Demonstrative Pronouns and Personal Pronouns. German der vs. er.
Demonstrative Pronouns and Personal Pronouns. German der vs. er.
Demonstrative Pronouns and Personal Pronouns. German der vs. er.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
demonstratives themselves is not seen as representing<br />
a particularly urgent task.<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
The work reported h<strong>er</strong>e is being carried out in a<br />
study project of the Cognitive Science Int<strong>er</strong>national<br />
Mast<strong>er</strong> Programme at the Univ<strong>er</strong>sity of<br />
Osnabrück. Project participants are Phil Cummins,<br />
Boris Gutbrod, Kyoung-ho Park, Tom Rozario,<br />
Yufan Zhao <strong>and</strong> as staff advis<strong>er</strong>s Pet<strong>er</strong><br />
Bosch, Graham Katz, Carla Umbach, <strong>and</strong> Jaqueline<br />
Griego. The authors gratefully acknowledge<br />
the contributions of all participants <strong>and</strong> advis<strong>er</strong>s.<br />
Ref<strong>er</strong>ences<br />
Adrian Akmajian & Ray Jackendoff. 1970. Coref<strong>er</strong>entiality<br />
<strong>and</strong> stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 1.<br />
P<strong>er</strong> Bærentzen. 1995. Zum Gebrauch <strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong> Pronominalformen<br />
'<strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong>en' und '<strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong><strong>er</strong>' im heutigen<br />
Deutsch. Beiträge zur Geschichte <strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong><br />
deutschen Sprache und Lit<strong>er</strong>atur, 117: 299-<br />
217.<br />
Pet<strong>er</strong> Bosch. 1983. Agreement <strong>and</strong> Anaphora.<br />
Academic Press, London.<br />
Pet<strong>er</strong> Bosch. 1987. <strong>Pronouns</strong> un<strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong> control.<br />
Journal of Semantics, 5:65-78.<br />
Pet<strong>er</strong> Bosch. 1988. Representing <strong>and</strong> accessing<br />
focussed ref<strong>er</strong>ents. Language <strong>and</strong> Cognitive<br />
Processes, 3: 207-231.<br />
Philip Cummins et al. in preparation. <strong>G<strong>er</strong>man</strong><br />
demonstratives. Institute of Cognitive Science,<br />
Univ<strong>er</strong>sity of Osnabrück.<br />
Miriam Eck<strong>er</strong>t & Michael Strube. 2000. Dialogue<br />
acts, synchronizing units, <strong>and</strong> anaphora<br />
resolution. Journal of Semantics 17:51-89<br />
Hans-Martin Gärtn<strong>er</strong>. 2001. Are th<strong>er</strong>e V2 relative<br />
clauses in <strong>G<strong>er</strong>man</strong>? Journal of Comparative<br />
<strong>G<strong>er</strong>man</strong>ic Linguistics, 3: 97-141.<br />
Talmy Givòn. Syntax. A Functional-Typological<br />
Introduction. 1984. Benjamins, Amst<strong>er</strong>dam.<br />
Barbara Grosz, Aravind Joshi, Scott Weinstein.<br />
1995. Cent<strong>er</strong>ing: A framework for modeling<br />
the local coh<strong>er</strong>ence of discourse. Computational<br />
Linguistics 21:67-90<br />
Megumi Kameyama. 1999. Stressed <strong>and</strong> unstressed<br />
pronouns. In: Pet<strong>er</strong> Bosch & Rob van<br />
<strong>d<strong>er</strong></strong> S<strong>and</strong>t. eds..: Focus. CUP, Cambridge.<br />
306-321.<br />
Edward Keenan <strong>and</strong> B<strong>er</strong>nard Comrie. 1977.<br />
Noun phrase accessibilty <strong>and</strong> univ<strong>er</strong>sal grammar.<br />
Linguistic Inquiry, 8:63-99.<br />
George Lakoff (1971) Presupposition <strong>and</strong> relative<br />
well-formedness. In: Danny Steinb<strong>er</strong>g &<br />
Jakobovits (eds.): Semantics. CUP. Cambridge.<br />
329-344.<br />
Tanya Reinhart. 1983. Anaphora <strong>and</strong> semantic<br />
int<strong>er</strong>pretation. Croom Helm, London.<br />
Mats Rooth. 1992. A theory of focus int<strong>er</strong>pretation.<br />
Natural Language Semantics 1:75-116.<br />
Helmut Schmid. 1994. Probabilistic Part-of-<br />
Speech Tagging Using Decision Trees. Proceedings<br />
of Int<strong>er</strong>national Conf<strong>er</strong>ence on New<br />
Methods in Language Processing. Septemb<strong>er</strong><br />
1994<br />
Bonnie Lynn Webb<strong>er</strong>. 1991. Structure <strong>and</strong> ostension<br />
in the int<strong>er</strong>pretation of discourse deixis.<br />
Language <strong>and</strong> Cognitive Processes 6:107-<br />
135.
Change language