14.07.2013 Views

Youth Saving Patterns and Performance in Ghana - Center for ...

Youth Saving Patterns and Performance in Ghana - Center for ...

Youth Saving Patterns and Performance in Ghana - Center for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Colombia <strong>Ghana</strong> Kenya Nepal<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Per<strong>for</strong>mance</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Ghana</strong><br />

Background<br />

by G<strong>in</strong>a A.N. Chowa, Mat Despard, & Isaac Osei-Akoto<br />

If provided an opportunity to save via <strong>for</strong>mal f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

services, will youth participate? This is one of the<br />

fundamental questions be<strong>in</strong>g asked by <strong>Youth</strong>Save, a<br />

four-country study targeted <strong>for</strong> young people ages 12<br />

to 18 liv<strong>in</strong>g predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>in</strong> low-<strong>in</strong>come households.<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> do save <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mally <strong>and</strong>, given an opportunity,<br />

may also participate <strong>in</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal bank<strong>in</strong>g services (UNCDF,<br />

2011). However, such opportunities are m<strong>in</strong>imal. On the<br />

other h<strong>and</strong>, the limited research available suggests that<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>clusion has important youth development<br />

effects <strong>and</strong> deserves greater study (Chowa & Ansong,<br />

2010; Deshp<strong>and</strong>e & Zimmerman, 2010; Elliott, 2012;<br />

Scanlon & Adams, 2009; Ssewamala & Ismayilova, 2009).<br />

<strong>Youth</strong>Save is a pioneer<strong>in</strong>g project designed to <strong>in</strong>crease<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> development among low-<strong>in</strong>come youth<br />

<strong>in</strong> Colombia, <strong>Ghana</strong>, Kenya, <strong>and</strong> Nepal. The goals of<br />

<strong>Youth</strong>Save research are to measure the uptake, sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

outcomes, experiences, <strong>and</strong> impacts of <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong>s<br />

Accounts (YSAs) on clients <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

In <strong>Ghana</strong>, a rigorous research design that <strong>in</strong>cludes<br />

a control group, with quantitative <strong>and</strong> qualitative<br />

evidence, has been implemented to assess the impact<br />

of sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts on youth development <strong>and</strong> asset<br />

accumulation.<br />

This research brief focuses on the sav<strong>in</strong>g attitudes <strong>and</strong><br />

behavior of youth <strong>in</strong> the <strong>Youth</strong>Save <strong>Ghana</strong> Experiment.<br />

Many youth <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) save or try to<br />

save part of their <strong>in</strong>come—usually <strong>for</strong> school materials<br />

<strong>and</strong> fees, cloth<strong>in</strong>g, enterta<strong>in</strong>ment, <strong>and</strong> emergencies—by<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal methods such as cash boxes <strong>and</strong> hid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

places (UNCDF, 2011). When given access to sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

products, <strong>in</strong>centives, <strong>and</strong> support, youth <strong>in</strong> SSA are also<br />

able to save us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong>mal methods (Chowa & Ansong,<br />

2010; Erulkar & Chong, 2005; Mason, Nam, Clancy, Kim,<br />

& Loke, 2010; Ssewamala & Ismayilova, 2009). Still,<br />

little is known about the sav<strong>in</strong>g attitudes <strong>and</strong> behavior of<br />

July 2012 <strong>Youth</strong>Save Research Brief No. 12-36<br />

<strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Social Development<br />

youth <strong>in</strong> SSA. Research <strong>in</strong> <strong>Youth</strong>Save is anticipated to fill<br />

some of these gaps.<br />

Methods<br />

The <strong>Ghana</strong> Experiment uses a cluster r<strong>and</strong>omized<br />

design, with 100 schools r<strong>and</strong>omly selected from eight<br />

of <strong>Ghana</strong>’s ten regions. Fifty-schools were r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

assigned to the treatment condition <strong>and</strong> another 50<br />

schools were r<strong>and</strong>omly assigned to the control condition.<br />

Sixty students were r<strong>and</strong>omly selected from each school<br />

<strong>for</strong> a total of 3,000 youths <strong>in</strong> the treatment <strong>and</strong> 3,000 <strong>in</strong><br />

the control condition with oversampl<strong>in</strong>g to take attrition<br />

<strong>in</strong>to account. This process yielded a sample of 6,252<br />

youth.<br />

Data from this brief are from basel<strong>in</strong>e surveys with<br />

6,252 youth <strong>and</strong> 4,576 parents <strong>and</strong> guardians of these<br />

youth. The youth are from three grade levels, Primary<br />

6 (equivalent to grade 6 <strong>in</strong> the US), Junior High School<br />

1 (equivalent to grade 7 <strong>in</strong> the US), <strong>and</strong> Junior High<br />

