14.07.2013 Views

national register nomination for boulevard park historic

national register nomination for boulevard park historic

national register nomination for boulevard park historic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (provide a summary paragraph that includes level of<br />

signficance and applicable criteria)<br />

Boulevard Park is a residential suburban neighborhood designed and subdivided by the development firm<br />

of Park Realty and the real estate sales firm of Wright and Kimbrough. Built on the <strong>for</strong>mer site of the<br />

Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State Fair’s Union Racetrack, the neighborhood was a streetcar suburb that integrated “City<br />

Beautiful” principles of urban design and landscape architecture within Sacramento’s original gridiron<br />

block plan. Building styles include a variety of Arts & Crafts and revival styles, but deed restrictions and<br />

setback requirements ensured a consistent streetscape throughout the neighborhood. The subdivision plan<br />

included two landscaped <strong>boulevard</strong>s that give the neighborhood its name, three small <strong>park</strong>s located in<br />

alleys, and a city <strong>park</strong> on the northern edge of the property. The neighborhood was marketed as a sylvan<br />

retreat from the central city <strong>for</strong> both professional and working families. Proximity to streetcar lines gave the<br />

neighborhood a connection to the central city, a connection that was severed when streetcar service ended,<br />

workplaces relocated farther from the central city, and middle-class families moved to new automobile<br />

suburbs farther from the central city. Boulevard Park is eligible <strong>for</strong> the National Register as a <strong>historic</strong><br />

district under Criterion A at the local level of significance <strong>for</strong> its role in the development of Sacramento’s<br />

streetcar suburbs, and as a district that embodies the characteristics of early 20th century landscape<br />

architecture, suburban neighborhood design, and residential architecture at the local level of significance.<br />

The property’s period of significance is from 1905 to 1946, from the construction of the district’s earliest<br />

buildings to the end of streetcar operation in the neighborhood.<br />

________________________________________________________________________<br />

Narrative Statement of Significance (provide at least one paragraph <strong>for</strong> each area of significance)<br />

Criterion A: Streetcar Suburbs, Progressive Housing Re<strong>for</strong>m and Sacramento’s Urban Development<br />

During the late 19th and early 20th century, electric streetcars allowed construction of new middle-class<br />

suburbs at the outer perimeter of cities. In Sacramento, streetcar suburbs were first built in the 1880s and<br />

1890s, outside the city limits to the southeast. The planned relocation of the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia State Agricultural<br />

Society racetrack to a new site in 1905 allowed the Park Realty Company and the Wright & Kimbrough<br />

development firm the opportunity to create a new neighborhood that was already served by a streetcar line,<br />

closer to the central city than other suburbs but far enough from industrial areas to avoid the noise, smoke<br />

and traffic of downtown. In addition to its proximity to downtown Sacramento, its location within an<br />

established residential neighborhood with good transit connections made the district a prime location <strong>for</strong> a<br />

new streetcar suburb. In 1907, a separate streetcar line along C Street provided more transit connections <strong>for</strong><br />

the neighborhood’s residents. The neighborhood was served by streetcars until 1946. (Continued)<br />

Criterion A: “City Beautiful” Suburban Design and Architecture<br />

Boulevard Park’s overall design was strongly influenced by the “City Beautiful” movement, a movement<br />

that promoted the design of better cities and cohesive suburban neighborhoods in the <strong>for</strong>m of residential<br />

<strong>park</strong>s and garden suburbs. A general plan of development, specifications and standards, and the use of deed<br />

restrictions were essential elements used to control house design, ensure quality and harmony of<br />

construction, and create spatial organization suitable <strong>for</strong> fine homes in a <strong>park</strong> setting. These design ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

were intended <strong>for</strong> more than mere aesthetic effect; they were intended to alleviate the ills of the crowded,<br />

polluted 19th century city, and eventually replace them entirely <strong>for</strong> middle-class and working people. The<br />

district’s boundaries and arterial streets used the same grid pattern found throughout Sacramento’s original<br />

city limits, but 21st and 22nd Street were widened into <strong>boulevard</strong>s to allow construction of landscaped<br />

medians, a prominent feature of “City Beautiful” suburbs. Lots were oriented toward the numbered<br />

<strong>boulevard</strong>s, while in the rest of Sacramento lots are oriented towards the lettered streets. Deed restrictions<br />

mandated setbacks <strong>for</strong> buildings to create a consistent streetscape along the <strong>boulevard</strong>s. A city <strong>park</strong> along<br />

the district’s north edge and three smaller <strong>park</strong>s located in alleys rein<strong>for</strong>ce the principles of “City<br />

Beautiful” neighborhood design. Home sizes vary but show a consistent progression from modest and<br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!