Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P s P r F 1 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 F 2 S R R S S S S S S S S R R R R R R R R S S 600 bp Figure 2. Example of agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of the polymorphic RAPD marker UBC-338 (CTG TGG CGG T; 600 bp band) in the F 2 population of the cross PI 189225 × 'NH Midget' (resistant × susceptible), segregating for resistance to gummy stem blight (S = susceptible, R = resistant). 163
1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Figure 3. Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products of the polymorphism of the RAPD marker UBC-338 (CTG TGG CGG T; 600 bp band) among inbred cultigens of watermelon resistant or susceptible to gummy stem blight. Resistant cultigens (top half; 1-38): PI 189225, PI 195771, PI 211915, PI 227203, PI 244019, PI 247398, PI 249009, PI 271982, PI 274035, PI 277979, PI 296332, PI 357677, PI 482257, PI 482260, PI 482283, PI 482293, PI 482294, PI 482297, PI 482307, PI 482315, PI 482326, PI 482342, PI 482343, PI 482357, PI 482374, PI 482379, PI 490375, PI 490376, PI 490384, PI 500312, PI 500323, PI 508443, PI 512361, PI 512388, PI 512398, PI 526233, and PI 542123, respectively. Susceptible cultigens (bottom half; 1-38): PI 167124, PI 169237, PI 169285, PI 169286, PI 171581, PI 173669, PI 173888, PI 175662, PI 175665, PI 176495, PI 176916, PI 177320, PI 179885, PI 179886, PI 183398, PI 207472, PI 214044, PI 222775, PI 223764, PI 226445, PI 226445, PI 226459, PI 234287, PI 266028, PI 277991, PI 357660, PI 357689, PI 357735, PI 357741, PI 368510, PI 381734, PI 435282, PI 512373, PI 512399, PI 525084, PI 525086, PI 525087, and PI 525091. Resistant cultigens 1 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + Susceptible cultigens 164
Page 1 and 2:
Abstract GUSMINI, GABRIELE. Inherit
Page 3 and 4:
Biography Gabriele Gusmini was born
Page 5 and 6:
Currently, Gabriele is planning his
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents LIST OF TABLES...
Page 9 and 10:
Germplasm and Crosses..............
Page 11 and 12:
GENERAL INTRODUCTION LIST OF TABLES
Page 13 and 14:
GENERAL INTRODUCTION LIST OF FIGURE
Page 15 and 16:
HERITABILITY AND GENETIC VARIANCE E
Page 17 and 18:
Brief History of Watermelon Breedin
Page 19 and 20:
absence of trichomes on the leaves
Page 21 and 22:
The genetics of the flesh color in
Page 23 and 24:
The primary nematode species attack
Page 25 and 26:
1975), but no gene has been found f
Page 27 and 28:
Henderson, W.R., G.H. Scott, and T.
Page 29 and 30:
Shimotsuma, M. 1963. Cytogenetical
Page 31 and 32:
Table 1. Watermelon cultivars with
Page 33 and 34:
Figure 2. Cultivar Allsweet, releas
Page 35 and 36:
Figure 4. Watermelon seeds size: 1
Page 37 and 38:
Introduction The inheritance of rin
Page 39 and 40:
stripes. In his study, Shimotsuma c
Page 41 and 42:
Diamond'), GG mm = mottled dark gre
Page 43 and 44:
Shimotsuma, M. 1963. Cytogenetical
Page 45 and 46:
Figure 2. Cultivars Japan 6 and Chi
Page 47 and 48:
Figure 4. Cultivars Crimson Sweet (
Page 49 and 50:
Abstract The watermelon [Citrullus
Page 51 and 52:
The rind (skin) colors and patterns
Page 53 and 54:
two hybrids are the original canary
Page 55 and 56:
Names and symbols for new genes pro
Page 57 and 58:
Salmon Yellow and Red Flesh During
Page 59 and 60:
During our experiments we did not f
Page 61 and 62:
Poole, C.F. and P.C. Grimball. 1945
Page 63 and 64:
Table 2. Single locus goodness-of-f
