Before Jerusalem Fell
by Kenneth L. Gentry by Kenneth L. Gentry
Additional External Witnesses 107 Revelation. He frequently challenges, however, other interpreters of his era who apply several of the prophecies of Revelation to the Jewish War under Vespasian and Titus.gl At Revelation 6:12, for instance, he writes: “There are not wanting those who apply this passage to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Titus.” On the interpretation of Revelation 7:1 he comments: “These things are referred by some to those sufferings which were inflicted by the Remans upon the Jews.” On Revelation 7:2 he observes: “Although these things happened in part to Jewish Christians, who escaped the evils inflicted on Jerusalem by the Remans, yet they more probably refer to Anti-christ.” From such statements it would appear evident that there were several (“there are not wanting” and “some”) noted commentators who flourished in the sixth century (or before!) who necessarily held to a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation. Arethas According to A. R. Fausset, “Arethas, in the sixth century, 92 applies the sixth seal to the destruction of Jerusalem (70 A.D.), adding that the Apocalypse was written before that event .“9 3 Like Andreas, he wrote a commentary on Revelation. Desprez cites Arethas’s comments on several verses .94 On Revelation 6:12 Arethas writes: “Some refer this to the siege of Jerusalem by Vespasian.” On Revelation 7:1 he notes: “Here, then, were manifestly shown to the Evangelist what things were to befall the Jews in their war against the Romans, in the way of avenging the sufferings inflicted upon Christ.” Of Revelation 7:4 we read: “When the Evangelist received these oracles, the destruction in which the Jews were involved was not yet inflicted by the Remans.” Stuart records some additional observations from Arethas’s commentary worthy of consideration.95 In his comments on Revelation 1:9, Arethas writes: “John was banished to the isle of Patmos under 91. See Stuart, Revelation 1:267; Desprez, Apoca~/xe, p. 7. 92. Some scholars, most notably Stuart (Apoca@e 1:268) and Fausset (Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, Conmerztary) assign Arethas to the sixth century. Others assign him much later to c. A.D. 914. For example Swete, Revelation, p. cxcix (on the strength of Harnack’s argument); and Kurt Aland, et. al., The Greek New Testament, 3rd ed. (London: United Bible Societies, 1975), p. xxvii. 93. Fausset, in Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, CommentaU 2:548. 94. Desprez, Apocalypse, p. 7. 95. Stuart, Aporu~pse 1:268.
108 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL Domitian, Eusebius alleges in his Chronicon.” Arethas does not appear to be satisfied with what Eusebius “alleges.” This is all the more evident in his comments on Revelation 7:1 and 7:4 (see above); there Arethas speaks his own mind. He then goes on to note that Josephus records the fulfillment of the predictions in the seals. Stuart saw these – and rightly, it would seem – to be compellingly suggestive of a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation. Tkophylact A much later witness is Theophylact, Metropolitan of Bulgaria and noted Byzantine exegete (d. 1107). He gives evidence of a dual tradition on John’s banishment. He puts Revelation “under Trajan, but elsewhere gives a date which would bring it into the time of Nero.’ygG In his Pref~e to Cornmentay on tb Gospel ofJohn, Theophylact puts the banishment of John under Nero when he says John was banished thirty-two years after the ascension of Christ97: “t% 17@u~ 74 vrjap $Cbpmr% 61ad6v psra _cplaKowa660 Erq r~< rofi ~lo-roc &va/lxjy&o
- Page 74 and 75: Irenaeu-s, Bishop of Lyons 57 tian
- Page 76 and 77: Irenaeus, Bishop of Lpn.s 59 rule.
