Naz, Antonia Corinthia C and Mario Tuscan N. Naz. 2006. Modeling ...

APPENDICES
A. List of Enumerators and Addresses 37
B. ECOSWAM Options: Annual Cost Calculations 38
C. Socio-Economic Characteristics of Respondents 45
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Estimated Costs of Sanitary Landfill Construction and Operation 6
Table 2: The Attributes and Levels of the Proposed ECOSWAM Services
for Households
11
Table 3: Sampling Size for Households and Business Establishments 12
Table 4: Variables in the Choice Models for the Households 13
Table 5: Attributes and Levels of the Proposed Ecological Solid Waste
Management for Business Establishments
15
Table 6: Variables in the Utility Equation for the Business Establishments 17
Table 7: Options or Scenarios Under Consideration By the Tuba Government 19
Table 8: Environmental Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions (EKAP) of the 20
Respondents
Table 9: Choice Models of the Households (Base Case) 22
Table10: Choice Models of Business Establishments (Base Case) 24
Table11: Implicit Prices for Households (per week) and Business
Establishments (per sack of waste), Model 1
25
Table12: Annual Marginal Revenues From Garbage or User Fees (Above Base 26
Case)
Table13: Annual Maintenance and Operating Costs (MOC) of the ECOSWAM 27
Service Options
Table14: Annual Marginal Costs of ECOSWAM Services 28
Table15: Cost per Stage of ECOSWAM Service as a Percentage of the MOCs 28
Table16: Comparative Costs of ECOSWAM Services Across LGUs 29
Table17: Funding Gap: Marginal Costs vs. Marginal Revenues 30
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 Block A, Choice Set 2
12
Figure 2 Block C, Choice Set 1 15
Figure 3 Households’ Responses to Choice Sets 21
Figure 4 Business Establishments’ Response to Choice Sets 21