Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist

Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
13.07.2013 Views

next — ayes, 45; noes, 38. The following resolution was immediately afterwards adopted “Resolved, That the engrossed bill establishing a provision for the teachers of the Christian religion, together with the names of the ayes and noes on the question of postponing the third reading of the said bill to the fourth Thursday in November next, be published in handbills, and twelve copies thereof delivered to each member of the General Assembly, to be distributed in their respective counties; and that the people thereof be requested to signify their opinion respecting the adoption of such a bill to the next session of Assembly.” The above resolution drew forth a number of able and animated memorials from religious societies of different denominations against the general assessment. Among a great variety of compositions, possessing different degrees of merit, a paper drawn up by Colonel James Madison (now President of the United States), entitled “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” will ever hold a most distinguished place. For elegance of style, strength of reasoning, and purity of principle, it has, perhaps, seldom been equalled; certainly never surpassed by anything in the English language. The sentiments of the people appearing to be decidedly against a general assessment, the question was given up forever. At the same session, however, (October, 1784,) in which the bill providing for a general assessment failed, an act passed for “incorporating the Protestant Episcopal Church.” This bill passed the House of Delegates by a small majority only, being ayes, 47; noes, 38; but in 1786 it was repealed. By the repealing law, the property belonging to all religious societies was secured to those societies respectively, who were authorized to appoint from time to time, according to the rules of their sect, trustees for the managing and applying such property to the religious uses of the society. And all laws which prevented any religious society from regulating its own discipline were repealed. Under the old ecclesiastical establishment no person could celebrate the rites of matrimony but a minister of the Church of England, and, according to the ceremony prescribed in the Book of Common Prayer; cases, however, frequently occurred, especially during the war, where the marriage ceremony was performed by others. This gave rise to an act of October, 1780, which declared all former marriages celebrated by dissenting ministers good and valid in law; and authorized the county courts to license dissenting ministers of the Gospel, not exceeding four to each sect, to celebrate the rites of matrimony within their counties only. It was not until the year 1784 that the dissenters

were put on the same footing as all other persons with respect to celebrating the rites of matrimony. By this act the marriage ceremony might be performed by any minister licensed to preach, according to the rules of the sect of which he professed to be a member. The same act has been incorporated in the late revisal of our laws. The Legislature of 1798 repealed all laws vesting property in the hands of any religious sect; by which the Episcopalians were deprived of the glebes, etc.; by which all religious sects were put into a state of perfect equality as it respected the favors of government. f37

next — ayes, 45; noes, 38. The follow<strong>in</strong>g resolution was immediately<br />

afterwards adopted<br />

“Resolved, That <strong>the</strong> engrossed bill establish<strong>in</strong>g a provision for <strong>the</strong><br />

teachers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Christian religion, toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ayes<br />

and noes on <strong>the</strong> question <strong>of</strong> postpon<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> third read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> said bill<br />

to <strong>the</strong> fourth Thursday <strong>in</strong> November next, be published <strong>in</strong> handbills,<br />

and twelve copies <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> delivered to each member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> General<br />

Assembly, to be distributed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir respective counties; and that <strong>the</strong><br />

people <strong>the</strong>re<strong>of</strong> be requested to signify <strong>the</strong>ir op<strong>in</strong>ion respect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> such a bill to <strong>the</strong> next session <strong>of</strong> Assembly.”<br />

The above resolution drew forth a number <strong>of</strong> able and animated memorials<br />

from religious societies <strong>of</strong> different denom<strong>in</strong>ations aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> general<br />

assessment. Among a great variety <strong>of</strong> compositions, possess<strong>in</strong>g different<br />

degrees <strong>of</strong> merit, a paper drawn up by Colonel James Madison (now President<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States), entitled “A Memorial and Remonstrance,” will ever hold<br />

a most dist<strong>in</strong>guished place. For elegance <strong>of</strong> style, strength <strong>of</strong> reason<strong>in</strong>g, and<br />

purity <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple, it has, perhaps, seldom been equalled; certa<strong>in</strong>ly never<br />

surpassed by anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> English language.<br />

The sentiments <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> people appear<strong>in</strong>g to be decidedly aga<strong>in</strong>st a general<br />

assessment, <strong>the</strong> question was given up forever.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> same session, however, (October, 1784,) <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> bill provid<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

a general assessment failed, an act passed for “<strong>in</strong>corporat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Protestant<br />

Episcopal Church.” This bill passed <strong>the</strong> House <strong>of</strong> Delegates by a small<br />

majority only, be<strong>in</strong>g ayes, 47; noes, 38; but <strong>in</strong> 1786 it was repealed. By <strong>the</strong><br />

repeal<strong>in</strong>g law, <strong>the</strong> property belong<strong>in</strong>g to all religious societies was secured to<br />

those societies respectively, who were authorized to appo<strong>in</strong>t from time to time,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir sect, trustees for <strong>the</strong> manag<strong>in</strong>g and apply<strong>in</strong>g<br />

such property to <strong>the</strong> religious uses <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> society. And all laws which<br />

prevented any religious society from regulat<strong>in</strong>g its own discipl<strong>in</strong>e were<br />

repealed.<br />

Under <strong>the</strong> old ecclesiastical establishment no person could celebrate <strong>the</strong> rites<br />

<strong>of</strong> matrimony but a m<strong>in</strong>ister <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> England, and, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong><br />

ceremony prescribed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Book <strong>of</strong> Common Prayer; cases, however,<br />

frequently occurred, especially dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> war, where <strong>the</strong> marriage ceremony<br />

was performed by o<strong>the</strong>rs. This gave rise to an act <strong>of</strong> October, 1780, which<br />

declared all former marriages celebrated by dissent<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>isters good and<br />

valid <strong>in</strong> law; and authorized <strong>the</strong> county courts to license dissent<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>isters <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Gospel, not exceed<strong>in</strong>g four to each sect, to celebrate <strong>the</strong> rites <strong>of</strong> matrimony<br />

with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir counties only. It was not until <strong>the</strong> year 1784 that <strong>the</strong> dissenters

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!