14.07.2013 Views

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...

Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Lande's method III:<br />

Mather's method:<br />

Wright's method:<br />

[ ( ) ] 2<br />

µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />

a<br />

8 " # 2 ( BC P ) + # 1 a<br />

2 ( BC P ) ! # 1 a<br />

2<br />

2<br />

# ( P ) + # a<br />

{ [ ( F ) 1 ] } ! 2 [ ( P ) b ]<br />

2<br />

[ ( ) ] 2<br />

µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />

a<br />

2<br />

2 " # 2 [ ( F ) 2 ] ! # 2 ( BC P ) + # 1 a<br />

2<br />

[ ( ) ] 2<br />

[ ( BC P ) 1 a ]<br />

µ ( P ) ! µ P " 1.5 ! 2 " b<br />

a<br />

µ F ( ) ! µ ( P )<br />

1<br />

a<br />

µ ( P ) ! µ ( P ) b<br />

a<br />

" 1 ! µ F / )<br />

# ( ) ! µ P 1<br />

a<br />

0 +<br />

$<br />

%<br />

1 *<br />

µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />

a<br />

8 " 5 2<br />

2<br />

5 ( P ) + 5 a ( F ) ! 2<br />

2 ( P ) + 2 " 5 b<br />

2<br />

/<br />

[ ( F ) 1 ] 2<br />

0<br />

4<br />

The possible gain from selection per cycle was predicted as h n<br />

1<br />

2<br />

! " 2<br />

3<br />

4<br />

( )<br />

( )<br />

& , 2<br />

'<br />

( . 3<br />

-4<br />

( P)<br />

multiplied by the selection<br />

differential in standard deviation units k for selection intensities of 5%, 10%, or 20% (Hallauer and Miranda,<br />

1988). The statistical analysis was performed using the SAS-STAT statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary,<br />

North Carolina).<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

In our experiments, watermelon fruit weight was a quantitative trait, with normal distribution of the F 2<br />

data for all the families tested (data not shown). Due to the large and continuous variation of the data, it was not<br />

possible to generate classes of weight and analyze the data according to a Mendelian model.<br />

The field at Clinton had fewer problems with standing water during fruit development than at Kinston,<br />

providing a better environment for growth for those families. Overall, the crop at Clinton appeared more<br />

vigorous and uniform than at Kinston, even though cultural practices were similar, and there was no problem<br />

with biotic or abiotic diseases at either location. The overall mean weights were higher at Clinton than at<br />

Kinston (12.2 vs. 8.7 kg, respectively). Furthermore, the fruit weight of the parental inbred lines were closer to<br />

the expected weights at Clinton. Nevertheless, we were interested in variance estimates and not in mean<br />

performance across environments. Thus, we presented the data from both locations. The measured variances<br />

were not homogeneous across locations and families, based on Bartlett's test (Ostle and Malone, 1988; Steel et<br />

al., 1997). Therefore, the data were analyzed separately by location and family.<br />

85

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!