The Problem of Evil - Common Sense Atheism

88 The Global Argument Continued
with God. As is the case with many rescue operations, the rescuer
and those whom he is rescuing must cooperate. For human beings
to cooperate with God in this rescue operation, they must know
that they need to be rescued. They must know what it means to be
separated from him. And what it means to be separated from God is
to live in a world of horrors. If God simply ‘‘canceled’’ all the horrors
of this world by an endless series of miracles, he would thereby
frustrate his own plan of reconciliation. If he did that, we should be
content with our lot and should see no reason to cooperate with him.
Here is an analogy. Suppose Dorothy suffers from angina, and that
what she needs to do is to stop smoking and lose weight. Suppose her
doctor knows of a drug that will stop the pain but will do nothing to
cure the condition. Should the doctor prescribe the drug for her, in the
full knowledge that if the pain is alleviated, there is no chance that she
will stop smoking and lose weight? Well, perhaps the answer is Yes—if
that’s what Dorothy insists on. The doctor is Dorothy’s fellow adult
and fellow citizen, after all. Perhaps it would be insufferably paternalistic
to refuse to alleviate Dorothy’s pain in order to provide her with
a motivation to do what is to her own advantage. If one were of an
especially libertarian cast of mind, one might even say that someone
who did that was ‘‘playing God’’. It is far from clear, however, whether
there is anything wrong with God’s behaving as if he were God. It is
at least very plausible to suppose that it is morally permissible for God
to allow human beings to suffer if the inevitable result of suppressing
the suffering would be to deprive them of a very great good, one that
far outweighs the suffering. But God does shield us from much evil,
from a great proportion of the sufferings that would be a natural consequence
of our rebellion. If he did not, all human history would be
at least this bad: every human society would be on the moral level of
Nazi Germany. (I say at least this bad because I don’t really know how
bad human beings can get. The Third Reich is my model for the moral
nadir, but, for all I know, this model is naively optimistic. Perhaps
there are levels of moral horror that surpass even that of the Nazis.
One lesson of Hitler’s Germany is that our great-grandparents did
not know how bad it was possible for human beings to be; for all we
know, our great-grandchildren will say that we didn’t know how bad
it was possible for human beings to be.) But, however much evil God
shields us from, he must leave in place a vast amount of evil if he is not
to deceive us about what separation from him means. The amount he