systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...
systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ... systems research - the IDRC Digital Library - International ...
Chang River cuts through the middle of the district. Administratively, the district is divided into eight tambons (subdistricts). The experimental plots were in tambon Don Sri Chum and tambon San Koang. All of Don Sri Chum is essentially ricefields; whereas, San Koang has about 16% upland area. Don Sri Chum is largely lowland with a reasonably stable rice production (Patanothai 1983), except for areas near the Mae Ing and Rong Chang Rivers, which flood in some years. The rice area in San Koang is a mixture of both uplands and lowlands and has a higher percentage of upland rice. Its rice production is less stable. Tambons Ban Tham, Ban Pin, and Huey Lan are ricefields. They have relatively less rice area (63-71%) than tambons Dok Kham Tai and Don Sri Chum (97%). The estimated population of Dok Kham Tai in 1990 was 77,297. The majority are involved in rainfed farming. Rainfall averaged 1,052 mm from 1981 to 1989 alld had a bimodal pattern with a lapse in June. Rainfall variability is a common problem in this district. Farms experience either floods or drought every 2 yr and, as a result, the district is well-known for poverty and out- migration. Transpl;lnted rice is the main crop in the lowlands during the wet season (WS). In some years, farmers experience delayed or inadequate rainfall. In some tambon, it is possible to grow field crops (e.g., garlic and soybean) in the ricefields during the dry season (DS). Most of the land, however, is left fallow in the DS until August. In the uplands, maize - mungbean is the most popular cropping pattern. Since 1984, when mungbean before rice was introduced, it has been widely practiced in the uplands. The cropping intensity in Jun is higher than in Dok Kham Tai. However, double cropping is possible in Dok Kham Tai. The district has a reputation for migration of young girls seeking off-farm jobs in the cities. They are usually employed in bars, massage parlors, night clubs, and brothels. Remittances from these migrants result in ma:erial prosperity in the district in terms of big new houses, cars, and electrical appliances. Young men migrate to the cities or even overseas as construction workers. Exchange labor for farm work is uncommon in Dok Kham Tai. Additional labor is usually provided by nearby areas or districts. The wage rate increases during transplanting and harvesting when the demand for labor is high. Expansion of area planted to mungbean The research stages and the expansion of the area planted to mungbean before rice from 1982-83 to 1985-56 are shown in Table 3. Mungbean before rice was widely adopted during the pilot-production stage. Mungbean covered 62.4 ha in Phayao Province in 1985-86. In the same year, information collected by the impact team suggested there were 13.8 ha planted to mungbean in Dok Kham
Tai. Mungbean was introduced in Dok Kham Tai in 1983. From an experimental area of 9.6 ha in 1984 it espanded to about 1,600 ha in 1990 (Table 4). In 1987, 658 households adopted mungbean in Dok Kham Tai (Table 5). However, the cultivation of mungbean had been affected by frequent floods and waterlogging. In 1989, floods destroyed much of the mungbean and lowered farm income. As a result, many farmers abandoned the cultivation of mungbean a year later. In 1990, 1,376 ha in the upland areas of tambon San Kaong were planted to mungbean (Table 4), but much less was planted in the other tambons (11-S8 ha). Although many farmers successfully planted mungbean, the price fluctuated widely and so did income. Many farmers abandoned mungbean cultivation in 1989 because prices were low at THB6-8/k (Table 6). In 1991, however, the price of mungbean increased to THB~o-I~,~~. Those who had continued to plant mungbean obtained high profits. The average area planted to mungbean per liousehold isas 2.1 ha in 1988 and 2.2 ha in 1989. In 19S8, 19% of