Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...
Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...
Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai - Cucurbit Breeding ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lande's method III:<br />
Mather's method:<br />
Wright's method:<br />
[ ( ) ] 2<br />
µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />
a<br />
8 " # 2 ( BC P ) + # 1 a<br />
2 ( BC P ) ! # 1 a<br />
2<br />
2<br />
# ( P ) + # a<br />
{ [ ( F ) 1 ] } ! 2 [ ( P ) b ]<br />
2<br />
[ ( ) ] 2<br />
µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />
a<br />
2<br />
2 " # 2 [ ( F ) 2 ] ! # 2 ( BC P ) + # 1 a<br />
2<br />
[ ( ) ] 2<br />
[ ( BC P ) 1 a ]<br />
µ ( P ) ! µ P " 1.5 ! 2 " b<br />
a<br />
µ F ( ) ! µ ( P )<br />
1<br />
a<br />
µ ( P ) ! µ ( P ) b<br />
a<br />
" 1 ! µ F / )<br />
# ( ) ! µ P 1<br />
a<br />
0 +<br />
$<br />
%<br />
1 *<br />
µ ( P ) ! µ P b<br />
a<br />
8 " 5 2<br />
2<br />
5 ( P ) + 5 a ( F ) ! 2<br />
2 ( P ) + 2 " 5 b<br />
2<br />
/<br />
[ ( F ) 1 ] 2<br />
0<br />
4<br />
The possible gain from selection per cycle was predicted as h n<br />
1<br />
2<br />
! " 2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
( )<br />
( )<br />
& , 2<br />
'<br />
( . 3<br />
-4<br />
( P)<br />
multiplied by the selection<br />
differential in standard deviation units k for selection intensities of 5%, 10%, or 20% (Hallauer and Miranda,<br />
1988). The statistical analysis was performed using the SAS-STAT statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary,<br />
North Carolina).<br />
Results and Discussion<br />
In our experiments, watermelon fruit weight was a quantitative trait, with normal distribution of the F 2<br />
data for all the families tested (data not shown). Due to the large and continuous variation of the data, it was not<br />
possible to generate classes of weight and analyze the data according to a Mendelian model.<br />
The field at Clinton had fewer problems with standing water during fruit development than at Kinston,<br />
providing a better environment for growth for those families. Overall, the crop at Clinton appeared more<br />
vigorous and uniform than at Kinston, even though cultural practices were similar, and there was no problem<br />
with biotic or abiotic diseases at either location. The overall mean weights were higher at Clinton than at<br />
Kinston (12.2 vs. 8.7 kg, respectively). Furthermore, the fruit weight of the parental inbred lines were closer to<br />
the expected weights at Clinton. Nevertheless, we were interested in variance estimates and not in mean<br />
performance across environments. Thus, we presented the data from both locations. The measured variances<br />
were not homogeneous across locations and families, based on Bartlett's test (Ostle and Malone, 1988; Steel et<br />
al., 1997). Therefore, the data were analyzed separately by location and family.<br />
85