14.07.2013 Views

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

problems, events, and initiatives. The Neighborhood Association had a variety of<br />

members, ranging in ethnic, social, and economic background. But the majority of<br />

members could be defined as middle-class, Caucasian, having a college degree and<br />

white-collar job. Some attendees of Neighborhood Association meetings were actually<br />

long-time residents, but regardless of length of residence, all felt the desire to help<br />

improve the quality of the neighborhood through economic development and<br />

beautification projects.<br />

The Neighborhood Association was officially formed in 2003 and consists of<br />

several board members who are residents in the neighborhood of Oak Park. Board<br />

members 19<br />

are voted into position and help create the topics of discussion for monthly<br />

meetings. They also network to gain prospective members and political and financial<br />

supporters. Most importantly, these members are committed to renewing the community<br />

through various revitalization programs, activities, and initiatives. Meetings are places<br />

where board members can discuss news that will affect the community, such as urban<br />

development, business closures, new community programs, community events, and crime<br />

in the neighborhood. Meetings have quickly become places where middle-class residents<br />

can voice their opinion about the condition of their community and how to improve it.<br />

In general, members of the local Neighborhood Association perceived poor<br />

residents as irresponsible and wanting an “easy way out,” and who at times partook in the<br />

informal economy of petty theft and crime as their livelihood. This group offered non-<br />

systemic reasons for why the poor could not break out of poverty and explained the social<br />

problems of the poor as an effect of their lack of motivation to take responsibility for<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!