

Tu<strong>to</strong>rial Activity<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

Task 1: T gives Ss Handout 3<br />

(Using MICUSP). T instructs Ss<br />

<strong>to</strong> read and complete all steps.<br />

Task 2: As a whole class, we<br />

discuss the benefits <strong>of</strong> using<br />

MICUSP.<br />

T reminds Ss that next class will<br />

be an editing workshop.<br />

Task 1: Ss carefully<br />

complete all steps as<br />

specified in handout 2.<br />

187<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

ideas/inputs about benefits<br />

<strong>of</strong> using MICUSP.<br />

Whole class


What is corpus?<br />

Corpus: An Introduction (Handout 1)<br />

Corpus is a large collection <strong>of</strong> natural-language texts used for analysis.<br />

A) Online COCA:<br />

searchable 400 + million word corpus <strong>of</strong> American <strong>English</strong><br />

5 major registers<br />

Spoken discourses (conversation)<br />

Academic prose (scholarly journal articles, university textbook)<br />

Newspaper<br />

Magazines<br />

Fiction<br />

B) MICASE<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> nearly 1.8 million words <strong>of</strong> academic language across disciplines<br />

2 major registers<br />

Academic spoken discourse<br />

Academic prose<br />

C) MICUSP<br />

a collection <strong>of</strong> around 830 “A” grade papers (full-texts).<br />

Paper Types<br />

Argumentative essay<br />

Creative writing<br />

Critique/Evaluation<br />

Research paper<br />

Proposal<br />

Report<br />

Response paper<br />

4 major academic departments<br />

Humanities and Arts<br />

Social Sciences<br />

Biological and Health Sciences<br />

Physical Sciences<br />

What are the benefits <strong>of</strong> using corpus?<br />

Identify grammatical features that are especially common or rare.<br />

Find the most accurate vocabulary usage<br />

Identify common pattern between words/phrases (collocation)<br />

Find differences in use among registers<br />

188


Handout 2: Using Corpus <strong>of</strong> Contemporary American <strong>English</strong> (COCA)<br />

Step 1: Tu<strong>to</strong>rial & Registration<br />

Go <strong>to</strong> corpus.byu.edu and click on COCA. It will take you <strong>to</strong> the introduction page.<br />

Read the Introduction (5 paragraphs long) <strong>to</strong> the right <strong>of</strong> the screen about American Corpus.<br />

When you get <strong>to</strong> the last paragraph take the five minute guided <strong>to</strong>ur by clicking on the “five<br />

minute <strong>to</strong>ur guided <strong>to</strong>ur.”<br />

After the five minute guided <strong>to</strong>ur, click on Register but<strong>to</strong>n at the <strong>to</strong>p right corner. It will take you<br />

<strong>to</strong> the data form page, where you will be required <strong>to</strong> fill out the form.<br />

Type in your full name and address<br />

Type in your password<br />

Type in your status as “student (undergraduate)”<br />

After you fill out the form, press the Submit but<strong>to</strong>n. Then check your email and click on the link<br />

in the email <strong>to</strong> complete your registration.<br />

Type in your e-mail address and password <strong>to</strong> log-in and use COCA.<br />

Step 2: Practice Performing Your Own Searches<br />

I. Frequency, Distribution, & Concordances<br />

In the left-hand column, select Chart, then write in the word “<strong>to</strong>ol.” At the bot<strong>to</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the<br />

window, click on the Search but<strong>to</strong>n. It will take you <strong>to</strong> the frequency and distribution chart.<br />

Register Awareness<br />

1. Which <strong>of</strong> the 5 registers (spoken, fiction, magazine, newspaper, and academic) is the<br />

word “<strong>to</strong>ol” used most frequently in?<br />

2. Which <strong>of</strong> the 5 registers is the word “<strong>to</strong>ol” least commonly used in?<br />

Now click on the bar for Academic, and you’ll get the first 100 concordances examples <strong>of</strong> “<strong>to</strong>ol”<br />

from a variety <strong>of</strong> different genres.<br />

How <strong>to</strong> use Concordances<br />

Left Collocate is a word or part <strong>of</strong> speech that frequently occurs <strong>to</strong> the left <strong>of</strong> the target word.<br />

Looking at the first 100 concordance <strong>of</strong> “<strong>to</strong>ol,” what part <strong>of</strong> speech frequently occurs <strong>to</strong> the left <strong>of</strong><br />

“<strong>to</strong>ol?”<br />

189


Right Collocate is a word or part <strong>of</strong> speech that frequently occurs <strong>to</strong> the right <strong>of</strong> the target word.<br />

Looking at the first 100 concordance <strong>of</strong> “<strong>to</strong>ol” again, what part <strong>of</strong> speech frequently occurs <strong>to</strong> the<br />

right <strong>of</strong> “<strong>to</strong>ol?”<br />

II. Comparing Two Words for Vocabulary Development<br />

In the left-hand column, select Compare and write in the words “affect” and “effect.”At the<br />

bot<strong>to</strong>m <strong>of</strong> the window, hit the Search but<strong>to</strong>n. It will show a screen <strong>to</strong> the right with the <strong>to</strong>p 100<br />

words that frequently appear with the words “affect and “effect.”<br />

What are the <strong>to</strong>p ten words that frequently appear with “affect?” Write them down here.<br />

What are the <strong>to</strong>p ten words that frequently appear with “effect? Write them down here.<br />

Then select chart again, and type “effect” and press the Search but<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

What register is “affect” most used in?<br />

Now click on the bar for Academic, and you’ll get the first 100 concordances for “affect.”<br />

1. Looking at the first 100 concordances, what do you think is the meaning <strong>of</strong> affect?<br />

(Consider its part <strong>of</strong> speech and words/phrases that surround the targeted word.)Write<br />

your conclusions down here by using the evidence displayed in the concordances (1-2<br />

sentences).<br />

Now do the same for “effect.”<br />

What register is “effect” most used in?<br />

Now click on the bar for Academic, and you’ll get the first 100 concordance for “effect.”<br />

2. Looking at the first 100 concordances, what do you think is the meaning <strong>of</strong> effect?<br />

190


(Consider its part <strong>of</strong> speech and words/phrases that surround the targeted word). Write your<br />

conclusions down here by using the evidence displayed in the concordances (1-2 sentences).<br />

Application: Data-Driven Learning<br />

You are now familiar with using online corpora. Now pick something else in <strong>English</strong> that you<br />

have always wanted <strong>to</strong> know more about but never had the chance (or time) <strong>to</strong> research it. For<br />

example, it can be a new vocabulary word you recently heard <strong>of</strong>, or simply knowing the<br />

difference between two phrases such as “on line” and “in line,” or even understanding the<br />

meaning <strong>of</strong> idioms like “take the cake” and “shoulder surfing.”<br />

Task 1: What is it that you want <strong>to</strong> know more about in <strong>English</strong>? Write this in the form <strong>of</strong> a<br />

question in the space below. For example, if you want <strong>to</strong> know more about the difference between<br />

“on line” and “in line,” then you would frame it as “What is the difference between “on line”<br />

and “in line?”<br />

A.____________________________________________________________________________<br />

______________________________________________________________________________<br />

Task 2: Researching using online corpus COCA<br />

B. What did you discover from using COCA? Did it answer your question? (Summarize this in 2-<br />

3 sentences)<br />

191


Handout 3: Using Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers (MCUSP)<br />

Step 1: Tu<strong>to</strong>rial<br />

Go <strong>to</strong>: micusp.elicorpora.info<br />

Scroll down for a tu<strong>to</strong>rial on how <strong>to</strong> use MICUSP and click on “MICUSP Simple<br />

Tu<strong>to</strong>rials.” You will watch a short video tu<strong>to</strong>rial that introduces you <strong>to</strong> the MICUSP,<br />

showing you how <strong>to</strong> browse MICUSP papers<br />

After the tu<strong>to</strong>rial, click on “Search and browse MICUSP SIMPLE online now!”<br />

Step 2: Exploring MICUSP SIMPLE<br />

In the left hand column, click on “Argumentative Essay” for Paper Types.<br />

Look at the Distribution Across Discipline chart. What discipline does this type <strong>of</strong> writing occur<br />

most frequently in?<br />

Look at the Distribution Across Paper Types chart. What is this paper type percentage across<br />

discipline? And where is it ranked with other paper types?<br />

In the left hand column, click on “<strong>English</strong>” for Disciplines.<br />

Look at the Distribution Across Paper Types chart. What is this paper type percentage in this<br />

field? Where does it rank with other paper types in this field?<br />

Now click on “ENG. G0.05.1”” for Paper ID and Title “People or Property?” A sample essay<br />

will appear along with a description <strong>of</strong> the student level, gender, native speaker status, paper type,<br />

and word count.<br />

Use your pre-reading skills (scanning and skimming) <strong>to</strong> examine the student’s essay. How does<br />

the student incorporate his/her sources in<strong>to</strong> the essay? Does he/she summarize, paraphrase, or<br />

directly quote them in his/her paper?<br />

192


Does the student provide a Works Cited page at the end <strong>of</strong> his/her paper? If so, how many sources<br />

does he/she includes in this essay?<br />

What are some benefits for using MICUSP <strong>to</strong> improve your writing skills? (Explain in 2sentences)<br />

193


SWBATS:<br />

Editing Workshop I: Sentence Boundaries (Lesson 17)<br />

Fragments, Run-ons, Comma-splices<br />

Identify and develop various and flexible strategies for editing and pro<strong>of</strong>reading student’s<br />

own writing.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> edit their work for appropriate grammar and<br />

mechanics<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> develop syntactic maturity and sentence clarity,<br />

specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> forming grammatically complete sentences.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Concordances<br />

Handout 2: How-<strong>to</strong>-Fix Guide<br />

Handout 3: Exercises 1 (Editing Own Writing)<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

5min Attendance/<br />

Announcements<br />

Task 1: T takes attendance<br />

Task 2: T tells Ss teacher-student<br />

conference is held in week 12 and<br />

passes out sign-up sheet. T also tells<br />

Ss <strong>to</strong> bring their log-in sheet (10<br />

hours required), Project 1 Draft B,<br />

and their potential research <strong>to</strong>pic for<br />

the Project 2.<br />

Whole class<br />

20min Activity I:<br />

Task 1: T passes out concordances Task 1: In groups, Ss<br />

Concordances<br />

w/ questions (Handout 1) and examine concordances<br />

instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> get in<strong>to</strong> groups <strong>to</strong> and answer the<br />

Note: Inductive complete the concordance activity. questions on Handout<br />

Approach<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

necessary.<br />

1.<br />

30min Presentation: How-<strong>to</strong>-<br />

Fix Guide<br />

Note: Guide Sheet<br />

(Adapted Roberta J.<br />

Ching, CSUS 2008)<br />

Task 3: As a whole class, T asks Ss<br />

<strong>to</strong> discuss findings.<br />

Task 1: T presents Handout 2<br />

(Guide sheet for correcting<br />

fragments, run-ons, and comma<br />

splices). While doing this, T has Ss<br />

correct incorrect sentences by<br />

writing them in the blank lines<br />

194<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

findings w/ the whole<br />

class.<br />

Task 1: Ss read the<br />

guide sheet and<br />

correct each incorrect<br />

sentence by writing<br />

the correct sentences<br />

in the lines provided


20min Activity 2: Edit Own<br />

Writing<br />

3min Wrap-up:<br />

Read “Fundamental<br />

Issues <strong>to</strong> Prevent and<br />

End Youth<br />

Homelessness”<br />

Read Ira Colby (2001)<br />

Due: Project 1<br />

Argumentative Essay<br />

Draft A<br />

provided on the same Handout.<br />

Task 2: As a whole class, T goes<br />

over correct sentences w/ Ss.<br />

Task 1: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

“Exercise 1: Editing Your Own<br />

Work” (Handout 3)<br />

Task 2: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if needed.<br />

T reminds Ss that Project 1<br />

Argumentative Essay is due next<br />

class session and <strong>to</strong> read the two<br />

articles about youth homelessness.<br />

on Handout 2.<br />

Task 2: Ss share w/<br />

class correct<br />

sentences.<br />

Ss are required <strong>to</strong><br />

pick a paragraph<br />

from their own<br />

argumentative essay<br />

and edit their own<br />

writing, looking for<br />

fragments, run-ons,<br />

and comma splices.<br />

Whole class<br />

195


Concordances (Handout 1)<br />

Here are some examples <strong>of</strong> sentences shown in a variety <strong>of</strong> academic genres taken from COCA.<br />

Look at the table below and answer the following questions. Pay careful attention <strong>to</strong> the bolded<br />

and underlined words/phrases.<br />

Table 1:<br />

Concordances<br />

The doc<strong>to</strong>r put a cold stethoscope on her chest. (A Journal <strong>of</strong> Delta Studies)<br />

He runs downstairs holding a stick. (Scholastic Scope)<br />

Students in guitar class should learn <strong>to</strong> play, read, and improvise single melodic lines in various<br />

styles. (Music Educa<strong>to</strong>rs Journal)<br />

When I first arrived, the country still looked like it was at war. (American Scholar)<br />

The engineers claimed that the bridge was safe; however, they were still not prepared <strong>to</strong> risk<br />

crossing. (Science)<br />

Note: Concordances taken from COCA<br />

Questions<br />

1. Look for the “subject” in these sentences. Where is it located? Does it come before the<br />

verb?<br />

2. Look for the verb(s). Where is it located? Does it come before or after the subject? Now<br />

look for the phrase that comes after the verb? We call this phrase the “predicate” <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sentence. What does the predicate contain?<br />

