COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 6<br />
ANALYSIS<br />
In Oak Park, a number of community groups are working to improve the quality<br />
of life for residents and improve the quality of the neighborhood through various means.<br />
They are implementing revitalization projects, creating grassroots projects for women<br />
and children, and organizing the poor. Similarly, non-profit organizations are<br />
undertaking their own efforts to serve the poor, by providing long-term and emergency<br />
services for needy residents. The agendas of these groups vary, but revitalization<br />
projects, which focus on ridding the neighborhood of “blight” and community<br />
“problems,” are gaining the most momentum and attracting participation of residents in<br />
the community. But, while many residents believe these projects will have positive<br />
outcomes for the neighborhood, certain dilemmas have been exposed through community<br />
activism. These “dilemmas of activism” center on: 1) who will actually benefit from<br />
these improvement projects and 2) how to alleviate the negative effects on lower-income<br />
residents in the neighborhood.<br />
Rights to the City<br />
Harrington and Merry (1988:713) claim that, “symbols of community<br />
participation, represented by concepts such as neighborhood justice and community<br />
justice, are not merely masks for state power but are expressions of it.” Thus,<br />
neighborhood justice and efforts of community activism work to merely mask the social<br />
inequality that exists between residents in gentrifying neighborhoods such as Oak Park.<br />
These dilemmas of activism expose the inequality of residents and reveal that some<br />
108