COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Members of the Labor Association labeled this takeover the “K Street Massacre” and<br />
attributed this as part of a pattern in which local government takes tax money from<br />
workers and small businesses and gives it to large corporations. This type of urban<br />
renewal, they emphasized, “always means urban renewal for local businesses and<br />
residents, who find their shops and homes bought out from under them or priced out of<br />
reach.”<br />
The Labor Association further wrote about a situation in which in 1999, the<br />
Housing and Redevelopment Agency demolished a minority owned store located on<br />
Stockton Boulevard, despite a series of protests held to save the local business. The<br />
agency ultimately handed over the property to the Raley Corporation. They warned that<br />
in Oak Park a few other businesses were on the list for seizure through eminent domain<br />
and the attempted takeover was underway for the owners of eleven lots, who are being<br />
forced to sell their property to the Housing and Redevelopment Agency. The association<br />
argued that the Oak Park neighborhood will get stuck with the bill for the redevelopment<br />
scheme because the Housing and Redevelopment Agency won a local property tax<br />
increase to pay for the development.<br />
Further, they argued that housing prices in Oak Park have doubled in the last five<br />
years, and are pricing low-income residents out of the neighborhood. Oak Park residents,<br />
they claim, are not the only victims of this displacement. Many Californians can no<br />
longer afford a medium-priced home. They wrote,<br />
Government programs that pour in money at the top—a.k.a.<br />
‘trickle-down’ schemes, which don’t trickle are increasing urban<br />
blight. The responsibility of the situation, they claim, does not lie<br />
with individuals, but with the system that enables corruption. For<br />
90