14.07.2013 Views

standardization of records keeping in indian zoos - Central Zoo ...

standardization of records keeping in indian zoos - Central Zoo ...

standardization of records keeping in indian zoos - Central Zoo ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

glue helps to ensure that the PIT tag does not become ejected before the wound heals<br />

(Wright 2001b).<br />

Complications with PIT tags which have been noted <strong>in</strong>clude: migration <strong>of</strong><br />

transponders if applied subcutaneously or <strong>in</strong>ternally, which may make them more<br />

difficult to read; breakage <strong>of</strong> the tags; and loss <strong>of</strong> signals (Wright 2001b).<br />

6.5 Freeze Brand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Freeze brand<strong>in</strong>g was first used as a technique for <strong>in</strong>dividually mark<strong>in</strong>g anurans <strong>in</strong><br />

1976 by Daugherty.<br />

Method:<br />

.<br />

Picture 26: Freeze brand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> Xenopus laevis<br />

Pieces <strong>of</strong> copper wire, bent <strong>in</strong>to the shape <strong>of</strong> numbers, are placed <strong>in</strong>to liquid nitrogen<br />

until boil<strong>in</strong>g stops. The brand is momentarily placed for 1.5 seconds on the ventral<br />

surface <strong>of</strong> an X. laevis which has been patted dry with tissue.<br />

Picture27: Once branded animals are easily identified by number. The brands will be clearly visible<br />

with<strong>in</strong> 24 hrs. This <strong>in</strong>dividual (089) was branded 2 years previously.<br />

DISCUSSION<br />

Hot and freeze brand<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> amphibians are other <strong>in</strong>vasive methods <strong>of</strong> mark<strong>in</strong>g<br />

but they are not recommended, as brand marks <strong>in</strong> amphibians may not be visible after<br />

a few months. Though described as convenient and the least expensive technique for<br />

mark<strong>in</strong>g amphibians (Donnelly et. al. 1994) recent studies has shown a number <strong>of</strong><br />

negative effects <strong>of</strong> toe clipp<strong>in</strong>g. One <strong>of</strong> the disadvantages is that marks are not<br />

permanent s<strong>in</strong>ce toes regenerate. Clarke (1972) reported a possible negative effect on<br />

survival us<strong>in</strong>g toe clipp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Bufo woodhousei fowleri. Underhill, cited <strong>in</strong> Daugherty<br />

(1976), noted a loss <strong>of</strong> weight <strong>in</strong> toe-clipped Rana pipiens. For tagg<strong>in</strong>g amphibians<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!