12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Th ContemPora~ Integrip of the Temple 173<br />

Rabbis, ‘bath God bestowed upon the world, and nine of these fall<br />

to the lot of <strong>Jerusalem</strong>’ – and again, ‘A city, the fame of which has<br />

gone out from one end of the world to the other.’ ‘Thine, O Lord, is<br />

the greatness, the power, the glory, and eternity.’ This – explains the<br />

Talmud – ‘Is <strong>Jerusalem</strong>.’ In opposition to her rival Alexandria, which<br />

was designated ‘the little,’ <strong>Jerusalem</strong> was called ‘the great.’ “3 9<br />

By the time of the Exile <strong>Jerusalem</strong> had come to be known among her<br />

people as The Ci@ in distinction from The Lan~40 and this is usual also<br />

in the Mishna. It is significant of the growth of her importance both<br />

material and spiritual, and of the absence of other cities in the rest of<br />

the now much diminished territory. Townships there were, and not a<br />

few fenced ones; but <strong>Jerusalem</strong> stood supreme and alone as The<br />

City.41<br />

The most natural interpretation of Revelation 11, then, would<br />

suggest that the references to the cultic structures have behind them<br />

the literal Temple complex, for only Revelation clearly refers to<br />

<strong>Jerusalem</strong>. Even recognizing that the part of the Temple complex to<br />

be preserved has a spiritual referent, 42<br />

how could John be commanded<br />

to symbolically measure what did not exist with the idea of<br />

preserving (in some sense) a part and destroying the rest? Why would<br />

there be no reference to its being already destroyed in such a work<br />

as this, a work that treats of judgment upon Judaism? When he<br />

originally held to a late date for Revelation, Robinson asked himself<br />

“Was it not strange that this cataclysmic event was never once<br />

mentioned or apparently hinted at”4 3<br />

in the books of the New Testament,<br />

particularly in Revelation and Hebrews? Moule came to have<br />

the same concern.w Where is there any reference to the rebuilding<br />

of the Temple in Revelation so that it could be again destroyed (as<br />

per the dispensationalist argument) ? Such a suppressed premise is<br />

essential to the futurist argument. If there is no reference to a<br />

rebuilding of the Temple and the book was written about A.D. 95,<br />

39. Alfred Edersheim, Sketche$ of J~ish Social Lz~e (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, rep.<br />

1975), p. 82.<br />

40, Eze. 7:23; Jer. 32:24fi Psa. 72:16 Isa. 46:6.<br />

41. Smith, <strong>Jerusalem</strong>, 1:269.<br />

42. See below.<br />

43. Robinson, Redating, p. 10.<br />

44. C. D. F. Moule, 77ze Bwth @_ the New ZWzment (3rd cd.: New York: Harper &<br />

ROW, 1982), p. 175.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!