School 2 (equivalent to grade 8 <strong>in</strong> the US). Nearly equal<br />

numbers of girls (51%) <strong>and</strong> boys (49%) were <strong>in</strong>terviewed.<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> were also fairly evenly divided by grade level,<br />

<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Primary 6 (36%), JHS1 (32%), <strong>and</strong> JHS2 (32%).<br />

The average age of youth is 15.4 years. Seventy-three<br />

percent of youth surveyed at basel<strong>in</strong>e have a parent or<br />

guardian who was also surveyed at basel<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

The youth survey <strong>in</strong>cluded questions about<br />

demographics, education, health, f<strong>in</strong>ancial capability,<br />

asset ownership, liv<strong>in</strong>g conditions, <strong>and</strong> future aspirations<br />

<strong>and</strong> expectations. The parent or guardian questionnaire<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded questions on household <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation, education,<br />

outlook <strong>and</strong> expectations, health, <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial wellbe<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Data were collected from May through June 2011 by<br />

our partners at the Institute of Statistical, Social <strong>and</strong><br />

Economic Research (ISSER) at the University of <strong>Ghana</strong>.


F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Amounts <strong>and</strong> Sources of Money<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> were asked how much money they had <strong>in</strong> their<br />

possession at the time of the survey. Most youth (72%)<br />

have at least some money that belongs to them.<br />

The average amount is 15.38 GHS (10.15 USD), 1 but<br />

the median is much lower at 5.00 GHS (3.30 USD),<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that most participants have modest amounts<br />

of money, while a relatively small number have larger<br />

amounts. Most youth (74%) report receiv<strong>in</strong>g money from<br />

their parents or other family members, <strong>and</strong> nearly a<br />

quarter (23%) report earn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>come. Other sources of<br />

money <strong>in</strong>clude gifts from family members, friends, <strong>and</strong><br />

boyfriends (Figure 1). Boys have significantly more money<br />

than girls (18.02 GHS vs. 12.80 GHS or 11.89 USD vs.<br />

8.45 USD, p


Figure 3. <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Frequency by Earned Income<br />

Figure 4. <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong> Duration: How Soon <strong>Youth</strong> Plan<br />

to Use <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong>s (% of <strong>Youth</strong>)<br />

Figure 5. Average Monthly <strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong>s<br />

3<br />

As seen <strong>in</strong> Figure 5, the difference between boys (15.33<br />

GHS or 10.12 USD) <strong>and</strong> girls (12.32 GHS or 8.13 USD)<br />

<strong>in</strong> the amount saved <strong>in</strong> a typical month is statistically<br />

significant (p


<strong>Sav<strong>in</strong>g</strong>s Methods<br />

If most youth are sav<strong>in</strong>g money, albeit <strong>for</strong> short durations<br />

<strong>and</strong> mostly short-term purposes, where are they actually<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g aside their money? Do any participants use<br />

banks to deposit their sav<strong>in</strong>gs? Do they use <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal<br />

mechanisms, like susu collectors? 3 Table 1 shows the<br />

various ways that youth use to set aside money:<br />

Participants mostly rely on <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal methods, like us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

friends or family members as safe-keepers or hid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

money, while few youth make deposits with a <strong>for</strong>mal<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution. Low usage of sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts<br />

among youth is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g, as one must be age 18 or<br />

older to open <strong>and</strong> operate a bank account <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ghana</strong>. Still,<br />

77% of those who say they save money <strong>in</strong> an account<br />

with a <strong>for</strong>mal f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitution (N=113) are under the<br />

age of 18. 4 The most common “other” sav<strong>in</strong>g method is<br />

keep<strong>in</strong>g money <strong>in</strong> their school bag.<br />

More girls (N=1,039) than boys (N=927) say that they<br />

depend on friends or family members to safeguard their<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs. There is a statistically significant difference <strong>in</strong><br />

this dependency (χ 2 =8.68, p


References<br />

Chowa, G., & Ansong, D. (2010). <strong>Youth</strong> <strong>and</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>in</strong> AssetsAfrica. Children <strong>and</strong> <strong>Youth</strong> Services Review,<br />

32(11), 1591-1596.<br />

Deshp<strong>and</strong>e, R., & Zimmerman, J. (Eds.) (2010). <strong>Youth</strong><br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g countries: Trends <strong>in</strong> practice, gaps<br />

<strong>in</strong> knowledge (A report of the <strong>Youth</strong>Save Consortium).<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: <strong>Youth</strong>Save Consortium.<br />