farmers planted mungbean on less than on 0.8 ha of land-. The rnaior,ity (-35%) planted on 0.8-1.6 ha. Only 14% planted on more than 3.2 ha (Tahie 7). Data from the field sune!, rei,ealed that the average yield of rnungbean was 250-300 kg/lia. This \+.as much lou'er than the estimated potential level of 550-1000 kg/ha. About 10% of the farmers obtained an average yield of 500 kg/ha or more. Most farmers (79%), however, obtained 375 &/ha or less in 1988. Yields were generally higher for mungbean planted in small plots (0.5-0.6 ha) because of better management and more thorough harvesting than in the large plots (Table S). During harvesting (July-August), labor is scarce and expensive because it coincides with rice cultivation Costs and returns of mungbean bcforee rice Flooding in 1938 destroyed most of the niungbean crops especially in Dok Kham Tai. About 175" of the farniers surveyed had totally lost their crop. Flooding recurred in 1989 and many farmers gave up planting mungbean. Variable cash costs per household were, on the average, TFIB1.278; whereas, gross margin was TMB2,S70, excluding f~mily labor costs ('Table 8). If family labor costs \yere included, the gross margin was only THB506. The maximum area planted to niungbean per household was 8.7 11:~. 'T1:e ri?xiirnum gross margin per household &.as THB31,6S1 (e:icluding Iariiil!: labor costs) clnci THB22,700 (when farnily labor cost isas included). Farmsrs \;,lie here affected by floods suffered losses. One farmer lost TIiB5,510. Avera~c: Ivsscc due tc flooding were about THB70,Y. Farmers who had an average yield of about 375-500 1x/lia and planted on an average of 2.8 ha, had gross margins of THB11394 in 1988 (Table 8). Average gross margin (excluding family labor) per hectare was TtiB1,691 for all
- Page 63 and 64: Table 6. Farm practices and product
- Page 65 and 66: Table 8. Major crops, crop varietie
- Page 67 and 68: Table 10. Production and use of mil
- Page 69 and 70: Table 13. Major problems and constr
- Page 71 and 72: Table 15. Training undergone by the
- Page 73 and 74: Table 17. Links between farmers and
- Page 75 and 76: ----l CROP SUBSYSlLM rnurt L OTT tb
- Page 77 and 78: West Java provincial le~el BACKGROU
- Page 79 and 80: OBJECTIVES The specific objectives
- Page 81 and 82: Labor requirement Labor requirement
- Page 83 and 84: system models. This indicated that
- Page 85 and 86: Unit prices for all items were obta
- Page 87 and 88: Price elasticity. The demand for al
- Page 89 and 90: district fishery extension services
- Page 91 and 92: Table 2. Production of freshwater f
- Page 93 and 94: Table 4. Level of inputs used in ea
- Page 95 and 96: Table 6. Labor requirement for each
- Page 97 and 98: able 8. Income analysis of each FS
- Page 99 and 100: Table 10. Nonfood expenditure patte
- Page 101 and 102: Table 12. The value of assets (IRP
- Page 103 and 104: Table 15. Nonfood expenditure patte
- Page 105 and 106: Table 17. Elasticities of food comm
- Page 107 and 108: l Oct k Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
- Page 109 and 110: From 1980 to 1986, the Integrated R
- Page 111 and 112: THE 1'\VO ;MATURE TECHNOLOGIES Dire
- Page 113: Conceptual framework STUDY METHODS
- Page 117 and 118: Land preparation for rice. The reac
- Page 119 and 120: price of mungbean was high, some fa
- Page 121 and 122: manufacturers. The earlier models (
- Page 123 and 124: Net farm income per household The a
- Page 125 and 126: that although adopters were better
- Page 127 and 128: W It produced a good stand of rice
- Page 129 and 130: Table l. The promising technologies
- Page 131 and 132: Table 3. Mungbean before rice areas
- Page 133 and 134: Table 5. Number of farm households
- Page 135 and 136: Table 7. Area planted to mungbean,
- Page 137 and 138: Table 9. Area planted to mungbean,
- Page 139 and 140: Table 11. Area under dry seeded ric
- Page 141 and 142: continued.. . Table 12. Socioeconom
- Page 143 and 144: continued.. . Table 12. Socioeconom
- Page 145 and 146: l~ndicative figures only. '~ature t