3. Is there a comma, semi-colon, or colon in any <strong>of</strong> the sentences? If so, where is it located<br />

in the sentence? What words come before and after?<br />

196


4. Is there a period, question mark, or exclamation mark? Where is it located? What words<br />

come before and after?<br />

5. Now, can you come up with a general pattern <strong>of</strong> how the sentences above are formed<br />

structurally?<br />

Reflection<br />

Do you think each <strong>of</strong> the above sentences contains a complete and grammatical thought? Explain<br />

in 2-3 sentences using what you found in the concordances above.<br />

197


How-<strong>to</strong>-Fix Guide (Handout 2)<br />

Instructions: Read the sections on Fragments, Run-ons, and Comma Splices below and edit each<br />

<strong>of</strong> the incorrect sentences by writing the correct sentences in the blank lines provided.<br />

Subordinate Clause Fragments<br />

Sentence Fragments<br />

A clause that begins with a subordinating word such as when, because, although, while, or if<br />

cannot stand on its own as a sentence. It must be attached <strong>to</strong> a main clause so it is part <strong>of</strong><br />

complete sentence.<br />

Incorrect: Even though hiring attractive people is not illegal. Discrimination is.<br />

(“Even though” is a subordinating phrase that introduces a subordinate clause. The<br />

subordinate clause forms a fragment unless it is joined <strong>to</strong> a main clause.)<br />

Correct: ___________________________________________________________________<br />

Correcting -ing and <strong>to</strong> Fragments<br />

When an -ing word or a <strong>to</strong> phrase appears at or near the start <strong>of</strong> a word group, a fragment may<br />

result. To correct these fragments, you can sometimes add the fragment <strong>to</strong> a complete sentence.<br />

Incorrect: Hiring people who can be “brand enhancers.” That is necessary and smart.<br />

(“Hiring” is a noun formed from the verb “hire.” It is a subject and needs <strong>to</strong> be connected <strong>to</strong><br />

the sentence that follows, which provides the verb “is.” Eliminate “that” because it refers <strong>to</strong><br />

“hiring.”)<br />

Correct: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

Correcting Added Information Fragments<br />

Added information fragments lack a subject and a verb. They usually add a detail <strong>to</strong> the preceding<br />

sentence and <strong>of</strong>ten begin with one <strong>of</strong> the following words.<br />

• such as • including • except • for example • especially<br />

You can correct an added detail fragment by attaching the fragment <strong>to</strong> the complete sentence<br />

preceding or following it.<br />

Incorrect: The company uses an aggressive approach. For example, recruiting attractive cus<strong>to</strong>mers<br />

as they shop.<br />

Correct: _____________________________________________________________________<br />

198


Sometimes a subordinate clause with a subject and verb follows a noun that is part <strong>of</strong> the added<br />

information. A fragment is still the result.<br />

Incorrect: The company uses an aggressive approach. An effort that <strong>of</strong>ficials proudly<br />

acknowledge.<br />

(The added information is not part <strong>of</strong> a main clause. It needs <strong>to</strong> be joined <strong>to</strong> the preceding<br />

sentence.)<br />

Correct: _____________________________________________________________________<br />

Correcting Missing Subject Fragments<br />

In this type <strong>of</strong> fragment, the sentence is missing a subject. To correct the fragment, you can attach<br />

the fragment <strong>to</strong> the preceding sentence (if the verb goes with the subject <strong>of</strong> the preceding<br />

sentence).<br />

Incorrect: The direc<strong>to</strong>r denied discriminating. But admitted that the company liked <strong>to</strong> hire<br />

people who “looked great.”<br />

Correct: _______________________________________________________________<br />

Run-on Sentences and Comma splices<br />

A sentence must have a main clause with a subject and a verb. It may have more than one main<br />

clause (a compound sentence) or a main clause and one or more subordinate clauses (a complex<br />

sentence). A run-on sentence occurs when two sentences (two main clauses) are punctuated as<br />

though they form a single sentence. There are two types <strong>of</strong> run-on sentences:<br />

• Two sentences that are joined with no punctuation<br />

• Two sentences that are joined with only a comma<br />

Both <strong>of</strong> these situations produce an error: a “run-on sentence.” The following is an example <strong>of</strong><br />

a run-on sentence.<br />

Incorrect: Hiring attractive people isn’t illegal discriminating is.<br />

(Two sentences are joined <strong>to</strong>gether without any punctuation between them.)<br />

Correct: _________________________________________________________________<br />

Correcting Run-On Sentences<br />

1.Make a separate sentence out <strong>of</strong> each main clause:<br />

Ex. Hiring attractive people isn’t illegal. Discriminating is.<br />

2. Combine the clauses with a comma and a coordinating conjunction. This method is useful<br />

when you have two ideas <strong>of</strong> equal importance and you want <strong>to</strong> show the relationship<br />

between them:<br />

199


Ex. Hiring attractive people isn’t illegal, but discriminating is.<br />

3. Make one clause a subordinate clause. This is an effective way <strong>to</strong> solve the problem if one <strong>of</strong><br />

the clauses is less important than the other.<br />

Although hiring attractive people isn’t illegal, discriminating is.<br />

4. Combine the clauses with a semicolon (;). This method is effective when the two clauses are<br />

very closely related and you don’t want <strong>to</strong> break them up with another word. Be careful <strong>to</strong><br />

use semicolons only when the ideas are closely related; don’t use them simply as an<br />

alternative <strong>to</strong> periods.<br />

Hiring attractive people isn’t illegal; discriminating is.<br />

5.Combine the clauses with a semicolon and a transition word followed by a comma. This<br />

method is also useful when you have two equally important ideas, and you want <strong>to</strong> show<br />

their logical relationship.<br />

Hiring attractive people isn’t illegal; however, discriminating is.<br />

(Adapted from Robert Ching’s “A Text-Based Grammar for Exposi<strong>to</strong>ry Reading and Writing,”<br />

2008)<br />

200


Handout 3<br />

Exercise 1: Editing your own writing<br />

Directions: Choose a paragraph from your argumentative essay. Underline the fragments and<br />

correct the fragments, run-on sentences, and comma splices.<br />

• Put a question mark in the margin next <strong>to</strong> any sentences that you are unsure about.<br />

• Exchange your paragraph with a partner and discuss the errors. Check with your teacher if you<br />

can’t agree on an answer.<br />

• Now edit the rest <strong>of</strong> your essay and correct the fragments and run-on sentences.<br />

(Adapted from Robert Ching’s “A Text-Based Grammar for Exposi<strong>to</strong>ry Reading and Writing,”<br />

2008)<br />

201


SWBATS:<br />

American Social Public Policy: Youth Homelessness (Lesson 18)<br />

Demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> support their point <strong>of</strong> view (argument/claim) in ways that are<br />

appropriate <strong>to</strong> their <strong>to</strong>pic, audience, and purpose.<br />

Demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> develop critical thinking skills for the purpose <strong>of</strong> writing<br />

argumentative papers<br />

Materials:<br />

Video Clip: “Voices from the Streets: Homelessness Youth Speak Out on State Policy”<br />

Assignment Sheet: Project # 2 Public Policy Research paper<br />

Handout 1: Analyzing and Comparing a Set <strong>of</strong> Readings<br />

Handout 2: Class Debate “Pros and Cons”<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

5min Attendance/ Task 1: T takes attendance and hands Task 1: Ss may ask any<br />

Announcement out Project # 2 Public Policy Research questions or raise any<br />

paper<br />

Task 2: T goes over Project # 2,<br />

highlighting the service learning aspect<br />

<strong>of</strong> the assignment.<br />

concern about Project #<br />

2<br />

7min Introduction:<br />

Youth<br />

Homelessness<br />

13min Activity 1:<br />

Analyzing and<br />

Comparing a Set<br />

<strong>of</strong> Readings.<br />

Task 3: T collects Argumentative Essay<br />

Draft A<br />

Task 1: T asks Ss if they know a family<br />

member or friend who is homeless.<br />

Task 2: T plays video clip # 1: “Voices<br />

from the Streets: Homelessness Youth<br />

Speak Out on State Policy” (6:51 min)<br />

(www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZmHHcv<br />

-SLVE&feature=relmfu)<br />

Task 1: T tells Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

“Analyzing and Comparing a Set <strong>of</strong><br />

Readings”(Handout 1)<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

students’ progress, and provides<br />

assistance if necessary.<br />

Task 2: Ss turn in<br />

Argumentative Essay<br />

Task 1: Ss share their<br />

experiences or<br />

observations about<br />

homelessness<br />

Task 2: Ss watch and<br />

take notes<br />

202<br />

Task 1: Ss use Handout<br />

1 <strong>to</strong> analyze and<br />

compare two sets <strong>of</strong><br />

readings dealing with<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

homelessness.


50min Activity 2: Class<br />

Debate<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

students’ progress, and provides<br />

assistance if necessary.<br />

Task 1: T splits class in<strong>to</strong> team A (for),<br />

and team B (against) and hands out<br />

“Debate” assignment (Handout 1)<br />

Task 2: T explains the rules. To receive<br />

a point, each team member must use<br />

evidence/examples from the readings or<br />

personal experience or observation <strong>to</strong><br />

support his/her argument. T gives each<br />

team 10 minutes <strong>to</strong> prepare.<br />

Task 3: T starts class debate. During<br />

debate T keeps track <strong>of</strong> points for each<br />

team.<br />

*T will bring in treats next class session<br />

for the team that wins!<br />

203<br />

Task 2: Ss then<br />

compare their answers<br />

w/ another classmate.<br />

Task 1: Ss first<br />

collaborate w/ other<br />

members in the group<br />

and then come up w/<br />

arguments for their<br />

respective side.<br />

Task 2: During the<br />

debate, some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

members in each group<br />

will present their<br />

arguments <strong>to</strong> the whole<br />

class.


Analyzing and Comparing a Set <strong>of</strong> Readings (Handout 1)<br />

Questions Reading 1: “Fundamental Issues<br />

<strong>to</strong> Prevent and End Youth<br />

Homelessness”<br />

1.What is the <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

or issue discussed<br />

in the two readings?<br />

(1-2 sentences)<br />

2. What is the main<br />

idea? Use your own<br />

words (paraphrase)<br />

<strong>to</strong> express the<br />

article’s main idea.<br />

3. What are the<br />

most important<br />

points/ideas each<br />

article makes? (list<br />

2-4)<br />

4. Do you agree or<br />

disagree with these<br />

points/ideas? Why?<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4<br />

Reading 2: “Runaway and<br />

Throwaway Youth: Time for<br />

Policy Changes & Public<br />

Responsibility”<br />

1.<br />

2.<br />

3.<br />

4.<br />

204


Class Debate: Pros & Cons (Handout 2)<br />

Classroom debates allow you <strong>to</strong> strengthen your critical thinking and problem-solving skills. You<br />

will use the assigned readings as well as your own personal experience or observation <strong>to</strong> assist<br />

you in developing a well-developed argument for this <strong>to</strong>pic. The debate <strong>to</strong>pic and position<br />

statements are outlined below.<br />

Debate Topic:<br />

Should the Government take full responsibility <strong>to</strong> help end youth homelessness?<br />

For this debate, you will randomly be selected in<strong>to</strong> your assigned team. Once you are assigned <strong>to</strong><br />

a team, you will first collaborate with your group members (using the Pro & Con chart below)<br />

and then present your argument <strong>to</strong> the whole class during the class debate. Representatives from<br />

each group will have <strong>to</strong> stand up and express their viewpoints. Each representative will have<br />

approximately 2-3 minutes <strong>to</strong> present his/her argument.<br />

Position Statement<br />

Team A: For (Pro). Yes, the government should take full responsibility<br />

Team B: Against (Con). No. the government should not take full responsibility.<br />

PRO CON<br />

205


SWBATS:<br />

Research Process: Finding a Research Topic (Lesson 19)<br />

Identify and understand the processes involved in writing research.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> develop focused research <strong>to</strong>pics and questions for<br />

academic writing.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Research Process<br />

Handout 2: Developing a Research Topic From SL Experience<br />

Handout 3: Potential Research Topic<br />

Lap<strong>to</strong>p (Ss check one out from the library)<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

20min Introduction:<br />

Research<br />

Process<br />

Developing a<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

Note: Handout 1 adapted<br />

from Booth, et al.’s The<br />

Craft <strong>of</strong> Research, 2008<br />

50min Activity 1: Develop<br />

Own Research Topic<br />

3min Wrap-Up:<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Research<br />

Process” (Handout 1) and<br />

“Developing a Research Topic”<br />

(Handout 2).<br />

Task 2: Using both handouts, T<br />

summaries the research process<br />

and explains <strong>to</strong> Ss how <strong>to</strong> develop<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pics as preparation for<br />

Project # 2 Public Policy paper.<br />

Task 1: Using Handout 3<br />

(Potential Research Topic), T<br />

instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> develop possible<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pics for their own<br />

Public Policy paper.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Ss progress, and provides<br />

assistance if needed.<br />

T asks Ss if they have any<br />

questions or concerns about their<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pic<br />

206<br />

Task 1: Ss follow<br />

along while T<br />

summarizes both<br />

handouts. Ss may raise<br />

any questions or<br />

concerns.<br />

Ss use the chart in<br />

Handout 3 and access<br />

the internet <strong>to</strong> find<br />

ways <strong>to</strong> narrow and<br />

focus their research<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics.<br />

Ss ask questions and<br />

raise concerns about<br />

their research <strong>to</strong>pic


The Research Process (Handout 1)<br />

One important fac<strong>to</strong>r in doing college level research is thinking about and using the steps in the<br />

research process. The steps illustrated in this process can be repeated or reordered, depending on<br />

your research needs.<br />

INVESTIGATE<br />

207<br />

The first step is investigating. This involves identifying what it is you need <strong>to</strong><br />

research, understanding the requirements <strong>of</strong> the assignment, and stating your<br />

research need as either a focused research question or thesis statement.<br />

The second step is searching and locating the information. In this step, you’ll<br />

choose keywords from your research <strong>to</strong>pic, and use these in catalogs and databases<br />

<strong>to</strong> find books and articles on your <strong>to</strong>pic either in the library or online at the school<br />

site.<br />

Once you obtain the information you need, the next step is evaluating the quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> that information (detailed more in-depth during week 11)<br />

The final step is integrating the information you’ve just identified, found, and<br />

evaluated for your research purpose. This might be a paper, speech, presentation, or<br />

research project. In this step, you will communicate what you found <strong>to</strong> a particular<br />

rhe<strong>to</strong>ric situation.<br />

SEARCH<br />

&<br />

LOCATE<br />

Research Process<br />

EVALUATE<br />

INTEGRATE<br />

Note: Adapted from Booth, W.C., Colomb, G.G., & Williams, J.M. (2008). The Craft <strong>of</strong><br />

Research. Chicago, Illinois: The University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.