- Page 78 and 79: Irenaew, Bishop of Lyon.s 61 narrat
- Page 80 and 81: Irenaeus, Bishop of Lpns 63 accept
- Page 82 and 83: Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons 65 upon t
- Page 84 and 85: Ireruzeus, Bishop of Lpns 67 John c
- Page 86 and 87: Clement of Alexandria 69 ~17E161j y
- Page 88 and 89: Clement of Alexandria 71 In the Syr
- Page 90 and 91: Clement of Alexandria 73 which lay
- Page 92 and 93: Clement of Alexandria 75 Another pa
- Page 94 and 95: Clcm.ent of Alexandria 77 Book 8 of
- Page 96 and 97: Clement of Alexandria 79 that he wa
- Page 98 and 99: Clement of Alexandria 81 now as the
- Page 100 and 101: Clement of Alexandria 83 of Christ,
- Page 102 and 103: Clemwn.t of Alexandria 85 here at M
- Page 104 and 105: Additional Extend Witnases 87 he ac
- Page 106 and 107: Additional External Witnases 89 Wit
- Page 108 and 109: Additional External Witnesses 91 mo
- Page 110 and 111: Additional External Witnesses 93 Wi
- Page 112 and 113: Additional Ext+mal Witnesses 95 als
- Page 114 and 115: Additional External Witnesses 97 vi
- Page 116 and 117: Additional External Witnesses 99 St
- Page 118 and 119: Additional External Witnesses 101 I
- Page 120 and 121: Additional Ex.%mnal Witnesses 103 p
- Page 122 and 123: Additional External Witwsses 105 It
- Page 126 and 127: Additional External Witnesses 109 a
- Page 128 and 129: 7 THE ROLE OF INTERNAL EVIDENCE We
- Page 130 and 131: The Role of Intemtal Euiderwe 115 l
- Page 132 and 133: Tb Role of Internal Euidence 117 an
- Page 134 and 135: The Role of Internal Evio%nce 119 t
- Page 136 and 137: 8 THE THEME OF REVELATION Although
- Page 138 and 139: Tb Theme of Revelation 123 import i
- Page 140 and 141: The Theme ofl?evelation 125 you als
- Page 142 and 143: Tb Th of Revelation 127 Clearly, th
- Page 144 and 145: Tb Thm of Rmelatwn 129 And in this
- Page 146 and 147: The Thaw of Revelation 131 substanc
- Page 148 and 149: 9 THE TEMPORAL EXPECTATION OF THE A
- Page 150 and 151: Inadequate Views Tb Tmporal Expecta
- Page 152 and 153: The Tm.oral Expectation of the Auth
- Page 154 and 155: The Temporal Expectation of the Aut
- Page 156 and 157: Tb Temporal Expectation of the Auth
- Page 158 and 159: Th Tmporal Expectation of tlu Autho
- Page 160 and 161: Th Tmporal Expectation of the Autho
- Page 162 and 163: Th ldenti~ of th Sixth King 147 in
- Page 164 and 165: Th Identi~ of th Sixth King 149 req
- Page 166 and 167: Th Identi@ of th Sixth King 151 he
- Page 168 and 169: The Identip of th Sixth King 153 Ga
- Page 170 and 171: The Idh.tip of the Sixth King 155 t
- Page 172 and 173: The Identip of the Sixth King 157 T
Additional External Witnesses 107<br />
Revelation. He frequently challenges, however, other interpreters of<br />
his era who apply several of the prophecies of Revelation to the<br />
Jewish War under Vespasian and Titus.gl At Revelation 6:12, for<br />
instance, he writes: “There are not wanting those who apply this<br />
passage to the siege and destruction of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by Titus.” On the<br />
interpretation of Revelation 7:1 he comments: “These things are<br />
referred by some to those sufferings which were inflicted by the<br />
Remans upon the Jews.” On Revelation 7:2 he observes: “Although<br />
these things happened in part to Jewish Christians, who escaped the<br />
evils inflicted on <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by the Remans, yet they more probably<br />
refer to Anti-christ.” From such statements it would appear evident<br />
that there were several (“there are not wanting” and “some”) noted<br />
commentators who flourished in the sixth century (or before!) who<br />
necessarily held to a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation.<br />
Arethas<br />
According to A. R. Fausset, “Arethas, in the sixth century, 92<br />
applies the sixth seal to the destruction of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> (70 A.D.),<br />
adding that the Apocalypse was written before that event .“9 3<br />
Like<br />
Andreas, he wrote a commentary on Revelation. Desprez cites Arethas’s<br />
comments on several verses .94 On Revelation 6:12 Arethas<br />
writes: “Some refer this to the siege of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by Vespasian.” On<br />
Revelation 7:1 he notes: “Here, then, were manifestly shown to the<br />
Evangelist what things were to befall the Jews in their war against<br />
the Romans, in the way of avenging the sufferings inflicted upon<br />
Christ.” Of Revelation 7:4 we read: “When the Evangelist received<br />
these oracles, the destruction in which the Jews were involved was<br />
not yet inflicted by the Remans.”<br />
Stuart records some additional observations from Arethas’s commentary<br />
worthy of consideration.95 In his comments on Revelation<br />
1:9, Arethas writes: “John was banished to the isle of Patmos under<br />
91. See Stuart, Revelation 1:267; Desprez, Apoca~/xe, p. 7.<br />
92. Some scholars, most notably Stuart (Apoca@e 1:268) and Fausset (Jamieson,<br />
Fausset, Brown, Conmerztary) assign Arethas to the sixth century. Others assign him<br />
much later to c. A.D. 914. For example Swete, Revelation, p. cxcix (on the strength of<br />
Harnack’s argument); and Kurt Aland, et. al., The Greek New Testament, 3rd ed. (London:<br />
United Bible Societies, 1975), p. xxvii.<br />
93. Fausset, in Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, CommentaU 2:548.<br />
94. Desprez, Apocalypse, p. 7.<br />
95. Stuart, Aporu~pse 1:268.