Facts and results from the Stockholm Trials

Facts and results from the Stockholm Trials Facts and results from the Stockholm Trials

stockholmsforsoket.se
from stockholmsforsoket.se More from this publisher
14.07.2013 Views

12.2 Tradespeople and driving schools The aim of this study is to study the effects of the Stockholm Trial on tradespeople and driving schools. The hypothesis is that the congestion tax has both negative and positive effects on tradespeople and driving schools. Reduced traffic as a result of the tax is positive, because this entails shorter travel times for tradespeople and driving schools, but the tax also involves higher costs for these companies. Whether the net effect is negative or positive depends on a number of different factors, such as how much travel time the companies earn, how the companies value their time, whether they can influence when during the day they travel, and whether they can charge their end customers for this higher expense. The survey is a case study of a number of tradespeople and driving schools. The same companies’ operations were measured both before and during the trial period. The survey also includes interviews with representatives of professional organisations for tradespeople and for driving schools. The conclusion is that the Stockholm Trial has not led to any major changes for tradespeople. The companies state that there is less traffic and they have shorter travel times. Furthermore, half of the companies charge their customers for the congestion tax. The attitude to the congestion tax is still negative, but to a lesser extent than before the trial. Driving schools’ proportion of clean vehicles has increased considerably between the two occasions when monitoring was conducted. The proportion of clean vehicles at driving schools has risen from 6% in 2004 to 50% in 2006. The driving schools have not changed their operations in other respects. Tradespeople On average, tradespeople have paid SEK 25 in congestion tax per day and vehicle during the week monitored in 2006. There is a great deal of variation between the companies. Two of the 12 companies interviewed pay the maximum tax of SEK 60 per day for all their vehicles, on all days of the week monitored, and a relatively large number of the companies pay the maximum tax for some of their vehicles on some days per week. Two companies state that they have never paid the maximum tax. The companies located in the inner city paid an average of SEK 34/vehicle and day in congestion tax during the week monitored, while tradespeople located outside the inner city paid SEK 20/vehicle and day. More than half the companies charge customers for the congestion tax, and about one in five tradespeople debit an extra administration fee for the tax. Tradespeople notice that traffic in the inner city has decreased. On the major routes, such as the Essingeleden bypass, they perceive that traffic is unchanged. Many point out in the interviews that it is easier to find a parking space in the inner city. Others claim the opposite; that it is more difficult in daytime, because fewer inner-city residents use their car to get to 112

work. On average, tradespeople estimate that their travel time has fallen by about 20%. Measurements via drivers’ logbooks reveal that the average length of journey has not altered, and was about 13 km on both occasions when monitoring work was performed. The average travel time per journey has decreased, from 22 to 19 minutes. Average speed has increased by 18% (from 33 km/h to 39 km/h). During the trial, tradespeople have not made any major changes to their operations, besides invoicing customers for the congestion tax. Driving schools In the autumn of 2004, three of the ten driving schools in the survey had at least one clean vehicle in its fleet, and four driving schools planned to purchase such vehicles. By March 2006, five of the seven driving schools that previously lacked clean vehicles had purchased at least one to add to their fleet. Just two of the driving schools had no clean vehicles the second time that data was collected. In March 2006, the driving schools interviewed had a total of 50 registered vehicles, of which 25 were clean vehicles. The driving school lessons usually take place close to the school. The driving schools have a number of relatively fixed routes that are used during the lessons. The schools have not made major changes to their routes in conjunction with the Stockholm Trial. One driving school located within the congestion-charge zone states that its lessons stay within the zone somewhat more often than before. Two schools situated outside the zone say that they stay outside the zone in their lessons more often than before the trial. During the week monitored in 2006, the proportion of lessons that cross the congestion-charge zone cordon was the same as in the week monitored in 2004. The clean vehicles of the driving schools are used more often in lessons where the pupil crosses the cordon compared to the schools’ other vehicles. During the week monitored, the maximum congestion tax was payable for more than 40% of the vehicles (not clean vehicles) on all days. On average, the cost of the congestion tax was SEK 14 per lesson (clean vehicles are excluded). None of the driving schools interviewed charge an extra fee for the congestion tax. Just under half of the driving schools raised their lesson prices at the end of 2005/start of 2006. This increase was partly to cover the extra cost of the congestion tax. 113