Developing a Research Topic from your SL Experience (Handout 2)<br />

Identifying a Research Topic<br />

Find a research <strong>to</strong>pic you want <strong>to</strong> know more about in your service learning experience for your<br />

public policy research paper. Your chosen <strong>to</strong>pic for this research paper must deal with current<br />

social issues that affect the community in which you serve in one <strong>of</strong> the areas <strong>of</strong> health care,<br />

human services, criminal justice, inequality, education, and labor.<br />

1. Brains<strong>to</strong>rming: One <strong>of</strong> the most effective ways <strong>to</strong> find a research <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> interest is <strong>to</strong><br />

brains<strong>to</strong>rm your ideas on a piece <strong>of</strong> paper. When you brains<strong>to</strong>rm, you are generating new<br />

ideas. When you are generating new ideas, you are generating new potential research<br />

<strong>to</strong>pics.<br />

2. Preliminary stages <strong>of</strong> research: Once you have your ideas on a piece <strong>of</strong> paper, you<br />

should research more about these ideas from a variety <strong>of</strong> sources. This initial research<br />

process should help you find a <strong>to</strong>pic <strong>of</strong> interest for your research paper. The steps are<br />

listed below.<br />

Step 1: Consult with your site supervisor about possible research <strong>to</strong>pics and ideas<br />

Step 2: Utilize your service learning field notes<br />

Step 3: Gather more information about your organization via internet or from<br />

collection <strong>of</strong> written artifacts at the site (i.e., monthly newsletter, mission<br />

statement, etc.)<br />

From a Broad Topic <strong>to</strong> a Narrowed and Focused Topic<br />

At this point, your <strong>to</strong>pic is probably <strong>to</strong>o broad. You need <strong>to</strong> start narrowing the <strong>to</strong>pic. Narrowing<br />

your <strong>to</strong>pic is integrated with a lot <strong>of</strong> library research and asking more questions about it. As you<br />

begin <strong>to</strong> understand more about your <strong>to</strong>pic, you will begin asking more questions about the <strong>to</strong>pic,<br />

thereby helping <strong>to</strong> narrow your <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

1. Extensive Library Research: At this point you should conduct in-depth library research<br />

about your research <strong>to</strong>pic in regards <strong>to</strong> its his<strong>to</strong>rical, political, social, and cultural climate.<br />

In other words, research everything you want <strong>to</strong> know about the <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Use Eureka & online databases provided by CSUS (explained more in-depth during<br />

next class session)<br />

2. Asking more questions: During your extensive library research process you will begin <strong>to</strong><br />

ask more questions about the <strong>to</strong>pic that will eventually lead <strong>to</strong> more questions. These new<br />

questions will help you narrow and focus your <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

208


Activity 1: Develop Your own Research Topic<br />

Potential Research Topic (Handout 3)<br />

1. Use the chart below and come up with a broad <strong>to</strong>pic for your Public Policy Research<br />

paper and narrow it by using ONE invention strategy (i.e. freewrite, brains<strong>to</strong>rm, listing,<br />

clustering, cubing, questioning, outlining etc.), as well as the general data collected from<br />

your SL experience.<br />

Broad Topic<br />

Generate Ideas<br />

*use one<br />

invention<br />

strategy<br />

SL Experience<br />

*use your field<br />

notes<br />

Possible<br />

Narrowed Topic<br />

209


2. After you have narrowed your <strong>to</strong>pic, use your lap<strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> go on the Internet and gather<br />

more information about the <strong>to</strong>pic. This will help you <strong>to</strong> focus your <strong>to</strong>pic. Use the<br />

information gathered from the internet <strong>to</strong> help you ask even more questions, and, finally,<br />

arrive at a “potential” focused <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Extensive Research<br />

(using the internet)<br />

Asking More<br />

Questions<br />

Focused Topic<br />

210


Library Research Tour (Lesson 20)<br />

1. Teacher will take the students <strong>to</strong> visit the library on campus for a day. Once there, the<br />

librarian will show the students how <strong>to</strong> access CSUS Eureka catalog. During the tu<strong>to</strong>rial,<br />

the librarian will show the students how <strong>to</strong> search and locate books in the library, renew<br />

items checked out, and place a hold on books they want (15-20min)<br />

2. Next, the librarian will show the students how <strong>to</strong> access online databases from CSUS<br />

main website. During the tu<strong>to</strong>rial, the librarian will show the students how <strong>to</strong> access<br />

recommended discipline-specific databases and search for scholarly articles related <strong>to</strong> the<br />

students’ research <strong>to</strong>pics. The librarian will then provide students with some effective<br />

search tips on how <strong>to</strong> narrow broad <strong>to</strong>pics (30-35min)<br />

3. Finally, students will use these recommended discipline-specific databases <strong>to</strong> search for<br />

scholarly articles related <strong>to</strong> their research <strong>to</strong>pics. (20min)<br />

211


Teacher-Student Conferences (Lesson 21)<br />

1. For these two class sessions, students will be required <strong>to</strong> meet w/ the teacher face-<strong>to</strong>-face<br />

in the classroom. During the conference, the teacher will assist each student with his/her<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pic in regards <strong>to</strong> the public policy research paper.<br />

2. Each student will be allotted about 7 minutes <strong>to</strong> conference w/ Teacher.<br />

3. During the conference, students are required <strong>to</strong> turn in a preliminary bibliography for the<br />

public policy research paper (as listed on the course syllabus), along with a copy <strong>of</strong> their<br />

service learning log-in sheet (10 out <strong>of</strong> the 20 required hours) and Draft B <strong>of</strong> Project 1<br />

Argumentative paper.<br />

4. Sign-up sheet and guidelines for this conference will be given <strong>to</strong> the students at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

week 8.<br />

212


SWBATS:<br />

Evaluating Sources (Lesson 22)<br />

Identify and practice evaluating sources appropriately<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> critically evaluate scholarly sources from nonscholarly<br />

sources.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Criteria for Evaluating Sources<br />

Handout 2: Source Evaluation Worksheet<br />

Variety <strong>of</strong> scholarly and non-scholarly texts<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENT ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

15-<br />

20min<br />

Presentation:<br />

Evaluating Sources<br />

50min Activity 1: Evaluating<br />

Sources w/ Scholarly<br />

and non-scholarly<br />

materials<br />

3min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Read SWH (pp.94-105)<br />

Post SacCT # 5 (see<br />

question below)<br />

T goes over evaluating sources<br />

using Handout 1 (Criteria for<br />

Evaluating Sources) as a guide.<br />

Note: Handout1(Adapted from<br />

B. Doyle, 1999)<br />

Task 1: T hands out “Source<br />

Evaluation<br />

Worksheet”(Handout 2)<br />

Task 2: T brings in a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

scholarly and non-scholarly<br />

texts for Ss <strong>to</strong> select from. Ss<br />

must use the worksheet <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate the source.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class, Ss<br />

share how they evaluate each<br />

text.<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> post SacCT #<br />

5, as well as complete the<br />

reading assignment.<br />

Ss read handout and<br />

follow along w/ T.<br />

Task 1: Ss read<br />

worksheet.<br />

213<br />

Task 2: Ss pick two texts<br />

(one academic & one<br />

popular) <strong>to</strong> evaluate while<br />

completing worksheet.<br />

Task 3: Ss first share<br />

what they found w/ the<br />

person next <strong>to</strong> them and<br />

then <strong>to</strong> the whole class, as<br />

well as ask any questions<br />

or concerns about how <strong>to</strong><br />

evaluate texts<br />

appropriately.<br />

Whole class


Choosing a research <strong>to</strong>pic:<br />

SacCT Journal Entry 5<br />

1. What is your research <strong>to</strong>pic? And is it related <strong>to</strong> your service learning experience? If so,<br />

how is it related? (Explain in 4-6 sentences)<br />

Note: Your research <strong>to</strong>pic should relate <strong>to</strong> your service learning experience. If not, then you must<br />

find another <strong>to</strong>pic that better suits your service learning experience. I suggest you talk <strong>to</strong> your site<br />

supervisor or contact me if you are having difficulty choosing a relevant research <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Alternative question:<br />

If you do not have a <strong>to</strong>pic that is related <strong>to</strong> your service learning experience, then you<br />

should tell me why it is not related (explain in 4-6 sentences). Hopefully by doing this<br />

you will come <strong>to</strong> realize how different your research <strong>to</strong>pic is <strong>to</strong> your service learning<br />

experience and you will consider picking a different research <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Evaluating sources:<br />

2. What kind <strong>of</strong> sources do you think will be most appropriate for your research <strong>to</strong>pic? And<br />

where will you locate them? (Explain in 3-5 sentences)<br />

Note: Be sure <strong>to</strong> comment on at least two other class members’ responses.<br />

214


Criteria for Evaluating Sources (Handout 1)<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> where you "do" your research--the library, Internet, surveys, personal interviews,<br />

even information gathered from your service learning experience--you should evaluate both the<br />

source <strong>of</strong> your information and the information you gather. Below is a list <strong>of</strong> criteria that can help<br />

determine whether or not a source is useful for your research paper.<br />

Accurate: How complete and accurate is the information?<br />

Print Sources (i.e. Books, Journals,<br />

Newspapers, Magazines)<br />

What are the author’s research<br />

methods?<br />

Are facts and statistics confirmed by<br />

research or studies?<br />

Does the author cite other research<br />

(footnotes or bibliography)?<br />

Have other scholars cited this piece <strong>of</strong><br />

work?<br />

Current: Is the information current enough?<br />

Print Sources (i.e. Books, Journals,<br />

Newspapers, Magazines)<br />

What is the copyright date?<br />

When was the piece <strong>of</strong> work<br />

published?<br />

How current are the sources listed in<br />

the bibliography?<br />

Web Sites<br />

215<br />

Does the information seem reasonable<br />

or verifiable?<br />

Are facts and statistics confirmed by<br />

research or studies?<br />

Does the information match other<br />

information source (i.e. print<br />

sources)?<br />

Web Sites<br />

When was the site created?<br />

When was it last updated?<br />

Is the site maintained and updated<br />

frequently?<br />

Do links still work?<br />

Note: The "facts" change: whether it's his<strong>to</strong>ry, politics, medicine, science or even the weather.<br />

New information or evidence contradicts old "facts".<br />

Reputable: Is the author or sponsoring organization reputable?<br />

Print Sources (i.e. Books, Journals,<br />

Newspapers, Magazines)<br />

Who is the author, publisher, or<br />

responsible organization?<br />

Are qualifications or credentials <strong>of</strong> the<br />

responsible party stated?<br />

What are the author’s credentials? Is<br />

he/she a specialist in the field?<br />

Who is the publisher? Is it a university<br />

Web Sites<br />

Is the author or organization<br />

identified?<br />

Is there biographical information<br />

about the author or organization?<br />

What are the author’s credentials?<br />

Is the site sponsored by an institution<br />

or organization?


press, commercial publisher, a trade<br />

association, the government, or is it<br />

self-published?<br />

In what type <strong>of</strong> periodical does the<br />

article appear? Is it a scholarly journal,<br />

a trade journal, or a popular magazine?<br />

Appropriate: Is the information relevant <strong>to</strong> your research <strong>to</strong>pic?<br />

216<br />

Where is the document published?<br />

(Check URL, see evaluating electronic<br />

sources section below for more details)<br />

You and your instruc<strong>to</strong>r are the best people <strong>to</strong> determine if a source is appropriate for your<br />

research. Many writing projects need research that is more detailed and precise. Make sure that<br />

the source is a known scholar, publication, organization, etc. in a field appropriate <strong>to</strong> your<br />

research <strong>to</strong>pic. Before using a source ask yourself first if this source is relevant (or related) <strong>to</strong><br />

your research <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Evaluating Electronic Sources<br />

Unlike printed sources <strong>of</strong> information--which most <strong>of</strong>ten go through a lengthy evaluation and<br />

editing process--electronic sources may be posted by anyone. There are clues which help you<br />

identify potentially useful sources, such as who's responsible for maintaining the web site,<br />

whether it is a personal web page (/~), a government site (.gov), a pr<strong>of</strong>essional organization or<br />

society (.org), or a business (.com). Here are some domain names <strong>to</strong> look out for:<br />

.com - this is the most popular domain name. The fact that it is easily recognizable makes it<br />

attractive <strong>to</strong> both business and non-business interests. Anyone can register under this domain.<br />

.org - anyone can also register under the .org domain, though, it is used most frequently by<br />

nonpr<strong>of</strong>it organizations.<br />

.edu - this domain is used by educational institutions.<br />

.gov - the use <strong>of</strong> this domain denotes that it is a government site. Both state and national<br />

government sites use the .gov domain.<br />

Note: It is best <strong>to</strong> approach these domain names with the understanding that the .com domain is<br />

used for commercial websites, whereas .edu and .gov are tied <strong>to</strong> institutions and thus are more<br />

appropriate and credible for academic work, and probably for your research <strong>to</strong>pic.<br />

Note: Adapted from North <strong>of</strong> Bos<strong>to</strong>n Library Exchange<br />

http://www.noblenet.org/merrimack/FYS_eval.pdf


Author(s):<br />

Source Evaluation Worksheet (Handout 2)<br />

Source Information<br />

Document Title: (article, web page, chapter, entry…)<br />

Source Title: (book, journal, magazine, website…)<br />

Publisher (host / sponsor if website):<br />

Publisher Location / Website URL:<br />

Publication Date:______________________ Access Date (website): ______________<br />

