12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Th Persecution of Christianip 289<br />

“evidence to justi~ this reputation is scanty.”z” Despite his employment<br />

of the Domitianic persecution as one of the major proofs of the<br />

late date, Morris himself admits that the evidence for a general<br />

persecution under Domitian “is not easy to find” !21<br />

The only non-Chnstian evidence for a Domitianic persecution of<br />

Christianity is based on an ambiguous statement from Dio Cassius’<br />

Roman Histoy, a history produced quite sometime after the events. 22<br />

Dio states that Domitian’s cousin Flavius Clemens was executed and<br />

his wife banished on the basis of the charge of “atheism,” a charge<br />

that Dio equates with the practice ofJudaism. Besides the ambiguity<br />

of the statement itself (is this “atheism” really Christianity, as some<br />

argue?), two-thirds of Die’s writing is preserved for us in an eleventh<br />

century epitome and a twelfth century summary. Cary argues, and<br />

Bell agrees, that the section dealing with Domitian was produced<br />

“very carelessly.<br />

W3 BellYS article in N~ Testament Studies provides an<br />

excellent analysis both of the difficulty of establishing a general<br />

persecution under Domitian and of the questionable utility of the<br />

evidence from Dio Cassius.<br />

Furthermore, it is remarkable that though Suetonius credited<br />

Nero with the persecution of Christians, he makes no mention of<br />

Domitian’s alleged persecution. 21 It would seem that since he viewed<br />

the punishment of Christians as praiseworthy under Nero, that any<br />

general persecution of them under Domitian would have deserved<br />

comment.<br />

Thus, the documentary evidence for a general imperial persecution<br />

of Christianity under Domitian is deemed questionable by a<br />

number of competent scholars. This fact alone should render this<br />

second leading proof of a late date for Revelation suspect. Even a<br />

good number of knowledgeable late date advocates doubt the usefulness<br />

of such an argument. Not only is the evidence suspect, but even<br />

if accepted, it reveals a persecution inferior in every respect to the<br />

Neronic persecution, as will be shown.<br />

20. Bruce, Histoty,p.412.<br />

21. Morns, Revelation, pp. 36-37.<br />

22. His dates are A.D. 150-235.<br />

23. Dio Cassius, Roman Histo~, trans. Ernest Cary, 9 VOIS. Loeb Classical Library -<br />

(Cambridge Harvard University Press, 1968) 1 :xxiii.<br />

24. Nero 16:2.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!