12.07.2013 Views

Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry

by Kenneth L. Gentry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Th Tmporal Expectation of the Author 145<br />

pay the Didrachma (known as the “Jewish Tax”), which was used<br />

to build the pagan temple Jupiter Capitolina. Regarding Christianity,<br />

the persecution of Domitian (if it did, in fact, occur)35 was the second<br />

persecution of Christianity, was not as severe or long-lasting, and did<br />

not result in the death of any inspired apostle. Regarding Rome,<br />

although Domitian was assassinated, the impact on the Empire was<br />

negligible in that a relatively orderly transfer of power followed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

Thus, it would seem that our first two considerations – i.e., the<br />

theme and the expectation of Revelation – powerfully suggest the<br />

prima facie plausibility of a pre-A.D. 70 writing of Revelation. A<br />

preterist approach to Revelation seems to be demanded by both the<br />

thematic statement and the temporal expectation of the author.<br />

Unfortunately, evangelical scholarship in the last fifty years has been<br />

hesitant to adopt a preterist hermeneutic. This has left the impression<br />

— at least among many lay students — that preterism is intrinsically<br />

liberal.<br />

Now we must admit that “some variant of this view [i.e., preterism]<br />

is adopted by most modern [read: liberal] scholars. “36 Nevertheless,<br />

we must recognize that there is what J. W. Roberts calls “left<br />

wing” and “right wing” camps in the preterist school .37 Thus, contrary<br />

to some evangelical complaints,38 there is clearly “a radical<br />

difference between those Preterists who acknowledge a real prophecy<br />

and permanent truth in the book, and the rationalistic Preterists who<br />

regard it as a dream of a visionary which was falsified by events.”39<br />

The preterist approach to Revelation must be scrutinized in terms<br />

of its own intrinsic merits, irrespective of the widespread employment<br />

of the system among radical scholars.<br />

35. See Chapter 17.<br />

36. Morris, Revelation, p. 17.<br />

37. J. W. Roberts, fi &elation to John (Austin, TX: Sweet, 1974), pp. 15, 16.<br />

38. E.g., George Eldon Ladd, A Commmtary on th Reuslation of John (Grand Rapids:<br />

Eerdmans, 19?2), p. 11.<br />

39. Schaff, Histoy 1:837-838.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!