14.07.2013 Views

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

COMMUNITY ACTIVISM IN OAK PARK: COMPETING AGENDAS ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Members of the Labor Association labeled this takeover the “K Street Massacre” and<br />

attributed this as part of a pattern in which local government takes tax money from<br />

workers and small businesses and gives it to large corporations. This type of urban<br />

renewal, they emphasized, “always means urban renewal for local businesses and<br />

residents, who find their shops and homes bought out from under them or priced out of<br />

reach.”<br />

The Labor Association further wrote about a situation in which in 1999, the<br />

Housing and Redevelopment Agency demolished a minority owned store located on<br />

Stockton Boulevard, despite a series of protests held to save the local business. The<br />

agency ultimately handed over the property to the Raley Corporation. They warned that<br />

in Oak Park a few other businesses were on the list for seizure through eminent domain<br />

and the attempted takeover was underway for the owners of eleven lots, who are being<br />

forced to sell their property to the Housing and Redevelopment Agency. The association<br />

argued that the Oak Park neighborhood will get stuck with the bill for the redevelopment<br />

scheme because the Housing and Redevelopment Agency won a local property tax<br />

increase to pay for the development.<br />

Further, they argued that housing prices in Oak Park have doubled in the last five<br />

years, and are pricing low-income residents out of the neighborhood. Oak Park residents,<br />

they claim, are not the only victims of this displacement. Many Californians can no<br />

longer afford a medium-priced home. They wrote,<br />

Government programs that pour in money at the top—a.k.a.<br />

‘trickle-down’ schemes, which don’t trickle are increasing urban<br />

blight. The responsibility of the situation, they claim, does not lie<br />

with individuals, but with the system that enables corruption. For<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!