Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist
Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist
next — ayes, 45; noes, 38. The following resolution was immediately afterwards adopted “Resolved, That the engrossed bill establishing a provision for the teachers of the Christian religion, together with the names of the ayes and noes on the question of postponing the third reading of the said bill to the fourth Thursday in November next, be published in handbills, and twelve copies thereof delivered to each member of the General Assembly, to be distributed in their respective counties; and that the people thereof be requested to signify their opinion respecting the adoption of such a bill to the next session of Assembly.” The above resolution drew forth a number of able and animated memorials from religious societies of different denominations against the general assessment. Among a great variety of compositions, possessing different degrees of merit, a paper drawn up by Colonel James Madison (now President of the United States), entitled “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” will ever hold a most distinguished place. For elegance of style, strength of reasoning, and purity of principle, it has, perhaps, seldom been equalled; certainly never surpassed by anything in the English language. The sentiments of the people appearing to be decidedly against a general assessment, the question was given up forever. At the same session, however, (October, 1784,) in which the bill providing for a general assessment failed, an act passed for “incorporating the Protestant Episcopal Church.” This bill passed the House of Delegates by a small majority only, being ayes, 47; noes, 38; but in 1786 it was repealed. By the repealing law, the property belonging to all religious societies was secured to those societies respectively, who were authorized to appoint from time to time, according to the rules of their sect, trustees for the managing and applying such property to the religious uses of the society. And all laws which prevented any religious society from regulating its own discipline were repealed. Under the old ecclesiastical establishment no person could celebrate the rites of matrimony but a minister of the Church of England, and, according to the ceremony prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer; cases, however, frequently occurred, especially during the war, where the marriage ceremony was performed by others. This gave rise to an act of October, 1780, which declared all former marriages celebrated by dissenting ministers good and valid in law; and authorized the county courts to license dissenting ministers of the Gospel, not exceeding four to each sect, to celebrate the rites of matrimony within their counties only. It was not until the year 1784 that the dissenters
were put on the same footing as all other persons with respect to celebrating the rites of matrimony. By this act the marriage ceremony might be performed by any minister licensed to preach, according to the rules of the sect of which he professed to be a member. The same act has been incorporated in the late revisal of our laws. The Legislature of 1798 repealed all laws vesting property in the hands of any religious sect; by which the Episcopalians were deprived of the glebes, etc.; by which all religious sects were put into a state of perfect equality as it respected the favors of government. f37
- Page 1 and 2: THE BAPTIST HISTORY COLLECTION STAT
- Page 3 and 4: TO THE BAPTIST GENERAL MEETING OF C
- Page 5 and 6: Convention, serving until his death
- Page 7 and 8: PREFACE. UNLESS the compiler is who
- Page 9 and 10: PREFACE TO THE REVISED EDITION. THE
- Page 11 and 12: A correspondent writing from New Yo
- Page 13 and 14: “‘Having finished his course on
- Page 15 and 16: government was entirely upon the pl
- Page 17 and 18: CHAPTER 2. — FROM THEIR FINAL SET
- Page 19 and 20: send delegates to his meeting-house
- Page 21 and 22: journey, accompanied by Mr. Graves
- Page 23 and 24: with their diligence, many believed
- Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 3. — FROM THE COMMENCEMEN
- Page 27 and 28: After their discharge, which was a
- Page 29 and 30: The rage of persecutors had in nowi
- Page 31 and 32: this season they received the most
- Page 33 and 34: ‘Tis true, they had some outward
- Page 35 and 36: To preserve the purity of doctrine
- Page 37: minister admitted into a parish was
- Page 41 and 42: time to favor Zion at length arrive
- Page 43 and 44: plausible guess about what happened
- Page 45 and 46: they communicate to each other the
- Page 47 and 48: from Virginia and both the Carolina
- Page 49 and 50: Adjourned till Monday morning 8 o
- Page 51 and 52: The church of Shenandoah and Fauqui
- Page 53 and 54: elders, etc. From which it would se
- Page 55 and 56: Query. Ought all the ministerial gi
- Page 57 and 58: were still in use. Mr. Ford also wr
- Page 59 and 60: It seems that one great object in u
- Page 61 and 62: Some rules for the government of As
- Page 63 and 64: The large number of churches and th
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 6. — CONTAINING A HISTORY
- Page 67 and 68: It was then consulted, whether it w
- Page 69 and 70: a place; that if there were some am
- Page 71 and 72: composed of delegates from all the