Credibility<br />

Author: Academic credentials:__________________________________________________<br />

Publisher/Host:<br />

Affiliation(s):________________________________________________________<br />

____university press ____ pr<strong>of</strong>essional society ____ non-pr<strong>of</strong>it organization<br />

____government agency ____commercial publisher ____ other corporation/business<br />

____self-published<br />

Is this a reputable source? (Explain in 1-2 sentences.)<br />

Currency<br />

Copy Right Date______________ Date <strong>of</strong> Published_________________<br />

How current are the sources in the bibliography? ____still relevant ____outdated<br />

217


What best describes this information:<br />

Accuracy<br />

___ formal report <strong>of</strong> a study ___ news / feature by interested<br />

amateur<br />

___ fact sheet / data / statistics ___ anecdote / personal experience<br />

___ news / feature article by journalist ___ fiction<br />

___ opinion piece: expert? journalist? amateur? ___ other:<br />

Purpose: ___Inform ___Persuade ___Satirize ___Amuse ___Sell___<strong>Other</strong><br />

Are facts and statistics confirmed by research or studies? Y/N<br />

Does the author cite other research (footnotes or bibliography)? Y/N<br />

Documentation: ____ sources cited formally ___ sources mentioned in text but cited formally<br />

____none<br />

How are the writing, grammar and spelling? ____ Excellent ____ Adequate ____Flawed<br />

Appropriateness/Relevancy:<br />

1. Is this an acceptable information source for an academic research paper? Why or why<br />

not? Explain in 3-5 sentences.<br />

218


SWBATS:<br />

Integrating Sources (Lesson 23)<br />

Identify and practice integrating sources appropriately<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> accurately integrate sources by using a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

writing strategies (i.e. quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing)<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: How <strong>to</strong> Integrate Sources (A Guide)<br />

Handout 2: Quoting, Paraphrasing, & Summarizing<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

20min Presentation:<br />

Integrating Sources<br />

50min Activity 2: Quoting,<br />

Paraphrasing, &<br />

Summarizing<br />

3min Wrap-Up<br />

T goes over w/ Ss how <strong>to</strong> integrate<br />

sources using Handout 1(How <strong>to</strong><br />

Integrate Sources) as a guide.<br />

Note: Handout 1 adapted from<br />

Gordon Harvey, Writing with Sources<br />

(Hackett<br />

Publishing Company, Inc, 2008)<br />

Task 1: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete the<br />

“Quoting, Paraphrasing, &<br />

Summarizing” (Handout 2)<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

needed.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class T goes over<br />

the Handout 2 w/ Ss.<br />

T reminds Ss <strong>to</strong> bring in Public Policy<br />

Draft A for peer review next class<br />

session.<br />

219<br />

Ss read handout and<br />

follow along w/ T,<br />

while he summarizes<br />

how <strong>to</strong> integrate<br />

sources appropriately.<br />

Task 1: Ss practice<br />

how <strong>to</strong> quote,<br />

paraphrase, and<br />

summarize information<br />

accurately in Handout<br />

2.<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

answers <strong>to</strong> the whole<br />

class.<br />

Whole class


How <strong>to</strong> Integrate Sources: A Guide (Handout 1)<br />

Three Ways <strong>to</strong> Integrate Sources<br />

1. Direct Quotation: A direct quotation is the use <strong>of</strong> the author’s exact words in your essay.<br />

When you use a direct quotation, indicate this by putting the author’s words in quotation marks.<br />

2. Summary: When using a summary in your essay, you condense a lengthy source <strong>to</strong> just a few<br />

sentences or a short paragraph <strong>of</strong> your own words. If you use any words from the source in your<br />

summary, you must put those words in quotation marks.<br />

3. Paraphrase: Paraphrasing is somewhat similar <strong>to</strong> summarizing; you put a source’s ideas in<strong>to</strong><br />

your own words. The main difference, though, is that a paraphrase is around the same length as<br />

the original source while a summary is a shortened version <strong>of</strong> a source.<br />

Provide Titles and Credentials <strong>of</strong> Authors!<br />

Enhance your ethos by making clear why sources are credible. Provide information geared <strong>to</strong><br />

your audience’s needs and background knowledge. For example:<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Library and Information Science William J. Cox<br />

Albert Joseph, Vera Heinz Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Sociology,<br />

Donna Loan Smith, women's studies scholar,<br />

Experienced arbiter Elizabeth Johnson<br />

Popular at<strong>to</strong>rney Richard E. Baldwin<br />

Renowned Pittsburgh symphony cellist James Greer<br />

Use signal phrases!<br />

The signal phrase alerts your readers that a source is coming, whether it’s a quotation, summary,<br />

or paraphrase. The signal phrase mentions the author and/or text <strong>of</strong> the source you are using—<br />

namely, source author + verb (e.g., Smith contends). Choose the tense for your signal phrase<br />

verb based on the citation style you will be using (either MLA or APA). Do not overuse<br />

“says.”Use other verbs in place <strong>of</strong> “says”. Here are some examples:<br />

Analytical and Informative: comments, notes, reports, observes, responds, points out, suggests,<br />

implies, compares, illustrates, adds, writes, advises, concludes, confirms, criticizes, discusses,<br />

explains, reveals,<br />

Argumentative: admits, argues, claims, declares, disputes, insists, rejects, asserts, contends,<br />

reasons, thinks, denies, refutes, grants, agrees, acknowledges, emphasizes, believes, confirms,<br />

endorses, contends, disagrees, opposes,<br />

How <strong>to</strong> Quote (General Principles)<br />

Carefully. Do not just cut-and-paste. You do not want <strong>to</strong> accidently plagiarize your source. When<br />

transcribing from books, do so accurately. Note the book’s publication information and the<br />

quote’s page number.<br />

220


In context. All quotes should be preceded by an introduc<strong>to</strong>ry sentence or signal phrase that<br />

identifies the “speaker” and/or the source, alerting the reader <strong>to</strong> what they’re looking for in the<br />

quote.<br />

Concisely. Every part <strong>of</strong> the quote should have an evident reason <strong>to</strong> be there so your reader will<br />

not have <strong>to</strong> wade through extraneous information.<br />

Strategy for Paraphrasing<br />

Read: Read the selection carefully so you understand the main point(s)<br />

Write: Draft your paraphrase, using your own words and phrases in place <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

wording. Rely on synonyms and equivalent expressions. You can retain names, proper nous, and<br />

the like. Use quotation marks <strong>to</strong> identify a unique term or phraseology you have borrowed exactly<br />

from the source.<br />

Revise: Rewrite for clarity. Change sentence structures and phrasing <strong>to</strong> make sure your version is<br />

easier <strong>to</strong> read than the original source.<br />

Document: Indicate clearly the source <strong>of</strong> your paraphrase using a standard style <strong>of</strong><br />

documentation (see MLA or APA handout) <strong>to</strong> avoid plagiarism.<br />

Integrate: Integrate your paraphrase in<strong>to</strong> your paper carefully, in context, and concisely.<br />

Strategy for Summarizing<br />

Read: Read the selection, looking for the key ideas, evidence, and information.<br />

Look over your highlighting and/or annotation: Re-read what you highlight and annotate <strong>to</strong><br />

decide which <strong>of</strong> the ideas you've noted are the most important.<br />

Write (1): Summarize each section in a single sentence, highlighting key ideas/points.<br />

Write (2): Summarize the entire passage in a single sentence, capturing its main point.<br />

Combine: Combine your section summaries and overall summary <strong>of</strong> the passage.<br />

Revise: Rewrite for logic and ease <strong>of</strong> reading. Check against the source for accuracy.<br />

Document: Indicate clearly the source <strong>of</strong> your summary using a standard style <strong>of</strong> documentation<br />

Integrate: Integrate your summary carefully, in context, and concisely.<br />

Note: Adapted from Gordon Harvey, Writing with Sources (Hackett Publishing Company, Inc,<br />

2008) and from Learning Skills. (2006). <strong>English</strong> 86 Course Materials, 2006.<br />

221


Quoting, Paraphrasing, & Summarizing (Handout 2)<br />

In this activity, you will carefully and accurately introduce your quotations, summaries, and<br />

paraphrases in the spaces below. Read the selection in the box and complete the following steps<br />

below.<br />

Integrating a Direct Quote<br />

“Students frequently overuse direct quotation in taking notes, and as a result they overuse<br />

quotations in the final paper.” (Lester, James D. Writing Research Papers, 2 nd edition. (1976), pp.<br />

46.<br />

1. Read the quote above. Write the author and source <strong>of</strong> the information in the space below.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

2. Then create a single phrase (about the author and source) <strong>to</strong> introduce this quote so that<br />

you can provide context and write it in the space provided below.<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

3. Now put the single phrase (or introduc<strong>to</strong>ry phrase) and quote <strong>to</strong>gether in the space below.<br />

Make sure you use appropriate punctuations when quoting.<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

Paraphrasing<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

1. Read the quote above again and then use your own words and expressions <strong>to</strong> paraphrase<br />

the quote in the space below.<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

2. Now practice using a different single phrase (or introduc<strong>to</strong>ry phrase) <strong>to</strong> introduce your<br />

paraphrase so that you can provide context and write it in the space below.<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

222


3. Now put the single phrase and your paraphrase <strong>to</strong>gether in the space below.<br />

Summarizing<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

_______________________________________________________________________<br />

Students frequently overuse direct quotation in taking notes, and as a result they overuse<br />

quotations in the final paper. Probably only about 10% <strong>of</strong> your final manuscript should appear as<br />

directly quoted matter. Therefore, you should strive <strong>to</strong> limit the amount <strong>of</strong> exact transcribing <strong>of</strong><br />

source materials while taking notes. (Lester, James D. Writing Research papers, 2 nd ed. (1976),<br />

pp. 46-47.<br />

1. Read the selection above and highlight the main point(s). What is/are the main point(s) <strong>of</strong><br />

this selection? Write it in the space below.<br />

2. Now use your own words <strong>to</strong> summarize the above selection in one sentence. Write it in<br />

the space below.<br />

4. Now practice using a different single phrase (or introduc<strong>to</strong>ry phrase) <strong>to</strong> introduce your<br />

summary so that you can provide context and write it in the space below.<br />

5. Now put the single phrase and summary <strong>to</strong>gether and write it in the space below.<br />

223


SWBATS:<br />

Peer Review for Public Policy Paper (Lesson 24)<br />

Identify the essential parts <strong>of</strong> the Introduction and Body paragraphs in a research paper.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> show evidence <strong>of</strong> applying some effective feedback strategies on other student<br />

writing.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> show evidence <strong>of</strong> incorporating peers’ comments in<strong>to</strong> their own essay.<br />

Become more comfortable and confident in providing feedback on other students’<br />

writing.<br />

Material:<br />

Handout 1: Revision Checklist & Peer Response Form for Introduction and Body<br />

Paragraphs<br />

Handout 2: Reflection on Peer Review Session<br />

Draft A: Public Policy Research paper<br />

Time Lesson Teacher Action Participation (Student<br />

Action)<br />

2 min Attendance T takes roll Whole Class<br />

50min Peer Review<br />

Session<br />

20min Reflection<br />

Activity<br />

Task 1: T provides Handout 1 <strong>to</strong> Ss<br />

(Revision Checklist & Peer Response<br />

Form)<br />

Task 2: T forms Ss in<strong>to</strong> groups <strong>of</strong> 3 for<br />

peer review session.<br />

Task 3: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> read each<br />

other’s whole paper first and then<br />

provide comments on the introduction<br />

and body paragraphs using the revision<br />

checklist (part A) and peer response<br />

questions (part B) in the Handout 1.<br />

Task 4: T walks around and provides<br />

assistance if needed<br />

After the peer review session, T passes<br />

out reflection activity (Handout 2), where<br />

Ss reflect on the peer review session as a<br />

whole, as well as on specific comments<br />

in regards <strong>to</strong> their own research paper<br />

made by their classmates.<br />

224<br />

Task 1: Ss get in<strong>to</strong><br />

groups and exchange<br />

papers.<br />

Task 2: Ss read each<br />

other’s paper first and<br />

then provide feedback<br />

on the introduction<br />

and body paragraphs<br />

using the revision<br />

checklist and peer<br />

response form.<br />

Students reflect on<br />

their peer response<br />

experience by<br />

answering questions<br />

on handout 2, and<br />

write a paragraph<br />

about what was<br />

helpful and not as


3min Wrap-up:<br />

No Homework!<br />

T asks Ss if they have any question about<br />

the Public Policy Research paper<br />

helpful about their<br />

peers’ comments<br />

225<br />

Ss may raise questions<br />

or concerns about the<br />

Public Policy<br />

Research paper.


