Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist

Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist Semple - History of the Baptists in Virginia - Landmark Baptist

landmarkbaptist.org
from landmarkbaptist.org More from this publisher
13.07.2013 Views

the decaying edifice, every dissenter put to his shoulder to push it into irretrievable ruin. The revolutionary party found that the sacrifice must be made, and they made it. It is said, however, and probably not without truth, that many of the Episcopalians who voted for abolishing the Establishment did it upon au expectation that it would be succeeded by a general assessment. And considering that most of the men of wealth were on that side, they supposed that their funds would be lessened very little. This, it appeared in the sequel, was a vain expectation. The people having once shaken off their fetters, would not again permit themselves to be bound. Moreover, the war now rising to its height, they were in too much need of funds to permit any of their resources to be devoted to any other purpose during that period; and we shall see that when it was attempted, a few years after the expiration of the war, the people set their faces against it. Having thus mentioned the Establishment, it will be proper to treat more fully respecting the origin and nature of those laws by which it arose and fell. Our ancestors, being chiefly emigrants from England, brought with them all that religious intolerance which had so long prevailed in the mother country. Thus we see that the first care of our early legislatures was to provide for the Church of England, as established by the act of Parliament. By the first act of 1623, it is provided that in every plantation or settlement there shall be a house or room set apart for the worship of God. But it soon appears that this worship was only to be according to the canons of the Church of England, to which a strict uniformity was enjoined. A person absenting himself from divine service on a Sunday without a reasonable excuse, forfeited a pound of tobacco; and he that absented himself a month, forfeited fifty pounds. Any minister who was absent from his church above two months in a year, forfeited half his salary; and he who absented himself four months, forfeited the whole. Whoever disparaged a minister whereby the minds of his parishioners might be alienated, was compelled to pay 500 pounds of tobacco and ask the minister’s pardon publicly in the congregation. No man was permitted to dispose of any of his tobacco till the minister was satisfied, under penalty of forfeiting double his part of the minister’s salary. The first allowance made to the ministers was ten pounds of tobacco and a bushel of corn for each tithable; and every laboring person, of what quality or condition soever, was bound to contribute. In the year 1631 the Assembly granted to ministers, besides the former allowance of ten pounds of tobacco and a bushel of corn, the twentieth calf, the twentieth kid and the twentieth pig. This was the first introduction of tithes, properly so called, in Virginia. But it did not continue long, for in 1733 the law was repealed.

To preserve the purity of doctrine and unity of the church, it was enacted in 1643 that all ministers should be conformable to the orders and constitution of the Church of England, and that no other persons be permitted to preach publicly or privately. It was further provided that the governor and council should take care that all non-conformists departed the colony with all conveniency. The statute of England of the 3d of James I. against Popish recusants, was also adopted in the year 1643. This statute declared that no Popish recusant should exercise the office of secret counsellor, register, commissioner (a term then used for justices of the peace), surveyor, or sheriff or any other public office. Nor should any person be admitted into any of those offices before he had taken the oaths of allegiance and supremacy. The same act of Assembly by which the statute of 3d James I. was adopted, further declared that if any person should assume the exercise of any of those offices and refuse to take the said oaths, he should be dismissed, and moreover forfeit 1,000 pounds of tobacco. No Popish priest thereafter arriving in the colony was permitted to remain more than five days, if wind and weather permitted his departure. During the existence of the Commonwealth of England, the church government of Virginia experienced an important change. Instead of enjoining obedience to the doctrine and discipline of the Church of England, no injunction in favor of any particular sect appears. Everything relating to the affairs of the church was left at the entire disposal of the vestry, who being elected by the people, it may, in effect, be said that the people regulated their own church government. The above law passed at the March session, 1657-’58. But only two years afterwards (at the March session, 1659-’60), when the Quakers first made their appearance in Virginia, the utmost degree of persecution was exercised towards them. No master of a vessel was permitted to bring in a Quaker under the penalty of £100 sterling; all Quakers were imprisoned without bail or mainprize till they found sufficient security to depart the colony; for returning, they were directed to be proceeded against as contemners of the laws and magistracy, and punished accordingly; and if they should come in a third time they were to be prosecuted as felons. All persons were prohibited, under the penalty of £100 sterling, from entertaining them or permitting their assemblies in or near their houses; and no person was permitted to dispose of or publish any books or pamphlets containing the tenets of their religion. An awful memento of the danger of giving to the civil authority power over the consciences of the people! This severe law against the Quakers passed during the Commonwealth, when the people were unrestricted in matters of religion; but it happened in this case, as it generally has where the civil power