Elliott, W. (2012). Does structural <strong>in</strong>equality beg<strong>in</strong> with<br />

a bank account? (Creat<strong>in</strong>g a F<strong>in</strong>ancial Stake <strong>in</strong> College,<br />

Report II). Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, DC: New America Foundation;<br />

St. Louis, MO: Wash<strong>in</strong>gton University, <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Social<br />

Development.<br />

Elliott, W., Jung, H., Kim, K., & Chowa, G. (2010). A<br />

multi-group structural equation model (SEM) exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

asset hold<strong>in</strong>g effects on educational atta<strong>in</strong>ment by race<br />

<strong>and</strong> gender. Journal of Children <strong>and</strong> Poverty, 16(2), 91-<br />

121.<br />

Erulkar, A., & Chong, E. (2005). Evaluation of a sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

<strong>and</strong> microcredit program <strong>for</strong> vulnerable young women <strong>in</strong><br />

Nairobi. Nairobi, Kenya: Population Council.<br />

Hirschl<strong>and</strong>, M. (2009). <strong>Youth</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts: A<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial service perspective (MicroReport #163).<br />

Retrieved from http://www.microl<strong>in</strong>ks.org/ev02.<br />

php?ID=44890_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC<br />

Mason, L. R., Nam, Y., Clancy, M., Kim, Y., & Loke, V.<br />

(2010). Child development accounts <strong>and</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong><br />

children’s future: Do f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>centives matter? Child<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>Youth</strong> Services Review, 32, 1570-1576.<br />

Scanlon, E. & Adams, D. (2009). Do assets affect wellbe<strong>in</strong>g?<br />

Perceptions of youth <strong>in</strong> a matched sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

program. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(1), 33-<br />

46.<br />

Ssewamala, F. M., & Ismayilova, L. (2009). Integrat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

children sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts <strong>in</strong> the care <strong>and</strong> support of<br />

orphaned adolescents <strong>in</strong> rural Ug<strong>and</strong>a. Social Service<br />

Review, 83(3), 453-472.<br />

United Nations Capital Development Fund (2011).<br />

Listen<strong>in</strong>g to youth: Market research to design f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-f<strong>in</strong>ancial services <strong>for</strong> youth <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa. Retrieved from http://mastercardfdn.org/whatwe-are-learn<strong>in</strong>g/publications/youth-f<strong>in</strong>ancial-<strong>in</strong>clusion<br />

5<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

This brief is a product of the <strong>Youth</strong>Save Project.<br />

Supported by The MasterCard Foundation, <strong>Youth</strong>Save<br />

<strong>in</strong>vestigates the potential of sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts as a<br />

tool <strong>for</strong> youth development <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong><br />

develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, by co-creat<strong>in</strong>g tailored, susta<strong>in</strong>able<br />

sav<strong>in</strong>gs products with local f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>and</strong><br />

assess<strong>in</strong>g their per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> development outcomes<br />

with local researchers. The project is an <strong>in</strong>itiative of the<br />

<strong>Youth</strong>Save Consortium, coord<strong>in</strong>ated by Save the Children<br />

<strong>in</strong> partnership with the <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Social Development<br />

at Wash<strong>in</strong>gton University <strong>in</strong> St. Louis, the New America<br />

Foundation, <strong>and</strong> the Consultative Group to Assist the<br />

Poor (CGAP).<br />

<strong>Youth</strong>Save Research Partners<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton University<br />

George Warren Brown School of Social Work<br />

<strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Social Development<br />

Campus Box 1196<br />

One Brook<strong>in</strong>gs Drive<br />

St. Louis, Missouri 63130-4899<br />

University of <strong>Ghana</strong><br />

Institute <strong>for</strong> Statistical, Social <strong>and</strong> Economic Research<br />

(ISSER)<br />

Legon, <strong>Ghana</strong><br />

Kenya Institute <strong>for</strong> Public Policy Research<br />

<strong>and</strong> Analysis (KIPPRA)<br />

Nairobi, Kenya<br />

New ERA<br />

Kathm<strong>and</strong>u, Nepal<br />

Universidad de los Andes<br />

Bogotá, Colombia<br />

University of North Carol<strong>in</strong>a<br />

School of Social Work<br />

Chapel Hill, North Carol<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Columbia University<br />

School of Social Work<br />

New York, New York<br />

Suggested Citation<br />

Chowa, G. A. N., Despard, M., & Osei-Akoto, I. (2012).<br />

<strong>Youth</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g patterns <strong>and</strong> per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ghana</strong><br />

(<strong>Youth</strong>Save Research Brief 12-36). St. Louis, MO:<br />

Wash<strong>in</strong>gton University, <strong>Center</strong> <strong>for</strong> Social Development.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!