Essay Revision Checklist for Introduction & Body Paragraphs (Handout 1)<br />

Writer’s Name:________________________________________________<br />

Reviewer’s Name: _____________________________________________<br />

Part A: Reading Whole Research Paper<br />

Exchange papers with your group member and quickly read his/her entire research paper. Do not<br />

provide any sort <strong>of</strong> feedback or s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> use the revision checklists for the introduction and body<br />

paragraphs until you have completely read your partner’s whole research paper. Your main goal<br />

is <strong>to</strong> get a sense <strong>of</strong> your group member’s main points and ideas before commenting on them.<br />

Once you have completed this task, you may complete parts B, C, & D.<br />

Part B: Introduc<strong>to</strong>ry Paragraph<br />

You will assist your classmates by helping them analyze their introduction paragraphs. This will<br />

help you <strong>to</strong> also be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the content areas <strong>of</strong> your<br />

own writing. Before you begin, read through their introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph(s) and highlight the<br />

background information in “yellow,” and the thesis in “blue.” Use the checklist provided and put<br />

a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement below needed <strong>to</strong> make a successful introduc<strong>to</strong>ry paragraph.<br />

Introduction (organization):<br />

_______ Interesting hook that engages the reader.<br />

_______ Provides adequate his<strong>to</strong>rical and current “background” information <strong>to</strong> introduce<br />

the research <strong>to</strong>pic (in regards <strong>to</strong> its political, social, and cultural climate).<br />

_______ The paper has a clear thesis (main idea).<br />

_______ The thesis is well supported with several major points or arguments.<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s introduction and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Be as specific as<br />

possible when referring <strong>to</strong> particular parts <strong>of</strong> the introduction in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about your partner’s introduction? From the checklist<br />

presented above, choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the introduction is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them<br />

better?<br />

226


Part C: Body Paragraphs<br />

You will assist your classmates by helping them analyze their body paragraphs. This will help<br />

you <strong>to</strong> also be able <strong>to</strong> recognize areas <strong>of</strong> weakness with regard <strong>to</strong> the content areas <strong>of</strong> your own<br />

writing. Before you begin, read through their body paragraphs and highlight the <strong>to</strong>pic sentence in<br />

“green,” the supporting details (either reference from the reading or data collected from your SL<br />

experience) in “yellow,” analysis in “blue,” and the concluding sentence in “red.” Use the<br />

checklist provided and put a “check” next <strong>to</strong> each requirement below needed <strong>to</strong> make a successful<br />

body paragraph.<br />

Body paragraph (organization):<br />

_______ Transition words are used effectively between paragraphs.<br />

_______ Include a clear <strong>to</strong>pic sentence that is directly tied <strong>to</strong> the thesis statement (main<br />

idea).<br />

_______ The supporting points are developed with ideas from various academic texts (i.e.<br />

articles, journals, and books), as well as data gathered from your<br />

service-learning experience.<br />

_______ The ideas and facts in academic texts and your service-learning experience<br />

have been reported accurately using correct citations.<br />

_______ The supporting points are effectively analyzed.<br />

_______ The conclusion ties the ideas in the body back <strong>to</strong> the thesis (main idea).<br />

Your purpose in answering these questions is <strong>to</strong> provide an honest and helpful response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

partner’s body paragraphs and <strong>to</strong> suggest ways <strong>to</strong> make his/her writing better. Pick one body<br />

paragraph <strong>to</strong> answer the questions below. Be as specific as possible when referring <strong>to</strong> particular<br />

parts <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph in your own words.<br />

1. What do you like most about your partner’s body paragraph? From the checklist<br />

presented above, choose one or two things that captured your attention.<br />

2. What part(s) <strong>of</strong> the body paragraph is/are missing?<br />

3. What parts need <strong>to</strong> have more detail added so that readers can understand them<br />

better?<br />

227


Part D: Constructive Feedback<br />

Dear Joe,<br />

1. On a separate sheet <strong>of</strong> paper, write a short letter (4 <strong>to</strong> 6 sentences) <strong>to</strong> your partner<br />

explaining how his or her writing can be improved. Begin your letter with your<br />

partner’s name and sign your own name at the end. Remember <strong>to</strong> “sandwich” any<br />

suggestions with positive comments on the outside. Follow this model:<br />

Positive comment—1-2<br />

Suggestions (improvements)—2 – 4<br />

Positive comment (encouragement)—1-2<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Bob<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample peer response forms, pp. 238 & 257<br />

228


Part I<br />

Part II<br />

Reflection on Peer Review Session (Handout 2)<br />

1. What did you learn from reading your classmate’s paper?<br />

2. Now look over your paper and read your peer’s comments. What did he/she say about<br />

your introduction and body paragraphs? Summarize his/her comments in 2-3 sentences.<br />

3. Do you agree with his/her comments? Do you find them helpful? Do you think you will<br />

use them in your revision? Why or why not?<br />

Instructions: Write 1 -2 paragraphs in which you explain (a) which <strong>of</strong> your classmate’s<br />

comments you found most helpful and (b) any comments you did not find helpful or with which<br />

you disagree, and (c) your own ideas (from your own rereading) about what you need <strong>to</strong> change<br />

when you revise the body paragraph.<br />

Note: Adapted from Ferris & Hedgcock’s sample follow-up activities, p. 245<br />

229


SWBATS:<br />

Editing Workshop II (Lesson 25)<br />

Subject-Verb agreement<br />

Identify and develop various and flexible strategies for editing and pro<strong>of</strong>reading student’s<br />

own writing.<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> edit their work for appropriate grammar and<br />

mechanics<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> develop syntactic maturity and sentence clarity,<br />

specifically in regards <strong>to</strong> forming correct subject-verb agreement sentences.<br />

Materials:<br />

Handout 1: Concordances<br />

Handout 2: Subject-Verb Agreement (How-<strong>to</strong>-Fix-Guide)<br />

Handout 3: Exercises 1, 2, & 3<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENT ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance T takes attendance Whole class<br />

20min Activity I:<br />

Concordances<br />

Note: Inductive<br />

Approach<br />

15min Presentation: Subject-<br />

Verb Agreement<br />

Note: Handout 2<br />

adapted from Roberta J.<br />

Ching, CSUS 2008)<br />

10min Activity # 2: Subject-<br />

Verb Agreement<br />

Exercise<br />

Task 1: T passes out concordances<br />

w/ questions (Handout 1) and<br />

instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> get in<strong>to</strong> groups <strong>to</strong><br />

complete the concordance activity.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

Ss progress, and provides<br />

assistance if necessary.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class, T asks<br />

Ss <strong>to</strong> discuss what they found.<br />

Task 1: T presents Handout 2<br />

(Subject-Verb Agreement). While<br />

doing this, T has Ss correct<br />

incorrect sentences by writing<br />

them in the blank lines provided<br />

on the same handout.<br />

Task 2: As a whole class T goes<br />

over correct sentences w/ Ss.<br />

Task 1: T passes out “Exercises 1<br />

(Handout 3).T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong><br />

complete “Exercise 1: Making<br />

230<br />

Task 1: In groups, Ss<br />

examine concordances<br />

and answer the<br />

questions on the<br />

handout<br />

Task 2: Ss share their<br />

findings w/ the whole<br />

class.<br />

Task 1: Ss correct each<br />

incorrect sentence by<br />

writing the correct<br />

sentence in the lines<br />

provided on Handout<br />

2.<br />

Task 2: Ss share w/<br />

class their answers.<br />

Task 1: In exercise 1,<br />

Ss are required <strong>to</strong> fill in<br />

the blanks w/ the


Note: Exercise also<br />

adapted from Roberta J.<br />

Ching, CSUS 2008<br />

25min Activity # 3:<br />

Edit own writing<br />

3min Wrap-Up: Homework<br />

Project 2 Public Policy<br />

Research paper<br />

ReadSWH (pp.58-66)<br />

Verbs Agree w/ Subjects in<br />

Authentic Text.”<br />

Task 2: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if needed.<br />

Task 3: As a whole class T<br />

discusses answers w/ Ss.<br />

Task 1: T instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete<br />

“Exercise 2: Editing Your Own<br />

Work.” (Handout 3)<br />

Task 2: T walks around and<br />

provides assistance if needed.<br />

T reminds Ss that Project 2 is due<br />

next class session, as well as <strong>to</strong><br />

complete the reading assignment.<br />

231<br />

correct verb form <strong>to</strong><br />

agree w/ the subject.<br />

Task 3: Ss share<br />

answers w/ whole<br />

class<br />

Ss are required <strong>to</strong> edit<br />

their own writing,<br />

looking for subjectverb<br />

agreement errors,<br />

as well as any other<br />

error taught before.<br />

Whole class


Concordances (Handout 1)<br />

Here are some examples <strong>of</strong> complete and grammatical sentences shown in a variety <strong>of</strong> academic<br />

genres taken from COCA. Look at the table below and answer the following questions. Pay<br />

careful attention <strong>to</strong> the bolded and underlined words/phrases.<br />

Table 1:<br />

Concordances<br />

He wants a space devoid <strong>of</strong> context, not only without expectations and conventions <strong>to</strong> follow, but<br />

entirely without categories <strong>to</strong> qualify love. (Education)<br />

For example, women's spiral metal earrings indicate they are married….(Anthropological<br />

Quarterly)<br />

Scientists have carried out extensive work on the estimation <strong>of</strong> stature from a variety <strong>of</strong> bones<br />

throughout the world (Journal <strong>of</strong> Forensic Science)<br />

As Kelvin and the other scientists move the station <strong>to</strong>ward the planet's southern polar region,<br />

they try beaming Kelvin's own brain waves in<strong>to</strong> the ocean.<br />

Whether you are a diplomat or a negotia<strong>to</strong>r, an economist or a war strategist or just an ordinary<br />

person navigating the shoals <strong>of</strong> everyday life, sometimes you have <strong>to</strong> decide whether <strong>to</strong> behave<br />

cooperatively with other individuals. (Natural His<strong>to</strong>ry)<br />

If you were in her shoes would you have handled the situation differently when hit with the<br />

ball? (Physical Educa<strong>to</strong>r)<br />

The teacher assesses students regularly through discussion, classroom assignments, homework,<br />

and written tests. (Music Educa<strong>to</strong>rs Journal)<br />

Everyone agrees that all these mechanisms need strengthening, and no one denies being <strong>to</strong>tally<br />

surprised by the way that markets seized up and closed down in August and September <strong>of</strong> 1998.<br />

(Economics)<br />

Note: Adapted from COCA<br />

Questions:<br />

1. Look for the “subject” in these sentences. Where is it located? Is the subject singular or<br />

plural?<br />

2. Look for the verb. Where is it located? Is the verb form singular or plural?<br />

232


3. Is there a conjunction (i.e. and, or, nor, etc.) in any <strong>of</strong> the sentences? If so, where is it<br />

located? Does the conjunction join two subjects <strong>to</strong>gether?<br />

4. Now, can you come up with a pattern <strong>of</strong> how the subject and verb must be formed<br />

structurally and grammatically <strong>to</strong> make sense and agree w/ each other?<br />

233


Subject-Verb Agreement: How -<strong>to</strong>-Fix-Guide (Handout 2)<br />

Instructions: Read the section on Subject-Verb Agreement below and edit each incorrect<br />

sentence by writing the correct sentence in the blank lines provided.<br />

Subject-Verb Agreement<br />

The basic rule <strong>of</strong> subject-verb agreement is that if the subject is singular, the verb should be<br />

singular; if the subject is plural, the verb should also be plural. Although it is usually natural <strong>to</strong><br />

make subjects and verbs agree, if the subject is separated from the verb by other words or if there<br />

is more than one subject, it is more difficult.<br />

Verb forms that need <strong>to</strong> agree<br />

Present tense: Scientists study whether animals feel emotions.<br />

Present perfect tense: Some people have argued that animals have rights.<br />

Helping verbs: Does an elephant feel grief for a dead mate?<br />

Main verb <strong>to</strong> be: Daily play is essential for happy pigs.<br />

Pay particular attention when you have the following situations. If two or more subjects are<br />

joined by the conjunctions and, or, or nor, the conjunction determines if you use a singular or a<br />

plural verb.<br />

• When the subject <strong>of</strong> a sentence is composed <strong>of</strong> two or more nouns or pronouns connected by<br />

and, use a plural verb.<br />

Incorrect: Anger and pity is powerful emotions.<br />

Correct: _____________________________________________________________________<br />

• When the subject <strong>of</strong> a sentence is composed <strong>of</strong> two or more singular nouns or pronouns<br />

connected by or or nor, use a singular verb.<br />

Incorrect: Either anger or pity are an emotion that can cause us <strong>to</strong> take action.<br />

Correct: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

• When the subject <strong>of</strong> a sentence is composed <strong>of</strong> a singular and a plural noun connected by or or<br />

nor, the noun closest <strong>to</strong> the verb determines whether it is singular or plural.<br />

Incorrect: In the commercial, neither the doc<strong>to</strong>r nor the advertisers is being completely honest.<br />

Correct: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

If the subject and the verb are separated by a phrase or clause, make sure that the verb still agrees<br />

with the true subject <strong>of</strong> the sentence—not with a noun or pronoun in the phrase or clause.<br />

Examples<br />

• One <strong>of</strong> the philosophers is (“philosophers” is not the subject)<br />

• The people who understand rhe<strong>to</strong>ric are (“rhe<strong>to</strong>ric” is not the subject)<br />

• The farmer, as well as his neighbors, is (“neighbors” is not the subject)<br />

• The farmer with all the pigs is playing (“pigs” is not the subject)<br />

234


Some words that might sound plural are actually singular and take a singular verb. These words<br />

are each, each one, either, neither, everyone, everybody, anybody, anyone, nobody,<br />

somebody, someone, and no one.<br />

Examples<br />

• Each <strong>of</strong> these animals is<br />

• Either <strong>of</strong> the philosophers is<br />

• Everyone is<br />

(“Everyone” seems plural, but the verb agrees with “one,” which is singular.)<br />

In sentences beginning with “there is” or “there are,” be aware that “there” is not the true subject.<br />

Therefore, the verb has <strong>to</strong> agree with the noun that follows the verb.<br />

Examples<br />

• There are many arguments<br />

• There is an argument<br />

Note: Adapted from Robert Ching’s “A Text-Based Grammar for Exposi<strong>to</strong>ry Reading and<br />

Writing,” 2008.<br />

235


Handout 3<br />

Exercise 1: Making verbs agree with subjects in authentic text<br />

This exercise is based on letters <strong>to</strong> the edi<strong>to</strong>r regarding “A Change <strong>of</strong> Heart About Animals.”<br />

Directions: Fill in the blanks with the correct form <strong>of</strong> the verb in parentheses. When you have<br />

finished, compare your version with a classmate.<br />

Re “A Change <strong>of</strong> Heart About Animals,” Commentary, Sept. 1: Jeremy Rifkin __________<br />

