Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry by Kenneth L. Gentry

12.07.2013 Views

Clement of Alexandria 81 now as then obtain a Pope’s sanction. Nero, after Judas, becomes the most accursed of the human race. “The first persecutor of the Church must needs be the last, reserved by God for a final and a more awful vengeance.”7 1 Truly, “the picture of him as the incarnation of evil triumphed as Christianity triumphed.”7 2 The references to the Nero-Antichrist designation can be found in the following: the Sibylline Oracles, Tertullian, Lactantius, Jerome, Augustine, and Sulpicius Severus.73 Th First Centu~ Persecutions Fourth, the persecution of Christians under Domitian (if we may call it a persecution) was much less severe than that under Nero — although it certainly was a tyrannical outburst. 74 Lightfoot speaks of the Neronic persecution in comparison to the Domitianic thus: “the earlier and more severe assault on the Christians [occurred] in the latter years of the reign of Nero.”7 5 In fact, “early evidence is lacking for any general religious persecution during Domitian’s reign. Though the emperor was a violent man, his violence was directed not against Christians or any other group but against carefully selected individuals whom he suspected of undermining his authority. “76 As Edmundson puts it, Domitian’s persecution was “not a general persecution at all, but a series of isolated acts directed chiefly against a few influential persons, including members of his own family.”7 7 Hort speaks of the Domitianic persecution in contrast to the Neronic by noting that the dramatic language of Revelation “does not fit the short local reign of terror under Domitian. Nero affected the imagination of the world as Domitian, as far as we know, never did.”7 8 Late date advocate G. E. Ladd states that “there is no evidence that during 71. Henderson, Nero, pp. 420-421. 72. Griffin, Nero, p. 15. 73. Sibylline Oracles 5:33; &71; Tertullian, Apologia 5:+ Lactantius, Ttu Death of tlw Persecutors 2; Jerome, Daniel (at Daniel 11:28), and Dialogues 21:+ Augustine, Thz Cip of God 20:19; and Sulpicius Severus, Sacred Histoy 2:28, 29. 74. The evidence supportive of this will be examined more fully in Chap. 17. 75. Joseph B. Ligh&oot and J. R. Harmer, eds., ‘i% Apostolic Fathm (Grand Rapids: Baker, [1891] 1984), p. 3. 76. Glenn W. Barker, William L. Lane, and J. Ramsey Micbaels, The New Testati Speaks (New York: Harper & Row, 1969), p. 368. 77. Edmundson, Church in Rmrw, p. 168. 78. Hort, A@oca~p$e, xxvi.

82 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL the last decade of the first century there occurred any open and systematic persecution of the church.’”g Significantly, Domitian’s “persecution” warranted his being called a “Nero” by many, Christian and non-Christian alike. The Roman satirist Juvenal, says Domitian was regarded by the Roman aristocracy as a “bald Nero.”8° Martial even refers to Domitian’s death as “Nero’s death.”81 Tertullian speaks of Domitian in terms of Nero: to Tertullian he was not only “somewhat of a Nero in cruelty,”8 2 but a “sub-Nero.”83 That he was known as a “Nero,” indicates Nero-% name win paradigmatic of anti-Christian evil, not Domitian %. Tertullian (virtually a contemporary with Clement of Alexandria) also notes in his Scorpiaze that “Nero was the first who stained with blood the rising faith. “8 4 Elsewhere he speaks of Domitian much more favorably than of Nero, thus evidencing the especial early Christian hatred of Nero’s tyranny: “Consult your Annals: there ye will find that Nero was the first to wreak the fury of the sword of the Caesars upon this sect, now springing up especially at Rome. But in such a first founder of our condemnation we even glory. For whoever knoweth him, can understand that nothing save some great good was condemned by Nero. Domitian too, who was somewhat of a Nero in cruelty, had tried it, but forasmuch as he was also a human being, he speedily stopped the undertaking, even restoring those whom he had banished.”8 5 Indeed, he mentions only Nero3 persecution when citing the persecution of the Apostles who were the foundation of the Church (Eph. 2: 19ff) – and was not John one of the Apostles? Christian apologist Paulus Orosius (c. A.D. 385-418) writes in this regard: “For [Nero] was the first at Rome to torture and inflict the penalty of death upon Christians, and he ordered them throughout all the provinces to be afflicted with like persecution; and in his attempt to wipe out the very name, he killed the most blessed apostles 79. George Eldon Ladd, A Comrrrmtary on th Revelation of John (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1972), p. 8. 80. Juvenal, Satires 437ff. 81. Martial, Ep@am 11:33. 82. A~okru 5. 83. On the Mantle 4. 84. Antidotej6r ttu Scorpion’s Sting 15. 85. Tertullian, ApologY 5, in C. Dodgson, trans., T~tullian, vol. 1 of Apologetic and Prastisal Treatises, in A Libray of Fathers of the Ho~ Catholic Church (Oxford: Parker, 1842).

