14.07.2013 Views

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Labor requirement<br />

Labor requirements (men and women) for each activity within <strong>the</strong> 3 farming system<br />

models are presented in Tables 5 and 6. In general, <strong>the</strong> total number of hours<br />

required per hectare in FS I during <strong>the</strong> WS and DS was relatively higher than that<br />

required by FS I1 and FS 111.<br />

Men worked in almost all activities, particularly in land preparation, rat<br />

hunting, chemical spraying, weeding, and harvesting. Women performed rice<br />

planting, weeding, and harvesting. They spent more time in <strong>the</strong>se activities than<br />

men.<br />

Land preparation for rice farming and rice-fish farming was mostly done<br />

using hand tractors, which cost IRP49,000/ha in 1989-90 and IRP63,000/ha in 1990-<br />

91. However, manual labor was also used, particularly to hoe <strong>the</strong> corner plots of rice<br />

and to repair dikes and canals.<br />

In 1989-90, <strong>the</strong> use of labor for land pre aration was reduced. This indicated<br />

that cultivation of fish during <strong>the</strong> third season after two rice seasons) made land<br />

preparation easier.<br />

Rice and equivalent rice yields<br />

The average land size per family in FS I and FS I1 was 0.7 ha, while in FS I11 was<br />

1.1 ha. All yields and incomes were converted into hectares except in <strong>the</strong> case of fish<br />

in <strong>the</strong> second DS. The formula used was<br />

Price of fish Rp/kg of fish equiv kg<br />

Equivalent rice = X quantity of fish = X kg fish =<br />

Price of rice Rp/kg rice Price<br />

The rice yield and total equivalent rice yield in FS I were higher than <strong>the</strong><br />

yields in FS I1 and FS 111. This result was consistent in 1989-90 and 1990-91. The<br />

additional yield from rice - fish farming resulted from both fish production and<br />

cultivation of rice. Production figures for FS I, FS 11, and FS 111 are given in Table 7.<br />

The increase in rice yield in FS I and FS 11 in <strong>the</strong> WS may be due to <strong>the</strong><br />

residual effect of third-season fish cultivated in both farming <strong>systems</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />

<strong>the</strong> high yield of rice in FS I may be due to <strong>the</strong> biological control of weed and insect<br />

infestation. Most of <strong>the</strong> RFFS areas were relatively less vulnerable to insect<br />

infestation and weed problems during <strong>the</strong> crop years 1989-91 and 1990-91. This was<br />

evident from <strong>the</strong> lower levels of insecticide, herbicide, and labor used for weeding<br />

and chemical application, compared with FS 111. In <strong>the</strong> DS, FS I also produced <strong>the</strong><br />

highest rice yield. However, <strong>the</strong> increase of 32% compared with FS 111 in 1989-90<br />

was reduced to 23% in 1990-91.<br />

P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!