(argue) that science __________ (have) shown that the differences between animals and humans<br />

__________ (be) less than we think and that we should extend more “empathy” <strong>to</strong> animals. I<br />

disagree. In nature, animals naturally __________ (kill) each other. If the hawk __________ (do)<br />

not care about the feelings <strong>of</strong> the rabbit that it __________ (eat), why should humans be any<br />

different? __________ (be) Rifkin saying that nature __________ (be) wrong?<br />

Rifkin __________ (go) so far as <strong>to</strong> say that pigs __________ (need) social contact and should be<br />

provided with <strong>to</strong>ys. There __________ (be) many real human children in the world who<br />

__________ (do) not have these things. __________ (be) animals more important than human<br />

children? Should our society spend scarce resources on <strong>to</strong>ys for pigs?<br />

Anyone who __________ (have) owned a pet __________ (know) that animals can feel pain,<br />

happiness, anger, and other simple emotions. Most people __________ (have) heard a parrot or a<br />

mynah bird talk, but this __________ (be) just imitation and mimicry. We __________ (do) not<br />

need science <strong>to</strong> tell us that animals can do these things. However, __________ (do) a parrot<br />

understand what it __________ (be) saying? Can an animal write a poem or even a grocery list?<br />

Rifkin __________ (be) simply an animal rights activist hiding behind a handful <strong>of</strong> scientific<br />

studies. He __________ (want) <strong>to</strong> ignore human suffering and focus on animal discomfort. He<br />

__________ (want) animals <strong>to</strong> have more rights than humans. Let’s not be fooled.<br />

Exercise 2: Editing your own writing<br />

Directions: Pick a paragraph from your public policy research paper and edit it, making sure that<br />

the subjects and verbs agree.<br />

Put a question mark in the margin next <strong>to</strong> any subject-verb agreement that you are unsure<br />

about.<br />

Next, exchange your paragraph with a partner and discuss any questions you have. Check<br />

with your teacher if you can’t agree on an answer.<br />

Now look over the same paragraph again and correct other errors dealing with fragments,<br />

run-ons, and comma splices.<br />

Note: Adapted from Robert Ching’s “A Text-Based Grammar for Exposi<strong>to</strong>ry Reading and<br />

Writing, 2008<br />

236


SWBATS:<br />

Oral Presentation & Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric (Lesson 26)<br />

Identify and understand how <strong>to</strong> effectively conduct an oral presentation<br />

Identify and practice using some effective visual rhe<strong>to</strong>ric on PowerPoint<br />

Begin <strong>to</strong> demonstrate the ability <strong>to</strong> use PowerPoint (i.e. font types, colors, etc.) and visual<br />

presentations (graphs, charts, pictures, etc.) effectively.<br />

Materials:<br />

Computer Lab<br />

PowerPoint Slides: Oral Presentation & Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric<br />

Handout 1: Intro <strong>to</strong> PowerPoint-Tu<strong>to</strong>rial Guide<br />

Handout 2: Creating a Mini-PowerPoint Presentation<br />

TIME LESSON TEACHER ACTION PARTICIPATION<br />

(STUDENT<br />

ACTION)<br />

2min Attendance T takes roll Whole class<br />

15-<br />

20min<br />

Introduction: Oral<br />

Presentation Delivery<br />

& Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric<br />

20min Activity 1:<br />

PowerPoint tu<strong>to</strong>rial<br />

30min Activity 2: Creating a<br />

Mini-PowerPoint<br />

Presentation<br />

(Handout 2)<br />

T presents oral presentation delivery &<br />

visual rhe<strong>to</strong>ric slides (1-12).<br />

Note: PowerPoint slides adapted from<br />

Dr. Heather, 2008.<br />

Task 1: T passes out PowerPoint<br />

Tu<strong>to</strong>rial Guide (Handout 1) <strong>to</strong> Ss and<br />

instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> complete the steps listed<br />

in the Handout using the computer in<br />

the lab.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

needed.<br />

Task 1: T passes out (Handout 2) <strong>to</strong> Ss<br />

and instructs Ss <strong>to</strong> get in<strong>to</strong> their groups<br />

<strong>to</strong> complete the steps listed in order <strong>to</strong><br />

make an effective Mini-PowerPoint<br />

Presentation for their academic<br />

discourse community project.<br />

Task 2: T walks around, moni<strong>to</strong>rs Ss<br />

progress, and provides assistance if<br />

needed.<br />

Ss listen and take<br />

notes<br />

237<br />

Task 1: Using the<br />

computer, Ss<br />

complete the steps<br />

listed in the<br />

PowerPoint Tu<strong>to</strong>rial,<br />

thereby becoming<br />

familiar w/<br />

PowerPoint S<strong>of</strong>tware.<br />

In groups, Ss<br />

complete the steps<br />

listed in Handout 2 <strong>to</strong><br />

make an effective<br />

Mini-PowerPoint<br />

Presentation for their<br />

academic discourse<br />

community project.<br />

3min Wrap-up: PowerPoint presentation next class!!! Whole class


Oral Presentation Delivery &<br />

Visual Rhe<strong>to</strong>ric<br />

<strong>English</strong> 10M<br />

Vu Tran<br />

Preparation<br />

• Know your <strong>to</strong>pic—become an expert<br />

• Know your audience<br />

• Prepare an outline—bullet or number<br />

the main points<br />

Experience<br />

The more you do oral presentations,<br />

the more experience you will gain.<br />

The more experience you gain, the<br />

more effective your oral presentations<br />

will become!<br />

Three Keys <strong>to</strong> Effective Oral<br />

Presentation & Delivery<br />

Preparation<br />

Practice<br />

Experience<br />

In front <strong>of</strong> a mirror<br />

Practice<br />

In front <strong>of</strong> a live audience (friends or<br />

family)<br />

Time yourself so you do not go over the<br />

time limit<br />

Delivery Tips: Physical<br />

1. Coping with anxiety: deep breaths,<br />

don’t lock knees, drink water<br />

2. Eye contact with audience<br />

3. Articulation<br />

4. Volume<br />

5. Pacing/delivery speed<br />

(the phone number principle)<br />

6. Body language<br />

238


Information Delivery<br />

Pick fewer main points, BUT develop<br />

them thoroughly.<br />

Communicate your organization clearly:<br />

1.Tell ‘em what you’re gonna tell ‘em<br />

2.Tell ‘em<br />

3.Tell ‘em what you <strong>to</strong>ld ‘em<br />

Check Font Sizes<br />

This is 18 point font.<br />

This is 20 point font.<br />

This is 24 point font.<br />

This is 28 point font.<br />

This is 32 point font.<br />

This is 36 point font.<br />

This is 40 point font.<br />

This is 44 point font.<br />

Check Your Colors<br />

This is white.<br />

This is light blue.<br />

This is yellow.<br />

This is red.<br />

This is green.<br />

This is orange.<br />

This is pink.<br />

This is black.<br />

This is light blue.<br />

This is yellow.<br />

This is red.<br />

This is green.<br />

This is orange.<br />

This is pink.<br />

Guidelines for Slides<br />

Minimal content with few words<br />

Not <strong>to</strong>o much on a slide<br />

Not <strong>to</strong>o small<br />

Not <strong>to</strong>o cute or <strong>to</strong>o fancy<br />

Consider fonts, background & color<br />

(check the lighting in the presentation<br />

room)<br />

Font Options<br />

You can use a sans serif font like<br />

Helvetica, Arial, or Geneva (this is<br />

Arial)<br />

OR you could use a serif font like Times<br />

New Roman, New Century Schoolbook<br />

(this is Times New Roman)<br />

Whatever you do, be careful about<br />

using “fun” fonts such as HerculaNum<br />

Chant The Mantra<br />

1. I know how <strong>to</strong> speak publicly and I will do it<br />

correctly.<br />

2. I have prepared well, so I won't make many<br />

mistakes.<br />

3. If I make a mistake, the audience is not<br />

likely <strong>to</strong> notice.<br />

4. If my mind goes blank, I know how <strong>to</strong> give<br />

myself time <strong>to</strong> recover.<br />

239


Getting Started<br />

Step 1: Open PowerPoint<br />

Intro <strong>to</strong> PowerPoint: A Tu<strong>to</strong>rial Guide (Handout 1)<br />

Double click on Applications folder and then click on Micros<strong>of</strong>t <strong>of</strong>fice folder<br />

Double click on the Micros<strong>of</strong>t PowerPoint program<br />

Step 2: Starting a new presentation & selecting slides<br />

1.When you first<br />

open your<br />

PowerPoint, you<br />

will see the<br />

main menu.<br />

Click on the title<br />

or content areas<br />

<strong>to</strong> change them.<br />

2.To add a slide<br />

click Home tab,<br />

then the New<br />

Slide but<strong>to</strong>n, and<br />

then select your<br />

desired slide<br />

layout<br />

3.You can<br />

change the slide<br />

layout by<br />

clicking on the<br />

Layout but<strong>to</strong>n<br />

and selecting<br />

your desired<br />

layout.<br />

240


Inserting Graphs, Pictures, and Clip Arts<br />

Step 3: Creating and Integrating Graphs<br />

1. Click on Insert tab<br />

and then click on<br />

Chart but<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

2. The Insert Chart<br />

will show<br />

templates <strong>of</strong><br />

various visual<br />

representations<br />

(i.e. bar graphs,<br />

pie graphs, line<br />

graphs, etc.).<br />

Choose one <strong>of</strong><br />

these visual<br />

representations for<br />

your presentation<br />

and press “OK.”<br />

3. The graph will be<br />

inserted along with<br />

the Micros<strong>of</strong>t<br />

Excel spreadsheet<br />

attached so you<br />

can change the<br />

graph <strong>to</strong> fit your<br />

text.<br />

241


Step 4: Inserting Pictures<br />

1.Go online and pick a<br />

picture and save it <strong>to</strong><br />

the computer<br />

2. Click on the Picture<br />

but<strong>to</strong>n and it will show<br />

the picture saved on<br />

the computer file.<br />

Then click on the<br />

picture that you saved<br />

and then click on Open<br />

and Insert.<br />

2. The picture will be<br />

inserted au<strong>to</strong>matically<br />

in your slide <strong>of</strong> the<br />

PowerPoint<br />

presentation.<br />

Note: You can enlarge<br />

or make it smaller<br />

depending on how you<br />

want <strong>to</strong> present your<br />

information.<br />

242


Step 5: Inserting Clip Arts<br />

1. Click on Clip Art but<strong>to</strong>n<br />

and the clip art board on<br />

the left side <strong>of</strong> the screen<br />

will appear.<br />

2. In the Search for box,<br />

type in “<strong>to</strong>ol” and press<br />

go. Clip arts <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>ols will<br />

appear. Then select one<br />

and insert it in<strong>to</strong> your<br />

PowerPoint Presentation<br />

Note: As with all the others you<br />

can enlarge it or make it smaller<br />

243


Creating a Mini-PowerPoint Presentation (Handout 2)<br />

Application: Mini-PowerPoint Presentation<br />

Instructions: Create an effective PowerPoint presentation for your academic discourse project.<br />

Follow the three steps below <strong>to</strong> complete this activity using Micros<strong>of</strong>t Office PowerPoint.<br />

Step 1: Choose a layout<br />

You can choose a different layout for each slide or retain the same layout throughout<br />

(depends on how you want <strong>to</strong> present your information <strong>to</strong> your audience).<br />

Step 2: Create the first slide <strong>to</strong> your presentation (Introduc<strong>to</strong>ry Page)<br />

Your first slide must include the following information below:<br />

Title <strong>of</strong> your Academic Discourse Community<br />

Names <strong>of</strong> all group members involved<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> class<br />

Note: Remember <strong>to</strong> use appropriate font, size, color, and background when creating your slides!<br />

Step 3: Create a slide (or two) that includes some essential contents about your Academic<br />

Discourse Community.<br />

Your contents must:<br />

Include short, concise words <strong>to</strong> guide your audience (i.e. keywords & phrases).<br />

Use bullet points. Don't use full sentences in your PowerPoint presentations unless it's<br />

absolutely necessary.<br />

Incorporate visual representations (i.e. pictures, graphs, tables, figures, charts) <strong>to</strong> support<br />

the contents.<br />

Note: If you have already created slides for your PowerPoint presentation, then chose one that<br />

you would like <strong>to</strong> revise and improve on it by adhering <strong>to</strong> the principles above.<br />

244


Academic Discourse Community Presentation (Lessons 27-29)<br />

1. For a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> three class sessions, each group will use PowerPoint <strong>to</strong> present their<br />

selected Academic Discourse Community <strong>to</strong> the whole class. To supplement the<br />

PowerPoint presentation, each group must also pass out extra copies <strong>of</strong> the handout that<br />

summarizes the PowerPoint presentation <strong>to</strong> every student.<br />

2. Each group must go in the order for which they signed-up on the first day <strong>of</strong> the week 2.<br />

Each group will have approximately 15 minutes <strong>to</strong> present, with an extra 2-3 minutes <strong>to</strong><br />

answer any questions the audience may have about their selected discourse community.<br />

Each member in the group must equally participate!<br />

3. The teacher will use the PowerPoint Presentation Feedback Form (Handout 1) <strong>to</strong> evaluate<br />

each group’s overall performance.<br />

245


PowerPoint Presentation Feedback Form (Handout 1)<br />

Name <strong>of</strong> Presenters:____________________________________________________________<br />