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Table 6. Continued. z Generation To
Page 71 and 72:
Figure 1. Intermittent stripes in '
Page 73 and 74:
Figure 3. Moons and stars induced o
Page 75 and 76:
Figure 5. Examples of unexpected fl
Page 77 and 78:
Abstract High yield is a major goal
Page 79 and 80:
States appears to be narrow, with m
Page 81 and 82:
y using only two replications from
Page 83 and 84:
value=0.0001), indicating that cult
Page 85 and 86:
Levi, A., C.E. Thomas, A.P. Keinath
Page 87 and 88:
Table 1. Analysis of variance (degr
Page 89 and 90:
Table 2. Continued. Yield z Fruit s
Page 91 and 92:
Table 2. Continued. Yield z Fruit s
Page 93 and 94:
w L/D = length/diameter ratio measu
Page 95 and 96:
Abstract The cultivated watermelon
Page 97 and 98:
dominance, and epistatic effects we
Page 99 and 100:
thumped (Maynard, 2001). Weights we
Page 101 and 102:
The giant-fruited parents had a lar
Page 103 and 104:
Literature Cited Brar, J.S. and K.S
Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. Phenotypic variances by ge
Page 107 and 108:
Table 2. Variance and heritability
Page 109 and 110:
t h 2 n = narrow-sense heritability
Page 111 and 112:
Table 3. Continued. Effective Facto
Page 113 and 114:
Figure 1. Each of the three cultiva
Page 115 and 116:
CHAPTER FIVE HERITABILITY AND GENET
Page 117 and 118:
fungus that is seed-borne (Lee et a
Page 119 and 120:
the technique described herein. Pyc
Page 121 and 122:
9 = plant dead. Plants with a disea
Page 123 and 124:
The possible gain from selection pe
Page 125 and 126:
Based on our data, Norton may not h
Page 127 and 128: Gusmini, G., T.C. Wehner, and G.J.
Page 129 and 130: Sherbakoff, C.C. 1917. Some importa
Page 131 and 132: Table 1. Single locus goodness-of-f
Page 133 and 134: Table 1. Continued. z Generation To
Page 135 and 136: w Expected was the hypothesized seg
Page 137 and 138: on leaves only; 5 = some leaves dea
Page 139 and 140: on leaves only; 5 = some leaves dea
Page 141 and 142: z Data are ratings from four famili
Page 143 and 144: CHAPTER SIX PRELIMINARY STUDY OF MO
Page 145 and 146: fungus that is seed-borne (Lee et a
Page 147 and 148: approach was successful in assembli
Page 149 and 150: subculture on artificial medium bas
Page 151 and 152: We extracted DNA using an extractio
Page 153 and 154: products using the Genescan ® -500
Page 155 and 156: (DNA/Polysaccharides) and 260/280 (
Page 157 and 158: Future Research Based on our prelim
Page 159 and 160: Gusmini, G., T.L. Ellington, and T.
Page 161 and 162: Perin, C., L.S. Hagen, V. De Conto,
Page 163 and 164: Table 2. Analysis of variance for t
Page 165 and 166: 029 v 1 . 3 3 . . 3 4 3 3 . . . + B
Page 167 and 168: Table 3. Continued. 071 v 1 3 . 3 4
Page 169 and 170: Table 3. Continued. 113 2 4 5 5 4 3
Page 171 and 172: Table 3. Continued. 155 2 4 5 4 . 4
Page 177: Figure 1. Agarose gel electrophores
Page 181 and 182: The genetics of rind color (or patt
Page 183 and 184: were not successful, even though se
Page 185 and 186: Breeding Methods Traits of interest
Page 187 and 188: alternative to biotechnology and te
Page 189 and 190: The solution to these problems is n
Page 191 and 192: Cucurbit Gene List Committee. 1979.
Page 193 and 194: Henderson, W.R., G.H. Scott, and T.
Page 195 and 196: Matthews, P. (ed.). 1993. The guinn
Page 197 and 198: Provvidenti, R. 1991. Inheritance o
Page 199 and 200: Souza, F.F.d., M.A.d. Queiroz, and
Page 201: Wright, S. 1968. The genetics of qu
show all

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?