14.07.2013 Views

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUBSTANCE AND STYLE IN GEORGE HERBERT<br />

Although primarily a lyricist, a poet of “private ejaculations,” as the 1633 title<br />

page suggests, Herbert was also probably the finest teller of stories in verse in<br />

the seventeenth century. In “Redemption,” we understand exactly why Herbert<br />

valued “stories and sayings” for their educative value: as memorial aids superior<br />

to exhortation. 24 Long after we have forgotten the particular route—bizarre as it<br />

is—that has brought this tenant farmer to Calvary, we will continue to<br />

remember the reward of resolve because the plot and the final saying are so<br />

completely punctuated: “Your suit is granted, said, & died.” In this drastically<br />

foreshortened poem, there is no time for reflection by the speaker, no time to<br />

pause in front of the crucifixion and to meditate, no time even for a reply.<br />

Getting there then—and now—is what counts.<br />

And, of course, we remember the final lyric of “The Church,” “Love [III]”:<br />

not because it is last (getting there is only just a beginning) or even because,<br />

coming after a sequence on the Four Last Things (“Death,” “Dooms-day,”<br />

“Judgment,” and “Heaven”), it invites us to imagine the soul’s reception into<br />

heaven, as astonishing as that action is; but because after so many abbreviated<br />

exchanges between Christ and the various speakers in The Temple, exchanges<br />

that have been rendered cryptically (as in “Redemption”) or correctively (as in<br />

“Jordan [II]”) or as part of a formal dialogue that is theologically unsatisfying to<br />

the speaker (“A Dialogue”), we are suddenly and finally treated to the fullest<br />

representation in language of a dialogue that has always been at the desired<br />

center of The Temple. In “Love [III],” the earlier “whispers” and “methoughts”<br />

give way to table talk of the most profound order:<br />

Love bade me welcome: yet my soul drew back,<br />

Guilty of dust and sinne.<br />

But quick-eye’d Love, observing me grow slack<br />

From my first entrance in,<br />

Drew nearer to me, sweetly questioning,<br />

If I lack’d any thing.<br />

A guest, I answer’d, worthy to be here:<br />

Love said, You shall be he.<br />

I the unkinde, ungratefull? Ah my deare,<br />

I cannot look on thee.<br />

Love took my hand, and smiling did reply,<br />

Who made the eyes but I?<br />

Truth Lord, but I have marr’d them: let my shame<br />

Go where it doth deserve.<br />

And know you not, sayes Love, who bore the blame:<br />

My Deare, then I will serve.<br />

You must sit down, sayes Love, and taste my meat:<br />

So I did sit and eat.<br />

154

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!