Symbol Key<br />

√+ Excellent<br />

√ Adequate<br />

√- Marginally Adequate (did this but not always)<br />

≠ Inadequate (did this poorly or not at all)<br />

Criteria for Evaluating<br />

______Handout clearly written and well edited<br />

______Visual representation<br />

______Focus/organization<br />

______Clarity (content & language used)<br />

______Eye contact<br />

______Articulation<br />

______Volume<br />

______Body language (i.e., posture, gestures, etc.)<br />

______All members participated equally<br />

Comments:<br />

246


Last Week <strong>of</strong> ENGL 10M (Week 16)<br />

1. Students are required <strong>to</strong> turn in Summary-Response Draft C, Argumentative Essay Draft<br />

C, and Public Policy Research Paper Draft B <strong>to</strong> receive full credit for <strong>English</strong> 10M and<br />

move on <strong>to</strong> <strong>English</strong> 11M in the spring semester <strong>of</strong> 2013.<br />

247


APPENDIX D<br />

COURSE READINGS<br />

248


Summary <strong>of</strong> Course Readings<br />

Bausch, L. S. (2003). Just Words: Living and learning the literacies <strong>of</strong> our students’ lives.<br />

Language Arts, 80 (3), 215-222.<br />

This article describes the journey <strong>of</strong> a teacher who documented actual literacy events in<br />

her community and used what she found <strong>to</strong> bring the outside world in<strong>to</strong> her classroom.<br />

The author provides examples <strong>of</strong> her students’ works taken from their home lives and/or<br />

communities, and uses these works <strong>to</strong> celebrate her students’ accomplishments through<br />

various classroom related activities.<br />

Boudreaux, M. C., Lord, W. D., & Etter, S. E. (2000). Child abduction: An overview <strong>of</strong> current<br />

and his<strong>to</strong>rical perspectives. Child Maltreatment, 5, 63–71.<br />

This article defines children abduction from two perspectives (the legal and social<br />

aspects). In addition, the authors summarize research findings in regards <strong>to</strong> children<br />

249<br />

abduction rates, victim and <strong>of</strong>fender characteristics, motivation, and risk fac<strong>to</strong>rs. They<br />

suggest that practical application based on these research findings should be used <strong>to</strong> (1)<br />

create “sound” child safety training programs and (2) build highly trained law<br />

enforcement agencies handling child abduction cases.<br />

Carlson, M., & O’Neal-McElrath, T. (2008). Winning grants: Step by step (3 rd Ed.). San<br />

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />

This is a comprehensive workbook for planning, developing, and writing successful<br />

proposals. The guidelines, exercises, worksheets, and samples <strong>of</strong> materials included in


this workbook are designed <strong>to</strong> help a novice create materials for various organizations in<br />

the nonpr<strong>of</strong>it sec<strong>to</strong>r—community-based agencies, educational institutions, hospitals and<br />

clinics, and research organizations.<br />

Colby, I. (2011). Runaway and throwaway youth: Time for policy changes and public<br />

responsibility. Journal <strong>of</strong> Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children<br />

at Risk, 2, 1-11.<br />

This article describes the characteristics <strong>of</strong> youth homelessness, delineating between<br />

“throwaways” and “runaways.” The author defines “throwaways” as being forced <strong>to</strong> live<br />

somewhere else, and “runaways” as having the choice <strong>to</strong> live somewhere else. In<br />

response <strong>to</strong> the increase <strong>of</strong> youth homelessness, the federal government has taken several<br />

key steps <strong>to</strong> end youth homelessness by (1) implementing the Runaway and Homeless<br />

Youth Act, and (2) authorizing federal funding for three programs: the Basic Center<br />

Program, Transitional Living Program, and Street Outreach Program.<br />

Johnson, C. F. (2000). Death from child abuse and neglect. The Lancet Perspectives, 356, s14.<br />

The author summarizes research findings in the area <strong>of</strong> children abuse and neglect in<br />

many countries. The research findings come from myriads <strong>of</strong> countries such as the United<br />

States, New Zealand, Australia, France, Japan, Mexico, and a few others. According <strong>to</strong><br />

the data in 1997, 41 states in the U.S. reported 967 fatalities from child abuse and neglect,<br />

which estimated <strong>to</strong> about 1.7 per 100,000 deaths. In the Netherlands, this rounded out <strong>to</strong><br />

250


about 1.14 deaths per 100, 000 deaths. Countries such as Australia, France, and Japan<br />

reported slightly higher amounts <strong>of</strong> deaths in children than did all other countries.<br />

Kajornboon, A. B. (2005). Using interviews as research instruments. E-Journal for Research<br />

Teachers, 2(1), 1-10.<br />

This article discusses the dynamics involved in conducting research, in particular with<br />

using interviews as research instruments for data collection. The author focuses on four<br />

different types <strong>of</strong> interviews—(1) structured interviews, (2) semi-structured interviews,<br />

(3) unstructured interviews, and (4) non-directive interviews. Finally, the author<br />

discusses some <strong>of</strong> the ethical issues involved in conducting interviews.<br />

Martin-Young, N. (1995) Communication skills in the workplace: Employers talk back. Retrieved<br />

online at North CEI [accessed 03<br />

January 2012].<br />

The author identifies three main skills needed by all workers: teamwork, flexibility, and<br />

communication (written and oral skills). In addition <strong>to</strong> these skills, employees must<br />

possess technical skills such as using e-mail, word processing, and other basic computer<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. These skills are essential for every employee wanting <strong>to</strong> become successful in<br />

<strong>to</strong>day’s high-powered workplace.<br />

Melzer, D., & Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University Writing & Reading Subcommittee. (2009). Student<br />

writing handbook. (1 st edition). Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

251


This resourceful handbook guides first-year freshmen through their writing career at<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State. The first part <strong>of</strong> the handbook provides information about the campus<br />

writing programs at Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State. The second part <strong>of</strong> the handbook explains how the<br />

university writing, reading, and researching processes interact with one another. The final<br />

section details how <strong>to</strong> conduct research and write in the various disciplines encountered<br />

at Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State (i.e., Natural Science, Social Science, Arts & Humanities, and<br />

Business).<br />

National Alliance <strong>to</strong> End Homelessness (NAEH). (2006). Fundamental issues <strong>to</strong> prevent and end<br />

youth homelessness. Youth Homelessness Series, Brief No. 1, 1-4.<br />

This issue brief highlights the key issues surrounding youth homelessness, especially the<br />

causes and characteristics <strong>of</strong> youth homelessness. The NAEH organization also explains<br />

the “Youth Housing Continuum,” a solution for developing stable housing for youth<br />

homelessness during their transition <strong>to</strong> adulthood. Finally, they outline some policy<br />

implications for preventing and ending youth homelessness.<br />

Schullery, N. M., Ickes, L., & Schullery, S. E. (2009). Employer preferences for résumé and<br />

cover letters. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(2), 163-176.<br />

The authors summarize the results <strong>of</strong> employers’ preferences for résumé style, résumé<br />

delivery method, and cover letters. The results show that employers still widely prefer the<br />

“standard chronological résumé.” As for the type <strong>of</strong> delivery method, the results show<br />

that electronic delivery, either by email (46%) or at the company’s website<br />

252


(38%) is the best method for résumé delivery, with only a small percentage preferring a<br />

paper copy (7 %). Finally, the submission <strong>of</strong> a cover letter along with the résumé is also<br />

widely preferred by the majority <strong>of</strong> employers (56%).<br />

Tech Directions. (2004). Career directions: Résumé and cover letter writing tips. Retrieved from<br />

[accessed 05 January 2012].<br />

This article defines essential elements <strong>of</strong> résumé and cover letter writing. It also provides<br />

tips and strategies for writing effective résumés and cover letters, along with providing<br />

reliable information and resources.<br />

Thomas, S. (2000). JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey murder investigation. New York, NY:<br />

St. Martin’s Press.<br />

This book is a comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> the Ramsey case. Steve Thomas, a former lead<br />

Boulder Police detective, explores the case and reveals facts and information about<br />

JonBenet Ramsey known only <strong>to</strong> detective and cops closest <strong>to</strong> the case. Thomas describes<br />

the mistakes made during the crucial early hours, and then details where the subsequent<br />

investigation led and where it went wrong. In the end, Thomas believes that there existed<br />

reasonable evidence <strong>to</strong> arrest Patsy Ramsey in connection with the death <strong>of</strong> her daughter,<br />

but because <strong>of</strong> a careless investigation from the beginning, the Ramseys successfully hid<br />

behind a group <strong>of</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rneys, where Mrs. Ramsey was never arrested and charged <strong>of</strong> the<br />

murder.<br />

253


REFERENCES<br />

Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From reader <strong>to</strong> reading teacher: Issues and<br />

strategies for second language classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Au, K.H. (2006). Multicultural issues and literacy achievement. Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum<br />

Associates.<br />

Bacon, N. (1997). Community service learning: Problems, challenges, questions. In Adler<br />

Kassner, L., Crooks, R. & Watters, A. (Eds), Writing the Community: Concepts and<br />

models for service-learning in composition (pp. 39-56). Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: American<br />

Association for Higher Education.<br />

Bamberg, B. (2003). Revision. In Clark, I. (Ed.), Concepts in composition: Theory and practice<br />

in the teaching <strong>of</strong> writing (pp. 108-140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.<br />

Bausch, L. S. (2003). Just Words: Living and learning the literacies <strong>of</strong> our students’ lives.<br />

Language Arts, 80 (3), 215-222.<br />

Beach, R., & Liebman-Kleine, J. (1986). The writing/reading relationship: Becoming one’s own<br />

best reader. In B. T. Petersen (Ed.), Convergences: Transactions in reading and writing<br />

(pp.64-81). Urbana, IL: National Council <strong>of</strong> Teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>.<br />

Belcher, D., & Hirvela, A. (Eds.). (2001). Linking literacies: Perspectives on L2 reading—writing<br />

connections. Ann Arbor: University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Press.<br />

Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects <strong>of</strong> trained peer response on ESL students’ revision types and<br />

writing quality. Journal <strong>of</strong> Second Language Writing, 8, 215-241.<br />

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure<br />

and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<br />

254


Booth, W. C., Colomb, G. G., & Williams, J. M. (2008). The craft <strong>of</strong> research. Chicago, Illinois:<br />

The University <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press.<br />

Brack, G. W., & Hall, L. R. (1997). Combining classroom and the community: Service-learning<br />

in composition at Arizona State University. In Adler Kassner, L., Crooks, R. & Watters,<br />

A. (Eds), Writing the Community: Concepts and models for service-learning in<br />

composition (pp. 143-152). Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: American Association for Higher<br />

Education.<br />

Bransford, J. D., & McCarrell, N. S. (1975). A sketch <strong>of</strong> a cognitive approach <strong>to</strong> comprehension.<br />

In Weimer, W. B. & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. New<br />

York: Holt, Rinehart & Wins<strong>to</strong>n.<br />

Brigham Young University. (2012). The Corpus <strong>of</strong> Contemporary American <strong>English</strong> (COCA).<br />

Retrieved from http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/.<br />

California State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong> [CSUS]. (2011). Total Enrollment 1947-2011.<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions <strong>of</strong> ESL peer response group<br />

interaction. Journal <strong>of</strong> Second Language Writing, 5, 1-19.<br />

Carlson, M., & O’Neal-McElrath, T. (2008). Winning grants: Step by step (3 rd Ed.). San<br />

Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.<br />

Ching, R. J. (2008). A text-based grammar for exposi<strong>to</strong>ry reading and writing.<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: California State University, Sacramen<strong>to</strong>.<br />

Clark, I. (2003). Process. In Clark, I. (Ed.), Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the<br />

teaching <strong>of</strong> writing (pp. 72-93). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (Eds.). (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design <strong>of</strong><br />

social futures. London: Routledge.<br />

255


Conrad, S. (1996). Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from<br />

biology. Linguistics and Education, 8, 299-326.<br />

CSUS <strong>English</strong> Studies. (2006). <strong>English</strong> self-study. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State<br />

University.<br />

Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive academic language pr<strong>of</strong>iciency, linguistic interdependence, the<br />

optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19,<br />

197-205.<br />

Davies, W. M., & Beaumont, T. J. (2007). Conducting an interview. [PDF document].<br />

Retrieved from http://tlu.fbe.unimelb.edu.au/<br />

Dollieslager, R. et al. (1993). Exciting them <strong>to</strong> excellence: Publishing student work. Paper<br />

presented at the Southern Conference on <strong>English</strong> in the Two-Year College <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Council <strong>of</strong> Teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>. Chattanooga, TN.<br />

Eagle<strong>to</strong>n, M. B., & Dobler, E. (2007). Reading the web: Strategies for Internet inquiry. New<br />

York: Guildford.<br />

Ede, L. S. (1989). Work in progress: A guide <strong>to</strong> writing and revising. New York: St. Martin’s<br />

Press.<br />

Elbow, P., & Belan<strong>of</strong>f, P. (1995). A community <strong>of</strong> writers: A workshop course in writing. New<br />

York: McGraw-Hill.<br />

Elwell, M. D., & Bean, M. S. (2001). Edi<strong>to</strong>r Choice: The efficacy <strong>of</strong> service-learning for<br />

community college ESL students. Community College Review, 28(4), 47-61.<br />

Eskey, D. E. (1986).Theoretical foundations. In F. Dubin, D. E. Eskey, & W. Grabe (Eds.),<br />

<strong>Teaching</strong> second language reading for academic purposes (pp. 3-23). Reading, MA:<br />

Addison-Wesley.<br />

256


Eskey, D. E. (1993). Reading and writing as both cognitive process and social behavior. In J.<br />

Carson, & I. Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language<br />

perspectives (pp. 221-233). Bos<strong>to</strong>n: Heinle.<br />

Fairclough, N. (2000). Multiliteracies and language: Orders <strong>of</strong> discourse and intertextuality. In B.<br />

Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design <strong>of</strong> social<br />

futures (pp. 162-181). London: Routledge.<br />

Ferrando, J. et al., (2011). Multilingual Students: Who they are, how they learn and how <strong>to</strong> tu<strong>to</strong>r<br />

them. In Tu<strong>to</strong>ring book by the tu<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> the university reading and writing center (2001-<br />

2011). Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University, pp. 94-101.<br />

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2005).<strong>Teaching</strong> ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice.<br />

