- Page 1 and 2: IRRl DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES NO. 15
- Page 3 and 4: RECEIVED I RECU .- r b :'.i!~atlon
- Page 5 and 6: Welcome address S .P.R. Weerasinghe
- Page 7 and 8: Welcome Address S. P. R. Weerasingh
- Page 9 and 10: Opening Comments After 15 yr of far
- Page 11 and 12: increased as well, but only nlargin
- Page 13 and 14: esult in high incomes for farmers,
- Page 15 and 16: Investor concerns Usually investors
- Page 17 and 18: WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES This workshop i
- Page 19 and 20: Rice is the major food crop and die
- Page 21 and 22: esource use and productivity varies
- Page 23 and 24: Determination of ado,)tion factors
- Page 25 and 26: number of active family members per
- Page 27: At both sites, more than 73% of the
- Page 31 and 32: Table 2. Crop varietal sequence sco
- Page 33 and 34: Table 4. Correlation illatsix used
- Page 35 and 36: - Table 6. Socioeconomic characteri
- Page 37 and 38: Table 8. Extent of adoption and ave
- Page 39 and 40: Table 10. Resource use and producti
- Page 41 and 42: Table 12. Extent of adoption and di
- Page 43 and 44: Table 14. Summary of per hectare ca
- Page 45 and 46: IRlPACT OF FARMING SYSTEMS RESEARCH
- Page 47 and 48: new information collected during FS
- Page 49 and 50: average family owns seven heads of
- Page 51 and 52: H Horticulture. To have a more regu
- Page 53 and 54: improved varieties require higher l
- Page 55 and 56: The types of the training provided
- Page 57 and 58: extension agency in the district, t
- Page 59 and 60: m Extension and other production-su
- Page 61 and 62: Table 3. Farm characteristics of th
- Page 63 and 64: Table 6. Farm practices and product
- Page 65 and 66: Table 8. Major crops, crop varietie
- Page 67 and 68: Table 10. Production and use of mil
- Page 69 and 70: Table 13. Major problems and constr
- Page 71 and 72: Table 15. Training undergone by the
- Page 73 and 74: Table 17. Links between farmers and
- Page 75 and 76: ----l CROP SUBSYSlLM rnurt L OTT tb
- Page 77 and 78: West Java provincial le~el BACKGROU
- Page 79 and 80:
OBJECTIVES The specific objectives
- Page 81 and 82:
Labor requirement Labor requirement
- Page 83 and 84:
system models. This indicated that
- Page 85 and 86:
Unit prices for all items were obta
- Page 87 and 88:
Price elasticity. The demand for al
- Page 89 and 90:
district fishery extension services
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 2. Production of freshwater f
- Page 93 and 94:
Table 4. Level of inputs used in ea
- Page 95 and 96:
Table 6. Labor requirement for each
- Page 97 and 98:
able 8. Income analysis of each FS
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 10. Nonfood expenditure patte
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 12. The value of assets (IRP
- Page 103 and 104:
Table 15. Nonfood expenditure patte
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 17. Elasticities of food comm
- Page 107 and 108:
l Oct k Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
- Page 109 and 110:
From 1980 to 1986, the Integrated R
- Page 111 and 112:
THE 1'\VO ;MATURE TECHNOLOGIES Dire
- Page 113 and 114:
Conceptual framework STUDY METHODS
- Page 115 and 116:
Tai. Mungbean was introduced in Dok
- Page 117 and 118:
Land preparation for rice. The reac
- Page 119 and 120:
price of mungbean was high, some fa
- Page 121 and 122:
manufacturers. The earlier models (
- Page 123 and 124:
Net farm income per household The a
- Page 125 and 126:
that although adopters were better
- Page 127 and 128:
W It produced a good stand of rice
- Page 129 and 130:
Table l. The promising technologies
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 3. Mungbean before rice areas
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 5. Number of farm households
- Page 135 and 136:
Table 7. Area planted to mungbean,
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 9. Area planted to mungbean,
