Before Jerusalem Fell

by Kenneth L. Gentry by Kenneth L. Gentry

12.07.2013 Views

Additional External Witnesses 107 Revelation. He frequently challenges, however, other interpreters of his era who apply several of the prophecies of Revelation to the Jewish War under Vespasian and Titus.gl At Revelation 6:12, for instance, he writes: “There are not wanting those who apply this passage to the siege and destruction of Jerusalem by Titus.” On the interpretation of Revelation 7:1 he comments: “These things are referred by some to those sufferings which were inflicted by the Remans upon the Jews.” On Revelation 7:2 he observes: “Although these things happened in part to Jewish Christians, who escaped the evils inflicted on Jerusalem by the Remans, yet they more probably refer to Anti-christ.” From such statements it would appear evident that there were several (“there are not wanting” and “some”) noted commentators who flourished in the sixth century (or before!) who necessarily held to a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation. Arethas According to A. R. Fausset, “Arethas, in the sixth century, 92 applies the sixth seal to the destruction of Jerusalem (70 A.D.), adding that the Apocalypse was written before that event .“9 3 Like Andreas, he wrote a commentary on Revelation. Desprez cites Arethas’s comments on several verses .94 On Revelation 6:12 Arethas writes: “Some refer this to the siege of Jerusalem by Vespasian.” On Revelation 7:1 he notes: “Here, then, were manifestly shown to the Evangelist what things were to befall the Jews in their war against the Romans, in the way of avenging the sufferings inflicted upon Christ.” Of Revelation 7:4 we read: “When the Evangelist received these oracles, the destruction in which the Jews were involved was not yet inflicted by the Remans.” Stuart records some additional observations from Arethas’s commentary worthy of consideration.95 In his comments on Revelation 1:9, Arethas writes: “John was banished to the isle of Patmos under 91. See Stuart, Revelation 1:267; Desprez, Apoca~/xe, p. 7. 92. Some scholars, most notably Stuart (Apoca@e 1:268) and Fausset (Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, Conmerztary) assign Arethas to the sixth century. Others assign him much later to c. A.D. 914. For example Swete, Revelation, p. cxcix (on the strength of Harnack’s argument); and Kurt Aland, et. al., The Greek New Testament, 3rd ed. (London: United Bible Societies, 1975), p. xxvii. 93. Fausset, in Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, CommentaU 2:548. 94. Desprez, Apocalypse, p. 7. 95. Stuart, Aporu~pse 1:268.

108 BEFORE JERUSALEM FELL Domitian, Eusebius alleges in his Chronicon.” Arethas does not appear to be satisfied with what Eusebius “alleges.” This is all the more evident in his comments on Revelation 7:1 and 7:4 (see above); there Arethas speaks his own mind. He then goes on to note that Josephus records the fulfillment of the predictions in the seals. Stuart saw these – and rightly, it would seem – to be compellingly suggestive of a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation. Tkophylact A much later witness is Theophylact, Metropolitan of Bulgaria and noted Byzantine exegete (d. 1107). He gives evidence of a dual tradition on John’s banishment. He puts Revelation “under Trajan, but elsewhere gives a date which would bring it into the time of Nero.’ygG In his Pref~e to Cornmentay on tb Gospel ofJohn, Theophylact puts the banishment of John under Nero when he says John was banished thirty-two years after the ascension of Christ97: “t% 17@u~ 74 vrjap $Cbpmr% 61ad6v psra _cplaKowa660 Erq r~< rofi ~lo-roc &va/lxjy&o

Additional External Witnesses 107<br />

Revelation. He frequently challenges, however, other interpreters of<br />

his era who apply several of the prophecies of Revelation to the<br />

Jewish War under Vespasian and Titus.gl At Revelation 6:12, for<br />

instance, he writes: “There are not wanting those who apply this<br />

passage to the siege and destruction of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by Titus.” On the<br />

interpretation of Revelation 7:1 he comments: “These things are<br />

referred by some to those sufferings which were inflicted by the<br />

Remans upon the Jews.” On Revelation 7:2 he observes: “Although<br />

these things happened in part to Jewish Christians, who escaped the<br />

evils inflicted on <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by the Remans, yet they more probably<br />

refer to Anti-christ.” From such statements it would appear evident<br />

that there were several (“there are not wanting” and “some”) noted<br />

commentators who flourished in the sixth century (or before!) who<br />

necessarily held to a pre-A.D. 70 date for Revelation.<br />

Arethas<br />

According to A. R. Fausset, “Arethas, in the sixth century, 92<br />

applies the sixth seal to the destruction of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> (70 A.D.),<br />

adding that the Apocalypse was written before that event .“9 3<br />

Like<br />

Andreas, he wrote a commentary on Revelation. Desprez cites Arethas’s<br />

comments on several verses .94 On Revelation 6:12 Arethas<br />

writes: “Some refer this to the siege of <strong>Jerusalem</strong> by Vespasian.” On<br />

Revelation 7:1 he notes: “Here, then, were manifestly shown to the<br />

Evangelist what things were to befall the Jews in their war against<br />

the Romans, in the way of avenging the sufferings inflicted upon<br />

Christ.” Of Revelation 7:4 we read: “When the Evangelist received<br />

these oracles, the destruction in which the Jews were involved was<br />

not yet inflicted by the Remans.”<br />

Stuart records some additional observations from Arethas’s commentary<br />

worthy of consideration.95 In his comments on Revelation<br />

1:9, Arethas writes: “John was banished to the isle of Patmos under<br />

91. See Stuart, Revelation 1:267; Desprez, Apoca~/xe, p. 7.<br />

92. Some scholars, most notably Stuart (Apoca@e 1:268) and Fausset (Jamieson,<br />

Fausset, Brown, Conmerztary) assign Arethas to the sixth century. Others assign him<br />

much later to c. A.D. 914. For example Swete, Revelation, p. cxcix (on the strength of<br />

Harnack’s argument); and Kurt Aland, et. al., The Greek New Testament, 3rd ed. (London:<br />

United Bible Societies, 1975), p. xxvii.<br />

93. Fausset, in Jamieson, Fausset, Brown, CommentaU 2:548.<br />

94. Desprez, Apocalypse, p. 7.<br />

95. Stuart, Aporu~pse 1:268.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!