14.07.2013 Views

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PATRIOTIC AND POPULAR POETS<br />

Elizabethan in the early years of the second decade, a nostalgia made acute by<br />

the death of Prince Henry in 1612 (for many, including Browne, Henry was<br />

perceived as the direct link to Elizabethan chivalry and maritime exploration)<br />

and the subsequent marriage of Elizabeth to the Elector Palatine in 1613. But<br />

Browne was still too much the gentleman amateur to do more than either<br />

refine what he had already received or call for something he could only<br />

intermittently produce.<br />

In 1614, as part of the short-lived resurgence of pastoral, Browne “drove<br />

forth” once again in a sort of generic stutter step with The Shepheard’s Pipe.<br />

The seven eclogues, on diverse topics, seek to create a larger poetic moment<br />

for their author and themselves by turning pastoral into a community mode as<br />

Browne (Willy) incorporates his friends, George Wither (Roget) and<br />

Christopher Brooke (Cutty), into several of the eclogues. There is also a small<br />

attempt to resuscitate a native tradition of poetry: Browne translates the Tale<br />

of Jonathas by Chaucer’s contemporary Thomas Hoccleve in the first eclogue,<br />

and the third eclogue is meant to stir our sympathies for Old Neddy<br />

(Drayton?), who because of deceit and treachery, finds a receptive audience<br />

only in “The Farmer’s house”—hardly a Penshurst Place. But how significant<br />

can the moment be or become when the poet urged to exchange the oaten<br />

reed for a trumpet is Christopher Brooke? How deep is Browne’s commitment<br />

to the native past when Skelton is summoned as the epitome of the bad poet<br />

(Eclogue 1)? In the pastoral revival of 1613–16, it is surely possible to witness<br />

its thinning as an imaginative resource, and the fact that Browne never<br />

published the third part of Britannia’s Pastorals, with its trenchant criticisms of<br />

the Spanish, 21 suggests how marginal the pastoral had become as a way of<br />

voicing national themes. It could still serve as an opportunity for selfpresentation,<br />

and Browne would be occasionally echoed by later regionalists<br />

like the Welsh poet of the Usk, Henry Vaughan. But beyond that, Spenserian<br />

pastoral, with its complex relation to national destiny, needed to be forgotten<br />

before it could be fully reactivated, as Milton was to do beginning in 1629<br />

with his ode “On the Morning of Christ’s Nativity.”<br />

Browne’s was a literary career—if “career” is even the right word—that<br />

became increasingly less visible. Many of his later years were spent either at<br />

Oxford or with the Herbert family at Wilton, the same location where Sidney<br />

had composed portions of the New Arcadia in the 1580s. The latter was surely<br />

an appropriate retreat for the poet who praised Drayton in Poly-Olbion by<br />

associating him with “Immortall Sydney” and who also wrote one of the<br />

century’s best epitaphs, if one reads only the first six lines, on Mary Sidney,<br />

the Countess of Pembroke, who died in 1621:<br />

Underneath this sable Herse<br />

Lyes the subject of all verse:<br />

Sydneys sister, Pembroke’s Mother:<br />

Death, ere thou hast slaine another,<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!