12.2 Tradespeople <strong>and</strong> driving<br />

schools<br />

The aim of this study is to study <strong>the</strong> effects of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Stockholm</strong> Trial on<br />

tradespeople <strong>and</strong> driving schools. The hypo<strong>the</strong>sis is that <strong>the</strong> congestion<br />

tax has both negative <strong>and</strong> positive effects on tradespeople <strong>and</strong> driving<br />

schools. Reduced traffic as a result of <strong>the</strong> tax is positive, because this entails<br />

shorter travel times for tradespeople <strong>and</strong> driving schools, but <strong>the</strong> tax<br />

also involves higher costs for <strong>the</strong>se companies. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> net effect is<br />

negative or positive depends on a number of different factors, such as<br />

how much travel time <strong>the</strong> companies earn, how <strong>the</strong> companies value <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

time, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y can influence when during <strong>the</strong> day <strong>the</strong>y travel, <strong>and</strong><br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y can charge <strong>the</strong>ir end customers for this higher expense.<br />

The survey is a case study of a number of tradespeople <strong>and</strong> driving schools.<br />

The same companies’ operations were measured both before <strong>and</strong> during<br />

<strong>the</strong> trial period. The survey also includes interviews with representatives<br />

of professional organisations for tradespeople <strong>and</strong> for driving schools.<br />

The conclusion is that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Stockholm</strong> Trial has not led to any major<br />

changes for tradespeople. The companies state that <strong>the</strong>re is less traffic <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>y have shorter travel times. Fur<strong>the</strong>rmore, half of <strong>the</strong> companies charge<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir customers for <strong>the</strong> congestion tax. The attitude to <strong>the</strong> congestion tax<br />

is still negative, but to a lesser extent than before <strong>the</strong> trial.<br />

Driving schools’ proportion of clean vehicles has increased considerably<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two occasions when monitoring was conducted. The proportion<br />

of clean vehicles at driving schools has risen <strong>from</strong> 6% in 2004 to<br />

50% in 2006. The driving schools have not changed <strong>the</strong>ir operations in<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r respects.<br />

Tradespeople<br />

On average, tradespeople have paid SEK 25 in congestion tax per day <strong>and</strong><br />

vehicle during <strong>the</strong> week monitored in 2006. There is a great deal of variation<br />

between <strong>the</strong> companies. Two of <strong>the</strong> 12 companies interviewed pay<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum tax of SEK 60 per day for all <strong>the</strong>ir vehicles, on all days of<br />

<strong>the</strong> week monitored, <strong>and</strong> a relatively large number of <strong>the</strong> companies pay<br />

<strong>the</strong> maximum tax for some of <strong>the</strong>ir vehicles on some days per week. Two<br />

companies state that <strong>the</strong>y have never paid <strong>the</strong> maximum tax. The companies<br />

located in <strong>the</strong> inner city paid an average of SEK 34/vehicle <strong>and</strong> day<br />

in congestion tax during <strong>the</strong> week monitored, while tradespeople located<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> inner city paid SEK 20/vehicle <strong>and</strong> day. More than half <strong>the</strong><br />

companies charge customers for <strong>the</strong> congestion tax, <strong>and</strong> about one in five<br />

tradespeople debit an extra administration fee for <strong>the</strong> tax.<br />

Tradespeople notice that traffic in <strong>the</strong> inner city has decreased. On <strong>the</strong><br />

major routes, such as <strong>the</strong> Essingeleden bypass, <strong>the</strong>y perceive that traffic is<br />

unchanged. Many point out in <strong>the</strong> interviews that it is easier to find a parking<br />

space in <strong>the</strong> inner city. O<strong>the</strong>rs claim <strong>the</strong> opposite; that it is more difficult<br />

in daytime, because fewer inner-city residents use <strong>the</strong>ir car to get to<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!