<strong>the</strong> decay<strong>in</strong>g edifice, every dissenter put to his shoulder to push it <strong>in</strong>to<br />

irretrievable ru<strong>in</strong>. The revolutionary party found that <strong>the</strong> sacrifice must be<br />

made, and <strong>the</strong>y made it.<br />

It is said, however, and probably not without truth, that many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Episcopalians who voted for abolish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Establishment did it upon au<br />

expectation that it would be succeeded by a general assessment. And<br />

consider<strong>in</strong>g that most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> men <strong>of</strong> wealth were on that side, <strong>the</strong>y supposed<br />

that <strong>the</strong>ir funds would be lessened very little. This, it appeared <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sequel,<br />

was a va<strong>in</strong> expectation. The people hav<strong>in</strong>g once shaken <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong>ir fetters, would<br />

not aga<strong>in</strong> permit <strong>the</strong>mselves to be bound. Moreover, <strong>the</strong> war now ris<strong>in</strong>g to its<br />

height, <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>in</strong> too much need <strong>of</strong> funds to permit any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir resources to<br />

be devoted to any o<strong>the</strong>r purpose dur<strong>in</strong>g that period; and we shall see that when<br />

it was attempted, a few years after <strong>the</strong> expiration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> war, <strong>the</strong> people set<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir faces aga<strong>in</strong>st it. Hav<strong>in</strong>g thus mentioned <strong>the</strong> Establishment, it will be<br />

proper to treat more fully respect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong> and nature <strong>of</strong> those laws by<br />

which it arose and fell.<br />

Our ancestors, be<strong>in</strong>g chiefly emigrants from England, brought with <strong>the</strong>m all<br />

that religious <strong>in</strong>tolerance which had so long prevailed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mo<strong>the</strong>r country.<br />

Thus we see that <strong>the</strong> first care <strong>of</strong> our early legislatures was to provide for <strong>the</strong><br />

Church <strong>of</strong> England, as established by <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> Parliament. By <strong>the</strong> first act <strong>of</strong><br />

1623, it is provided that <strong>in</strong> every plantation or settlement <strong>the</strong>re shall be a house<br />

or room set apart for <strong>the</strong> worship <strong>of</strong> God. But it soon appears that this worship<br />

was only to be accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> canons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> England, to which a<br />

strict uniformity was enjo<strong>in</strong>ed. A person absent<strong>in</strong>g himself from div<strong>in</strong>e service<br />

on a Sunday without a reasonable excuse, forfeited a pound <strong>of</strong> tobacco; and he<br />

that absented himself a month, forfeited fifty pounds. Any m<strong>in</strong>ister who was<br />

absent from his church above two months <strong>in</strong> a year, forfeited half his salary;<br />

and he who absented himself four months, forfeited <strong>the</strong> whole. Whoever<br />

disparaged a m<strong>in</strong>ister whereby <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ds <strong>of</strong> his parishioners might be<br />

alienated, was compelled to pay 500 pounds <strong>of</strong> tobacco and ask <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister’s<br />

pardon publicly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> congregation. No man was permitted to dispose <strong>of</strong> any<br />

<strong>of</strong> his tobacco till <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister was satisfied, under penalty <strong>of</strong> forfeit<strong>in</strong>g double<br />

his part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>ister’s salary.<br />

The first allowance made to <strong>the</strong> m<strong>in</strong>isters was ten pounds <strong>of</strong> tobacco and a<br />

bushel <strong>of</strong> corn for each tithable; and every labor<strong>in</strong>g person, <strong>of</strong> what quality or<br />

condition soever, was bound to contribute. In <strong>the</strong> year 1631 <strong>the</strong> Assembly<br />

granted to m<strong>in</strong>isters, besides <strong>the</strong> former allowance <strong>of</strong> ten pounds <strong>of</strong> tobacco<br />

and a bushel <strong>of</strong> corn, <strong>the</strong> twentieth calf, <strong>the</strong> twentieth kid and <strong>the</strong> twentieth pig.<br />

This was <strong>the</strong> first <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> ti<strong>the</strong>s, properly so called, <strong>in</strong> Virg<strong>in</strong>ia. But it<br />

did not cont<strong>in</strong>ue long, for <strong>in</strong> 1733 <strong>the</strong> law was repealed.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!