Clement of Alexandria 81<br />

now as then obtain a Pope’s sanction. Nero, after Judas, becomes the<br />

most accursed of the human race. “The first persecutor of the Church<br />

must needs be the last, reserved by God for a final and a more awful<br />

vengeance.”7 1<br />

Truly, “the picture of him as the incarnation of evil triumphed as<br />

Christianity triumphed.”7 2<br />

The references to the Nero-Antichrist<br />

designation can be found in the following: the Sibylline Oracles,<br />

Tertullian, Lactantius, Jerome, Augustine, and Sulpicius Severus.73<br />

Th First Centu~ Persecutions<br />

Fourth, the persecution of Christians under Domitian (if we may<br />

call it a persecution) was much less severe than that under Nero<br />

— although it certainly was a tyrannical outburst. 74<br />

Lightfoot speaks<br />

of the Neronic persecution in comparison to the Domitianic thus: “the<br />

earlier and more severe assault on the Christians [occurred] in the<br />

latter years of the reign of Nero.”7 5<br />

In fact, “early evidence is lacking<br />

for any general religious persecution during Domitian’s reign. Though<br />

the emperor was a violent man, his violence was directed not against<br />

Christians or any other group but against carefully selected individuals<br />

whom he suspected of undermining his authority. “76 As Edmundson<br />

puts it, Domitian’s persecution was “not a general persecution<br />

at all, but a series of isolated acts directed chiefly against a few<br />

influential persons, including members of his own family.”7 7<br />

Hort<br />

speaks of the Domitianic persecution in contrast to the Neronic by<br />

noting that the dramatic language of Revelation “does not fit the<br />

short local reign of terror under Domitian. Nero affected the imagination<br />

of the world as Domitian, as far as we know, never did.”7 8<br />

Late<br />

date advocate G. E. Ladd states that “there is no evidence that during<br />

71. Henderson, Nero, pp. 420-421.<br />

72. Griffin, Nero, p. 15.<br />

73. Sibylline Oracles 5:33; &71; Tertullian, Apologia 5:+ Lactantius, Ttu Death of tlw<br />

Persecutors 2; Jerome, Daniel (at Daniel 11:28), and Dialogues 21:+ Augustine, Thz Cip<br />

of God 20:19; and Sulpicius Severus, Sacred Histoy 2:28, 29.<br />

74. The evidence supportive of this will be examined more fully in Chap. 17.<br />

75. Joseph B. Ligh&oot and J. R. Harmer, eds., ‘i% Apostolic Fathm (Grand Rapids:<br />

Baker, [1891] 1984), p. 3.<br />

76. Glenn W. Barker, William L. Lane, and J. Ramsey Micbaels, The New Testati<br />

Speaks (New York: Harper & Row, 1969), p. 368.<br />

77. Edmundson, Church in Rmrw, p. 168.<br />

78. Hort, A@oca~p$e, xxvi.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!