14.07.2013 Views

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ARENAS OF RETREAT<br />

In focusing on Nicodemus, Vaughan stands completely apart from the other<br />

devotional poets with whom he is usually associated: Donne, Herbert, Crashaw,<br />

or even Milton have no place for Nicodemus in their poetry. And in favoring him,<br />

Vaughan goes against strong exegetical evidence to the contrary, perhaps even<br />

against Calvin’s earlier condemnation of those Protestants as cowardly Nicodemites<br />

who chose to go along with Catholic formalities rather than to risk persecution. 27<br />

Nicodemus has been always a questionable figure for the orthodox; but for Vaughan,<br />

living in a “land of darkness and blinde eyes,” requiring secrecy under the threat of<br />

persecution and yet wishing regeneration, Nicodemus could readily be imagined<br />

as a “kinred” spirit. “The Night,” it should be noted, is next to “Abels blood.”<br />

But something else odd happens in the poem, too, something for which, one<br />

can only guess, Vaughan’s reading of Nicodemus played a pivotal role as well.<br />

Quem quaeritis? If Nicodemus is the exemplary believer (“Most blest believer<br />

he!”) who reappears in John 19:39 to help preserve Jesus’s body, Vaughan<br />

becomes a Mary Magdalene figure looking for the Lord. “And they say unto her,<br />

Woman why weepest thou? She said unto them Because they have taken my<br />

Lord, and I know not where they had laid him” (John 20:13):<br />

O who will tell me, where<br />

He found thee at that dead and silent hour!<br />

What hallow’d solitary ground did bear<br />

So rare a flower,<br />

Within whose sacred leafs did lie<br />

The fulness of the Deity.<br />

Mary’s lament for Jesus becomes braided into Vaughan’s for a vision comparable<br />

to Nicodemus’s, a fusion in which the worry of loss, concentrated in the word<br />

“dead,” is gradually transformed into an experience of wonder by the image of<br />

“the fulness of the Deity” emerging from “so rare a flower.” There is nothing<br />

shocking here, as there is in “I walkt the other day,” when the “warm Recluse”<br />

delivers its startling message of loss and renewal. Rather, the moment of solitude—<br />

Nicodemus’s, Mary’s, Vaughan’s, the reader’s—is hallowed, the ground sanctified,<br />

as it were, by a view of Jesus alone, observed only by nature and by us:<br />

No mercy-seat of gold,<br />

No dead and dusty Cherub, nor carv’d stone,<br />

But his own living works did my Lord hold<br />

And lodge alone;<br />

Where trees and herbs did watch and peep<br />

And wonder, while the Jews did sleep.<br />

“My Lord”: from here, we move from one imaginary garden to another, as the<br />

voice migrates into that of the bride in the Song of Songs: “I am come into my<br />

garden…I sleep, but my heart waketh; it is the voice of my beloved that<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!