- Page 147 and 148: composition, increases in income ca
- Page 149 and 150: not be captured if the criteria for
- Page 151 and 152: crops (rice, maize, and mungbean) a
- Page 153 and 154: The explanatory Lwiable, nitrogen (
- Page 155 and 156: of the ratio of actual intake and r
- Page 157 and 158: Farming Systems Research and Extens
- Page 159 and 160: Table 3. Input levels and productiv
- Page 161 and 162: Table 5. Comparison of annual house
- Page 163 and 164: Table 7. Comparison of annual nonfo
Chang River cuts through <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> district. Administratively, <strong>the</strong> district<br />
is divided into eight tambons (subdistricts). The experimental plots were in<br />
tambon Don Sri Chum and tambon San Koang.<br />
All of Don Sri Chum is essentially ricefields; whereas, San Koang has<br />
about 16% upland area. Don Sri Chum is largely lowland with a reasonably<br />
stable rice production (Patanothai 1983), except for areas near <strong>the</strong> Mae Ing and<br />
Rong Chang Rivers, which flood in some years. The rice area in San Koang is a<br />
mixture of both uplands and lowlands and has a higher percentage of upland<br />
rice. Its rice production is less stable. Tambons Ban Tham, Ban Pin, and Huey<br />
Lan are ricefields. They have relatively less rice area (63-71%) than tambons<br />
Dok Kham Tai and Don Sri Chum (97%).<br />
The estimated population of Dok Kham Tai in 1990 was 77,297. The<br />
majority are involved in rainfed farming. Rainfall averaged 1,052 mm from 1981<br />
to 1989 alld had a bimodal pattern with a lapse in June. Rainfall variability is a<br />
common problem in this district. Farms experience ei<strong>the</strong>r floods or drought<br />
every 2 yr and, as a result, <strong>the</strong> district is well-known for poverty and out-<br />
migration.<br />
Transpl;lnted rice is <strong>the</strong> main crop in <strong>the</strong> lowlands during <strong>the</strong> wet season<br />
(WS). In some years, farmers experience delayed or inadequate rainfall. In some<br />
tambon, it is possible to grow field crops (e.g., garlic and soybean) in <strong>the</strong><br />
ricefields during <strong>the</strong> dry season (DS). Most of <strong>the</strong> land, however, is left fallow in<br />
<strong>the</strong> DS until August. In <strong>the</strong> uplands, maize - mungbean is <strong>the</strong> most popular<br />
cropping pattern. Since 1984, when mungbean before rice was introduced, it has<br />
been widely practiced in <strong>the</strong> uplands. The cropping intensity in Jun is higher<br />
than in Dok Kham Tai. However, double cropping is possible in Dok Kham Tai.<br />
The district has a reputation for migration of young girls seeking off-farm<br />
jobs in <strong>the</strong> cities. They are usually employed in bars, massage parlors, night<br />
clubs, and bro<strong>the</strong>ls. Remittances from <strong>the</strong>se migrants result in ma:erial<br />
prosperity in <strong>the</strong> district in terms of big new houses, cars, and electrical<br />
appliances. Young men migrate to <strong>the</strong> cities or even overseas as construction<br />
workers.<br />
Exchange labor for farm work is uncommon in Dok Kham Tai.<br />
Additional labor is usually provided by nearby areas or districts. The wage rate<br />
increases during transplanting and harvesting when <strong>the</strong> demand for labor is high.<br />
Expansion of area planted to mungbean<br />
The <strong>research</strong> stages and <strong>the</strong> expansion of <strong>the</strong> area planted to mungbean before<br />
rice from 1982-83 to 1985-56 are shown in Table 3. Mungbean before rice was<br />
widely adopted during <strong>the</strong> pilot-production stage. Mungbean covered 62.4 ha in<br />
Phayao Province in 1985-86. In <strong>the</strong> same year, information collected by <strong>the</strong><br />
impact team suggested <strong>the</strong>re were 13.8 ha planted to mungbean in Dok Kham