- Page 73 and 74: The next General Committee met at N
- Page 75 and 76: they went much conversation and agi
- Page 77 and 78: The last act of the General Committ
- Page 79: The former moderator being absent b
- Page 82 and 83: finally divide. f82 To the Lower Di
- Page 84 and 85: presbyteries could be; that the imp
- Page 86 and 87: very interesting. The business was
next — ayes, 45; noes, 38. The follow<strong>in</strong>g resolution was immediately<br />
afterwards adopted<br />
“Resolved, That <strong>the</strong> engrossed bill establish<strong>in</strong>g a provision for <strong>the</strong><br />
teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian religion, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ayes<br />
and noes on <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> postpon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> third read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> said bill<br />
to <strong>the</strong> fourth Thursday <strong>in</strong> November next, be published <strong>in</strong> handbills,<br />
and twelve copies <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> delivered to each member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> General<br />
Assembly, to be distributed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective counties; and that <strong>the</strong><br />
people <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> be requested to signify <strong>the</strong>ir op<strong>in</strong>ion respect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> such a bill to <strong>the</strong> next session <strong>of</strong> Assembly.”<br />
The above resolution drew forth a number <strong>of</strong> able and animated memorials<br />
from religious societies <strong>of</strong> different denom<strong>in</strong>ations aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> general<br />
assessment. Among a great variety <strong>of</strong> compositions, possess<strong>in</strong>g different<br />
degrees <strong>of</strong> merit, a paper drawn up by Colonel James Madison (now President<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States), entitled “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” will ever hold<br />
a most dist<strong>in</strong>guished place. For elegance <strong>of</strong> style, strength <strong>of</strong> reason<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />
purity <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, it has, perhaps, seldom been equalled; certa<strong>in</strong>ly never<br />
surpassed by anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> English language.<br />
The sentiments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people appear<strong>in</strong>g to be decidedly aga<strong>in</strong>st a general<br />
assessment, <strong>the</strong> question was given up forever.<br />
At <strong>the</strong> same session, however, (October, 1784,) <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> bill provid<strong>in</strong>g for<br />
a general assessment failed, an act passed for “<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Protestant<br />
Episcopal Church.” This bill passed <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Delegates by a small<br />
majority only, be<strong>in</strong>g ayes, 47; noes, 38; but <strong>in</strong> 1786 it was repealed. By <strong>the</strong><br />
repeal<strong>in</strong>g law, <strong>the</strong> property belong<strong>in</strong>g to all religious societies was secured to<br />
those societies respectively, who were authorized to appo<strong>in</strong>t from time to time,<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sect, trustees for <strong>the</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g and apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />
such property to <strong>the</strong> religious uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> society. And all laws which<br />
prevented any religious society from regulat<strong>in</strong>g its own discipl<strong>in</strong>e were<br />
repealed.<br />
Under <strong>the</strong> old ecclesiastical establishment no person could celebrate <strong>the</strong> rites<br />
<strong>of</strong> matrimony but a m<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> England, and, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />
ceremony prescribed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Common Prayer; cases, however,<br />
frequently occurred, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war, where <strong>the</strong> marriage ceremony<br />
was performed by o<strong>the</strong>rs. This gave rise to an act <strong>of</strong> October, 1780, which<br />
declared all former marriages celebrated by dissent<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>isters good and<br />
valid <strong>in</strong> law; and authorized <strong>the</strong> county courts to license dissent<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Gospel, not exceed<strong>in</strong>g four to each sect, to celebrate <strong>the</strong> rites <strong>of</strong> matrimony<br />
with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir counties only. It was not until <strong>the</strong> year 1784 that <strong>the</strong> dissenters