14.07.2013 Views

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM WROTH TO PHILIPS<br />

Butt O my hurt, makes my lost hart confess<br />

I love, and must: So farwell liberty.<br />

But she is also unable to imagine for very long, or very emphatically, another<br />

alternative to her circumstances. Her flight is a brief and airy trespass, her return<br />

a muted and dutiful concession. In her desire to seek out some other “hoste,” we<br />

are reminded of Herbert in “The Collar,” but without the anger and snap.<br />

“Predicament,” in fact, seems to be the right word to describe the kind of<br />

emotional and circumstantial complexity revealed in a sonnet like this, one that<br />

perhaps helps to explain why a contemporary like Jonson might proclaim<br />

Wroth’s artistry rather than her originality. As a number of modern readers have<br />

suggested, the sonnets do not assert a strongly eroticized female point of view to<br />

match or to rival the kind of rhetorical flourishings exhibited by male wooers. 15<br />

There are no blazons, no attempts at seductive persuasion, no groveling at the<br />

feet of the beloved in Pamphilia to Amphilanthus. As her sonnet beginning “Like<br />

to the Indians, scorched with the Sun” suggests, Wroth’s speaker bears “the<br />

marke of Cupids might”—the stigmata of eros—inwardly, “in hart as they in<br />

skin” bear the mark of Phoebus’s light. And as these sonnets further illustrate,<br />

Wroth’s poems frequently reaffirm the value of constancy: from a pledge of<br />

ceaseless “offrings to love while I Live,” to the plain-speaking resolve of “I love,<br />

and must.”<br />

Indeed, more often than not we are struck by the frequent removal, not the<br />

reversal, of the usually explicit gender markings in this genre, as Wroth makes<br />

Pamphilia’s own subjectivity, not Amphilanthus, the object of her focus, her<br />

pursuit. Pamphilia can flee—into the self (how is my situation comparable to<br />

that of a dark-skinned Indian whose part I once played in Jonson’s 1606 Mosque<br />

of Blackness?); or into darkness, in the poem beginning:<br />

Truly poore Night thou wellcome art to mee<br />

I love thee better in this sad attire<br />

Then that which raiseth some mens phant’sies higher<br />

Like painted outsid[e]s which foule inward bee.<br />

She regards herself not as a galley charged with forgetfulness but as<br />

a ship, on Goodwines cast by wind,<br />

The more she strives, more deepe in sand is prest<br />

Till she bee lost; so am I, in this kind<br />

Sunk, and devour’d, and swallow’d by unrest.<br />

But what she never does is pursue Amphilanthus: the Duchess of Malfi she is<br />

not. One might say, as Jonson implies, that courtly decorum, especially of a high<br />

Sidneyan order, does not permit Wroth to be the aggressor, a Daphne chasing<br />

Apollo; that image might too readily become material for male erotic fantasy, as<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!