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 11. Area under dry seeded ric
- Page 141 and 142:
continued.. . Table 12. Socioeconom
- Page 143 and 144:
continued.. . Table 12. Socioeconom
- Page 145 and 146:
l~ndicative figures only. '~ature t
- Page 147 and 148:
composition, increases in income ca
- Page 149 and 150:
not be captured if the criteria for
- Page 151 and 152:
crops (rice, maize, and mungbean) a
- Page 153 and 154:
The explanatory Lwiable, nitrogen (
- Page 155 and 156:
of the ratio of actual intake and r
- Page 157 and 158:
Farming Systems Research and Extens
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 3. Input levels and productiv
- Page 161 and 162:
Table 5. Comparison of annual house
- Page 163 and 164:
Table 7. Comparison of annual nonfo
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 9. Comparison of percentage p
- Page 167 and 168:
Table 11. Log-linear models of impa
- Page 169 and 170:
INSTITUTIONALIZING THE FARILIIIVG S
- Page 171 and 172:
agricultural production system by i
- Page 173 and 174:
In the midwest plain, where there a
- Page 175 and 176:
Varietal irnprovernent. This compon
- Page 177 and 178:
solutions to problems under the bas
- Page 179 and 180:
Table 2. Rice farming systems in Ca
- Page 181 and 182:
Table 5. Component-technology studi
- Page 183 and 184:
Wangwacharachul (1984) examined the
- Page 185 and 186:
household basis on an income and ex
- Page 187 and 188:
first crop. In 1989-90, the adopter
- Page 189 and 190:
Nonfarm expenses constituted the bu
- Page 191 and 192:
Herbicide is essential for DSR. How
- Page 193 and 194:
o The classification of farmers on
- Page 195 and 196:
Table 1. List of \,ariables idc~l~l
- Page 197 and 198:
Table 3. Conlparison of cash flow o
- Page 199 and 200:
Table 5. Level of input use for the
- Page 201 and 202:
Table 7. Production elasticities of
- Page 203 and 204:
FROXl GREEN REVOLUTION TO FARhlING
- Page 205 and 206:
ainfed areas. The RIARS project app
- Page 207 and 208:
stability and sustainability. 1nsti
- Page 209 and 210:
o Limited feedback at all levels. A
- Page 211 and 212:
Table l. Chronological sequcnce of
- Page 213 and 214:
Table l. Chronological sequence of
- Page 215 and 216:
Impact studies A number of studies
- Page 217 and 218:
some simple statistical tests to as
- Page 219 and 220:
assets). Patterns of food consumpti
- Page 221 and 222:
Production functions for first-seas
- Page 223 and 224:
and nonadopters indicate that there
- Page 225 and 226:
E~zdowr~tcnt of l~ouselrol~f assets
- Page 227 and 228:
variety, inadequate attention was p
- Page 229 and 230:
Table 1. Farming system research si
- Page 231 and 232:
Table 4. Comparison of levels of in
- Page 233 and 234:
Table-6. Compariso~i of le\.els of
- Page 235 and 236:
Table 9. Estimated production funct
- Page 237 and 238:
Table 11. Factor shares of first-se
- Page 239 and 240:
Table 13. Factor slirlres of third-
- Page 241 and 242:
Table 15. Endownlent of farm assets
- Page 243 and 244:
IAIPACT ASSESShlEhT OF FARMING SYST
- Page 245 and 246:
Depending on the adequacy of rainfa
- Page 247 and 248:
Demograpllic cllaractehtics. The co
- Page 249 and 250:
The major farm implements owned by
- Page 251 and 252:
Effect of RWCS on household cash fl
- Page 253 and 254:
Table 1. Average cash expenses per
- Page 255 and 256:
Table 5. Selected clia~~acteristics
- Page 257 and 258:
Table 7. Comparative pcrforinance o
- Page 259 and 260:
hiem bers Discussion and Recommenda
- Page 261 and 262:
Guideline 4: FSR impact projects sh
- Page 263 and 264:
hlem bers o The need to improve doc
- Page 265 and 266:
Members what is right depends on po
- Page 267 and 268:
Decentralization and farming system
- Page 269 and 270:
o More program and less project fun
- Page 271 and 272:
Bangladesh Mr. RaGqul Islam Banglad
- Page 273 and 274:
Dr. N.F.C. Ranawecru Di\ision of .-
- Page 275 and 276:
CFTSSF CLSU CSD CSSAC CVIADP CVRP-I
- Page 277 and 278:
PIADP PCA PCARRD PHARLAP PSC PTA RA
- Page 279 and 280:
Production Team Editor : Michael Gr