13.07.2013 Views

World Development Report 1984

World Development Report 1984

World Development Report 1984

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

have fewer children (see Box 1.1); absolute annual FIGURE 1.2<br />

increases will be close to or more than 80 million Indicators of standard of living, selected countries<br />

people a year in developing countries well into the and years<br />

next century. The baby "bulge" that resulted from Primary school enrollment rate<br />

the trends of high fertility and falling mortality that (percent)<br />

started twenty years ago is now entering child- l00<br />

Singapore<br />

Chile<br />

bearing age. In China, for example, the number of<br />

women aged twenty to thirty-four almost doubled United States<br />

Brazia<br />

Korea<br />

between 1950 and 1980; throughout the 1980s, as E and Wales B anIadesh<br />

the children born in the 1960s enter their twenties,<br />

the number of women marrying and bearing children<br />

will continue to increase. To reduce population<br />

growth to 1 percent a year by the early 1990s,<br />

50<br />

Japan<br />

Sudan<br />

$ Ethiopia<br />

couples in China would need to have fewer than 0<br />

two children on average. 1900 1960 1980<br />

These considerations should not obscure the Literacy rate<br />

central fact that the world's population growth (percent)<br />

rate is falling. The latter part of the twentieth cen- United States<br />

tury has been a demographic watershed, the high England and Chile<br />

point of several centuries of accelerating growth Wales Korea<br />

and the beginning of what demographers project Brazil<br />

to be a continuous decline, until world population 50 Malaysia<br />

stabilizes sometime in the twenty-second century. India<br />

Though absolute numbers will continue to<br />

increase for several decades, the issue now is how<br />

25 Sudan<br />

Bangladesh<br />

Pakistan<br />

quickly the rate of increase can be slowed downand<br />

how individual countries (and the interna-<br />

Ethiopia<br />

tional community) are to cope with continued 1900 1960 1980<br />

growth in the meantime. Life expectancy at birth<br />

(years)<br />

The rise in living standards 60 iCrhie<br />

Until the seventeenth or eighteenth century, life Sweden<br />

Korea<br />

Malaysia India<br />

expectancy had probably changed little, and few United States Pakistan<br />

people were literate. Since 1850, however, while 40 England and Vales . Sudan<br />

world population size has more than tripled,<br />

income per person has increased perhaps six times<br />

in real terms, life expectancy has risen dramati-<br />

Japan Ethiopia<br />

cally, and education has become widespread. Pro- 20<br />

gress in education and life expectancy in develop- 1900 1960 1980<br />

ing countries has been especially notable since GNP per capita<br />

1950. Even in today's poorer developing countries, (constant 1980-82 dollars)<br />

primary school enrollment rates and life expec- M United States<br />

tancy are above the levels achieved by richer countries<br />

eighty years ago, though income per person<br />

3,000<br />

and adult literacy are not (see Figure 1.2). 2,000<br />

But these averages can be misleading. Though England and Chile<br />

most people are better off today, for many the<br />

gains have been small. Since 1950 it has been the<br />

countries<br />

with<br />

wltn<br />

lower<br />

lower<br />

levels<br />

levels or<br />

of income<br />

mcome<br />

per<br />

per<br />

person<br />

person<br />

that have had much faster population growth. In<br />

those countries absolute increases in income have<br />

been much smaller than in the countries which<br />

1,000<br />

Sweden s<br />

Japan<br />

,Sinp Brazil aore<br />

; i<br />

Malaysia<br />

.. Korea<br />

Sudan<br />

Pakistan<br />

India<br />

E thiopa<br />

Sources: Tan and Haines, <strong>1984</strong>; U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1960; Keyfitz<br />

began the period already richer. Consider a simple and Fleiger, 1968; Mosk, 1983; Johansson, 1977; Zimmerman, 1965.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!