(2 nd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Ferris, D. (2009a). <strong>Teaching</strong> college writing <strong>to</strong> diverse student population. Ann Arbor: University<br />

<strong>of</strong> Michigan.<br />

Ferris, D. (2009b). What is a “multilingual writer”?. In D. Melzer and the Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State<br />

University Writing & Reading Subcommittee. (2009). Student writing handbook. (1 st<br />

edition). Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

Flower, L. (1979). Writer-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College<br />

<strong>English</strong>, 41, 19-38.<br />

Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory <strong>of</strong> writing. College Composition<br />

And Communication, 32, 365-387.<br />

Flowerdew, J. (1993). An education, or process approach <strong>to</strong> the teaching <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional genres.<br />

ELT Journal, 47, 305-316.<br />

Gilmore, A. (2000). Using online corpora <strong>to</strong> develop students’ writing skills. ELT Journal, 63,<br />

363-371.<br />

257


Glau, G. R. (2007). Stretch at 10: A progress report on Arizona State University’s stretch<br />

program. Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic Writing, 26 (2), 30-48.<br />

Glenn, C., Goldthwaite, M. A., & Connors, R. (2003). The St. Martin’s guide <strong>to</strong> teaching writing.<br />

Bos<strong>to</strong>n: Bedford/St. Martin’s.<br />

Goen, S., & Gillottee-Tropp, H. (2003). Integrating reading and writing: A response <strong>to</strong> the basic<br />

writing “crisis.”Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic Writing, 22 (2), 90-113.<br />

Goen-Salter, S. (2008). Critiquing the need <strong>to</strong> eliminate remediation: Lessons from San Francisco<br />

State. Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic Writing, 27 (2), 81-105.<br />

Gordon, E. (2007). Raising the bar for classroom publication: Building a student press initiative.<br />

The <strong>English</strong> Journal, 96 (3), 63-67.<br />

Grabe, W., & S<strong>to</strong>ller, F. (2001). Reading for academic purposes: Guidelines for the ESL/EFL<br />

teacher. In M. Celce-Murica (Ed.), <strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>English</strong> as a second or foreign language (3 rd<br />

ed., pp. 187-203). Bos<strong>to</strong>n: Heinle.<br />

Grabe, W., & S<strong>to</strong>ller, F. (2002). <strong>Teaching</strong> and researching reading. Harlow, England: Pearson<br />

Education.<br />

Harvey, G. (2008). Writing with Sources: A guide for students. Indianapolis, Indiana: Hackett<br />

Publishing Company, Inc.<br />

Heather, J. (2008). Oral presentations: Preparation and delivery [PPT document]. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>,<br />

CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

Hedgcock, J. S, & Ferris, D. R. (2009). <strong>Teaching</strong> readers <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>: Students, texts, and<br />

contexts. New York: Routledge.<br />

Heller, M. F. (1999). Reading-writing connections: From theory <strong>to</strong> practice (2 nd ed.). Mahwah,<br />

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

258


Herzberg, B. (1994). Community service & critical thinking. College Composition and<br />

Communication, 45, 307-319.<br />

Heuser, L. (1999). Service-learning as pedagogy <strong>to</strong> promote the content, cross-cultural, and<br />

language-learning <strong>of</strong> ESL students. Journal <strong>of</strong> TESL Canada, 17, 54-71.<br />

Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana,<br />

IL: National Conference on Research in <strong>English</strong>.<br />

Hirvela, A. (2004). Connecting reading and writing in second language writing instruction.<br />

Ann Arbor: University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Press.<br />

Howard, J. P. F. (1998). Academic service learning: A counternormative pedagogy. New<br />

Directions for <strong>Teaching</strong> and Learning, 73, 21-29.<br />

Hyland, K. (2002). <strong>Teaching</strong> and researching writing. United Kingdom: Pearson Education.<br />

Ingraham, B., Levy, P., McKenna, C., & Roberts, G. (2007). Academic literacy in the 21 st<br />

century. In G. Conole, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in e-<br />

learning research: Themes, methods, and impact on practice (pp. 160-173). London:<br />

Routledge<br />

Janzen, J. (1996). <strong>Teaching</strong> strategic reading. <strong>TESOL</strong> Journal, 6 (1), 6-9.<br />

Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2007).Graphic organizers in reading instruction: Reading findings and<br />

issues. Reading in a Foreign Language, 19 (1), 34-55.<br />

Johns, A. M. (1993). Written argumentation for real audiences: Suggestions for teacher research<br />

and classroom practice. <strong>TESOL</strong> Quarterly, 27(1), 75-90<br />

Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. New York:<br />

Cambridge University Press.<br />

259


Johns, A. M. (2006). Opening our doors: Applying socioliterate approaches (SA) <strong>to</strong> language<br />

minority classrooms. In P. K. Matsuda et al., (eds.), Second-language writing in the<br />

composition classroom (pp. 284-295). Urbana, IL: National Council <strong>of</strong> Teachers <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>English</strong>.<br />

Kincaid, N. M., & Sotiriou, P. (2004). Service-learning at an urban two-year college. <strong>Teaching</strong><br />

<strong>English</strong> in the Two-Year College, 31(3), 248- 259.<br />

Kraemer, D. J. (2005). Servant class: Basic writers and service-learning. Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic<br />

Writing, 24(2), 92-109.<br />

Kroll, B. (2001). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-<br />

Murcia (Ed.), <strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>English</strong> as a second or foreign language (3 rd ed., pp. 219-232).<br />

Bos<strong>to</strong>n: Heinle.<br />

Lewis, J. (2001). Academic literacy: Readings and strategies (2 nd ed.). Bos<strong>to</strong>n: Hough<strong>to</strong>n Mifflin.<br />

Learning Skills Center (LS). (2006). Learning Skills Center Self-Study. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA:<br />

Sacramen<strong>to</strong> State University.<br />

Learning Skills Center (LS). (2006). Course materials: LS 86. Sacramen<strong>to</strong>, CA: Sacramen<strong>to</strong><br />

State University.<br />

Lawrence, S. M., & Sommers, E. (1996). From the park bench <strong>to</strong> the (writing) workshop table:<br />

Encouraging collaboration among inexperience writers. <strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>English</strong> in the Two-<br />

Year College, 23, 101-11.<br />

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. Ann<br />

Arbor: University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Press.<br />

Marlow, S. (2007). Creating authentic dialog: ESL students as recipients <strong>of</strong> service learning. The<br />

internet TESL Journal, 8 (7), http://iteslj.org/.<br />

260


Mavor, S., & Trayner, B. (2001). Aligning genre and practice with learning in higher education:<br />

An interdisciplinary perspective for course design and teaching. <strong>English</strong> for Specific<br />

Purposes, 20, 345-366.<br />

Mikulecky, B. S. (1990). A short course in teaching reading skills. California: Addison Wesley<br />

Publishing.<br />

Mikulecky, B. S., & Jeffries, L. (1996). More reading power. White Plains, NY:<br />

AddisonWesley.<br />

Miller, M., & Higgins, B. (2008). Beyond test preparation: Nurturing successful learners through<br />

reading and writing workshops. Kappa Delta Pi, 44, 124-127.<br />

Mil<strong>to</strong>n, J., & Hyland, K. (1999). Assertions in students’ academic essays: A comparison<br />

<strong>of</strong> L1 and L2 writers. In R. Berry, B. Asker, K. Hyland, and M. Lam (eds.), Language<br />

analysis, description and pedagogy. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University <strong>of</strong> Science and<br />

Technology Press.<br />

Minor, J. M. (2001). Using service-learning as a part <strong>of</strong> an ESL program. The Internet TESL<br />

Journal, 7 (4).<br />

Michigan Corpus <strong>of</strong> Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). (2009). Ann Arbor, MI: The<br />

Regents <strong>of</strong> the University <strong>of</strong> Michigan. Retrieved from http://search-<br />

micusp.elicorpora.info/simple/<br />

Mullaney, J. (1999). Service-learning and language acquisition theory and practice. In<br />

Hellebrandt, J., & Varona, T. (Eds.). Building bridges: Concepts and models for<br />

service-learning in Spanish (pp. 49-57). Washing<strong>to</strong>n, DC: AAHE.<br />

North <strong>of</strong> Bos<strong>to</strong>n Library Exchange (2012). Criteria for evaluating sources [PDF document].<br />

Retrieved from http://www.noblenet.org/merrimack/FYS_eval.pdf<br />

261


Newell et. al., (2011). <strong>Teaching</strong> and learning argumentative reading and writing: A review <strong>of</strong><br />

research. Reading Research Quarterly, 46(3), 273-304.<br />

Newfields, T. (2001). Sample text passage summaries. Retrieved from<br />

http://www.tnewfields.info/Articles/sum1.htm<br />

Peele, T. (2010). Working <strong>to</strong>gether: Student-faculty interaction and the Boise State stretch<br />

program. Journal <strong>of</strong> Basic Writing, 29(2), 50-73.<br />

Pine, N. (2008). Service learning in a basic writing class: A best case scenario. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />

BasicWriting, 27(2), 29-55.<br />

Pichert, J. W., & Anderson, R. (2000). Taking different perspective on a s<strong>to</strong>ry. In Tovani, C.<br />

(Ed.), I read it, but I don’t get it: Comprehension strategies for adolescent readers.<br />

Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.<br />

Pre<strong>to</strong>-Bay, A. M. (2004). The socio-cultural dimension <strong>of</strong> academic literacy development<br />

and the explicit teaching <strong>of</strong> genres as community heuristics. The Reading Matrix, 4, 86-<br />

116.<br />

Ramsey, J. (1998). Text <strong>of</strong> John Ramsey letter. Retrieved from<br />

http://extras.denverpost.com/news/jon0929b.htm<br />

Ransdell, D. R. (2001). Class workshops: An alternative <strong>to</strong> peer-group review. <strong>Teaching</strong> <strong>English</strong><br />

in the Two-Year College, 29, 32-42.<br />

Reid, J. M. (2006). “Eye” learners and “Ear” learners: Identifying the language needs <strong>of</strong><br />

international students and U.S. resident writers. In P. K. Matsuda et al., (eds.), Second-<br />

language writing in the composition classroom (pp. 76-88). Urbana, IL: National Council<br />

<strong>of</strong> Teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>.<br />

Reppen, R. (2010). Using corpora in the language classroom. New York: Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

262


Robb, T. (2001). Extensive reading for Japanese <strong>English</strong> majors. In J. Murphy & P. Byrd (Eds.),<br />

Understanding the courses we teach: Local perspectives on <strong>English</strong> language teaching<br />

(pp. 218-235). Ann Arbor: University <strong>of</strong> Michigan Press.<br />

Rochford, R. A., & Hock, S. (2010). A letter writing campaign: Linking academic success and<br />

civic engagement. Journal <strong>of</strong> Community Engagement and Scholarship, 3(2), 76-83.<br />

Rothschild, D., & Klingenberg, F. (1990). Self- and peer evaluation <strong>of</strong> writing in the intensive<br />

ESL classroom. TESL Canada Journal, 8(1), 52-65.<br />

Scarcella, R. (1996). Secondary education in California and second language research. CA<strong>TESOL</strong><br />

Journal, 9, 129-152.<br />

Singhal, M. (2004). Academic writing and generation 1.5: Pedagogical goals and instructional<br />

issues in the college composition classroom. The Reading Matrix, 4, 1-13.<br />

Sladky, P. (1994). Why we need <strong>to</strong> publish student writers. Paper presented at the Annual<br />

Meeting <strong>of</strong> Conference on College Composition and Communication. Nashville, TN,<br />

March 16-19.<br />

Stavrianopoulos, K. (2008). Service-learning in the freshman year experience. College Student<br />

Journal, 42(2), 703-712.<br />

Steinke, M. H. (2009). Learning <strong>English</strong> by helping others: Implementing service learning in<strong>to</strong><br />

ESOL classroom. Journal <strong>of</strong> Civic Commitment, 12, 1-13.<br />

Tarvers, J. K. (1993). <strong>Teaching</strong> writing: Theories and practice (4 th ed.). New York:<br />

HarperCollins.<br />

Thomas, D. (2000). Writing partnerships: Service-learning in composition. Urbana, IL: National<br />

Council <strong>of</strong> Teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>English</strong>.<br />

Thomas, S. (2000). JonBenet: Inside the Ramsey murder investigation. New York, NY:<br />

St. Martin’s Press.<br />

263


Todorovska, V. (1996). An ESL instruc<strong>to</strong>r’s perspective on the stretch program. Paper presented<br />

at the Annual Meeting <strong>of</strong> the Conference on College Composition and Communication:<br />

Milwaukee, WI. March 27-30, 1996.<br />

Valdes, G. (1992). Bilingual minorities and language issues in writing. Written Communication,<br />

9, 85-136.<br />

Valdes, G. (2000). Nonnative <strong>English</strong> speakers: Language bigotry in <strong>English</strong> mainstream<br />

classrooms. ADE Bulletin, 124, 12-17.<br />

Varely, S. (2009). I’ll just look that up in the concordance: Integrating corpus consultation in<strong>to</strong><br />

the language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22, 33-152.<br />

Zamel, V. (1982). Writing: The process <strong>of</strong> discovering meaning. <strong>TESOL</strong> Quarterly, 16, 195-<br />

209.<br />

Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes <strong>of</strong> advanced ESL students: Six case studies. <strong>TESOL</strong><br />

Quarterly, 17, 165-187.<br />

Zamel, V., & Spack, R. (Eds.). (1998). Negotiating academic literacies: <strong>Teaching</strong> and learning<br />

across languages and cultures. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.<br />

Zamel, V. (1992). Writing one’s way in<strong>to</strong> reading. <strong>TESOL</strong> Quarterly, 26, 463-485.<br />

Weigert, K. M. (1998). Academic service learning: Its meaning & relevance. New Directions<br />

for <strong>Teaching</strong> & Learning, 73, 3-10.<br />

264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!