14.07.2013 Views

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

ENG LYRIC POETRY.pdf - STIBA Malang

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAROLINE AMUSEMENTS<br />

There your sad thoughts with joy and wonder fill,<br />

And see Seas calme as Earth, Earth as your Will.<br />

And scattered among his verse, especially in the second volume entitled Lucasta:<br />

Posthume Poems (1659), a number of poems take the Caroline fetish for small<br />

things in an overtly political direction. Without being fully Aesopian, these<br />

suggest that Lovelace’s emphasis on ants and snails in the latter collection marks<br />

a further turn toward a genre already coded as subversive—Aesop himself was a<br />

slave—and exploited as such by fellow royalists like John Ogilby in his 1651<br />

edition of The Fables of Aesop Paraphras’d in Verse. 55<br />

A willingness to spot diamonds in the rough—and few poets in the<br />

seventeenth century are as syntactically convoluted as Lovelace—and an<br />

interest in drawing connections between Lovelace and a major poet like<br />

Marvell, who seems to have made sustained imaginative works out of<br />

possibilities barely glimpsed by Lovelace, are necessary responses to his verse. So,<br />

too, is recognizing Lovelace as the epitome of the Cavalier poet: a third<br />

generation soldier (his grandfather had been knighted by Essex for his efforts in<br />

the Irish campaign, his father by James) and loyalist virtuoso whose knowledge<br />

of the sister arts—to say nothing about his quasi-scientific interest in natural<br />

lore—seemed an inevitable extension of his royalist sympathies. Van Dyck’s<br />

pupil and successor at Charles’s court, Peter Lely, was an intimate friend of<br />

Lovelace; both were admitted to the Freedom of the Painter’s Company in 1647.<br />

Allusions to Italian masters like Raphael, Giorgione, and Titian dot the canvass<br />

of his writings. On several occasions, furthermore, Lovelace’s special interest in<br />

the visual arts, besides helping to account for a hypertrophied use of imagery,<br />

shows him equating a royalist politics with an aesthetic “naturalism.” In a poem<br />

that has earned the right to be called the most intensely conceived ecphrastic<br />

analysis of a painting so far produced in England, 56 the sympathetic assessment<br />

by painter and poet emerges as the only legitimate response to the current<br />

political situation. After twenty lines describing the clouded fortunes of Charles<br />

and the brave sufferings shared by the son, Lovelace insists on the acute<br />

naturalism of Lely’s art, the graceful and mysterious connection between the<br />

painter and the royal sitters:<br />

Not as of old, when a rough hand did speake<br />

A strong Aspect, and a faire face, a weake;<br />

When only a black beard cried Villaine, and<br />

By Hieroglyphicks we could understand;<br />

When Chrystall typified in a white spot,<br />

And the bright Ruby was but one red blot;<br />

Thou doest the things Orientally the same,<br />

Not only paintst its colour, but its flame:<br />

Thou sorrow canst designe without a teare,<br />

And with the Man his very Hope or Feare;<br />

126

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!