systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...
systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...
systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Labor requirement<br />
Labor requirements (men and women) for each activity within <strong>the</strong> 3 farming system<br />
models are presented in Tables 5 and 6. In general, <strong>the</strong> total number of hours<br />
required per hectare in FS I during <strong>the</strong> WS and DS was relatively higher than that<br />
required by FS I1 and FS 111.<br />
Men worked in almost all activities, particularly in land preparation, rat<br />
hunting, chemical spraying, weeding, and harvesting. Women performed rice<br />
planting, weeding, and harvesting. They spent more time in <strong>the</strong>se activities than<br />
men.<br />
Land preparation for rice farming and rice-fish farming was mostly done<br />
using hand tractors, which cost IRP49,000/ha in 1989-90 and IRP63,000/ha in 1990-<br />
91. However, manual labor was also used, particularly to hoe <strong>the</strong> corner plots of rice<br />
and to repair dikes and canals.<br />
In 1989-90, <strong>the</strong> use of labor for land pre aration was reduced. This indicated<br />
that cultivation of fish during <strong>the</strong> third season after two rice seasons) made land<br />
preparation easier.<br />
Rice and equivalent rice yields<br />
The average land size per family in FS I and FS I1 was 0.7 ha, while in FS I11 was<br />
1.1 ha. All yields and incomes were converted into hectares except in <strong>the</strong> case of fish<br />
in <strong>the</strong> second DS. The formula used was<br />
Price of fish Rp/kg of fish equiv kg<br />
Equivalent rice = X quantity of fish = X kg fish =<br />
Price of rice Rp/kg rice Price<br />
The rice yield and total equivalent rice yield in FS I were higher than <strong>the</strong><br />
yields in FS I1 and FS 111. This result was consistent in 1989-90 and 1990-91. The<br />
additional yield from rice - fish farming resulted from both fish production and<br />
cultivation of rice. Production figures for FS I, FS 11, and FS 111 are given in Table 7.<br />
The increase in rice yield in FS I and FS 11 in <strong>the</strong> WS may be due to <strong>the</strong><br />
residual effect of third-season fish cultivated in both farming <strong>systems</strong>. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore,<br />
<strong>the</strong> high yield of rice in FS I may be due to <strong>the</strong> biological control of weed and insect<br />
infestation. Most of <strong>the</strong> RFFS areas were relatively less vulnerable to insect<br />
infestation and weed problems during <strong>the</strong> crop years 1989-91 and 1990-91. This was<br />
evident from <strong>the</strong> lower levels of insecticide, herbicide, and labor used for weeding<br />
and chemical application, compared with FS 111. In <strong>the</strong> DS, FS I also produced <strong>the</strong><br />
highest rice yield. However, <strong>the</strong> increase of 32% compared with FS 111 in 1989-90<br />
was reduced to 23% in 1990-91.<br />
P