14.07.2013 Views

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Guideline 4: FSR impact projects should define a new technology selected for<br />

study in spatial and historical terms, and in its technical composition, social<br />

evolution, and adaptation.<br />

Selection of analytical techniques<br />

Selection of analytical techniques, as in any project, will be guided by <strong>the</strong> number<br />

and nature of hypo<strong>the</strong>ses and associated objectives. The issues of adopter and<br />

nonadopter arose several times. This required ingenuity by <strong>the</strong> individual <strong>research</strong><br />

teams to resolve <strong>the</strong> issue in <strong>the</strong> best way possible. Although open to some<br />

challenge, each technique proved useful under particular circumstances. Techniques<br />

for relating adoption, productivity, income, and household expenditures were more<br />

conventional and posed no great problems.<br />

Cash-flow analysis was used, and simple comparisons of a range of<br />

characteristics of adopter and nonadopter groups provided useful information. In<br />

several instances, choice of techniques was limited by sample size, which varied<br />

considerably between studies.<br />

Given <strong>the</strong> exploratory and pioneering nature of <strong>the</strong>se studies and <strong>the</strong> lack of<br />

an accepted FSR impact study methodology, no general guidelines have emerged<br />

for analytical techniques. The diversity of techniques actually applied in different<br />

circumstances shows <strong>the</strong> flexibility needed at this stage. The greatest versatility and<br />

sophistication was shown in <strong>the</strong> Sri Lankan study, which attempted <strong>the</strong> most<br />

comprehensive analysis. However, its results were restricted by small sample size<br />

and by <strong>the</strong> civil unrest in <strong>the</strong> country, which limited data collection to only l yr. No<br />

results, for example, were obtained on <strong>the</strong> relations between technology and welfare<br />

attributes.<br />

Key constmints. In this and any multilocation <strong>research</strong> project, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

unanticipated random constraints that lower performance limits. The constraints are<br />

diverse and numerous and defy classification. They include (not exhaustively):<br />

o lack of baseline data on which to design surveys and comprehend <strong>the</strong><br />

socioeconomic and institutional setting of technological introduction<br />

and adoption;<br />

o unsatisfactory primary and secondary data, typically collected by<br />

agencies unrelated to <strong>the</strong> project unit (i.e., exteiision officers who<br />

aggregate data from <strong>the</strong> survey location);<br />

o <strong>the</strong> usual problems of household income management;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!