Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry by Kenneth L. Gentry

12.07.2013 Views

The Idh.tip of the Sixth King 155 the title Zmperator. Suetonius clearly records his claim to the “praenomen ImPeratoris. “2 9 This puts him in line with Augustus 30 and the following emperors who naturally claimed the same. Indeed, the following emperors even called themselves by his name, “Caesar.” But more compelling than this are the several contemporary and nearly contemporary lists that include Julius in the line of the Caesars, and as the first of the line. In his Lives of the Twelve Caesars, Roman historian Suetonius (c. A.D. 70-160) begins his numbering of the Caesars with Julius. His first book. in his Lives of the Twelve Cazzsars is entitled The Divim Julius. Likewise another Roman Historian, Dio Cassius (c. A.D. 150-235), numbers Julius as the first of the emperors.3 ] For our purposes perhaps the most decisive representative of those who reckon the emperors from Julius is the Jewish writer Flavius Josephus. Not only do his dates (A.D. 37-101) overlap the very period ofJohn and the New Testament, but he is also a Jew from Palestine, and his works were written for both the Remans and the Jews. Surely his reckoning would reflect contemporary opinion among the Jews and the Remans. In his Antiquities he calls Augustus the “second” and Tibenus the “third” emperor. 32 Later Gaius is called the “fourth.”3 3 In a later chapter he calls Julius the “first who transferred the power of the people to himself.”34 In addition, we should understand that the Jewish people were particularly fond of Julius. He granted them a legal status and many special privileges. Suetonius records the great lamentation of the Jews for Julius when he died. 35 A Jew, such as Josephus and John, would naturally have conceived of Julius as the first of the Caesars. Further evidence for a common Jewish reckoning of Julius as the first emperor appears in 4 Ezra (a composite work with Christian additions,3G sometimes called 2 Esdras). This work was written and 29. Suetonius, Juliur 76. 30. See for example, Aurelius Victor, E@”tQrm 1:1. 31. Dio Cassius, Roman HistoU 5. 32. Antiquities 18:2:2. 33. Antiquities 18:6:10. 34. Antiquities 19:1:11. 35. Juliw 84 36. Bruce M. Metzger, “The Fourth Book of Ezra,” in James H. Charlesworth, cd., Old 7kmmt Pwudepigrapha, 2 VOIS (Garden City, NY Doubleday, 1983) 1:517.

156 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL edited between A.D. 100 and 120, with four chapters being added in the third century.37 The crucial statement reads: “Behold, the days are coming when a kingdom shall arise on earth, and it shall be more terri$ing than all the kingdoms that have been before it. And twelve kings shall reign in it, one after another. But the second that is to reign shall hold sway for a longer time than any other of the twelve.”3 8 Here Julius is included in the line of the twelve Caesars, for the reference to the “second” king is obviously to Augustus Caesar, whose 44 year reign was one-third of the combined reigns of the first twelve emperors. The same is true in chapter 11: “And I looked, and behold, on the right side one wing arose, and it reigned over all the earth. And while it was reigning it came to its end and disappeared, so that its place was not seen. Then the next wing arose and reigned, and it continued to reign a long time. And while it was reigning its end came also, so that it disappeared like the first. And behold, a voice sounded, saying to it, ‘Hear me, you who have ruled the earth all this time; I announce this to you before you disappear. After you no one shall rule as long as you, or even half as long.’ The third wing raised itself up, and held the rule like the former ones, and it also disappeared.”3 g Coggins notes that “the first wing can be identified as Julius Caesar because the next wing is clearly Augustus.’ ya According to Box “one of the surest results of the critical discussion is that in the ori~nal vision the greater wings must represent the six Julian Emperors, beginning with Julius Caesar. The identification of the second ruler with Augustus (cf. 11:15- 17) is unmistakable, and makes the reckoning from Julius Caesar certain.”4 ’ Again the clear reference is to Julius as the “first” and Augustus (the longest reigning emperor) as the one who followed him, who in turn, is followed by the “third.” And this “prophecy” was given in the general era ofJohn’s time. 37. Metzger, “Fourth Ezra,” OTP 1:517, 520, 522. See also R. J. Coggins and M. A. Knibb, T/u Ftrst and Seuma’ BookJ of Esdnr.r. Cambridge Bible Commentary on the New English Bible (London: Cambridge, 1979), p. 115; J. M. Myers, I and 2 Esdrm: Introduction, Translation and Comnwntury. Anchor Bible (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1974), pp. 129K.; and Robinson, Redating, pp. 247, 315. Howard Clark Kee, The Originr of Chri.stiani~: Sources and DocunwztJ (Englewcmd, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973), p. 191. 38.4 Ezra 12:1311; OTP 1:550. 39.4 Ezra 11: 13ff.; OTP 1:548. 40. Coggins and Knibb, Esdras, p. 240. 41. G. H. Box, T/w EZra-A@zlMse (London: Pitman, 1912), p. 261.

The Idh.tip of the Sixth King 155<br />

the title Zmperator. Suetonius clearly records his claim to the “praenomen<br />

ImPeratoris. “2 9<br />

This puts him in line with Augustus 30<br />

and the following<br />

emperors who naturally claimed the same. Indeed, the following<br />

emperors even called themselves by his name, “Caesar.”<br />

But more compelling than this are the several contemporary and<br />

nearly contemporary lists that include Julius in the line of the Caesars,<br />

and as the first of the line. In his Lives of the Twelve Caesars,<br />

Roman historian Suetonius (c. A.D. 70-160) begins his numbering<br />

of the Caesars with Julius. His first book. in his Lives of the Twelve<br />

Cazzsars is entitled The Divim Julius. Likewise another Roman Historian,<br />

Dio Cassius (c. A.D. 150-235), numbers Julius as the first of the<br />

emperors.3 ]<br />

For our purposes perhaps the most decisive representative of<br />

those who reckon the emperors from Julius is the Jewish writer<br />

Flavius Josephus. Not only do his dates (A.D. 37-101) overlap the<br />

very period ofJohn and the New Testament, but he is also a Jew from<br />

Palestine, and his works were written for both the Remans and the<br />

Jews. Surely his reckoning would reflect contemporary opinion among<br />

the Jews and the Remans. In his Antiquities he calls Augustus the<br />

“second” and Tibenus the “third” emperor. 32<br />

Later Gaius is called<br />

the “fourth.”3 3<br />

In a later chapter he calls Julius the “first who<br />

transferred the power of the people to himself.”34 In addition, we<br />

should understand that the Jewish people were particularly fond of<br />

Julius. He granted them a legal status and many special privileges.<br />

Suetonius records the great lamentation of the Jews for Julius when<br />

he died. 35<br />

A Jew, such as Josephus and John, would naturally have<br />

conceived of Julius as the first of the Caesars.<br />

Further evidence for a common Jewish reckoning of Julius as the<br />

first emperor appears in 4 Ezra (a composite work with Christian<br />

additions,3G sometimes called 2 Esdras). This work was written and<br />

29. Suetonius, Juliur 76.<br />

30. See for example, Aurelius Victor, E@”tQrm 1:1.<br />

31. Dio Cassius, Roman HistoU 5.<br />

32. Antiquities 18:2:2.<br />

33. Antiquities 18:6:10.<br />

34. Antiquities 19:1:11.<br />

35. Juliw 84<br />

36. Bruce M. Metzger, “The Fourth Book of Ezra,” in James H. Charlesworth, cd.,<br />

Old 7kmmt Pwudepigrapha, 2 VOIS (Garden City, NY Doubleday, 1983) 1:517.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!